@gecko39i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
aim to do good
Joined November 2009
- Tweets444K
- Following4.7K
- Followers2.3K
- Likes314K
Pinned Tweet
#PeopleWays Are People First
#SDGs
#CarFreeNYC
#CarFreeMegaCities
#ActOnClimate
#VisionZero
#COP21Paris
#COP22Marrakech
#LeaveItInTheGround nitter.cf/gecko39/status/9398124…
UN News - Put ‘people, not cars’ first in transport systems, says UN environment chief
un.org/apps/news/story.asp?N…
Replying to @dgelles
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
Abstract
Earth’s climate system is moving deeper into uncharted territory.
We present the 2026 update of planetary vital signs that track the state of Earth’s climate system, alongside indicators of the human activities driving ongoing change.
Of 16 climate-related indicators, seven are currently at record extremes.
Several indicators also show evidence of accelerating trends or abrupt shifts, raising concerns about increasing climate instability, interacting feedbacks, and the growing risk of crossing critical tipping points.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion, remain the dominant drivers of these changes.
Despite the worsening trends, encouraging signs of societal changes are emerging, including the rapid expansion of renewable electricity and battery storage, although progress remains far below the scale and speed needed to stabilize Earth’s climate system.
Rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, effective adaptation, ecosystem protection, and transformative societal change remain essential to reducing climate risks and securing a more resilient and sustainable future.
We are witnessing the rapid destabilization of the Earth’s climate system.
This is no longer a warning for the future; it is a diagnosis of the present.
Earth’s life-support systems are being pushed beyond stable limits, with changes unfolding faster than our ability to respond.
Human activities are driving profound shifts in the atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are higher now than any time in the last 2 million years (IPCC 2021).
Across the globe, extreme heat, floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are no longer rare events but defining features of a changing planet.
For example, July 2026 was the hottest month on record for the contiguous United States (1895–present) (NOAA 2026), while global ocean temperatures also reached a record high for July (figure S1).
Climate-related changes appear to be accelerating and intensifying, raising concerns about reinforcing feedbacks and crossing of tipping points, with potential irreversible impacts.
Climate change is increasingly interacting with global biodiversity loss, freshwater stress, food insecurity, pathogens, and geopolitical instability, amplifying risks across interconnected human and natural systems.
Yet, the gap between scientific understanding and societal response continues to widen despite mounting evidence of escalating risks.
The evidence for accelerating climate and ecological disruption is now so compelling that attention must shift toward rapid decarbonization as well as adaptation, resilience, scalable responses, and transformative systemic change.
Crucially, the communities least responsible for historical emissions, particularly in the Global South and small island states, are bearing disproportionately severe and early consequences, raising fundamental questions of climate justice that must inform both policy and science.
Amid these intensifying risks, important signs of societal and technological transformation are also emerging.
Solar and wind power are expanding rapidly worldwide, with low-carbon sources providing roughly 43% of global electricity generation in 2025 (Ember 2026a).
This signals the emergence of a new clean-energy era, the Age of Electricity.
At the same time, advances in energy storage, adaptation planning, ecosystem restoration, and climate response tools are providing new opportunities to reduce risks from climate change and strengthen resilience across human and natural systems.
Although current progress remains far below what is needed to stabilize the climate system, these developments suggest that large-scale societal transformation remains possible and still within reach.
In this report, we update the vital signs of the planet and the human activities driving their rapid change. We provide a clear synthesis of the latest evidence for scientists, policymakers, and the public while identifying the risks ahead and the opportunities for meaningful action still available.
Documenting change is no longer enough. We must also communicate what it means and what actions are needed.
As scientists, we have a responsibility to communicate these realities with clarity and urgency.
This report is part of our ongoing effort to deliver timely, accessible updates on rapidly intensifying climate change.
Planetary vital signs
Of 16 planetary vital signs spanning greenhouse gas concentrations, temperatures, the oceans, ice, energy balance, and wildfire, 7 (44%) are currently at record extremes, and several show evidence of acceleration or abrupt shifts (figure 1; and see table S1 for data sources and methods).
Figure 1 Time series of climate-related responses.
For surface temperature anomaly (d), estimates based on a segmented linear regression model are shown in gray (prior to 2010) and black (beginning in 2010).
For area burned (o), the black horizontal lines show changepoint model estimates, which indicate abrupt shifts (figure S3).
For other variables with relatively high variability, local regression trendlines are shown in black.
The variables were measured at various frequencies (e.g., annual, monthly, weekly). The labels on the x-axis correspond to midpoints of years. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S1.
Mitigation
Many climate solutions are already technically feasible and increasingly cost-competitive, although their implementation remains far below the scale and speed required (IPCC 2022b).
Growing concern also surrounds the destabilization of climate tipping elements.
