Impromptunite retweeted
Mike Stoklasa arriving at the George Lucas Museum of Narrative Art
This quoted post is unavailable.
Impromptunite retweeted
When I was in grade school my class made us write letters to a soldier in the Iraq war but all my letter said was "Dear Mr Soldier, I don't do anything at all for fun. I just sit there and stare at the wall all day." And they were so mad they had an assembly about it.
Impromptunite retweeted
"People who doubt the Artemis lunar program are just Reddit noise"
Replying to @ThePrimalDino
Do you believe that taking an extremely long time to do something makes it safer.. ? like 5 years of development is safer than 2 years? Were NASAβs decisions to pivot in weeks for Gemini VI/VII or months for Apollo 8 unsafe, or were they historic examples of competence that kept America in the space race?
Much of the Reddit noise seems to come from people looking for reasons to take out their affinity for specific hardware, political differences, or personality conflicts on Americaβs lunar program.
It has been long enough. We have been working for decades on Americaβs return to the Moon. We finally have the space policy, political alignment, resources, industry, and talent to accomplish this goal safely after a very long wait.
We have two landers, and we will preserve the option to use either for as long as possible while turning every knob available to improve the probability of success.
That means different vehicle configurations will remain on the table for Artemis IV until they are no longer viable. And for the most committed EUS advocates, it was never going to be an option within the timelines required. The OIG report already covered that. Even getting core stage production to an annual rate is a challenge.
The decision to consider Centaur, stretched Centaur, and other upper-stage options over EUS was made by nonpolitical NASA leadership assessing cost, technical work ahead within timelines. I know this is disappointing to some hardware fans, but the idea that it is all a cover for lander availability does not hold up. NASA would have wanted an Artemis III test before an Artemis IV landing regardless, and an extended-mission Centaur would offer far more value for a lunar base and other applications than EUS. That is the reality.
We are an energized and dynamic NASA and we are not just waiting around for others to deliver. It is NASAβs responsibility to drive the outcomes people have been waiting for, and that is exactly what we intend to do.
We are targeting October 23 for the next Artemis update, though that date is not final as folks return from IAC.
Impromptunite retweeted
How it feels to watch your absolutely hilarious comedy gold response on Jackbox lose the vote because someone entered βpregnant marioβ again for the 43rd time
Impromptunite retweeted
AAA Master Chief origin story game
Next Halo Game May Be a Master Chief Origin Story, New Report Claims polygon.com/halo-reboot-mastβ¦
Impromptunite retweeted
Modern Warfare 2 HACKERS are now using AC130'S to MASSACRE Minecraft villagers
Impromptunite retweeted
βItβs actually pretty easy, just go to your TVβs settings, go to display, find motion smoothing and turn it off.β
β[hissing and guttural growling that mimics human speech]β
βYou can also set your TV to βMovie modeβ.β








































