Cee Deelicious retweeted
Replying to @neflhimIL
I will be showing shortly that No Kings and other protests are run by a secret panel called United Democracy Alliance, with names.
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Slash a woman on the face in the subway, get released without bail.
Arrested. See the judge. Released.
This is Letitia James’s lawless New York.
Time for a new AG.
nypost.com/2026/10/18/us-new…
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Secretary @SecScottBessent. Director @FBIDirectorKash.
@HSBC paid $1.92 billion. No one went to jail. I was the whistleblower.
14 years later, @BankofAmerica admits it willfully broke the law, pays $1.2 billion, and no one goes to jail.
3.6 million Americans read my letter. You haven’t responded.
So I’m asking on camera: who is going to be charged?
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
On October 14th I wrote to you about Bank of America @BankofAmerica.
You did not answer. 3.6 million Americans did.
I want to tell you what that looked like from where I sit, because I do not think Washington understands it yet. The messages did not come from one side. They came from Republicans and Democrats, from veterans and nurses and small business owners, from people who have not agreed with each other about anything in a decade. They all said a version of the same sentence. We have had enough.
That is what a national security issue looks like when it finally breaks through. It does not pick a party. It belongs to everyone who has a kid, a bank account, or a flag on the porch.
So let me be plain about my concern. I am worried that nothing is going to happen. The fine has been announced. The press cycle is already turning. In a few weeks the number will be forgotten and the bank will be back to business. I have watched this exact sequence play out before, and I am writing to you now, while there is still a window, because once that window closes it does not reopen.
I am also widening this letter, because Treasury does not act alone.
To the Department of Justice @TheJusticeDept and to FBI Director Kash Patel @FBIDirectorKash:
Director Patel, you were not in the chair when this happened, so I want you to hear it from me directly. In 2011 I walked into the FBI with everything I had on HSBC. Not a tip. Boxes. Names, account numbers, transaction records, internal emails. Agents worked that evidence for over a year. I trusted them, and I still believe they wanted to do their jobs.
Then the settlement was announced. $1.9 billion. I called the agents and asked the only question that mattered. When do you raid the building and when are the arrests?
Their answer was four words. Our hands are tied.
I have thought about those four words every day since. Not because the agents failed me. Because somebody above them decided that a bank was too important to treat like a defendant. That decision was made quietly, by people whose names I will never know, and it has been made again every time since. Director Patel, you now have the authority to make a different one.
I remember the words carved into the stone outside the federal building in Philadelphia the day I walked in to report @HSBC: justice is the defense of our liberty. I believed that. I still want to. But a justice system that handcuffs a dealer on the corner and sends a bank a bill is not defending anyone’s liberty. It is choosing whose liberty counts.
To Brian Moynihan, Chief Executive Officer of Bank of America @BankofAmerica:
Mr. Moynihan, your bank just agreed to pay $1.2 billion for failures that regulators called willful. I have a few questions, and the 3.6 million people reading this would like the answers too.
Who was fired?
Not reassigned. Not retired early with a package. Fired, by name, for the conduct the government described.
What has actually changed in your anti money laundering program? Not the budget line. Not the consultant’s slide deck. What is different today about how an alert gets cleared and who is allowed to say stop?
Were there any consequences inside the building at all? Or did this land the way it landed at HSBC bank, as a line item?
And how much is your bonus this year?
I ask because I know what it costs a compliance officer to raise his hand inside a bank like yours. I would like to know what it cost anyone at the top. Do you even care? I am asking sincerely. I would like to be wrong.
Here is what I did about all of this, and why it matters to this letter. After the government declined to help me or any of the whistleblowers I have met since, I built the thing I wished had existed. Tactical Rabbit is a private intelligence agency. We find the truth, we prove it, and we put it in the hands of people who will act on it. I made a decision a long time ago that if the government would not stop the next HSBC, I would.
So to anyone inside a bank reading this who is looking at something they know is wrong: if your bank will not act, and the government will not act, come to me. I will get the truth to the public. That is not a threat. It is a promise I have already kept once.