Global greenhouse gases and temperature
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
Because climate change is driven by interconnected energy, economic, ecological, and social systems, meaningful progress will likely depend on integrated responses operating across multiple sectors and scales. In many emerging economies, climate mitigation must also be pursued alongside pressing development objectives, including expanding access to affordable and reliable energy.
A growing number of interactive climate tools are now helping policymakers, researchers, educators, and the public better understand the complexity of climate solutions.
For example, the En-ROADS Climate Solutions Simulator allows users to explore how combinations of policies, technologies, and societal changes could influence future warming, energy systems, economic outcomes, and climate risks.
climateinteractive.org/en-ro…
Complementing this approach, the Drawdown Explorer provides science-based assessments of a wide range of climate solutions, including their effectiveness, scalability, co-benefits, and potential risks.
drawdown.org/explorer
Such tools can help reveal important tradeoffs, delays, and synergies among climate responses while illustrating how decisions made during the coming decades may shape long-term climate outcomes.
Emerging climate interventions
Recent developments in renewable energy, electrification, battery storage, and ecosystem restoration suggest that some positive social and technological tipping points may already be emerging. More work is needed to reduce environmental impacts of renewable energy infrastructure (Sonter et al. 2020).
Rapid declines in the costs of solar power, wind energy, batteries, and electric vehicles are helping accelerate the transition toward low-carbon systems in many regions (Lenton et al. 2022).
Global investment in clean energy technologies has also increased substantially in recent years, with growing deployment of renewable electricity, grid-scale energy storage, and electrified transportation.
At the same time, expanding interest in natural climate solutions, including forest, wetland, and mangrove restoration, is creating new opportunities to reduce emissions while strengthening biodiversity protection, coastal resilience, and ecosystem health.
Together, these developments suggest that coordinated technological, ecological, and societal changes could help accelerate progress toward a more sustainable and resilient future.
Transformative change
Transformative change is essential to stabilize the climate system and reduce the risk of crossing dangerous Earth system thresholds.
Incremental adjustments alone are unlikely to achieve the rapid emissions reductions and societal shifts needed at the scale required, highlighting the need for deep transformations in energy systems, consumption patterns, food systems, economic priorities, and governance structures, in ways that create synergies with biodiversity protection (Pascual et al. 2022).
Such changes could also create opportunities to improve human well-being, reduce inequality, and align development with the planet’s biophysical limits (Ripple et al. 2024).
Transformative change may also involve the emergence of “positive social tipping points” in which relatively small shifts in technology, policy, finance, or public behavior trigger much larger systemic changes.
Recent developments in renewable energy, electrification, and climate policy suggest that such transitions may already be emerging in some sectors (Lenton et al. 2022).
Responding effectively will likely require stronger international cooperation, long-term planning, and institutions capable of managing increasingly interconnected climate risks.
As climate impacts exceed adaptation limits in some regions, the United Nations’ Loss and Damage Fund marks a key step in supporting irreversible losses, though its adequacy will depend on whether it can scale to meet growing needs.
Feelings of anxiety, grief, or helplessness in response to climate change are increasingly common, particularly among younger generations.
However, research suggests that community engagement, collective action, education, and participation in local climate solutions can help foster a greater sense of agency, resilience, and hope (Epel et al. 2025).
Even relatively small actions, when multiplied across communities and institutions, can contribute to broader societal change and help strengthen public support for climate mitigation and adaptation efforts.
Final words
Despite escalating climate risks, signs of societal transformation are beginning to emerge.
Rapid advances in renewable energy, battery storage, adaptation planning, ecosystem restoration, and climate response tools suggest that large-scale change remains possible.
The 2026 Santa Marta conference in Colombia marked an important milestone as the first global summit dedicated exclusively to the practical phase-out of fossil fuels (transitionawayconference.com…).
The meeting established a new international precedent for transitioning away from coal, oil, and gas, involving more than 50 participating nations and 24 formal signatory countries.
Although current progress remains far below what is needed to stabilize the climate system, the future trajectory of both the climate system and human societies has not yet been fully determined.
The decisions made during the coming years will strongly influence whether future generations inherit a planet with an unstable climate system or a more resilient and sustainable world.
Resources and project website
We encourage readers to use the State of the Climate report series in their work, teaching, and communication efforts; to submit your comments about how you have used these reports, please use this form.
The World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency paper (Ripple et al. 2020) now has approximately 15,892 signatories from 167 countries, and the project continues to collect signatures from scientists.
To sign or learn more, visit the Alliance of World Scientists website at scientistswarning.forestry.o….
To learn about science-based advocacy and view A Scientist’s Warning, a documentary film on scientists speaking out, visit youtube.com/watch?v=byXGCPo-….
Growing concern also surrounds the destabilization of climate tipping elements.
