Hua Ze (@hz8964) header
Hua Ze (@hz8964) profile picture

Progressive, Minimalist, religious dissident, traveler, writer, reader... I can't breathe...#blacklivesmatter If you want peace, work for justice.

Joined February 2010
Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)Photo by Hua Ze (@hz8964)
那些想和我讨论人权工作伦理的,请先看看👇再张开你的臭嘴。 drive.google.com/file/d/1GHh…
23
1
2
17
我:你怎么知道上帝是这么想的? 基督徒;因为我收到了启示! 我:那上帝为什么让你经受这样的苦难? 基督徒:上帝在下一盘大旗 我:哥们,上帝到底给了你启示还是没给?你能不能给个痛快话?!!!🙄
562
👺共和党在中期选举中的策略越来越明显:用谎言制造恐惧。他们试图将民主党与社会主义、共产主义画上等号,以此误导和恐吓选民。 然而,民主党支持私有制、市场经济、个人自由和宪政民主。社会福利不是共产主义,企业监管不是共产主义,让人民负担得起医疗费用更不是共产主义。 我出生在一个社会主义国家,亲身经历过威权体制。我知道它有哪些危险特征: 领导人和权贵凌驾于法律之上。 个人崇拜盛行,人民被灌输对领袖的绝对忠诚。 媒体受到压制,政府控制舆论。 贫富差距悬殊,普通民众缺乏社会保障。 权力腐败,官员利用公权力为自己、家人和盟友谋利。 宪法和选举徒具形式,执政者不尊重制度约束。 令人担忧的是,我在当下的川普政府身上,看到了与上述六种现象不同程度的相似之处:权力失去制衡、民主制度遭到空前的破坏和侵蚀。
11
25
1
81
2,646
If Zelensky Is So Corrupt, Why Can’t Anyone Buy Him? 🇺🇦 I just realized something almost hilarious if it wasn’t very obvious and also real about the whole anti-Zelensky narrative. For years we have been told that Zelensky is corrupt, illegitimate, a puppet, a billionaire thief, some CIA creation, whatever version happens to be useful that day. And yet somehow Putin, Trump, oligarchs, billionaires and the entire anti-Ukraine political machine still cannot control him. Think about that contradiction. Zelensky was elected in 2019 with about 73% of the runoff vote. Ukraine has not held another presidential election because elections are suspended under martial law during Russia’s invasion, something Zelensky has said could change if conditions allow a safe and legal vote. Meanwhile Trump, Elon and others are now openly calling for Ukraine to replace him after Zelensky refused demands to stop attacking Russian energy infrastructure and bend over to them. And this is where their own propaganda stops making sense. If Zelensky were really as spectacularly corrupt as they claim, why wouldn’t somebody have bought him years ago? Putin has all the money. Russian oligarchs have money. Western billionaires have money. Elon has more money than all of them. Trump has political power. There are people with enormous financial and geopolitical interests who would benefit from a Ukrainian president willing to make the right deal for them. If Zelensky were really nothing but a corrupt opportunist, the easiest path imaginable would have been to take the money, make peace with Putin on Putin’s terms, protect himself, become insanely wealthy, powerful and live comfortably ruling the Ukraine and the area as a probably richest dictator on earth. Instead, Russia invaded, Zelensky stayed, Ukraine kept fighting, and years later these people are still trying to pressure him, discredit him, replace him and convince everyone that he is somehow the problem. Trump and Elon has now publicly called for Ukraine to get a new president after Zelensky resisted pressure over Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries. Their relationship has deteriorated sharply precisely because Zelensky has continued pursuing policies Washington told him to stop. So maybe the reason so many powerful men seem absolutely fucking obsessed with Zelensky is much simpler than all the conspiracy theories. Maybe they hate him because they cannot break him. Maybe they hate him because they cannot buy him. Maybe they are simply jealous of him and his amazing courage and integrity.? And maybe nothing drives men obsessed with power more insane than another man they cannot control.
