I dont know who your company is but I didn't order anything from you, my grandson just grabbed my phone and started pressing buttons including navigating to your website entering my billing address and credit card info and accepting all offers in the upsell path. Dont worry though i contacted my bank and reported this as fraud
Imagine sharing all your personal emails and data access to get a fucking free pizza. You cheap morons deserve this
This is like the programmers who are coping about ai coding, but worse
Might just be me but I think this style of marketing is a slow race to the bottom.
Yes, I think it’s great how diligent they are with their testing but I don’t think I can take a brand seriously that builds solely for an algorithm, as opposed towards building for their consumer.
The Pixar crap, the AI ads, the lack of brand in everything - it can work in the short term because it’s arbitraging cheap impressions BUT it all lacks emotion, human connection and all of the principle of marketing that have existed in nearly every successful consumer brand.
Hard to hit grand slams ripping shit that's working right now. Lots of singles and doubles, maybe a triple here and there, but you probably won't get any world beaters.
The sendooors come when you take inspiration from past shit that's been "forgotten" by the market.
Study the greatest and try to understand why they worked so well.
Here is an example that could probably run today with very few changes itself.
But the real magic is in understanding the REASONS it was so successful (Time-Life books was one of the top short form tv advertisers in the 80's)
Figure out how you can swipe the frameworks and adapt for your thing in today's market.
(These spots used to scare the shit out of me as a kid)
youtu.be/wbUOIeIeGaI?is=ARdn…
And if that was tof this would be equivalent of mof/bof
youtu.be/pV79bhwI-94?is=MWxG…
John Cocktosen retweeted
A man cannot prompt the same agent twice, for it is has compacted and is not the same agent, and he is not the same man
Peak retardation if you think this will save you from getting fucked by the long dick of the ftc
Song ads aren't gonna burn as fast as you think because 92% of them suck ass and won't support any meaningful spend
People just brainlessly use the slopaholic skills and workflows from engagement farming larps on here and then wonder why the ads come out like hot trash
Anyone can make a suno song and generate pixar clips. It takes actual thinking to create one that sells and can scale.
John Cocktosen retweeted
Replying to @indiewhacker
Men used to conquer Asia. Now they can’t even conquer Ads Manager
Breakthroughs come when you start turning up the aggression re: angles and marketing
Not in a brute force blackhat mrr type of way -
In a creativity type of way.
If an ad, an angle or even a whole offer you wrote doesn't make you read it and say "umm is this too crazy/edgy/painful/aggro"?
Then it probably wont make your intended audience feel enough to drive enough action
brands wonder why they can't get traction and then ask claude for more vanilla flat bullshit they can spray and pray
The killers are using llms to execute - not to think.
And sure you can rip an angle from someone else, but ffs do something to make it your own because it will work way better
Test and iterate. Think without constraints or limitations.
You can always dial things back much easier than you can amp up something flat
It's just a static version of their song ads which are some of the most successful ads in the supplement space right now.
They combined 2 "boring cheap and widely available" ingredients into a weight loss solution,
are selling it with a proven angle that has worked for decades in weight loss, just edgier
leveraged the tech to deliver in a unique way to each individual audience pocket for perfect message to market match
with unbelievably good timing, to a market that has seen everything
And most importantly, they recognized how powerful the angle is, and are aggressively extracting as much juice as possible from it with near flawless execution
Marketing disguised as gossip is a valuable weapon in the arsenal.
Almost no one in the market understands this as well as resilia right now
Comments section here is a masterclass in the enormous difference between calling yourself a marketer in your bio, and actually knowing what tf you're talking about
Butterfly Marketing and Mass Control were 2 IM guru courses that were way ahead of their time. Mike and Frank cooked. I still use concepts from these to this day.
John Cocktosen retweeted
A lot of people have asked me how to get to the third layer of understanding your buyer.
If you haven’t seen that post, I’ll plug it below.
Now let me break it down…
Layer one, what people say they want, is easy…
Because they’ll tell you. Whether it’s in surveys, interviews, comments, reviews, etc. Stuff like “I want to make more money,” “I want to lose weight.”
Layer two, what they actually want but won’t say, takes more work.
You get there by watching what people do, not what they say.
For instance, don’t trust a relative who says they’ll buy your product when you launch your business. Trust the one who asks how he can pay for it.
You also get there by being observant in conversations.
People reveal their real beliefs by accident, while talking about something else. There’s this story from my book Quiet Persuasion that illustrates this.
This girl I know was gossiping about another woman I had just met. They work in the same field, so she heard the stories: the woman’s husband was a massive cheater who got caught multiple times. When I asked why she was still married to him, my friend said “Well I don’t know, but I guess when your husband buys you a Porsche for your birthday, you tend to look the other way.”
The thing is, these two women had never met. My friend had no inside knowledge. She just heard the cheating stories through work and filled in the rest herself.
But her speculation told me more about her own beliefs than the other woman’s. She’d never admit it openly of course, but what she was essentially saying is that she’d tolerate cheating herself if her husband was wealthy enough.
And that’s layer two. The beliefs people reveal without realizing they’re revealing them.
Layer three is the deepest, and you won’t get it from a conversation.
Layer three is understanding that most people carry old emotional wounds, often from childhood, that shape what they buy without them knowing it.
In my book I call these schemas.
The guy who keeps buying status symbols is not looking for a watch. He might be trying to drown out a feeling of defectiveness he’s carried since he was young. The woman who buys every self-improvement course is not looking for tactics. She’s trying to prove she’s not the failure someone once told her she would be.
You don’t need to become a therapist to write to this layer. You just need to ask yourself one question:
What is this person trying to feel, or stop feeling, that has nothing to do with my product?
Answer that, and you’re talking to a deep, deep part of them.
Now, you never write this out loud in your copy, obviously… You never write “buy this so your dad stops thinking you’re a failure,” because, first of all, maybe it’s not their dad. Maybe it’s their mom, their uncle, a teacher. Second, this would break the spell.
What you do instead is describe a scene where that wound shows up.
The morning he caught his reflection and didn’t recognize himself. Or the time he couldn’t buy his kid the toy he asked for. Or the night he realized his “someday” only had a few years left.
You describe that scene precisely enough, and he doesn’t read it.
He relives it.
And once he’s back in that feeling, your solution becomes more than a product: it’s the way out of something he’s been carrying for a long time.
That’s layer three in practice. You never name the wound.
You touch it.
Haven't seen a bigger bunch of brokies crying in the comments since my days in the shitcoin space
I’ll explain the new Pro 200 plan differently, before I start live tweeting from DevDay on things that are going out!
Today we are going to ship a number of things that increase what you can do across the Plus and Pro plans. A lot of compute is online for this increase. As we increase the floor, we are changing the relative difference between plans to be
Plus = 1X
Pro 100 = 5X
Pro 200 = 10X
and we are reopening subscriptions for Pro 200 (we had paused it). If you have an existing plan you will keep the 20X multiplier for a bit and also receive a lot of additional credits because we know changes are hard even if it means that everyone will get more in the end.