Global greenhouse gases and temperature
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 49:42 to 58:54
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
49:42
Bryony Worthington: vital signs, the checking the patient's pulse of the earth more… with more technology and more equipment. I don't know who wants to… maybe Piers, what do we need to do about the monitoring? I mean, it seems quite fragile, actually, as well. We're often very dependent on the US for much of our data. Are more countries coming forward? Is there more focus on this early warning?
50:04
Piers Forster: Yeah, I think with what's going on in America and the United States, that we're… we're…
50:11
Piers Forster: We're realizing the, kind of, monitoring system is quite fragile and quite quite…
50:19
Piers Forster: dependent on one or two countries, so I think we do need to make a whole monetary system far more
50:33
Piers Forster: Past, and we have to have Okay. Piers Forster: different countries contributing and coming together to contribute different types of data.
50:46
Piers Forster: So, of course, we need to have the good satellite data that Tater within the…
50:55
Piers Forster: The ocean has to be coordinated by being in the dark. Piers Forster: pains, but it's also good to really understand what's occurring in communities and communities. Well, so we have a… I think we have a job to do as a kind of scientific community.
51:17
Piers Forster: To work with our governments to… to really try and get a far more robust and resilient and comprehensive approach to collecting this.
51:26
Piers Forster: data. Piers Forster: and of course, and then really work on delivering that data as well, but because there's only so much you can do collecting it, you have to try and make sure it gets in the hand of the right people in the right way. So that's why I'm quite keen on developing these really
51:50
Piers Forster: Good for BASP, very clear indicators to Piers Forster: To show the way the world is.
51:59
Piers Forster: changing… in an unambiguous direction. The different policymakers from different countries can get behind it indoors.
52:12
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Bryony Worthington: I'm going to combine a couple of questions here for you, Johan, about our response in terms of the energy transition. Elliott Cocker from Aalborg University and Robin Fossil Free London. I'm going to interpret the question slightly. In previous global problems that we've tackled, like let's take the ozone crisis, for example, and the Montreal Protocol, we didn't just rely on boosting alternatives.
52:38
Bryony Worthington: actually banned the substances that were causing the problem. Bryony Worthington: And in climate, because it's so complex, we've not taken that approach. But is there a point at which we have to say, it's not just about boosting the clean, we also need to phase out the dirty. We need to start putting more restrictions on fossil as the cause of that greenhouse gas blanket that's still getting thicker even today. You may not want to wish to comment, but this is quite a live discussion in the UK at the moment.
53:07
Bryony Worthington: with North Sea oil and gas being trumpeted as something we should be doing more of just at the time when we're experiencing incredibly horrendous heat waves. So, is there other approaches which perhaps we've not looked at, which we need to look at now because of the urgency?
53:22
Johan Rockström: Hmm. Yeah, no, it's a good point. I mean, among the nine planetary boundaries, only two are today within the safe operating space, and number one is the stratospheric ozone layer, which exactly as was pointed out here, in 1987, the Montreal Protocol was signed.
53:41
Johan Rockström: Global policymakers, believe it or not, they listened to science, they acted accordingly, and they banned a whole family of chlorofluorocarbons that were proven scientifically to destroy
53:54
Johan Rockström: it was an existential threat to the southern hemisphere of the stratospheric… protective stratospheric ozone layer, and industry innovated and brought us away from danger. I think we need similar red lines
54:08
Johan Rockström: also for climate. Now, greenhouse gases is, is slightly different than the chlorofluorocarbons, but not so much, because we have
54:19
Johan Rockström: Quite successful, countries and policies that have put end dates, or attempted to put end dates on.
54:28
Johan Rockström: phasing out coal, like in the UK, but also phasing out internal combustion engine. You have a country like Ethiopia that has forbidden, now, imports of all internal combustion engines. The European Union has a red line on 2035 not to allow more sales of
54:46
Johan Rockström: diesel and petrol-run vehicles. I think these kind of red lines are necessary, and I would say that today we absolutely have evidence to say that we should put a complete ban on all new investments in fossil fuel infrastructure, because we know that that infrastructure
55:05
Johan Rockström: will operate for… for decades into the future, and we simply don't have remaining carbon budget to support it. So… so yes, we need red lines, but at the same time, we need to come back to Ines' point earlier. There is a… there's an equity dimension here as well. There's a global.
55:24
Johan Rockström: claire : access point that needs to be taken very seriously of how do you get a soft landing for those emerging economies in the Global South, and this is, as we know, a struggle in the negotiations.
55:38
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. I'm gonna come to you, Laurie, just for the final question, which is another amalgam of three questions we've had from Gregory Slater, Klaus Radunski, and Mike McCracken.