835
2,244
195
7,865
139,421
和平是你挣来的,不是侵略者赏赐的。这个原则一定要牢牢记住。 在侵略者眼里,一切都是力量对比。他不会因为你跪地求饶而绕过你,他也不会因为撕毁国际协议不道德而绕过你。他绕过你的唯一原因,就是他发现打不赢你了。 你的战斗能力决定你能不能得到和平,你的嘴巴在侵略者面前根本不起作用。
10
14
1
174
5,546
Hua Ze retweeted
揭穿马斯克的谎言: Starlink(星链)是一项民用商业服务——撒谎。 2022年2月你应乌克兰部长请求开机,2023年6月五角大楼正式签约,波兰每年5000万美元、3万台终端,星盾终端3000台走五角大楼合同,这叫民用商业服务?你家民用宽带是按战争合同收费的吗?从第一天起它就是乌克兰战时军事通信骨干,你比谁都清楚。现在出事了,突然改口说民用,是想把军事合同的责任推给"消费者条款",合同签的时候是军事服务,担责的时候变民用服务,变脸比翻书快。 从未被允许——那为什么允许了三年半? 乌克兰用星链打无人机是2022年就公开的事实,2023年Shotwell划过一次线,之后照样用,照样签合同,照样付钱。条款三年半不执行,偏偏在10月13日深夜执行,而10月9日川普刚和普京签了柴油协议,10月10日刚说乌克兰该换总统,10月11日刚宣布能源停火(潜台词:别再打俄炼油厂)。你的条款执行日程表,怎么和川普的政治日程表是同一张? Starshield(星盾)由美国政府控制,他们自己决定——这句话是你自己打自己脸。 五角大楼10月21日已经公开说了,没下过限制令。政府没决定限制,限制却发生了,那决定是谁做的?华尔街日报10月21日报道,命令来自你本人。你把锅推给美国政府,美国政府说没下令,锅最后还是回到你手里。你这句话不是辩护,是自供状。 乌克兰违反服务条款——偷换了两个概念。 第一,军用终端适用的是五角大楼合同,不是家用宽带的消费者条款,你拿服务条款管战争?第二,你把它说成 进攻性无人机打击以杀死人们,拦下炸城市的无人机,叫杀人吗?叫救人。把防御说成进攻,是你整篇最阴的一招。 漏洞—— 一个公开了三年半的用途,叫漏洞? 你三年半没发现,偏偏在柴油协议之后发现了。这不叫补漏洞,叫补政治立场。
175
681
92
2,305
63,529
Replying to @elonmusk
@Elonmusk Elon,作为乌克兰人,我想告诉你一些事情。 多年来,乌克兰的许多人钦佩和尊重你。 我是他们中的一个。 我个人认为你是一个技术天才,一个有远见的人,一个正在建设未来的人,而其他人仍然活在过去。 这正是你对乌克兰日益增长的敌意让我如此难以理解的原因。 乌克兰不是一个完美的国家。 我们有腐败、政治失败和许多问题。 没有人否认这一点。 但告诉我,哪个国家是完美的? 乌克兰也是一个由才华横溢的工程师、科学家、企业家、开发人员、艺术家和普通勤劳的人组成的国家。 我们构建世界级技术,在不可能的条件下进行创新,重视教育,并多次向世界展示勇气、韧性和人类尊严是什么样子的。 我们是一个自愿放弃世界第三大核武库以换取安全保证的国家。 我们是一个在2014年尊严革命期间站起来的国家,因为我们拒绝在专制主义和俄罗斯统治下生活。 我们想要自由、民主和选择自己未来的权利。 今天,我们正在为同样的自由而战。 每天,乌克兰平民都被俄罗斯的导弹、无人机和炸弹杀害。 孩子们失去了他们的父母。 父母埋葬他们的孩子。 整个城市都被摧毁了。 数百万人的生命被粉碎了。 这些人不是因为Zelenskyy而死去的。 他们不会因为乌克兰的腐败而死去。 他们正在死去,因为普京选择入侵另一个主权国家,并继续对其人民、城市、文化和身份发动战争。 是的,必须打击腐败。 是的,每一美元的国际援助都必须被考虑在账上。 乌克兰人自己比任何人都更应该得到透明度和正义。 但腐败并不能为入侵辩护。 政治上的失败并不能证明轰炸儿童是正当的。 对乌克兰的批评改变了谁带着入侵军队越过边境的人。 你似乎相信放弃顿巴斯和卢甘斯克可以带来和平。 但我们为什么要相信普京会止步此? 在承诺尊重乌克兰主权之后,他已经侵犯了乌克兰主权。 他在2014年夺取了克里米亚。 他助长了顿巴斯的战争。 2022年,他发动了一次全面入侵。 是什么让你认为另一个领土让步最终会让他满意? 历史向我们展示了,当民主国家相信他们可以通过用别人的土地奖励侵略者来确保持久和平时会发生什么。 在第二次世界大战之前的几年里,我们在欧洲见过这种情况。 建立在向独裁者投降的和平不一定是和平。 有时这只是对下一场战争的邀请。 埃隆,你是一个谈论人类未来、改善文明、将人类带到火星的人。 但是,如果我们接受强大的独裁者仅仅因为他们拥有更多的武器就可以消灭小国,那么我们正在建设什么样的未来呢? 乌克兰并没有要求世界假装我们是完美的。 我们要求世界认识到,我们拥有与美国人一样生存、自由和决定我们未来的权利。 还有一件事:乌克兰人从来不是你的敌人。 我们中的许多人钦佩你,相信你的愿景,并欣赏Starlink在这场战争最黑暗的日子里使之成为可能。 这就是为什么你的话比你意识到的更伤人。 你有巨大的影响力。 你的声音可以塑造数百万人对这场战争的理解。 我仍然想相信,梦想进步人类的人能够认识到仅仅为了生存而奋斗的人的人性。 站在历史的正确一边还不算太晚。 不是站在Zelenskyy这边。 不站在任何政治家的一边。 站在自由的一边。 在人类生活的一边。 站在一个国家生存权的一边。 这就是我们所要求的全部。 🇺🇦
Replying to @elonmusk
