
On-chain. AI-native. Inevitable. Founder @qntxorg
mars
Joined June 2022
- Tweets772
- Following892
- Followers96
- Likes2.2K
x.qntx.eth retweeted
Ultimately, precompiles and EVM are both the wrong place to put most cryptography support into Ethereum. The reason is that precompiles and EVM both operate on data that has to be included into the ethereum chain somehow, which realistically means included in a block as calldata. That space is limited - even with PeerDAS and blocks-in-blobs, there's a practical cap of ~8 MB/s before it starts getting uncomfortable.
Remember: it's not a blockchain. It's a cryptographic world computer. Any data/computation that does not need to be in the "main thread" of data/execution should not be put into the main thread.
Instead, the correct solution is... EIP-8288 maximalism.
If you have any heavy computation that's self-contained, compute it and STARK it client-side (this is quickly getting faster and faster, even on phones), and push the STARK through the EIP-8288 recursive aggregation mechanism. The chain sees the fact that the computation was done and what the result is; it never needs to see the actual data and computation.
This way everyone can use whatever cryptography they want, the Ethereum chain can be lean, and we never need to add more precompiles again.
Replying to @lex_node
> we could still ultimately do Lattice stuff for accounts, wallets, etc. through a precompile if it is proved to be AI-secure
The ideal route to support everyone's cryptography is imo through 8288. You make whatever signature you want locally, then STARK it, and then it gets included through the stark aggregator machine. Don't need any calldata onchain. Ethereum can then never add a new precompile again.
I've had agents implement and optimize the Campfire web app in Elixir, Go, and Rust. Yes, Ruby is the slowest. I didn't care about that when the pay-off was huge in terms of productivity and developer joy. But if you're no longer reading the code? github.com/basecamp/once-cam…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The shown benchmarks use non-equivalent implementations: Elixir routes all DB queries through a single GenServer with Redis for jobs (retained from Rails), while Rust uses in-process queues, omits CSRF tags/fields, and applies other caching changes.
github.com/basecamp/once-…
raw.githubusercontent.com/basecamp/once-…
github.com/basecamp/once-…
github.com/basecamp/once-…
x.com/zachsdaniel1/s…
x.qntx.eth retweeted
Today the EF and OA announce zkAPI—a new means for private AI
Picture this: deposit ether into a vault, sign a zk proof, get a fixed amount of private inference. Advances like these help us move past middlemen's requirements that we link our data and identities.
Read more below
Quick updates on the Open Anonymity project (@OpenAnonProject)!
1. OA-chat is live! You can now signup: chat.openanonymity.ai
2. We collaborated with @ethereumfndn (@VitalikButerin, @DavideCrapis, @VittoStack, @curryrasul) to develop zkAPI, a new zero-knowledge protocol for accessing gated / paid APIs with unlinkability. It’s like a generalization of OA unlinkable inference that also abstracts payments away. Now also available on OA-chat!
I'm excited because more infrastructure should exist where privacy and sovereignty is foundational and people are in control.
x.qntx.eth retweeted
qwen3.8-flash-next
ethereum client
100+ GB of local downloaded wikipedia + gutenberg + science articles
what else?
