@hellovidya

Co-founder, @finallayerai; Co-founder, @rizzleglobal; Ex @google

SF Bay Area, CA
Joined May 2009
Every now and then, evidence that we're not at any level of AGI just hits you in the face!
2
59
Muse has issues with long running tasks. Assume you guys are working on this @dps @finkd 😃
54
Ran through an article classification task with Jev and compared it to outputs from Deepseek, used Opus classification as the reference for accuracy. Interestingly, Opus sides more with Deepseek. That itself means nothing. This is a bit of a subjective output and in past testing with LLMs, we found human choices to align more closely with Opus than with other models. We will run a human comparison here to see how Jev fares. But the early results are very interesting.
1
1
86
The responsiveness I'm seeing on @Muse is the best I've seen across all AI apps. The only one that came close was probably @perplexity_ai. When the latency is low enough that the app feels hyper-responsive, first impressions are always amazing.
you can tell @natfriedman built Muse because almost every interaction is under 150ms
2
237
Of course China doesn't agree with an approach that keeps the US companies ahead and in charge of AI safety.
I see a lot of headlines saying China refuses to pace AI progress and doesn’t care about safety. That’s a misinterpretation of their response to Dario’s essay. China isn’t ignoring #AI #safety, it’s just doesn’t agree with Dario’s condition that AI safety be coupled with holding back their domestic AI labs. If we want cooperation we need to show mutual understanding and respect. More details in this new @WIRED article from @lmatsakis. “China Isn’t Buying Silicon Valley’s Call for an AI Slowdown” Nice to see my views are aligned with @kristy_loke, @kevinsxu, and @michellesnie in this piece.
2
242
Everything is playing out exactly aligned with everyone's priorities and future outlook. Meta is in a strong place for now in terms of cash position. They know they can handle the competition and eat the infra costs for a while to build a great consumer product and give it away for free.
Last month I wrote about how we can build a positive and safe future for everyone: meta.com/thefutureisforevery… Every lab has the responsibility and incentive to move at the pace required to train its models safely, and the ability to take its own actions to ensure that happens. The reality is: - People won't want to use agents that are misaligned with them and that don't do what they ask, so labs have a strong natural incentive to make their models more aligned. There is a lot of debate about slowing progress on capabilities until alignment catches up. My view is that trust and alignment are quickly becoming the most important capabilities that will differentiate agents and models. Any lab that doesn't focus on alignment will fall behind. - Labs face significant liability if their models cause harm, so they have a strong incentive to prevent this as well. Meta delayed shipping Muse for several months to focus on safety and security. We didn't call for everyone else to do this before we would. We just did it as part of our day-to-day work because it was clearly the right thing for people and for us. I'm proud of the security foundations we've built. - Engaging independent evaluators and advisors is industry best practice. MSL already does this today in several areas because it helps produce better work. Other labs can just do this too. In general, it would be helpful for there to be a larger and more diverse ecosystem of evaluators. - Committing the significant majority of compute towards serving people rather than racing towards recursive self-improvement is one of the best ways to ensure we develop this technology safely. Meta has made this commitment and other labs can do this as well. I believe the key to building a positive future for everyone is maintaining the right balance of power. This is within our power to do.
1
3
805
That's mind boggling. This is why b2c gets a bad rep. You can have a billion users, it won't matter to the bottom line. Propensity to pay is a thing.
OpenRouter users spent more on OpenAI models than on Anthropic models last week. This hasn't happened for more than 2.5 years
1
2
717
Replying to @hilbertspaess
What’s next for you? Do you support open weights?
1
4
614
Replying to @hilbertspaess
Are you planning to join METR or starting your own company? Thanks for supercharging the discussion on alignment and safety!
2
2
22
12,912
If you are trying to innovate, the worst thing you can be is an absolutist. If new data doesn't change your mind, you're unfit to innovate.
6
327
To build profitable companies, stop optimizing for venture capital.
3
140
We've historically seen battle lines drawn in tech based on potential monopolies/duopolies/triopolies. Cisco & gang vs the rest of the companies for the Internet. Qualcomm vs the rest of the planet in cellular. Here we are with AI. The stakes are higher and fear is the best weapon they got.
Replying to @PessimistsArc
Right. Dario was already claiming that GPT2 was too dangerous to open source back in 2019. I made fun of them then. Everyone should make fun of them now.
2
255
Let's get this straight. The infra spend is out of control. No private investor can take on more liability. So must go public. That needs a moat. Which is being eroded by open weight models. Cool. I think we get it now.
1
146
One of the decisions that'll work out to be in the right side of history. Although we all know these decisions can change on a dime, so there's no assurance of stability.
118
The most effective tweet I've seen this weekend
open source won’t pace
2
124
According to some of the recent noise, we've seen p(doom) to be quoted as high as 70%!! Fear mongering our way into regulations... Keeping the common enemy aka open source out at any cost.
I must be among an extremely small group of people (n=1?) that have both 1) trained a frontier LLM and 2) designed and synthesized custom viruses in a lab with my own two hands. And I think that the takes on AI killing us all by creating dangerous viruses is total bogus.
1
124
"the right set of government"? What is that? Absolutely no one wants a government or even a regulatory org run by the tech mafia. We're really drifting away from reality here 🤦🏻‍♀️
Replying to @Austen
He thinks he will be put in charge of the most powerful transnational organization in history and strongarm the USA. Saying he would hand everything over to "the right set of government" is obviously predicated on the assumption that it is run by him and his stooges, not Trump.
1
221
Just open source the frontier models and lead the charge to AI safety if you're worried about humanity. The theater is too dramatic.
6
557
Everyone agrees in the Twitter theater. But everyone wants their own profits and valuations. This is Internet security all over again 😂 The profits are ours, the risks are yours. We need market domination, but we need the world to worry about the consequences.
Dario Amodei, Elon Musk and Sam Altman now agree that we must slow down the development of AI and “pace the frontier.” That’s a start, but it’s not enough. When you are racing towards a cliff, you don’t just ease up on the gas pedal. You hit the brakes. When the future of humanity is at stake we need a PAUSE on advanced AI development and a ban on artificial superintelligence — an AI mind smarter than any human and capable of operating independently beyond our control. At their upcoming AI summit, Trump and Xi must negotiate a treaty to pause AI and ban superintelligence before it is too late.
444