> sir! we've got the readings in from the latest iteration of our "MLM" themed frog revolver. i think you're gonna wanna see this... my god... are these numbers saying what i THINK they're saying? > yes, sir. frog smooch factors increased by 625 percent, with readings on smooch duration, quality, and wetness remaining consistent with baseline. 625 percent, you say... but, wouldn't that push the slop factor beyond the accepted siemann constant? are we certain these numbers are accurate? > yes, sir. believe me, we've been running as many trials as our budget will allow. the results all align. ...do you realize— DO YOU REALIZE what you've done here? > ah, yes, ...this could send ripples through the gay frog community. for dog's sake; we've disproved the siemann hypothesis! this could throw the entire world of frog forecasting into disarray! have our secretary call up the prime minister. tell her... "this time, it's for real." (from ig @ gechenlei027)