55:48
Bryony Worthington: We know we need to reduce greenhouse gases, we know that's the fundamental cause of the problem, that's what's destabilized the system in the first instance, and it's what's continuing to thicken the blanket of gases. But, as has been alluded to by Piers and others, there are these other mechanisms that we could look to to try and cool the planet down in the very… in the short term.
56:08
Bryony Worthington: But it needs governance, right? Because it's as much a socio-political problem as it is a scientific problem. Have we got the mechanics and the wherewithal to come together and produce new governance systems that look at how we can protect ourselves from harm?
56:25
Bryony Worthington: where do you look to for examples, and what could we do to try and address that socio-political problem of we don't have a global government that can make decisions on our behalf about the state of the planet? How do we get from where we are now to where we need to be?
56:41
Laurie Laybourn: I think like we've always had to, which is to work around the state of geopolitics at the time. And in the case of the energy transition, there has been some extraordinary work in working with the increasingly competitive geopolitical age we live in when it comes to, you know, one-upmanship, various agreements on winning the renewables race. And in some ways that has kind of been an accelerant to that.
57:03
Laurie Laybourn: For other things, like the technologies you're talking about there, or threats to food security.
57:09
Laurie Laybourn: We've got to make sure that the, the zero-sum logics that currently prevail globally.
57:16
Laurie Laybourn: are not the ones that prevail in those areas. Because ultimately, what we're looking at, when we see the indicators in this report, is that those logics will take us to a situation where all are beggared, ultimately, by an Earth system that is destabilized. So, we are entering, I think, an era in which
57:32
Laurie Laybourn: the geopolitical logic, some of the security logics that have prevailed for hundreds of years, and definitely recently, are going to… well, are not appropriate in the face of the hard dynamics of the Earth system. So, I think that that's the challenge. I think that we have huge opportunities to broker the kind of geopolitics and cooperation that we need now. I'm in Iceland right now, there's a major concern here about the changes in the
57:57
Laurie Laybourn: Atlantic circulation. Laurie Laybourn: And we had the Arctic Circle Assembly last week, where that was on the agenda, and I know Johan was speaking there. There is a huge potential.
58:05
Laurie Laybourn: for countries like Iceland with a quite significant global reach and a reputation to broker some of these conversations for like-minded countries that will all be affected severely if, in this case, the Atlantic circulation were to continue to significantly weaken. So.
58:21
Laurie Laybourn: The geopolitics has got to be how we build this around it, and we've done that many times in the past, and we have to do it again now.
58:29
Bryony Worthington: Okay, listen, thank you so much, everyone, for joining us. We're out of time. Thank you, all of you who posted questions. Sorry we didn't get time to come to all of them. Thank you so much to the speakers for coming, and thank you to Bill Ripple for the paper that has just been published today that's sparked this conversation, a conversation I'm sure will be continued from here on in. I would just like to look at that little earth we've got behind us and remind ourselves that we're living on a fragile
58:54
Bryony Worthington: bauble rushing through space, this is our common home, we've got to come together and protect it, and I think there is enough agency, human agency, now that we could do this, so we should be hopeful, but we should also work with great urgency to make sure that this is at the top of the agenda where it needs to be. Thank you, everyone, and we'll be publishing a version of this, a recording of this, to those who want to go back and listen to any of it again. Thank you again. Bye-bye.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 25:19 to 49:23
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
25:19
Johan Rockström: the threshold lies actually slightly below 1.5 degrees Celsius, and that's what we're seeing occurring right as we speak. I mean, global bleaching due to human-reinforced El Nino events are now impacting over 85% of
25:37
Johan Rockström: you know, causing stress due to bleaching of coral reef systems on 85% of corals across the tropical regions on planet Earth. But on your question on the systems that I at least keep my sharpest eye on right now, the number one is the AMOC.
25:54
Johan Rockström: which is the overturning of heat in the North Atlantic, one of the three thermohaline pumps that regulates the currents and the heat exchange across the ocean.
26:03
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, We can no longer consider this being a low likelihood event of a severe slowdown, or potentially even a shutdown this century. The uncertainty range is wide. I mean, it ranges likelihood-wise from a 10% risk of severe slowdown to over 50%.
26:22
Johan Rockström: likelihood of slowdown within this century. But you know, a 10 to 50% likelihood for a potentially catastrophic impact.
26:31
Johan Rockström: Is… is an unacceptable risk. Johan Rockström: And the second one to keep a special eye on right now is the Amazon Basin, because this is a major carbon sink. It is the richest ecosystem on land on planet Earth.
26:45
Johan Rockström: biodiversity-wise. It is a major provider of freshwater across the entire South American continent. It's simply too big to fail in terms of natural system contributing to the entire functioning of the biosphere and the climate system.