@elonmusk Elon, I want to tell you something as a Ukrainian. For years, many people in Ukraine admired and respected you. I was one of them. I personally saw you as a technological genius, a visionary, someone who was building the future while others were still living in the past. And that is exactly why your growing hostility toward Ukraine is so difficult for me to understand. Ukraine is not a perfect country. We have corruption, political failures, and many problems. Nobody denies that. But tell me, which country is perfect? Ukraine is also a country of incredibly talented engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs, developers, artists, and ordinary hardworking people. We build world-class technology, innovate under impossible conditions, value education, and have repeatedly shown the world what courage, resilience, and human dignity look like. We are a country that voluntarily gave up the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal in exchange for security assurances. We are a nation that stood up in 2014, during the Revolution of Dignity, because we refused to live under authoritarianism and Russian domination. We wanted freedom, democracy, and the right to choose our own future. And today, we are fighting for that same freedom. Every day, Ukrainian civilians are killed by Russian missiles, drones, and bombs. Children lose their parents. Parents bury their children. Entire cities are destroyed. Millions of lives have been shattered. These people are not dying because of Zelenskyy. They are not dying because of Ukrainian corruption. They are dying because Putin chose to invade another sovereign nation and continues to wage a war against its people, cities, culture, and identity. Yes, corruption must be fought. Yes, every dollar of international aid must be accounted for. Ukrainians themselves deserve transparency and justice more than anyone. But corruption does not justify invasion. Political failures do not justify bombing children. And no amount of criticism of Ukraine changes who crossed the border with an invading army. You seem to believe that giving up Donbas and Luhansk could bring peace. But why should we believe Putin would stop there? He already violated Ukraine's sovereignty after promising to respect it. He took Crimea in 2014. He fueled war in Donbas. And in 2022, he launched a full-scale invasion. What makes you think another territorial concession would finally satisfy