I personally dislike like the ongoing debate regarding live vocal processing. I see comments of people are quick to jump the gun disregarding the hardwork and talent put into her craft and its sad. Classic Twitter. Personally live autotune only slightly alters/snaps your pitch. Overdoing it will make you sound well... Artificial... Either that or it could potentially be a pre-recorded/produced track. (Which I don't think it is) Either way live auto tune only slighty/moderately alters your pitch. It does not alter emotion nor technique. Whatever you hear is less about pitch, but more about raw skill and technique. I've personally dabbled with a similar setup, I use it from time to time but I can't be bothered to use auto tune cause it hates my screamos. But from my pov its the kind of processing that requires actual skill to control. You actually need to be someone with insane control with a range of techniques to pull this off. (My pov after hearing all the songs she sang induring her debut.) Just as a mixer and live singer I can hear where her skill range is despite all the heavy processing and autotune. In the end 70% - 80% of what you her is real. The rest are just good processing/EQ, saturation and a solid compression to balance the volume at all time. Its mainly used blends her voice to match the intrumental. It doesn't really take anything away and only enchances it. Personally I always strive for these live production cause its a mix of both worlds. The raw skill output adding a slight tweak for the vocalist to stand out among the rest. Not quiet produced for a song cover's standard but also so much better than an average live performence. I think my main annoyance comes from people going "oh autotune bad, so dissappinting" and not being experienced to see that even without using autotune, she is a better vocalist and performer than 80% of the list.