27:02
Johan Rockström: So I would say the AMOC Johan Rockström: John Fischer, coral reef systems and the tropical rainforest over the Amazon are 3, but of course, we have a whole set of systems, particularly in the Arctic, that are very, very close to tipping points as well. This just shows how urgent it is to take this science very seriously in trying to move away from danger.
27:24
Bryony Worthington: Mmm. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. I'm sure that simulated a lot of questions. Please do use the Q&A if you want to follow up on any of this. But Piers, perhaps turning to you.
27:34
Bryony Worthington: I mean, Johan mentioned that there are some uncertainties still in this analysis, diagnosis of the problem and how much risk we face. Are there particular areas that you think require more research to sort of narrow down our understanding of what the causes are? I'm always struck when we, when talking to climate scientists that we get to a point where we say, and then there's clouds.
27:58
Bryony Worthington: And we don't really know what's happening to clouds. But I don't want to lead your answer. But Piers, you look at the data that's available to us. Are there areas where you would like to see more attention paid so we can get better observational data?
28:11
Piers Forster: Absolutely. Piers Forster: Well, we absolutely need to have continued observation of.
28:18
Piers Forster: thousand How the atmospheric changes across the sea.
28:26
Piers Forster: scales, and there are certainly opportunities with things like artificial intelligence to try and try and… trying to…
28:36
Piers Forster: Try and develop a more complex understanding.
28:41
Piers Forster: standing, but… but… but I do think the
28:47
Piers Forster: Key thing we have to get away from is just giving the. Piers Forster: We can test… estimate comes from our projections. We have to understand some of the inherent
29:05
Piers Forster: risks that come from the uncertainty, and I think we've got to get better at articulating the different
29:14
Piers Forster: probabilities of potential outcomes, and that is the work I think we have to concentrate on, personally.
29:25
Bryony Worthington: Yeah, and and it it's it's a difficult, it's a really difficult thing for policymakers to to navigate. And in us you you are you're there writing our next big global assessment report, but the the interval between those reports is quite long, right? It's it's a sort of seven to eight year cycle, it ends up being. But but we're in an era where the consequences are with us today.
29:50
Bryony Worthington: And we do spend a lot of time in climate talking about 2100, but policymakers really care about 2030, 2035, if we're lucky. So, what do you think is the value of perhaps focusing more on observable data and these annual assessments to complement the IPCC?
30:10
Inés Camilloni: It's absolutely relevant, in particular in this context. We have the timeline for the presentation for the Climate Change and Cities report. It will be in next year, and also the two methodologies report that are being prepared by the IPCC.
30:26
Inés Camilloni: But these days, the panel, the IPCC is discussing the timeline for the presentation of the three big assessments reports. There's no agreement on that.
30:37
Inés Camilloni: So, every single paper that shows an update until we have this, These big reports, presented.
30:49
Inés Camilloni: Maybe in 2028, hopefully, before the second global stocktake, or at the end in 2029, but it's urgent to have reliable information.
31:02
Inés Camilloni: with… based on… on… on science, and this, the information that was presented today in this paper, and every paper that helps policymakers to… to make decisions about, the… the pathways, the best pathways to
31:19
Inés Camilloni: Not to avoid, but at least to limit the overshoot, not only in the amount of warming exceeding 1.5, but also in the length of the overshoot, that it's also critical in terms of potential impacts and risk, is absolutely relevant.
31:40
Bryony Worthington: Yeah, and if I may, Ines, I mean, you're in South America, you work in Argentina, one of the foremost national institutes for science.
31:49
Bryony Worthington: How are you feeling about this upcoming summer with this supercharged El Nino now looking like it's, as Johan's slide showed, completely unprecedented, off-the-chart heat that it's, that we're experiencing from that? How does it feel in Latin America at the moment?
32:07
Inés Camilloni: The situation is extremely difficult right now, related to El Nino. Substantial South America, in particular in the region of La Plata Basin, is the most populated region in South America.
32:19
Inés Camilloni: And it's also the most important region in terms of the economic activities that are being developing there.
32:28
Inés Camilloni: And in that region, we have a clear signal related to El Nino.
32:33
Inés Camilloni: That, brings much more rainfall. Inés Camilloni: And this is what we are having now, these days. We have severe rainfalls in South Brazil and also in Northern Argentina. The main rivers of La Plata Basin are in really very high levels. We are having… already, we are having flats.
32:56
Inés Camilloni: And the impacts associated to these floods are related, not only related to infrastructure and economic loss.
33:08
Inés Camilloni: but also to health. The risk, for example, for dengue transmission is increasing related to these floods events, so the situation is difficult, and as every developing countries.
33:22
Inés Camilloni: the possibility to adapt to these extreme events is really very limited. So, the forecasts for the next months are not very optimistic.
33:34
Inés Camilloni: But at least we have early warning systems, at least, to help people to save lives, at least.