Mr. Secretary, Director Patel, the Department of Justice, and Mr. Moynihan: four addresses, one question. Will anyone be held accountable?
Not fined. Not suspended. Not asked to attend training. Accountable.
Please end the cycle of too big to jail. I will not stop until there is change, and neither will the millions of Americans standing behind this letter. Answer them.
We need a banker in jail.
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder, Tactical Rabbit
Cee Deelicious retweeted
If France showed us anything these last 24 hours, it’s that we have to stand strong on pushing for mass deportations. There should be no gray area on this!
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Elon Musk need to use his boring company to help Hamas rebuild the tunnels.
These tunnels were vital meeting places for LGBTQ+ people.
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Does someone want to explain to me why New York State Transportation workers are pulling down Republican Lawn Signs off PRIVATE PROPERTY!!!!
Cee Deelicious retweeted
.@RepJeffries You say the economy is heading in the wrong direction and demand dramatic change.
I recreated Elizabeth Warren’s Trump Inflation Tracker for Biden, using comparable 21-month periods.
Under Biden, consumer prices jumped 13.9%, groceries 18.1%, and gasoline 69.6%. Real hourly earnings fell 3.8%. Mortgage rates climbed from 2.67% to 6.70%.
Under Trump, consumer prices rose 6.8%, groceries 4.3%, and gasoline 41.6%. Real hourly earnings were roughly flat from January 2025 through September 2026. Mortgage rates reached 7.40% in October 2026.
Using Warren’s own yardstick, what would you call Biden’s economy? Where were your demands for dramatic change then?
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Je vais dire quelque chose qui risque de déplaire à beaucoup de monde, mais tant pis.
Je crois qu’une partie de notre société est en train de perdre quelque chose de bien plus grave que sa compétitivité économique.
Elle est en train de perdre sa capacité à rêver.
Hier, Tesla a présenté une démonstration spectaculaire autour d’une voiture capable de quitter le sol. Un prototype, certes, pas encore la voiture volante de Retour vers le futur.
Mais quand même, bordel. On parle de technologies qui semblaient relever de la science-fiction quand nous étions gamins.
Et ce matin, en regardant certaines réactions françaises, qu’est-ce que je découvre ?
« Ça sert à rien. »
« Musk est un raciste. »
« Ça ne règle pas les problèmes de recharge. »
« Ça n’efface pas ses saluts nazis. »
Mais sérieusement, qu’est-ce qui nous est arrivé ?
À quel moment avons-nous perdu cette âme d’enfant qui nous faisait ouvrir grand les yeux devant une invention ?
Et le plus triste dans tout ça, c’est qu’on semble avoir oublié notre propre histoire.
La France, c’est le pays des frères Lumière, qui ont contribué à faire naître le cinéma.
C’est le pays de Louis Pasteur, dont les travaux ont révolutionné la microbiologie et la vaccination.
C’est le pays de Nicéphore Niépce, pionnier de la photographie.
C’est le pays des frères Montgolfier, qui ont envoyé l’être humain dans les airs à bord d’une montgolfière.
C’est le pays de Blaise Pascal, qui concevait déjà une machine à calculer au XVIIe siècle.
C’est aussi le pays du TGV, et l’un des deux pays qui ont donné naissance au Concorde.
Vous imaginez ce que représentaient ces inventions à leur époque ?
Des humains qui osaient accomplir ce que beaucoup pensaient impossible.
Des gens qui n’acceptaient pas les limites de leur temps.
Des visionnaires, des ingénieurs, des scientifiques, des entrepreneurs qui voulaient repousser les frontières du réel.
Nous avons été ce pays-là.
Alors comment avons-nous pu en arriver à un point où notre premier réflexe devant l’extraordinaire semble parfois être de chercher pourquoi il faudrait le mépriser ?
SpaceX récupère des fusées qui reviennent se poser sur Terre ? On parle immédiatement d’Elon Musk et de ses provocations.
