Strategy consultant. Views are my own, RT is not endorsement, and other usual disclaimers. ES/EN.
Madrid
Joined August 2009
- Tweets19.3K
- Following701
- Followers1.2K
- Likes152
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
Uno de los mayores tesoros culturales de España fue robado en Villena y todavía hoy no tenemos una explicación del Ministerio de Cultura sobre lo ocurrido y, desde luego, los españoles no hemos recuperado ese patrimonio perdido.
El ministerio de Cultura abre la vía judicial para impugnar el veto ideológico de Castilla y León al cine y afirma que ve “indicios de afectación a la libertad de creación y expresión, así como riesgos de censura y arbitrariedad” elpais.com/cultura/2026-10-2…
Habéis confundido ‘veto ideológico’ con ‘no usar el dinero del resto de los ciudadanos para financiarlo’. De nada.
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
Acabo de encontrarme una página web de un ministerio sirviendo el backend de una plataforma crypto 😶
Aprende a leer, grotesco bufón analfabeto: acreditar haber salido de España en las fechas de referencia vale, pero es que no están acreditando ni siquiera eso.
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
un propietario pide que necesita volver a su piso, un juez le da la razón, el desahucio tarda en ejecutarse 7 años, y aún tiene que venir la comisaría entera porque viene una horda a intentar impedirlo
luego que por qué te piden las últimas 10 nóminas para entrar en un alquiler
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
hola pablo, vamos a hacer las cuentas:
según oxfam, que es de donde sale la cifra que citas, esas 33 personas suman 197.500 millones de euros. dejando aparte lo que ya pagan por patrimonio y por el impuesto de grandes fortunas, imagina que les aplicamos el mismo impuesto a los milmillonarios que se va a votar en california: un pago único del 5% de todo su patrimonio (ojo, es importante lo de "único", no es un impuesto anual recurrente). supongamos también condiciones perfectas: nadie se va, nadie lo recurre, no hay exención de empresa familiar, todo se valora a precio de mercado y la venta de acciones para pagarlo no hace bajar su precio (y con él, lo que se recauda)
con esto salen 9.900 millones. te da para pagar las pensiones, la sanidad y la educación públicas durante unos 10 días. no llega ni para pagar la nómina de pensiones contributivas de la seguridad social de un mes, que en septiembre fueron 14.500 millones
qué hacemos después de esos 10 días?
un saludo!
Efectivamente, se jodió. La palabra sola no prueba nada, sería un disparate y una tremenda injusticia regalar nuestra nacionalidad a un tipo que entra en un consulado y dice, sin ninguna prueba, que tuvo un abuelo español.
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
Gente trabajando sin casa y sin hijos. Gente no trabajando porque no quiere con hijos y casa pagados por la gente que trabaja. España 2026 – at Coria, España
Solo tienes que probar que antes de X vivías en España y después no. Y si no puedes probarlo, mala suerte, la verdad. Tampoco tenían el derecho a ser españoles antes, es un privilegio ad-hoc que se concede por cumplir ciertas condiciones. Si no pueden demostrarlo es su problema.
Precisamente por eso la ley solo pide justificar que se abandonó el país en determinadas fechas (1939-55), presuponiendo que todos ellos fueron exiliados (que es mucho suponer, pero bueno). El caso es que ni siquiera se están justificando y verificando esas fechas.
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
Ignacio Munguía ★★ retweeted
He warned you, sorry folks
I don’t think people realize just how much Ian Smith got right about Rhodesia's future
In 1976 he said on the radio that if the country went from white rule to black rule overnight “it will be a disaster for Rhodesia.” only three years after independence, Mugabe sent his North Korean trained Fifth Brigade into Matabeleland and around 20,000 civilians were killed.
He warned Rhodesia would become “a kind of banana republic where the country would in no time be bankrupt.” by 2008 inflation was in the billions of percent, they printed a 100 trillion dollar note, and the next year they dropped the Zimbabwe dollar completely.
He said for years that Mugabe would destroy the farms that fed the country. from 2000 about 4,000 farms were seized, and the country needed food aid. in 2020 the same government agreed to pay $3.5 billion in compensation.
He warned it would end up a one-party state. Mugabe openly called for one, swallowed Nkomo’s party in 1987 and ruled for 37 years. when he lost the first round in 2008, opposition supporters were beaten and killed until his opponent pulled out.
He warned the whites would leave and take their skills and money with them. there were around 275,000 in the 70s. by the 2010s there were fewer than 30,000.
He said Mugabe's Marxist government would never allow a free press. in 2001 the printing press of the Daily News was bombed and in 2003 the paper was shut down. journalists were jailed and foreign reporters were thrown out.
And in 2005, with Mugabe at the height of his power, Smith said “the people in the end will say we’ve had enough.” in 2017 the army moved on Mugabe and Harare filled with people celebrating in the streets. that was 10 years after his death.
They called him a racist and a relic for saying all this, but its genuinely insane how right he ended up being about all of it.
