
follow me at bluesky & https://xitter.cf/t.co/0T8Sjcicj8 prosocial scalable partnership tech #opensource #p2p #transformativejustice #panentheism
North Georgia, USA
Joined March 2010
- Tweets3.8K
- Following998
- Followers763
- Likes7.6K
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
“I just checked—it turns out that Art. II, Sec. 1 of the Constitution of the United States does *not* say ‘The executive Power shall be vested in a bunch of sociopaths who think they can do whatever the f*ck they want and make sh*t up as they go along.’” — George Conway
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
A joint statement from me, @SenatorSlotkin, @SenMarkKelly, @RepJasonCrow, @RepGoodlander, and @RepHoulahan.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
This is the most straightforward attack on free speech from state actors I've ever seen in my life and it's not even close.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
An inexcusable act of political violence by one disturbed individual must never be exploited as justification for broader censorship and control.
This Administration is increasingly using the weight of government power to suppress lawful expression. 🧵
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
By firing skilled human workers and replacing them with spicy autocomplete, Musk is assuming his final form.
21/
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
Yes a shutdown would have consequences.
And a Republican President, Republican House, and Republican Senate would be responsible.
They have acted in a unilateral and unprecedented way.
Democrats cannot cave. They must fight back.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
I know quite a few people who voted for Trump and I wouldn’t call them “MAGAtards.” There’s a difference between people who were fed up with the Democrats, & voted for a change, & the full on cultists.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
“Illegal protests?” He’s not a king. He doesn’t have the authority to stop protests. Or expel students. Or tell protestors not to wear masks. He’s not a king.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
This would seem to run afoul of the First Amendment in several important ways.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
This week started with administration officials refusing to acknowledge that Russia started the war in Ukraine. It ends with a tense, shocking conversation in the Oval Office and whispers from the White House that they may try to end all U.S. support for Ukraine. I know foreign policy is not for the faint of heart, but right now, I am sick to my stomach as the administration appears to be walking away from our allies and embracing Putin, a threat to democracy and U.S. values around the world.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
You can't understand the damage done to Europe/US relations without watching the German Foreign Minister's speech today, essentially saying that the US has fallen to Russia.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
Marco Rubio in March 2016:
“For years to come, there are many people on the right, in the media and voters at large, that are going to be having to explain and justify how they fell into this trap of supporting Donald Trump.”
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
There is an aggressor: Russia.
There is a victim: Ukraine.
We were right to help Ukraine and sanction Russia three years ago—and to keep doing so.
By “we,” I mean the Americans, the Europeans, the Canadians, the Japanese, and many others.
Thank you to all who have helped and continue to do so. And respect to those who have been fighting since the beginning—because they are fighting for their dignity, their independence, their children, and the security of Europe.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
Dozens of world leaders from democracies all over the world issuing statements supporting Zelensky after that meeting.
Meanwhile, the Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement praising Trump.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
It doesn't matter who Donald Trump "nominates."
The next Secretary of Labor, Secretary of Education, Secretary of Treasury, and Secretary of Housing ... is Elon Musk.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
Q: Who’s DOGE administrator?
LEAVITT (feigning exasperation): Elon Musk is overseeing DOGE.
Q: He’s the administrator?
LEAVITT (feigning exasperation): No, he’s a special govt employee.
Q: Who’s the admin?
LEAVITT: I’m not going to reveal that...We’ve been incredibly transparent.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
The Post-Woke Synthesis
Which Way, Western He/They?
Have you heard? There’s a vibe shift.
We’re at a fork in the road, two roads marked “anti-woke” and “post-woke”. I’m hoping we can avoid the reactionary trap and find the integrated post-woke synthesis.
Last week I was interviewed for the Doomer Optimism podcast [1], where we started exploring what it might look like to embrace old-school leftist values while rejecting the misguided cultural norms that have taken over leftist organising in the past 5-10 years.
A couple days later, I was interviewed on the Metagame podcast [2] where I was able to summarise my position in just a couple of minutes. Here’s the essence of it:
“I come from a pretty far left political background – the Occupy Movement was where I first got politically activated. I’m just as motivated as I ever was around questions of freedom, oppression, liberation, and people’s ability to choose their own path in life. So I deeply care about the original founding values of the left. But some years ago I quit the movement.
The actual lived experience of being in leftist groups is awful, it’s awful. It’s not a humane place for a lot of people – maybe especially an unpleasant place for me as a white man.I’ve been quietly eager for us to get to the next step, where we maintain these values of equality and justice and care, but we extend the tolerance and generosity to all kinds of people. Religious people. Rural people. Old people. All people. Not just elite, cool, coastal, urban, queer people. When is the moment where we genuinely go for equality, instead of for these inverted hierarchies?
I’m cautiously optimistic that there’s a moment here, there’s a brief opening, where we get to shape the public conversation again. I started using this term “post-woke” as an attempt to crystallise a new conversation: if you have progressive values, and a deep distrust of progressive norms that took over in the last 5 or 10 years, can we collectively articulate a new posture to the world? Can we say, “hey we learned the lesson, sorry for being so disrespectful and antisocial, we were really trying to do something important, and we got some weird bugs in our cultural code.” Can we get to the next step?
