Elektabilitas Prabowo Setelah Dua Tahun Presiden I Survei SMRC Oktober 2026 : dedi mulyadi 35.5%, anies baswedan 10.3%, prabowo 9.8%%, gibran 8.4%. …. youtu.be/8cvw5vvoZ88?si=8b22… via @YouTube

All the governance issues mentioned in the MSCI statement are correct and severe, and Indonesian authorities have been very slow in resolving those issues. Criticism is severely needed. But a few questions I think worth asking: How severe is the market dysfunction in Indonesia relative to other markets in MSCI’s Emerging Markets index, such that it would justify the drop to Standalone Market status? Is there a quantitative way of measuring this? My understanding is that market dysfunction—opaque ownership, coordinated trading—is not unique to Indonesia. IIRC Turkey faces a lot of the same issues, and in many respects its economic governance is not that better than Indonesia’s—but the MSCI reaction has been different. The more fundamental question: if the statement of a multinational financial institution can exogenously send the stock market of an emerging economy plunging down by 11%, do we not deserve better transparency of how that decision was made in the first place? Is this not too much power concentrated in a single entity? If this happened in the US, one could expect congressional hearings already by the next week.