
@doubletop_io tribe leader @hyperliquidx maxi DM me if you're building a project with real revenue and economic value of a token.
Kyiv
Joined June 2019
- Tweets11K
- Following3.4K
- Followers23.6K
- Likes18.3K
Pinned Tweet
DOUBLETOP VAULT!
You don't have 5-10 hours a day to figure out why oil is pumping, why unemployment is dropping, whether the Fed cuts next month, and what Saylor's earnings print says next Monday?
Cool. Neither do most of you.
So we built something.
Introducing the DOUBLETOP Vault on @HyperliquidX.
The strategy is dead simple:
buy the lows, sell the highs, repeat. Risk management + common sense. No overtrading. Only midterm swing/narrative trading.
That's the whole edge. No magic.
Now the honest part.
Promising you returns would be dumb and probably not even legal. This is our first vault. We genuinely don't know how it ends either. We'll talk numbers when there's a public track record. Right now it's an experiment.
Every man is responsible for the buttons he presses.
Don't believe in us? Don't deposit. We'll be fine without you.
Why the setup is actually fair, bc we have skin in the game:
→ we paid $10k just to launch it
→ we're FORCED to hold min 5% of the pool. Our money rides the exact same trades as yours
→ we can ONLY trade the deposited funds. We literally cannot withdraw your capital
→ you pull out anytime, zero lockup
→ 10% fee on PROFIT only
→ every position and PnL is fully on-chain, real-time. Nothing hidden
Vault → app.hyperliquid.xyz/vaults/0…
No account yet? Start here → app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/DOU…
P.S. anyone depositing 50k+ might catch some perks down the line 🤭
The market is wound tight. This should be a volatile week.
Crypto can’t sit at these levels much longer with equities doing what they’re doing.
Either we show relative strength while stocks bleed, or we go test 75K.
Took a few speculative positions anyway.
$BTC was higher the morning after CPI in 22 of the last 32 prints. This year it’s 8 of 9.
CPI drops in 30 mins.
Core is expected at 0.3% m/m.
→ 0.4% or higher adds odds of a hike on October 28
→ 0.2% or lower is good for the market
$BTC has been ranging since September 21 and pressing into 84K for a few days now. Nothing on the higher timeframes looks bad to me.
Expect volatility today. Either way, it’s fresh material for new ideas. Watching closely.
How much longer am I sitting on the fence?
Spent another weekend out of the market. Missed nothing, again.
Last week we corrected to 80.4K, bounced, and we’re back in the range.
Still, nothing on my watchlist looks good except:
celestia:native, $ONDO, $NEAR and $ZRO.
So I keep waiting for timing with a good RR. CPI drops Wednesday. Might start building positions around it.
Still doing nothing. No position is a position too.
The market's basically standing still. Anything I'd have opened would've ended in a stop, or at best, paid funding.
Range hasn't changed:
82,800 – 87,500. A sweep below 82,800 is the interesting zone to buy back.
In this market, 90% of alts fade every impulse.
The 10% holding up:
$NEAR $PUMP $ZRO $ETHFI $TAO
Narrative plays with good entries:
$ONDO $LIT $HYPE $VVV solana:JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN
Save the list.
Still doing nothing. No position is a position too.
The market's basically standing still. Anything I'd have opened would've ended in a stop, or at best, paid funding.
Range hasn't changed:
82,800 – 87,500. A sweep below 82,800 is the interesting zone to buy back.
In this market, 90% of alts fade every impulse.
The 10% holding up:
$NEAR $PUMP $ZRO $ETHFI $TAO
Narrative plays with good entries:
$ONDO $LIT $HYPE $VVV solana:JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN
Save the list.
Still no bias on this market.
I agree it's overheated. But it can keep grinding up in this choppy format too.
Leaning toward the scenario on the chart, though probably with a shallower correction.
Ideal path:
push higher, finish the impulse, drop to 81,500, then lower. That's where I'd start looking for an entry.
Busy week ahead.
In a market like this, the main thing is not doing anything stupid.
Still no bias on this market.
I agree it's overheated. But it can keep grinding up in this choppy format too.
Leaning toward the scenario on the chart, though probably with a shallower correction.
Ideal path:
push higher, finish the impulse, drop to 81,500, then lower. That's where I'd start looking for an entry.
Busy week ahead.
In a market like this, the main thing is not doing anything stupid.
Everyone was scared of the $1.3B $HYPE unlock. Price went up 5%.
The team didn't dump into the market. They sold OTC to institutions instead.
Two things that just got confirmed:
→ The team is sensible. They need money for operations, but they won't shoot themselves in the foot.