Des robots humanoïdes commencent à réaliser des tâches physiques de plus en plus complexes ? « Ça va détruire des emplois. »
L’IA ouvre des perspectives gigantesques pour la médecine, la science, l’éducation et la création ? « Ça pollue, ça vole le travail des artistes, ça sert à tricher. »
Un entrepreneur annonce vouloir réaliser quelque chose d’incroyable ? « Encore un milliardaire qui veut s’en mettre plein les poches. »
Mais est-ce qu’on réalise seulement ce qui est en train de se passer ?
Nous vivons une époque où des fusées réutilisables se posent après leur mission, où l’IA accélère certaines découvertes scientifiques, où des robots apprennent à évoluer dans notre monde, où des personnes seules commencent à créer des choses qui nécessitaient auparavant des équipes entières.
Et devant tout ça, on serait devenus incapables de dire simplement : « Putain, c’est incroyable. Comment est-ce qu’ils ont réussi ça ? »
Je ne demande pas qu’on admire aveuglément les milliardaires. Ni qu’on ferme les yeux sur les conséquences sociales, environnementales ou politiques de leurs projets.
On peut condamner les propos d’Elon Musk tout en reconnaissant les prouesses des ingénieurs de SpaceX et de Tesla.
On peut défendre les travailleurs tout en trouvant la robotique fascinante.
On peut vouloir encadrer l’IA tout en étant émerveillé par ses possibilités.
L’esprit critique n’a jamais obligé personne à devenir cynique.
Et c’est justement ce cynisme qui me désespère.
J’ai parfois l’impression qu’on a remplacé l’admiration par la jalousie, le goût du risque par la peur de l’échec, l’ambition par la suspicion et le rêve par le sarcasme.
Cee Deelicious retweeted
In contrast, I find Americans to be quite pleasant and engaging. They are intellectually curious; as one example, an elderly American couple I know study French simply because they enjoy French culture and respect its people.
The difference politically is that Americans understand Trump. They take him seriously but not literally. You take him literally but not seriously. They know that unlike the preening Obama that Europe reveres, Trump genuinely loves America and wants to improve it. In this, Americans have the better approach.
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Hey @nytimes, Katie Zacharia graduated from Pepperdine Law School but apparently isn’t licensed to practice law. You investigated her calling herself a lawyer.
Abdul El-Sayed graduated from Columbia Medical School but never completed a residency or obtained a medical license. He has publicly called himself a physician, including in testimony submitted to the U.S. Senate.
Have you subjected El-Sayed’s professional claims to the same scrutiny?
Or does the standard change depending on whose credentials you’re examining?
President Trump’s new press secretary, Katie Zacharia, describes herself as a lawyer, and he called her “an attorney.” The New York Times was unable to find a law license for her. In an interview, she said the confusion is the result of a misunderstanding. nyti.ms/3UnhqMh
Cee Deelicious retweeted
Someone needs to listen to this man.
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
My grandfather came to America from Spain with $17 in his pocket.
He didn’t come looking for a handout. He came looking for an opportunity.
That opportunity became a family business, thousands of jobs and a life none of us could have imagined.
THAT is the America I want to preserve.
A country that gives you the FREEDOM to pursue success.
Cee Deelicious retweeted
. @SenSchumer If ICE arrests a noncitizen for illegally voting in a federal election, is that protecting election integrity or interfering with an election?
It’s a simple question. I’d like to hear your answer.
Donald Trump has made clear that he wants to mess with our elections.
We must take nothing for granted.
That’s why Senate Democrats announced today that we have recruited and trained more than 100 Senate staff as official congressional election observers.
They will serve as the Senate’s eyes and ears on the ground in closely contested Senate races.
Our elections have always been fair, safe, and secure. We’re committed to keeping it that way.
yahoo.com/news/politics/arti…
Replying to @FedorovMykhailo
Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.
Starlink is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX. Usage of Starlink is limited to civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.































