idk retweeted
The impulse to "solve homelessness" is actually the most evil possible thought a human can have. It is, once again, based on blank slate disease, which is the #1 liberal psychosis.
The idea that "we have enough for everybody," which I call "everybodyism," originates from a low level of thinking usually occupied by women and children. This idea of "sharing the snacks equally" is intended to be applied to small family or clan groups (like a household or a kindergarten classroom) and not to all "humans" (which are actually several species).
The reason this thought is evil is the same reason it would be evil to elect a baby president or put a cripple in the Olympics; the situation does not match the individual.
(I will be creating maps to depict this and selling a book of them. I have developed a system that describes the conscious grasp of reality in simple terms. That was the easy part. The hard part is depicting it.)
The homelessness situation is much more complicated than President Baby because it is made of many individuals arranged in a system. However, each of these individuals has their own situation relative to the system.
Some of the individuals in the system are homeless and can improve with help. Most homeless individuals do not improve with help. We already learned this a long time ago. Most of what you give to them will go to waste, or worse.
Some of the individuals in the system wish to give up some of their own wealth to help the homeless. Most of the individuals in the system do not wish to give up very much if any.
This creates a system where most of the people paying to help the homeless are actually being robbed since they do not want to contribute, and most of the people being "helped" are actually just being enabled to continue causing typical homeless problems.
In other words, by "solving homelessness, you're doing almost nothing but robbing the honors student and the average Joe to buy groceries and e-bikes for illiterate criminals.
If you try to explain this to kindergarten mommy spinsters like Claire, they will have feminine, emotional screeching fits about it. This is because they don't care about what's true or what's good. They only care if they get their feelings satisfied, no matter how much harm it does.
And if you want to see how much harm it's done, go to any American city or suburb. There's nothing left because we let people like this keep talking.
It is long past time to criminalize free speech for the undeveloped. People who cannot grasp an issue should not be allowed to speak about it.
idk retweeted
During my race, my opponent ran AI ads against me, portraying me as a Democrat dining with Muslims.
This ad was published by Ted Cruz's super PAC.
My opponent was not Byron Donalds. It was Ted Cruz, AIPAC, and Fox News.
idk retweeted
>California kids can't read or do basic math
>uses image of an Asian girl and a white boy
Really, NY Post?
idk retweeted
I love Japan! 🇯🇵
To my friends in the U.S., please don’t be surprised.
When Japanese people say, “I love Japan!”, some people on the left sometimes label them as “far-right.”
Don’t you think that’s strange?
You get scolded for saying you love your own country.
It’s strange, isn’t it?
But if you say, “I hate Japan!” you get praised.
That’s absolutely unacceptable.
Why is it not allowed to love one's own country?
Just as my American friends take pride in the Stars and Stripes, I take pride in the Rising Sun Flag. 🇺🇸🇯🇵
I’ll keep saying it with my head held high.
I love Japan! 🇯🇵
idk retweeted
"California kids can't read"
>image of white boy and Asian girl
Sure ok
idk retweeted
Women at the gym are dressing more provocatively than literal streetwalkers.
Shane Gillis made a joke about it. Women lost their minds.
But here's the proof, women in all-female gyms wear baggy shorts and sweatpants. Find a gym with men and you'll see the wedgie shorts all day.
They know exactly what they're doing. Just own it.
idk retweeted
This "women dress like whores at the gym" thing is so funny to me because... they kinda do?
People who train regularly know this...
At my gym, I have mistaken women for being naked before. Girlypops walk around in virtually no clothing.
If you want to dress this way, whatever. But, don't get mad when you get called out for it. 😭😂
idk retweeted
The reason Ben Shapiro is losing it over this is likely because the Israel Lobby's top goal this year has been to court Christians.
Everyone from Shapiro and Mark Levin to Jonathan Greenblatt has been all hands on deck trying to manufacture a new "Judeo-Christian" alliance.
Unfortunately for them, Shapiro gave the game away by telling everyone they'll need to abide by the Noahide Laws to "have a share in the world to come."
Ben Shapiro seeks to pilpul his way out of the Noahide Laws controversy by crying "anti-Semitism" and constructing a straw man.
"This entire fake controversy went crazy online because some liar named Chris Menahan put out a tweet that had millions and millions of views that said, 'Ben Shapiro urges TPUSA crowd to abide by the Noahide Laws.'"