→ Everyone wants to hold $HYPE. Buyers absorbed $320M of this unlock without blinking — while every ETF combined has raised $350M, all time.
Winners average winners. $HYPE is the proof.
$1.3B of $HYPE unlocks in 16 hours. Should you be scared?
14.17M tokens. That's 1.4% of supply, 2.7% of the cap.
The unlock itself will probably land softer than the headline, same as every time.
The team historically claims very little, and buybacks and staking sit on the other side of it.
The real risk isn't the unlock. It's the positioning around it.
My base case: elevated volatility, a 5-10% pullback like August, trend intact.
The bad version needs three things at once — visible whale selling, a weak broad market, and a liquidation chain in lending. Any one alone isn't enough.
Robinhood Chain is at the lows. Dead, or just a correction?
The timeline split into two camps and I'm honestly not on either side yet.
The bull case:
Robinhood is a billion-dollar shop that figured out how to play this game and handled the first hype wave fine. Standard change of hands from here, new narratives, off we go.
The bear case:
nothing fundamentally new got built. Volume went back to the usual places, and that's the whole story. Which can mean months of grinding sideways.
Lows are not an entry. They can always knock from below.
The one thing that could move this is the Robinhood Summit. Depends entirely on what gets announced and where the focus lands.
If the Summit actually moves price, a 50-70% correction across the chain is a great entry.
But I want confirmation that a catalyst exists before touching it. A lot of people are sitting on full bags right now, and weak announcements turn that into a sell-the-news event fast.
Not rushing. Waiting for the Summit to show its hand.
Robinhood trenches
Two weeks deep into this chain now. Here's the honest version.
I watched $CASHCAT from a $10M cap. Then Robinhood listed it in the app, the team started backing it publicly, and it ran to $225M. I watched it consolidate at $30-40M for weeks and never built the conviction. It's ~$200M now.
I watched $PONS go from $30M to $600M. Two real launchpads on this chain — Long and Pons — and Pons now eats ~80% of all launchpad volume and printed $21M in fees in a single week.
I researched $UNI when Uniswap got picked as the chain's main spot venue. Watched it from $4.20. Simplest buy-and-forget trade on the board.
So why did none of it happen?
Not enough stables. We didn't fix well enough at the end of 2025, and the book is majors plus $HYPE. That's the whole answer.
FOMO? Genuinely no.
I know exactly why it played out this way and I'm not sitting in it.
What I did instead: LP farming. ~$30K deployed, ~$40K a week later. Chain exposure with a fraction of the risk.
Still want the tokens though. Just have to keep watching.
$1.3B of $HYPE unlocks in 16 hours. Should you be scared?
14.17M tokens. That's 1.4% of supply, 2.7% of the cap.
The unlock itself will probably land softer than the headline, same as every time.
The team historically claims very little, and buybacks and staking sit on the other side of it.
The real risk isn't the unlock. It's the positioning around it.
My base case: elevated volatility, a 5-10% pullback like August, trend intact.
The bad version needs three things at once — visible whale selling, a weak broad market, and a liquidation chain in lending. Any one alone isn't enough.
Binance just listed $HYPE spot.
The last holdout folded. Not to the price, to the product.
I've seen enough portfolios this month to say it plainly: most of you have the exact same three problems.
→ 20 positions, none of them opened with a target
→ most are underwater and some are never coming back to breakeven
→ zero majors, zero actual performers
That's not investing. That's collecting.
Only $BTC survives buy-and-forget for ten years. Alts are speculation, and speculation has to be taken off the table.
There's one way out of a book like that, and nobody wants to hear it: sell the trash and start over.
It'll feel like locking in the loss. But you locked it in months ago.
Can confirm. This is my full-time job.
For everyone else, there's the DOUBLETOP vault.
app.hyperliquid.xyz/vaults/0…
Next thing I'm waiting on: a new high.
Somewhere around 83k, maybe a bit above.
That's where I want to make the decision, not before.
I'm allowing for the fakeout: break the high, then flush back to 74-70k. Wouldn't surprise me.
But I'm not trading that far ahead. After 83k it's either chop or a correction, and I'll read it live.
No plan needed for a level we haven't reached yet.
ARC mainnet is a mess right now. That's not a reason to skip it, it's a reason to wait.
I'm watching since launch, not rushing.
→ the timing is brutal
→ USDC slipped onto the chain before the official mainnet announcement, so the scams were already set up
→ trenching is painful
Going off the @RobinhoodCrypto experience: after the first impulse of activity came a pullback.
