@housecor

I help dev teams be insanely productive with AI. Courses: https://nitter.cf/t.co/D5emROQHUh & https://nitter.cf/t.co/6L1fD89GbP Consulting: https://nitter.cf/t.co/Qfp4TfpB8N ⚛️

Kansas City
Joined January 2009
10 lessons I've learned about handling React state over the last 7 years... (thread) #react #reactjs
76
598
52
2,442
Just met with someone who is unhappy with AI. Me: "What are you using?" Them: "Copilot with Sonnet" Me: There's your problem.
48
5
3
565
28,052
Just met with yet another developer won’t use AI because he “enjoys the act of typing code” and “can’t trust it”. I get it. I felt that way too. Problem is, that ship has sailed. AI isn’t not optional anymore. If you’re unwilling to do agentic coding, you’re a liability.
155
42
10
829
31,656
It's wild how much more enjoyable my work day is with Opus 5.5 vs previous versions. The output prose feels human again.
11
3
1
96
10,357
Just told Opus 5.5: "Clean up the prose in this doc. It was written by an older Opus version." So. much. simpler. Here's some before -> after results: What is moving, and what isn't -> Scope Completed pre-work -> Status They are not ours to edit -> We can't edit
15
11
657
74,006
Opus 5.5 just released. Comparable to Fable 5.1 and 40% cheaper to run?! Wow. The pace of improvement is wild.
5
2
68
6,653
Jev is compelling for making quick, cheap decisions. I specify a set of potential options, and Jev instantly provides its answer and its confidence level. Way faster and cheaper than an LLM. This vid uses Jev to quickly classify emails by category, identify scams, and rank emails by urgency. youtube.com/watch?v=o1CogAtW…
5
1
23
8,000
No. It’s a boring implementation detail. In 2026, I care about results.
Do devs still care about React? (I mean the average one) Be honest
15
2
1
141
27,996
I’m eager for the “post AI” dev world. What will software devs talk about after AI is a boring thing we all use and take for granted?
33
3
67
11,054
“A luxury, once sampled, becomes a necessity.” AI is the latest example. First we liked it. Now we require it.
13
3
65
6,473
In a family, communism works. Each person works and is “paid” according to their abilities and needs. This works because we love our family enough to accept the lopsided transaction. And a family is small enough that centralized planning is practical. Outside of a family, communism fails. Why? The free rider problem. Humans are natural energy savers. They need incentives to work. If I can’t keep the fruits of my extra effort, then I’m far less motivated to work hard. This is why East Germans tried to sneak into West Germany. This is why no one wants to immigrate to North Korea. Incentives matter. In a family, mercy for the freeloader is expected. In business, mercy for the freeloader is cruelty to the hard worker.
14
7
94
8,926
Finally!
We're adding support for AGENTS.md to Claude Code. Starting today in version 2.1.277, if there is no CLAUDE.md in a folder, Claude will check for and use AGENTS.md. You can toggle this behavior in /config.
1
30
6,201
Just spent the last week preparing a detailed plan to migrate a team from ADO to GitHub so we could use Copilot code review. Woke up today and Copilot reviews for ADO are now available in preview. Trying to decide if I should celebrate or cry
21
76
11,291
One of AI's most annoying tendencies is needless specificity. AI creates docs and comments with specific counts, even when the specific number doesn't matter, or changes often. I regularly remove these values to streamline reading and maintainance.
12
3
1
96
10,516
2027: Senior devs will get paid well to "harden" apps written by amateurs. Senior devs can see what's broken, notice what's needlessly complex, and have a rich vocabulary for prompting effectively. And they'll be wildly effective because they’ll use AI to accelerate their cleanup work.
40
23
5
339
24,890
if something is hard, do it more often
Replying to @housecor
Shipping often is the solution to so many issues. It exposes inefficiencies (why can't we ship, why was this decision stalled, why do we not know what to do next) and while there are other strategical things to do shipping forces the right conversations. Always.
3
29
5,768
There's an epidemic of teams drowning in needless process. Why? A lack of trust. Trust takes a long time to build, and it's easily broken. The moment trust is broken, the org wants to add "safety" through manual inspection, more environments, external approvals, less frequent deploys, and more planning meetings. But, these things are generally counter-productive. They create a false sense of control and safety, and ironically often reduce stability and quality. The actual solution? Automate quality checks and deploys. Merge daily and use feature flags to merge incomplete work. Ship often. Implement observability so you know immediately if things go sideways.
13
9
68
6,817
My grandma passed away this year. Today my mom handed me a card from my grandma. She made me a birthday card months in advance, knowing she wouldn’t be here. One last unexpected message from her was a wonderful gift. So thoughtful. That’s love.❤️
18
4
238
9,463
If I don’t know what “right” looks like, I can’t tell when AI does it wrong
13
4
1
66
6,445
Problem: AI is often a sycophant. It praises in an insincere way. Solution: Don't ask "Sound good?". Ask “What are the tradeoffs?”
16
3
62
6,439
Problem: AI's writing style is often dense and hard to understand. Solution: "Remove all mannered prose." Anthropic's latest docs suggest adding this line to avoid stock phrases and jargon.
17
24
2
397
29,556