Niv Goren (@hackertrader) header
Niv Goren (@hackertrader) profile picture

https://xitter.cf/t.co/JLdnz9N75L ⋅ https://xitter.cf/t.co/Zgs3PTOipj ⋅ https://xitter.cf/t.co/LMhOeOilJI ⋅ https://xitter.cf/t.co/pKCdI4Fcff

Joined April 2015
Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)Photo by Niv Goren (@hackertrader)
unusualbreakouts.com now have charts and theme detection became much stronger
18
9
4
343
43,028
$RSP / $SPY back to levels where buying breakouts works
12
1,284
1/ I backtested 1,657 breakouts from 2008 to 2026. Only 24% made money. The best 50 made 94% of all the profit. So I went through all 50, one by one 🧵
9
10
142
13,215
6/ My market filters skipped 22 of the 50. They still make the system better overall: fewer losers, smaller drawdowns. But it's not free, and I show every one they missed.
1
3
1,977
Many breakouts traders talk about breadth - when the index is up but most stocks aren't breakouts fail. So I backtested it with actual numbers. This is what I found: • RSP/SPY down in 20 days → breakouts lost money • when 80% or more of S&P500 stocks above 50sma -breakouts don't work. • when 80% or more of S&P500 stocks above 50 sma - breakouts don't work. unusualbreakouts.com/learn/f…
3
26
3,897
by overfitting and loosing their account
A lot of people don’t realize they’re 5 hours of vibe coding with Opus 5.5 away from changing their entire financial lives
2
37
2,482
Stanley Druckenmiller is famous for saying that earnings move individual stocks, but liquidity moves the market. I listened to many of his public speeches and came out with a macro score that represents his views. His macro score took my b/o strategy backtest from 22% to 33% CAGR. But only on top of individual stock fundementals. What macro parameters have an edge? 1. Financial conditions - 3-month change in the dollar, the 10-year yield, oil, credit spreads (HYG vs IEF) and the S&P. Each one moving the wrong way costs points. 2. Excess liquidity - M2 money supply growth minus industrial production growth. Money growing faster than the economy spills into assets. 3. The Fed - A rate cut in the last 6 months scores 3. A recent hike scores 0. QE adds, QT subtracts. 4. Companies and sector cycle - Fixed at neutral. Reading earnings calls point-in-time wasn't possible, so they never move the score. Full research with backtest results: unusualbreakouts.com/learn/f…
3
4
1
76
5,653
Never short before the teleport candle, only after $BIYA
6
1
34
3,649
I scored 1,837 breakouts with Peter Lynch's valuation checks, using only SEC filings that existed before each trade. Max drawdown went from −38% to −19%. Return kept: 20% CAGR vs 23%. The cheapest stocks were the worst breakouts. Here's the full research: unusualbreakouts.com/learn/f…
6
4
75
5,688
6. EV/EBITDA - > 40 is priced to perfection. Any disappointment ends the move.
1
2
415
7. P/E - 25–40 is growth at a reasonable price. Under 15 is Lynch's cyclical trap: a low P/E on peak earnings.
3
388