33:43
Inés Camilloni: But this is what we can do for now. Bryony Worthington: Yeah, thank you, Ines. Returning to you, Laurie, what are the…
33:53
Bryony Worthington: One of the things about the UK, just two of us at least, three of us at least, are based here in the UK, just to focus on what do governments need to do to respond. I mean, the UK has got a reasonable track record on mitigation, you know, it's tried to decouple its economic growth from emissions relatively successfully, but it's now increasingly talking about climate in terms of a security risk.
34:16
Bryony Worthington: And it… but it… what more could, could the UK be doing? And is the UK, I think, still in a sort of leadership position, do you think, when it comes to understanding the totality of the risk?
34:29
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, that's a good question. I think the first thing to say that, when we're talking here about security, we don't mean a narrow focus, say, on defense. We're talking about the kind of concepts of security that we were tragically reminded in the context of COVID, for example. We're talking about the security of the systems that we need to have
34:47
Laurie Laybourn: cohesive and prosperous societies, like food security and water and so on. And that has long been understood. Climate change is threatening the security of those systems. The question has been, well, will that become a major political focus, and will it become institutionalized in government? And it is welcome to hear that the UK government, most recently with Ed Miliband, the UK Foreign Secretary.
35:09
Laurie Laybourn: in New York during the UN General Assembly was making this connection, as you're inferring there. I think what's interesting about what the UK is doing at the moment is a number of, quite.
35:21
Laurie Laybourn: frontier research on issues like the tipping points that Johan was mentioning. There's a fantastic research and development arm of the UK government that is, for example, investing significant resource into developing an early warning system for a part of the overall Atlantic circulation, and
35:39
Laurie Laybourn: I would say that this is… this is showing the potential for Laurie Laybourn: leadership in us understanding how going over 1.5 does materially affect the way we might think and act on climate change. You know, we have now got to comprehend that these tipping points might be triggered, so we need more early warning. We've now got to have better situational awareness of the types of shocks that will hit societies, and another UK example of that is that in January, the government released a national security assessment
36:06
Laurie Laybourn: of the collapse of biodiversity and ecosystems change around the world and the effects on things like food security. That is an example of developing the awareness, the situational awareness of what the conditions we're going to be navigating through are looking like. So I would spotlight the UK as an example of how one among many countries are innovating in the context of policy.
36:27
Laurie Laybourn: On the types of capabilities we will need to navigate through, and ultimately, hopefully, out of the overshoot situation that we're in.
36:36
Bryony Worthington: Yeah. Bryony Worthington: I'm going to open a question to all of you. Maybe we'll go in reverse order. This does feel like an unprecedented period. The acceleration, I think, is what's concerning many people. It's clear that the impacts we're experiencing are non-linear, that there's this potential risk that things could speed up very fast.
36:59
Bryony Worthington: In that context, what more could we be doing? Are there more areas of response research, extreme adaptation that we need to be considering? I mean, I think everybody's heard the message that we need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and move to clean energy.
37:15
Bryony Worthington: But I my concern is that just feels that we're that there that the timing might be out, right? We still haven't bent the curve in emissions, and we are facing the impacts that I was not expecting to see in my lifetime.
37:28
Bryony Worthington: So are there any things that we should be looking at now? Do we need to change gear, I suppose, is the question. I'll come to you first, Laurie.
37:38
Laurie Laybourn: So my quick one to throw in is that we need to, maybe anticipate that the politics of this in many places are going to flip from a focus primarily on emissions reductions to demands from populations for protection. We definitely saw that to an extent in Europe this summer. As that increasingly happens, there is a risk that that could come at the cost of emissions reductions, but there is a vast opportunity
38:02
Laurie Laybourn: Because many of the technologies and ways of organizing society that will help protect us from climate consequences can simultaneously help us reduce emissions. Just to take that hot European summer, heat pumps, which can reduce your bills and your emissions and help you in the winter, do have reverse functionality. I mean, they can cool buildings in the summer as well, and that is an example of where what we need to protect ourselves in the moment
38:27
Laurie Laybourn: can also protect us in the longer term, because it reduces our emissions. So, in what comes next, I think those huge
38:34
Laurie Laybourn: co-benefits and complements between emissions reductions, the focus of a lot of climate action so far, and then keeping people safe, need to be emphasized and offered to people to show them that what they need to do to protect themselves against the consequences can deal with the causes as well.
38:50
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie. I'm coming to you next Ines. Inés Camilloni: Yes, one opportunity is reducing drastically the emissions from shortly climate forces. Methane is an example that it has a large potential of warming, and if we really can reduce it, it will help a lot.
39:14
Inés Camilloni: And also to keep in mind that. Inés Camilloni: multilateral decisions like the Paris Agreement are important. Even when we are out of reach of the 1.5 report, we should continue pushing for this kind of agreement, because
39:32
Inés Camilloni: We are better now than before the Paris Agreement, so it's not enough, but we should keep these agreements alive.