The decent projects retraced and did NOT rug, while the obvious rugs surfaced right away.
So I'm taking the safer position for now. What I'd especially want to see is official accounts interacting on X. That's how we get the RH pattern.
Shortlist, by RH analogy (NFA, please DYOR):
$ARGUS (@Arguspad) — $PONS
$AI (@Longdotsupply) — $LONG
$BANCOR — $CASHCAT
Be careful. Don't rush. Save the list.
Best meme breakdown I've seen on ARC so far 👇
if you already bridged to @arc - time to add some CAs to your watchlist. my choice:
1. $USDC - FatCatBatRatWifHat
CA: 0x0006ed5d37a9d6687d1ecc8b642ff9c4760d9a16
people falsely claim that 1st ever memecoin is arcanine because @ArcDEXScan shows that - they track when live USDC pool launched - thats exactly Arcanine. but 1st ever deployed og token is FatCatBatRatWifHat
> FatCat - block 10,460,249
> $ARCANINE - block 10,460,272. 12 sec later
moreover, currently wrong FatCatBatRatWifHat is pumped. 0xb94bfde76ea7cd55e8f63ae19fd7c74370e0f389 is sitting at $1.6m while og is at $600k
2. But if we are talking about the first Arc-native memecoin with a live USDC pool - its def Arcanine
> ARCANINE pool 0x6d8d…316d - first-seen block 10,458,871
> FatCat pool 0xefae…e7cd - block 10,460,252
CA: 0xf3715bf5c2de299f08b81180ffb739a8372a175f
everything else i like way less and with worse risk/reward
3. $BIRDIE - Posted by @chrisries this july
CA: 0x8e604ae97dda3deb77d9856606a8dc3135998fc4
4. $NOAH - first memecoin from @Noxa_Fi
CA: 0x1ed9306725b8b4ca1a1a56d32970e49e64c51dde
5. $BRC by @Brc_meme - DEX + Bridge, working infra
CA: 0x11c87c506acf3ea0799f8717127fe55a184f8efd
6. $MISCHA - @circle posted about this cat
CA: 0x6520feceeff3474020ebf9b59234575e94655ec2
buying at t.me/based_eth_bot?start=r_p…
now shill your bags
The paradigm for what actually pumps has changed.
I started saying this last year with $HYPE: revenue has to flow back into the token. A year on, plenty of projects adapted. Plenty didn't move at all.
Watching that play out taught me something that took longer than it should have:
The project and the token are two different things.
Great team. Real product. Shipping every week. And the token still bleeds, because none of that value has any reason to end up in it.
Stop researching companies. Start researching claims on cash flow.
I'm f*cking bullish. Nearly 80% of the book is in the market.
$BTC is still more than 50k below its high. Buy one now and that's 50k+ per coin over the next couple of years.
And we're one headline from 90k.
CLARITY passing, or another liquidity move like the Treasury announcement.
Midterm and longterm, you want to be allocated.
hexdrunker retweeted
Spot on🎯
@longdotxyz is actually more of an incubator than a conventional launchpad, which means its focus is to help the ecosystem's tokens win, vs. have as many tokens launched as possible.
It is the first and only platform that puts a lot of emphasis on liquidity and has opened up the design space on top of it (vault, open pairing, LongX, etc.), all of which are about how to drive value to the tokens launched on LONG that have shown signs of being a phenomenal runner in an organic way.
@Natan_benish has honed his skills in liquidity mechanism for years (one of the first, if not THE first builder that worked closely with @dopplerprotocol at its inception), LONG is his opportunity to finally apply those skills to the fullest, and he's killing it. MOO's strategy would not be possible if it wasn't for LONG's infra and liquidity focused modules, period.
In the end, the question is really just about if the launchpad benefits more from PVP or PVE, then execute your bet accordingly.
gMOO🐮
the incentive for pump/pons/stonk is to have as many deployments as possible as they make fees this way to drive back to their own token - these platforms win without having to have any winners (not saying it's impossible to have winners)
the incentive for long is to have the strongest ecosystem with deep liquidity that reinforces the flywheel of strong projects becoming stronger (no token means all focus and incentives are driven towards the ecosystem)
instead of quantity, the focus is on quality
the bet on pump/pons/stonk is to buy pump/pons/stonk which is not a bad thing
but the bet on long is to buy ai/moo/meme/etc.
it's refreshing to see, and it's why i'm most bullish on natan and the long ecosystem over anything else that exists in the arena right now
the incentives make ai and moo the easiest to hold out of anything onchain that aren't revenue infra plays






