Any moment there’s been some injustice, the desire for justice will co-arise with the desire for vengeance. That’s just natural. That’s part of what it means to be a human, you want to over-react. A sensible, mature group or society would be able to distinguish justice from revenge and say, we’re in the business of dealing out justice, and we are going to do everything we can to contain this revenge fantasy, instead of enacting it and valorising people for their vengeance.
So all of this is to say, I think the progressives have thoroughly lost the moral high ground, I want them to regain it, and a lot of that comes down to how we treat each other, how we have disagreements, how we encounter someone with different ways of seeing the world and meet them with respect and curiosity.”
-----
If you know what to look for, this vibe shift is everywhere.
Here’s some recent writing from Starhawk [3], old school anarcha-feminist pagan Battle-of-Seattle leftist:
“The mood among progressives is more like that reflected in this Facebook post by Jackrabbit, an old friend who has been a political ally since we met at the Diablo Canyon blockade in 1981:
“I'm happy to have finally shed the burden of my membership in what has passed as the American Left. It is a bit disorienting, as it has been elemental to my identity, but it is also a relief to be free of the woke scolds and the social pressure to conform - unquestioningly - to a self-destructive agenda of diminishment and delusion.”
Molly Crabapple describes the political culture of the Left as “a censorious prissy culture, obsessed with academic terminology, easily parodied and repulsive to many, perhaps most.”
I've identified as a leftist since those days on the Liberal Lawn back in 1966. Jackrabbit expresses what I hear from many of my old friends and allies: that we often no longer feel a part of movements we’ve connected to and belonged to all of our adult lives. This is a very bad sign, if we want to build a movement broad enough and deep enough to actually achieve our goals. When people who have deeply invested in a movement no longer feel embraced by it, how can we expect to draw in new people and expand our reach?”
In my opinion, Starhawk is still pulling some punches, but if you can read between the lines, that’s a pretty damning critique of the current state of progressive politics.
-----
This is becoming my new favourite genre: old school leftist makes no-holds-barred attack on the degeneracy of the contemporary left. Check this one from Catherine Liu interviewed by Chris Hedges [4]:
“The liberals have become more authoritarian. They’ve become more repressive of dissent. They think the attitude of skepticism about their positions is fascist, is racist.
Let’s just say the whole problem of a technocratic managerial approach to inequality that they imposed on us through Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in the universities was something that we could debate. No! If you debate it, you are racist!
They blame a kind of leftism, people who are concerned with bread and butter issues, for the defeat of these candidates that have been promoted by a party completely captured by one segment of capital who are trying to show the American worker that they are idiots. They are racist, they’re anti-immigrant, they’re transphobic, they’re homophobic, they’re sexist!
These people who are supposed to be protecting our abilities to reason, research, develop knowledge that will enhance our understanding of politics, history, culture, and the American nation, they have completely abdicated their responsibility and yet they want to lead us.”
I highly recommend the rest of the interview, it’s so refreshing. It’s a great reminder that there’s still a strong contingent of leftist academics and organisers who are primarily concerned with the material needs of working people. They’ve been hounded into silence into recent years, but now there’s a vibe shift, you can expect to see a lot more of them.
-----
So what now?
It’s been so long since I had a political home base. Honestly I’m pretty confused about my politics!
I can’t stand the petty authoritarianism and frothing tribalism that has taken over the discourse in recent years. So my social network has changed. I’m spending most of my time with people who think of themselves as “apolitical”, because these are the people who won’t ostracise you for your beliefs.
I’ve enjoyed taking a break from the political fervour that I had 15 years ago, but it’s also unsatisfying. I have talents, resources, and opportunities to shape the world around me. I think it is still worth organising for peace, for nature, for workers, for a thriving future that works for all. I don’t want to retire from the struggle.
I don’t know what the next step is for me. But I suspect the answer will not be found online, it will be in my local neighbourhood, in the the real material needs of the real people around me.
I’ll let you know what I discover.
Greg Cassel @gregsc1.bsky.social retweeted
A part of my job entails listening to many points of view. I love it. I love swallowing an entire collection of conflicting points. I watch videos, read media, and listen to voices from all sides. It's deeply interesting. With that said, something I want to remind folks of in times like these, is that may be incredibly important for your sensemaking to take the time to engage with media that is the closest-to-primary-sources-you-can-get first from diverse views, and then do some due diligence on whether the information presented is veritable *if* you decide to have a strong opinion about it. the mission of the @SocietyLibrary is to help people in this matter, and I simply wish we could *move much faster.*
In the meantime, if you are interpreting the current political environment through the lens of second-hand sources (when primary writings, videos, etc. are available), you are corrupting the data going into your mind from the beginning. Of course, this is not to say that a primary source equals the truth of the matter, but if you care about truth, before you develop a hard opinion or reinforce your priors, try just looking at what the 'other side' is saying/writing directly. Try thinking of the multiple ways it can be interpreted. If thinking of the 2-16 ways something may be interpreted is hard for you, the @SocietyLibrary has a diversity of thought tinker toy tool, which we hope will be of service: general.perspectives.society…
Yes, there are information wars happening. Ideological groups are trying to take up the territory in your mind and they can resort to all sorts of tricks to do so (nefariously, in earnest, and as a matter of Realpolitik) but you can declare you are a sovereign state. It only takes you time and the willingness to be so.🫶

























