@igelblorki
iAccount based inEurope
About this account
- Account based in
- Europe
- Connected via
- Europe Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
David Sacks compares banning AI to the Chinese emperor who banned shipbuilding
“If you go back to the medieval time period, Chinese civilization was much more advanced than European civilization. And somewhere along the line, it basically switched and the West basically took the lead. And some historians have pinpointed this to the decision of a single Chinese emperor to ban shipbuilding."
“What that allowed is the Europeans then basically colonized the whole world and all the riches that flowed from that flowed back to Europe. And that's how Europe took the lead. And I think that if we were to do the Bernie Sanders thing, which is basically ban AI, it's like banning shipbuilding."
“Chinese civilization will rocket past us, they will be the ones that make all the discoveries and discover this new world and accrue all the wealth. But that's what we're talking about doing. I mean, crazy things like this have happened in history, where you'll engage in self sabotage."
igelblork retweeted
You probably know nothing about AI development. That's okay. You can discern everything you need to know by AI's enemies: Bernie Sanders, Epstein's best friend (Bill Gates), and the man who bankrupted California.
20 irrelevant countries with no tech industry (among them mine). i wonder if the leadership in these countries have any level of regret for the self-sabotage that led to this moment.
okay "sally stockholm"
Getting a like from the co-founder of OpenAI means the world to me.
Thank you @gdb
I pour my entire life into my research and making it available to you all. ❤️
you know, of all the ways of being insufferable, i think putting UPTALK into your WRITTEN COMMUNICATION might actually top it all off.
Replying to @realizingerin
Man, this is so sad, and really not accurate.
I think we talked for like a solid 10 minutes in the middle of a big panel? And I liked you questioning various premises.
And the whole reason why Ronny asked a bunch of people skeptical of AI extinction risk to raise their hands was to help y'all understand that there were a lot of you, and that you were welcome, and by inviting you into a room with others who felt similarly you would feel more comfortable expressing your skepticism.
The whole point of it was to give you a space where you felt supported by others, and where you greatly outnumbered the people who were more concerned about risk, so we don't end up with a bunch of dumb groupthink.
Feel free to reach out if you genuinely want to talk about this! I spent 4 hours last night talking to people openly and with genuine curiosity about a lot of different ways the AI stuff could be wrong. I had a good time, and I think many others did too.
IDK, maybe you ran into a bunch of other people later in the night who were super obnoxious. It was an open-invite event and so it's hard to be confident about who shows up, but I strongly dispute this as an accurate characterization of the panel and Q&A we had, and the conversation we had in that context.
igelblork retweeted
And you're black-pilling? nitter.cf/brunellaism/status/209…
igelblork retweeted
Donald Trump rejects calls from tech bosses for an AI slowdown ft.trib.al/bjaDHPx