don’t give up brothers. the risk/reward is looking better than it has in years. 90%+ of supply is already in circulation. AF downsizing, which means less burn and less treasury selling. And the community is small but dedicated. I do worry about the new strategy - make AF sustainable by selling services like a dev shop, and somehow that translates into a sustainable chain. I think that’s backwards. There’s a big difference between a central entity selling services to prop up the chain and the chain having a healthy economy that gives the central entity the ability to make money. Services revenue scales with headcount and accrues to AF (which is now a private for profit entity with shareholders, and it's not clear who they are). An on-chain economy scales without it and accrues to the whole ecosystem. And idk what business will be interested in a hollowed out chain. If the strategy becomes make the org sustainable and fck the chain then I'm similarly worried like you guys. I also don’t love seeing the C suite head for the exits. But there’s still time for William and team to change course. There are still a lot of good people at AF who I love and trust. Generating revenue is HARD. You don’t just flip a switch and tada, revenue. It may become clear pretty soon that growing the on-chain economy is easier than selling services b2b, or that the two go hand in hand. Algorand has survived plenty of turnover, it’s still here, and it will be for a long time, regardless of what decisions they make.