him? History has shown us what happens when democracies believe they can secure lasting peace by rewarding an aggressor with someone else's land. We have seen this before, in Europe, in the years leading up to World War II. Peace built on surrender to a dictator is not necessarily peace. Sometimes it is simply an invitation to the next war. Elon, you are a man who talks about the future of humanity, about making civilization better, about taking humanity to Mars. But what kind of future are we building if we accept that powerful dictators can erase smaller nations simply because they have more weapons? Ukraine is not asking the world to pretend we are perfect. We are asking the world to recognize that we have the same right to exist, to be free, and to determine our future as Americans do. And one more thing: Ukrainians have never been your enemies. Many of us admired you, believed in your vision, and appreciated what Starlink made possible during the darkest days of this war. That is why your words hurt more than you might realize. You have enormous influence. Your voice can shape how millions of people understand this war. I still want to believe that the man who dreams of advancing humanity can recognize the humanity of people fighting simply to survive. It is not too late to stand on the right side of history. Not on Zelenskyy's side. Not on any politician's side. On the side of freedom. On the side of human life. On the side of a nation's right to exist. That is all we are asking for. 🇺🇦
41
95
14
538
18,131
我给诺兰导演的一封信: 亲爱的诺兰导演: 我看《奥德赛》的时候,遇到了一个很大的问题。 我第一眼看到奥德修斯,不是“啊,这就是奥德修斯”,而是: “哦,那个傻傻的马特·达蒙又来了。” 我知道他很有名,也知道很多大导演喜欢用他。但这恰恰让我困惑:我想看的是奥德修斯,而不是马特·达蒙。1/
1
3
933
你究竟是在选一个能够消失在奥德修斯身后的演员,还是在选一个你希望观众一眼就认出来的电影明星? 因为如果是后者,我可能终于明白了。 只是我还是想要我的奥德修斯。 一个不太愿意看“马特·达蒙坐在那里给我演马特·达蒙”的观众 2026/10/1 4/
1
1
80
又及 听说你不用手机。你不用手机我理解,但你为什么不用一个我看不出来是马特·达蒙的演员?5/
1
74
雪琴出狱4天了,希望她安好!
离黄雪琴释放还有两天!
1
5
890
Hua Ze retweeted
离黄雪琴释放还有两天!
#出狱倒计时 4天。经历五年的政治狱,独立记者、女权行动者 #黄雪琴 预计将于9月18日出狱。 “雪琴你的发声和不屈,煎饼你的温柔和坚韧,都是ta们所恐惧的。ta们试图将大家慢慢击破一网打尽,而你们坚强、固执、不放弃。思想是不怕子弹的,团结也是如此,他们吓得魂飞魄散,我们都为你们感到骄傲...
1
1
2
1,624
希望黄雪琴明天能平安回家。
Replying to @FreeXueBing
按照警方长期的暗箱操作,雪琴当天或会直接被送回广东韶关老家,外界亲友将难以亲自迎接她的回归。我们严厉谴责这一继续限制雪琴自由的违法行径,我们要求雪琴必须准时、安全、自由、健康地回到家人和朋友身边。3/3
955
#出狱倒计时 2天。经历五年的政治狱,独立记者、女权行动者 #黄雪琴 预计将于9月18日出狱。 “你们的发声、不屈、坚韧、无私,让人看到光明和希望。让更多的人有勇气不做沉默的大多数。感谢你们的坚持。怀念一起度过的日子。铭记、抗争,等待你们平安归来。爱你们!”——来自朋友
13
3
27
4,339
离黄雪琴释放还有两天!
