Is "probably fine" good enough for your access checks?
Login tells you who they are. Not whether they qualify.
That distinction is why the gap exists. Here's the design that closes it 👇
Building with Humanity via Claude, Cursor, or Codex? 🤔
We're collecting real feedback from devs using the MCP server. We want to know what's working, what's not, and what's missing.
Takes 2 min ⬇️
tally.so/r/MedBzY
Is this user real? Over 18? Already claimed this reward?
Those are yes/no questions. You don't need to store the documents that answer them.
But most apps do. Here's what that actually costs 👇
You've seen it. Signups that look real, rewards that drain, engagement that goes nowhere.
We've been thinking about why. It's one broken assumption in how auth actually works. New article just dropped 👇
Developers: what would actually make you build on decentralized identity infrastructure?
Not a rhetorical question.
5-min survey — grant programs are coming and respondents hear first ✍️
tally.so/r/2EkjqM
Why you should integrate Humanity Protocol in your app:
➡️ Trust
➡️ Fairness
➡️Reduce fraud
➡️ Blend on-chain and offline identity
Get an API key now:
humanity.org/dev-application…
Human devs, the things to come:
→ more verifiable credentials (identity,
education, location, age)
→ Decentralized Identity Validators /
zkProofer Nodes
Get an API key here: humanity.org/dev-application…
Let's build the future of digital identity together!
