Currently hacking on the Humane Ai Pin (previously Vision Pro and Analogue Pocket). Mastodon: https://xitter.cf/t.co/BX8F6i31Hu

Joined May 2021
Big Humane Ai Pin milestone: Full preservation of the original experience, entirely on-device. I've applied Humane's UX work and polish so we can build whatever functionality we want Video: Ai Mic -> cosmOS -> Gemini -> live search Powered by PenumbraOS penumbraos.com/
6
5
3
31
3,390
I'm sure people are buying a $2k+ iPhone Duo to... Play 40+ year old Game & Watch games! Now you can wish your fancy new phone into the 80s hands of a child
1
1
1
16
1,051
Adam Gastineau retweeted
Introducing Super Nt+ and Mega Sg+ The definitive way to play original Super Nintendo, Super Famicom, Sega Genesis, Mega Drive, and Master System. Beginning with Super Nt in 2017, the originals set a new standard for video game preservation. Nearly a decade later, they return. Super Nt+ & Mega Sg+. Definitive, all over again. Now with Bluetooth + 2.4G. Reworked industrial design, OS, packaging, and more. At the core: an FPGA architecture engineered in-house from scratch, backed by over a decade of development. Purpose-built 1080p for 2D gaming. No emulation. Zero lag. Total accuracy. Plug and play. Preorder Oct 19, 8am PDT. Ships Dec 2026. analogue.co
270
476
143
3,457
12,325,863
Have people settled on a location for sharing LLM speed benchmarks? The sites I find seem abandoned It's frustrating not being able to compare. I can't tell if M5 Ultra Q8, 32k, single stream at 185 t/s is good or not. Some places say 6000 Pro isn't typically hitting that at Q4
291
I wanted to try messing with (prompting) inference improvements with M5 Ultra. I'm rather surprised at the results and after a lot of checking I think they're accurate M5 Ultra 256GB, 80 core, Qwen3.8 Flash Next Q8 Up to 85% faster decode vs oMLX main: 378 t/s @ 32k, 8 streams
1
2
743
This largely is improving MTP performance on larger contexts or multiple streams. I don't know if people care much about this work, but I will be slowly trying to PR it upstream. I hate LLM code and LLM opened PRs, so I'm having to review, understand, and post PRs manually
1
166
If you're an iOS dev, you may have noticed that Device Hub doesn't support multitouch gestures with Option + Mouse, unlike Simulator has for a long long time (maybe forever?). This simple tool restores the lost behavior. github.com/agg23/DeviceHubMo…
1
1
386
GLM 5.3 Flash, Q4, 1 stream, 128k context, code: oMLX (latest main): 69.8 tok/s decode MTP (53.3 without), 2288 tok/s prefill Prefill barely unaffected by context size
Batch 2 of M5 Ultra benches. Things are changing fast Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, Q4, MTP, 1 stream, 128k context, code: mlx-serve 26.9.6: 141 tok/s decode, 3783 tok/s prefill oMLX main (unreleased): 112 tok/s, 5331 tok/s prefill oMLX 0.7.0rc1: 105 tok/s, 3624 tok/s prefill
2
2
698
For those with a 256GB Mac who wants to try it, you have to merge the MTP head from a different model against the current oMLX quants
188
Batch 2 of M5 Ultra benches. Things are changing fast Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, Q4, MTP, 1 stream, 128k context, code: mlx-serve 26.9.6: 141 tok/s decode, 3783 tok/s prefill oMLX main (unreleased): 112 tok/s, 5331 tok/s prefill oMLX 0.7.0rc1: 105 tok/s, 3624 tok/s prefill
Rough M5 Ultra 80 core GPU 256GB benches: Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, Q4 variants, MTP, 1 stream, 32k context, averaged code/prose: TensorFold 0.3.4.1: 152 tok/s decode, 2086 tok/s prefill mlx-serve 26.9.6: 124 tok/s, 3863 tok/s prefill oMLX 0.7.0rc1: 105 tok/s, 3694 tok/s prefill
2
1
6
1,843
Q8 continues to perform just as well with the new changes. I had to submit a small patch to fix a OOM bug, so I imagine few people have tried Q8 on Macs.
1
1
194
I'm hoping to do GLM 5.3 Flash next (it is running right now). The models are large enough that juggling them and trying to maintain a clean benchmark environment is hard, plus I'm just inexperienced. I'm learning (slowly)
2
138
Rough M5 Ultra 80 core GPU 256GB benches: Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, Q4 variants, MTP, 1 stream, 32k context, averaged code/prose: TensorFold 0.3.4.1: 152 tok/s decode, 2086 tok/s prefill mlx-serve 26.9.6: 124 tok/s, 3863 tok/s prefill oMLX 0.7.0rc1: 105 tok/s, 3694 tok/s prefill
10
1
5
50
17,148
Somewhat similar TensorFold numbers against M3 Ultra xitter.cf/ivanfioravanti/status/…
Long Context Benchmark: TensorFold 0.3.4.1 + PR 29 and PR 30 on M3 Ultra with Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 4bit. 🔥 Now prefill is great and there are no more issues with 64K+ context on first decode request. Here a comparison 0.3.4, 0.3.4.1 and this version. Peak: - 0.3.4.2 130 t/s - 0.3.4 128 t/s - 0.3.4.1 119 t/s
1
618
It is pretty hard to approach this scientifically, especially since I am not familiar with the field. I would not be surprised if the choice of quants messed up the engine comparisons significantly. TensorFold in particular is built for a very specific model + quant at the moment
3
323
Could only get oMLX to run Q8, so here's a Q4 vs Q8 comparison for oMLX only. Seems to be a ~12-14% cost to moving to Q8 ad the moment. 95 tok/s Q8 vs 105 tok/s Q4 @ 32k
2
2
633
I think there's a lot of headroom to be squeezed out still, and it's obviously early in the chip's life. A rough test shows the GPU can draw ~162W. GPU power, decode / prefill: TensorFold: 97 W / 123 W mlx-serve: 87 W / 130 W oMLX: 71 W / 150 W Decode maxes out at 430-460 GB/s
3
461
I'm excited to begin testing the M5 Ultra 256GB Mac Studio Benchmarks seem rare at the moment. Tell me a good benchmark regimen (test set, models, engines) and I'll attempt to get some comparable numbers I would like to see numbers taken by the same author in similar scenarios
1
6
535
It's hard to find reliable sources for a given model and quant. My current plan: Vontra/GLM-5.3-Flash-MLX-oQ4-MTP Vontra/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-MLX-8bit-MTP mlx-community/GLM-5.3-Flash-4bit mlx-community/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ6e-mtp mlx-community/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ8e-mtp
1
1
227
I imagine there will probably be some numbers contamination by the need to use different inference engines, but I don't know if that can be helped
151