(Getting rid of the need for centralized pinning services in IPFS is definitely high up the prio list)
x.qntx.eth retweeted
不要着急尝鲜。现在几乎每天都有新的AI模型、新的Agent、新的产品出来。很多人一看到新的东西,就马上去注册、测试、研究,生怕自己落后。但人的精力非常有限。你以为自己是在更早拥抱未来,很多时候,其实只是更早去趟坑。记住一个规律:真正有价值的东西,通常会留下来;能留下来的东西,才值得你长期投入研究。如果一个东西真的重要,你晚一个月研究,通常也不会错过它。所以不要被“新”牵着走。先看它能不能长期解决真实问题,再决定值不值得投入时间。先有问题,再找工具。而不是先有新工具,再给自己找问题。
x.qntx.eth retweeted
加密远不止是金融。目前最重要的是金融上链:美元/美股/美债上链,之后是其他各种资产上链,上链后交易流转。
之后还会有ai agent上链/身份上链/社会管理上链…….,正如当初互联网具有重塑力量,加密也一样。
互联网重塑的是分发成本,加密重塑的是结算与所有权成本。信息可以复制,所有权不能。
所以金融会先被重塑(美元、国债、股票、信用、回购),agent 经济会叠在已经上链的美元和身份之上,社会治理也会局部上链(比如凭证/许可/资金和审计/选举)等。
附录:截止目前为止,已有3461亿美元的资产上链,且有47 种不同的资产类型中被代币化。
x.qntx.eth retweeted
最近看了电影《时间规划局》:人到25岁后不再衰老,却必须不断赚取“时间”才能继续活着,富人拥有几百年,穷人每天为明天的生命奔波。很多人看到这里会愤怒于世界的不公平,却很少继续追问:这个秩序为什么会这样设计?如果所有人都拥有无限时间,而人口、资源和生产力仍然有限,系统同样无法持续,所以任何秩序本质上都是在特定生产力、资源和人口条件下,对稀缺进行管理和分配。
但真正的问题在于,秩序一旦长期运行,就会形成既得利益、组织结构和路径依赖:最初为了维持系统的规则,后来可能变成维持利益的规则;曾经真实的稀缺,也可能逐渐变成人为制造的稀缺。于是旧秩序很难在自己的框架里完成彻底改革,因为改革到最后,往往意味着否定自身。
所以世界的变化常常不是旧秩序无限优化,而是以周期和轮回的方式迭代:旧秩序解决上一轮问题,又在新的生产力和环境中制造下一轮问题,矛盾积累到临界点后,新秩序重新定义资源与分配。看见不公平只是看见结果,看见秩序才是在理解世界;而真正重要的,是判断一个秩序究竟还在解决问题,还是它本身已经成为了问题。
x.qntx.eth retweeted
加密市场已经不是原来的市场了。以前的市场,本质上是一群希望暴富的人凑在一起寻找共识。哪怕这个共识很荒谬,只要相信的人足够多,它就能形成价格,所谓“傻子共识也是共识”。但这个阶段正在过去。傻子会进步,镰刀也会被迫进步。过去靠信息差、叙事、情绪和互割就能赚钱,未来越来越难。如果你做镰刀的人自己都不学习、不成长,只希望市场里永远有更多傻子,那最后被淘汰的反而是你。以前的加密市场寻找的是:谁能制造共识,谁能完成互割。未来真正值钱的会变成:谁能创造真实价值,谁能落地,谁能制造流动性,谁能持续兑现,谁能建立信用。加密市场不是没有投机了,而是仅靠投机,就越来越难活下去了。
x.qntx.eth retweeted
以物观物。
想象一下,在一个公园里,
你不再坐在长椅上。
你就是长椅边的那棵树。
根已经在土里待了几十年,甚至上百年。土壤的温度、湿度、蚯蚓翻动的细微震动,都比人的脚步更早被感知。
人来人往,在树冠看来,不过是地面上匆匆掠过的小点。他们走得很快,声音很碎,像一阵突然刮过的风,来了又散。
野餐的布是一小块颜色,孩子在戏水场里溅起的水花,从高处看只是亮了一下,很快又暗下去。
草地上躺着的人,像几片暂时停住的落叶,过一会儿就会自己起来,走掉。
湖在更远处。水面是一块会呼吸的镜子,风过时会起细纹。鱼在水下,树看不见它们的鳞,只看见水面偶尔被顶起的小圆,或者鸭子划过时留下的一条白线。那些线很快就被风抹平。树不会去追那些线,也不会想鱼在想什么。鱼在水里过鱼的日子,树在风里过树的日子。
微风吹过,才是真正近的事。
风先碰到最高的几片叶子,它们轻轻一颤,像有人在耳边说了一句很轻的话。
然后风往下走,一层一层穿过枝叶,发出那种只有树才听得懂的沙沙声。有的叶子被托起来,有的被按下去,有的只是微微侧身。风走了,叶子慢慢回到原来的位置,但不是完全一样的位置——每一阵风过后,整棵树都微微调整过一次自己。
树不会评价这些人好不好看,这些孩子吵不吵,这些鹅笨不笨。
它甚至不怎么“看”。
它只是站在那里,让风从身体里穿过,让阳光在叶子上停留一会儿,让季节从根到冠慢慢走一遍。
人用眼睛看世界,世界就变成“我看到的世界”。
树用整棵自己去承接世界,世界就只是世界。
这是完全不同的视角:
不是站得更高所以看得更远;
是不再需要“看”这件事本身。






