39:40
Inés Camilloni: And also to keep in mind the asymmetries between Global North and Global South. Global South countries has much more less capacity to adapt to these extreme events.
39:53
Inés Camilloni: And in this sense, it's important, capacity building in the Global South, and.
40:00
Inés Camilloni: a contribution in infrastructure, for example, and
40:05
Inés Camilloni: technology transfer also is relevant. So, to work to build a more… a world with more justice and equity, it's also essential in the coming months and years.
40:22
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Coming to you next, Piers. Piers, I should have said, with your many hats that you wear, you're also on the, one of the advisory boards of the UK's Advanced Research Programme into Climate… Planetary Cooling, Research. But what would, do we need to open the aperture and widen the aperture of the things we look at to try and keep ourselves safe?
40:44
Piers Forster: Yeah, I think that's a very good question. I think, like others have said before, I think this
40:52
Piers Forster: Learning of adaptation and, kind of. Piers Forster: Kind of mitigation is important to understand that society did act.
41:06
Piers Forster: Have to act in. Piers Forster: kind of multiple ways, and it has to protect ourselves in an ecosystem on different time on.
41:15
Piers Forster: different timescales. It of course has to have an emergency response, but it also has to consider our, kind of, our, kind of, long-term
41:25
Piers Forster: term kind of response as well. So this is where I'm very
41:31
Piers Forster: Keen that we don't shut the door on particular He said…
41:36
Piers Forster: Challenges, so things like avoiding contact with aviation, for example, or short-lived pollutants, or even
41:45
Piers Forster: kind of solar radiation kind of modification should be… should be… should be explored, but not necessarily deployed. So I think it's good to keep that thing on the table. But what I've… what would be key, I think, in this kind of
42:03
Piers Forster: geopolitical turmoil, and we have to get countries that are the,
42:09
Piers Forster: coalition of the, kind of, willing, basically, to work with our, kind of, financial institutions to… to… to…
42:19
Piers Forster: to to really give them the urgency and
42:26
Piers Forster: assessments, so we can really accelerate the climate actions, which Johan talked about in his introduction, they are already underway.
42:46
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much. And to you, Johan, same question there. What more could we be doing to respond to this moment of emergency?
42:55
Johan Rockström: Yeah, and let me just start by… I just think it's important for us scientists to tick off the following point. You know, we're using, I would argue.
43:06
Johan Rockström: And I think Piers and Ines and all of you agree that the strongest language that I have at least used in my whole scientific career.
43:16
Johan Rockström: But that is not reactive. We've seen this coming. Already in 2009, when we published the first planetary boundary science, we put the safe climate boundary at roughly 1.3 degrees Celsius, because we knew already then, from the evidence we had already then.
43:32
Johan Rockström: that if we push the biosphere boundaries too far outside of safe levels, we will start seeing exactly the trends that we are experiencing today, with accelerated warming, loss of resilience, energy imbalances moving in the wrong direction, and the biosphere, so to say, misbehaving. So.
43:51
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, In that sense, it's no surprise that we are where we are today.
43:56
Johan Rockström: And we have also explored over the years what needs to happen rapidly to be able to turn away from unmanageable danger. And we know the pathways. I mean, one is indeed to accelerate the phase out of fossil fuels. A global price on carbon would do the job very rapidly.
44:16
Johan Rockström: You know, I congratulate the UK for having phased out coal. The European Union is actually doing headway, thanks to its emission trading scheme with the CBAM in place, which now is actually starting to see
44:28
Johan Rockström: gregory ford: you know, gradual implications, for example, in India, preparing for being able to export to the European Union by introducing a domestic price on carbon. These are the kind of mechanisms that are well researched in the economic area, and that needs to be deployed.
44:44
Johan Rockström: The second is the food system transition. We underestimate and don't really understand that the food system, through its entire value chain, is the single largest emitter of greenhouse gases, if you include methane and nitrous oxide, but it's also the number one
45:00
Johan Rockström: cause for breaching and undermining the biosphere boundaries through deforestation, loss of biodiversity, overuse of fresh water, and so on. So.
45:08
Johan Rockström: And then here again, we have the solutions, because the… Johan Rockström: solution number one is to eat healthy food. You don't even have to care about the planet to contribute towards accelerating the pathway away from danger. Eat more plant-based diets, and we help the pathway in the right direction. So, you know.
45:26
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, The possibilities of moving in the right direction are very significant, actually. It's a question, I would argue, to understand that we have a planetary emergency
45:37
Johan Rockström: at our time step, and we have to act accordingly. I mean, isn't it already Nick Stern that showed in 2007 that if we put 1% of GDP behind climate action, we can deviate away from danger? We're now putting, what is it, 5% of GDP in military spending?