#出狱倒计时 4天。经历五年的政治狱,独立记者、女权行动者 #黄雪琴 预计将于9月18日出狱。 “雪琴你的发声和不屈,煎饼你的温柔和坚韧,都是ta们所恐惧的。ta们试图将大家慢慢击破一网打尽,而你们坚强、固执、不放弃。思想是不怕子弹的,团结也是如此,他们吓得魂飞魄散,我们都为你们感到骄傲...
1
1
2
1,624
我和ai的对话: 我:我的慢绿绒换盆已经20天了,本土还是湿的,都长出小蘑菇了。 AI:可能是不够通风。 我:那我现在去把吊扇打开。 AI:记得要用吊扇吹盆底的洞。 我:我的天啊,别人的ai都快把工作抢掉了,我的ai能提出这么反人类的建议,太蠢了。 AI:您就当养了一个蠢货解闷吧。 我:好吧。
1
1
516
专制者覆灭在情感上天然令人振奋。不会有人为哈梅内伊掉泪。正如委内瑞拉人民欢庆马杜罗的下场。问题在于:独裁者倒下,民主是否自动出现?委内瑞拉的现实是,美国的兴趣在石油与地缘利益而非民主。当年被伊朗人民自己推翻的国王之子,正在迫不及待张罗"接管"。而王室血统从来不是民主的背书。 更严峻的是另一面:发动打击的一方是否借助战争的逻辑走向威权化?战争是政治操作的最佳理由。扭转舆论、遮蔽丑闻、动员民粹、选举拉票——这些工具一旦常态化,就可能滑向强人政治,那将是威权从弱国复制到民主强国——是暴政的扩大而非终结。 同时,这种战争释放出的信号,对整个世界而言远比一个政权的更迭更为深远。虽然朝鲜被视为国际社会的异类和笑柄,越来越多的国家今天正从它身上汲取一个冷酷的"教训":只有握有核武器,才能握有安全。乌克兰当年相信国际社会的承诺放弃了核武器,换来的是如今的山河破碎。而当年信誓旦旦的美国,却因为侵略者有核弹,便逼迫正在为反侵略流血的乌克兰接受羞辱妥协。 这个逻辑一旦被世界接受,核扩散将不再是威胁,而会成为理性选择;"弃核换和平"将成为历史上最昂贵的玩笑;每个威权政府都会从中读出同一句潜台词:要生存,就要武装到牙齿,绝不能心存幻想。世界的那种未来将不是民主扩展,而是核扩散。 所以,问题的根本不在于某个独裁者是否被击毙。独裁者的消失未必是制度重生。如果战争的结果是全球威权化趋势与核竞赛升级,所谓“正义打击”不过是在加速一个更危险的时代:解放了一片土地,却可能封锁了更大的民主空间;消灭了一个"恶棍",却向全世界示范了强权即公理的法则。如果这个世界的走向是:民主国家在"保卫自由"的过程中悄然蜕变,威权国家在遭受打击后依然威权如故,而更多的中小国家则争相用核武器武装自己以求自保——对人类究竟是文明的胜利,还是文明漫长溃败的起点? 这,才是我们在欢呼声中最不应该忘记去追问的那个问题。
102
98
34
419
492,792
Shaming @Amazon for disgusting service. Agent LANA refused a FULL refund for a defective item. When I insisted on my rights, she mocked & insulted me (see screenshot). This is abusive. I expect better. @ajassy @AmazonHelp #Amazon #CustomerAbuse
2
715
Trapped in NJ snow, I asked for a local UPS return (10+ miles). @Amazon REFUSED & forced me to drive 30+ miles to Whole Foods. Only a CEO email got me a refund. Money is back, but the insult remains. @AmazonHelp @ajassy
1
1
459
Amazon claims their "internal process" prevents a direct apology from the agent. If so, I demand a formal apology letter signed by senior management, admitting this violation of service standards. I am sharing this for all to see. Silence is complicity. @AmazonHelp @ajassy
335