"Okay, now, again, I'm just confused. Did I encourage Christians to abandon Christianity or did I do the opposite?" he says.
Did I tell anyone you encouraged people to abandon Christianity? No, I did not. I said you urged them to abide by the Noahide Laws, which you did, then quoted you word for word.
He also laughably claims that when Jews invoke the commandment to destroy "Amalek" they're just "speaking colloquially!" 😂
idk retweeted
Ben Shapiro is incredibly offended that he is being accused of wanting to KILL people of a different religion.
Meanwhile, he genuinely believes and often asserts the idea that half of this country wants to put him in a gas chamber because he is Jewish.
Do you get what I'm saying?
Ben Shapiro:
Tucker says he thinks I want to behead people! That's insane!
Question:
So what do you think about Tucker?
Ben Shapiro:
He wants to behead me, for sure.
idk retweeted
Many seem to be misunderstanding how the Noahide Laws apply to Christians, and I want to break it down for you, so you have all the information.
At a recent TPUSA event Ben Shapiro recommended Christians follow the seven Noahide laws “found in the Book of Genesis”:
Those are:
Do not worship idols, blaspheme, murder, commit sexual immorality, steal, eat flesh torn from a living animal, and do establish courts of justice.
First, they are not all found in the book of Genesis. Elements of just 2 of 7 are mentioned. Murder & eating animal flesh, but the Noahide laws themselves are a later rabbinic formulation found in the Talmud. Primarily, Sanhedrin 56A.
If you are new to the religion discussion, the Talmud is a highly revered collection of records in Rabbinic Judaism that is not recognized in Christianity.
Ben also only listed six of the seven. He left out the first one. Idolatry.
What is idolatry? Under the Noahide Laws, Jews and Gentiles are required to reject the worship of other gods and to recognize the one God.
Great. So what is the problem here?
The Jewish understanding of the Trinity.
Later Jewish authorities (most notably Maimonides in the 12th century) classified that Trinitarian Christianity (The belief that God is three co-equal, co-eternal persons- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is idolatry under the Noahide laws, despite Christians being monotheistic.
The Ashkenazi authorities at the time argued “shituf” for Christians (associating something else with God was NOT in violation of the Noahide Laws).
Um well thanks for that I guess, However, we also don’t believe that the Son and the Holy Spirit are “something else” apart from God.
Yet both sides codified these contradicting and incorrect misrepresentations of Christianity.
And we’re supposed to, I don’t know I guess get on board with one or the other and either be polytheists, or believe the Father is separate from the Son and the Holy Spirit.
So to be perfectly clear- there are two separate codifications for Christians in Jewish Noahide law that contradict each other- quite absolutely- while misrepresenting, trivializing, and reducing Christianity to a line item to be dealt with.
Why on earth would Christians cosign that? What the hell? lol.
To make matters even weirder, The First International Congress of Noahides is scheduled for November 2–6, 2026, in Jerusalem where about 65-70% of the population believe that the Trinity is idolatry.
Well gee, world congress that doesn’t understand Christianity aside, this doesn’t seem promising for Christians, at all.
So what’s the punishment for idolatry according to the Talmud?
Stoning. Sanhedrin 60b-61a.
Okay well to be fair, that is pretty dated. We probably don’t have to worry about be stoned for being dirty pagans, but still. Not a risk I want to stake my life on.
And no Christian should.
Jewish tradition may keep its Noahide laws, but the Talmud holds no authority over Christians. The Trinity is sacred, whole, and fully monotheistic. Ben Shapiro should not be using Charlie Kirk’s stages to lecture Christian youth under false pretenses, grossly misrepresenting our faith while Jewish law itself codifies it in two contradictory and insulting ways.
idk retweeted
The fact that Erika Kirk put this Christ hating—enemy of Charlie on stage to tell a room full of Christian’s how they can get to heaven tells you everything you need to know about TPUSA and why Charlie was murdered.
Erika must have hated her husband to do this.
When Ben Shapiro was asked why he didn't convert to Christianity, his answer below was 'because Christians don't need to convert to judaism.' If you think that sounds like a complete non-sequitur designed to sound like a real answer, then you're not imagining things. He completely avoided the question & is mad that you noticed.
The real reason Ben doesn't convert is because as a jew, he believes the talmudic interpretation of Jesus: Christ was the son of a wh*re who's boiling forever in His own excrement & semen.
