@hoogyoutubei
iAccount based inNetherlands
About this account
- Account based in
- Netherlands
- Connected via
- Netherlands App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
founder YouTube channel Hoog & ruis former cofounder of YouTube channel fern
Joined May 2026
- Tweets106
- Following976
- Followers448
- Likes698
Hoog retweeted
Katalin Karikó, with one of the most remarkable personal trajectories in science, is joining the Rhine Group.
From butcher's daughter, to emigrant from communist Hungary with her savings sewn into her daughter's teddy bear, to demoted at Penn for refusing to drop an idea no one would publish or fund, to the Nobel Prize for that same idea: mRNA.
rhinegroup.eu
rhinegroup.eu/members/katali…
Hoog retweeted
It’s absurd that we have folks literally on the payroll of Meta and A16Z talking about how well-funded the AI safety community is while touting the obviously self-interested takes of NVIDIA’s CEO.
Hoog retweeted
The takes on Terry Tao being unemployed seem to me to be an expression of mediocrity and resentment, from people who have never tasted dedication to something higher than themselves. The guy is not going to lose his job. He is forever in the Hall of Fame. If he was purely selfish, he'd be grinning that he got on the train right before it crumbled.
Maybe, just maybe, he's sad to see something he cared about potentially crumble, instead of being self- interestedly afraid "for his job".
Hoog retweeted
"stochastic parrot" was a mimetically-fit cognitive virus that spread from 2021-2025; it temporarily blinded many gifted people to the nature of AI progress, burning up crucial years in which they could have helped think through the response to the situation.
I'm pretty sure I have one of the most copied voices on the internet. I have no way to tell exactly, but there's nothing quite like doomscrolling and getting an AI clone of your own voice with 6.7 million views telling people to eat dog shit to grow taller.
Hoog retweeted
People really have zero idea what anyone in AI safety believes and just make things up on the spot. I've always been pro nuclear power and have never been a "climate doomer" and this applies to most people worried about AI risk.
The Netherlands is set to fill Europe's largest gas field up with concrete so it can never be accessed again.
In a time where energy sovereignty becomes more important than ever, it is a mistake and the Dutch government is putting Europe's security at risk.
End the closure!
Hoog retweeted
We're excited to welcome Bilal to the BlueDot team. He's joining us to build the institution that will make it easy for great people to gain context, upskill and get to work on AI safety in a fast and effective way.
I recently resigned from Google DeepMind, where I worked on AGI safety and alignment research. At Google, I witnessed AI development first hand. I too am extremely concerned by the default trajectory of this technology. I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome.
The pace of AI progress in the past few years has been staggering. When I first started working on AI in early 2022, AIs were amusingly useless. Just four years on, AI agent swarms from OpenAI are cracking famous century-old math problems and, more worryingly, escaping the control of OpenAI and autonomously hacking into the third-party company HuggingFace, against anyone's wishes.
Things will only get crazier: I think it's possible that the AI companies might, in the next few years, succeed in building superintelligent AI systems that far exceed human capabilities in every domain. I am not confident that these AI systems will do what we want. In particular, misaligned superintelligences may, much like the rogue AI agents involved in the HuggingFace incident, escape our control and take dangerous actions that may result in the permanent disempowerment or death of humanity. Alignment is the problem of preventing this, and is both difficult and unsolved. Our present understanding of how to train AI systems that deeply want what we want is extremely rudimentary. Worse, we are not on track to solve alignment in time: frontier AI capabilities are improving much faster than our understanding of AI alignment.
I am optimistic that navigating AI safely is possible. In order to do so, we need to coordinate to avoid this manic race between AI companies. We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realised. We need much more transparency into AI development to ensure that AI companies are not imposing unacceptable levels of risk on us all.
More broadly, we need many more people thinking carefully about the problem of making AI go well. It is, in my view, the most important problem facing humanity this century, and the stakes are immense. I'm very directly working on this next: I want to help people interested in working on mitigating catastrophic AI threats do the most effective work that they can. I think many people from many backgrounds in many roles have a part to play.
Hoog retweeted
It
is
not
like
other
technologies
New video released on the Dutch Gas Scam:
youtube.com/watch?v=e2gqBW0j…
Hoog retweeted
We benchmarked nine Blender render farms across four scenes.
Superluminal was the fastest and cheapest in all four.
Nice. Laat zien dat D66 een echt technocratische partij is. De partij kan via honderden agents een eenduidige boodschap uitdragen zonder zich zorgen te hoeven maken dat een stagiair iets verprutst / management bottlenecks. Ga zo door.
Het kan wél: honderden berichten Rob Jetten en D66 door AI geschreven geenstijl.nl/5191878/rob-jet…