45:54
Johan Rockström: because of just the Ukraine war. So we have to get our priorities right.
46:00
Bryony Worthington: Hmm. Bryony Worthington: Just turning now to audience questions, and thank you to those of you who've already posted. We're going to use the next 10 or so minutes to run through some of these. And I'm going to start with a question from Ben Nottingham. Thank you, Ben, which is about how we use language, and I think this is super important because, as Johan said at the start, we're all using much more extreme language. We're talking about a crisis, an emergency.
46:25
Bryony Worthington: But, and yet, if you kind of go about day-to-day business, it doesn't feel like the response has been commensurate. So, is there a way in which we are… are we… are we… do we need better narratives, or better stories, or just more clear communications directly to policymakers? It feels like I've been watching this evolve for the last 25 plus years, and I know many of you on here.
46:50
Bryony Worthington: been doing it for longer. Bryony Worthington: we've kind of failed, haven't we, to make this really… for people to really feel that this is a personal and perceptible, immediate risk. What can we do about any of this? Ines, I mean, does the IPCC concern it? Try to focus on, have we done our job right? Have we failed? Like, is that a conversation that's being had?
47:15
Inés Camilloni: Yes, absolutely, and the IPCC is planning an expert meeting on scientific communication that will be held next December.
47:24
Inés Camilloni: Just to improve the ways we use to communicate the scientific results and the assessments of the IPCC. But for sure, we've been trying to use different words. We moved from climate change to climate crisis.
47:39
Inés Camilloni: The, instead of, extreme, global warming, we're talking about unprecedented climate situation, but
47:49
Inés Camilloni: I think that, sometimes, people feel more the danger of climate change.
47:58
Inés Camilloni: when you see the events, for example, we had in Nepal recently, or the floods we have now in Argentina, and yesterday there was an extreme storm in South America, in Santiago de Chile also, so…
48:15
Inés Camilloni: These are not only words, but when you link these words with extreme events that are happening more frequently and more severe of these events, sometimes the communication is easier, but the idea also is to communicate that
48:34
Inés Camilloni: There's… there are many things that we can do. Inés Camilloni: not only to fall in despair about what climate change means, but also that it's a call also for climate action.
48:49
Bryony Worthington: Yeah. Well, and that point about what we can do, and agency, like, how much human agency is there in this… in this system? Like, how much have we perturbed the system, and then how much agency do we have over shifting it? Seems to be the fundamental challenge, right? That have we become godlike species or not? Like, we certainly seem to have unwittingly
49:11
Bryony Worthington: altered our climate. The question is, do we have enough agency to bring us back from the brink? And there's a question here about early warning and monitoring, from Nicholas Harrison.
49:23
Bryony Worthington: are we confident that we're harnessing all of today's technologies that we have available? Like, we're all walking around with supercomputers, thousands of satellites are being thrown up into the atmosphere every year, many of them not to help us monitor Earth systems. Is there more emphasis needed on actually that, kind of.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 49:42 to 58:54
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
49:42
Bryony Worthington: vital signs, the checking the patient's pulse of the earth more… with more technology and more equipment. I don't know who wants to… maybe Piers, what do we need to do about the monitoring? I mean, it seems quite fragile, actually, as well. We're often very dependent on the US for much of our data. Are more countries coming forward? Is there more focus on this early warning?
50:04
Piers Forster: Yeah, I think with what's going on in America and the United States, that we're… we're…
50:11
Piers Forster: We're realizing the, kind of, monitoring system is quite fragile and quite quite…
50:19
Piers Forster: dependent on one or two countries, so I think we do need to make a whole monetary system far more
50:33
Piers Forster: Past, and we have to have Okay. Piers Forster: different countries contributing and coming together to contribute different types of data.
50:46
Piers Forster: So, of course, we need to have the good satellite data that Tater within the…
50:55
Piers Forster: The ocean has to be coordinated by being in the dark. Piers Forster: pains, but it's also good to really understand what's occurring in communities and communities. Well, so we have a… I think we have a job to do as a kind of scientific community.
51:17
Piers Forster: To work with our governments to… to really try and get a far more robust and resilient and comprehensive approach to collecting this.
51:26
Piers Forster: data. Piers Forster: and of course, and then really work on delivering that data as well, but because there's only so much you can do collecting it, you have to try and make sure it gets in the hand of the right people in the right way. So that's why I'm quite keen on developing these really
51:50
Piers Forster: Good for BASP, very clear indicators to Piers Forster: To show the way the world is.
51:59
Piers Forster: changing… in an unambiguous direction. The different policymakers from different countries can get behind it indoors.
52:12
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Bryony Worthington: I'm going to combine a couple of questions here for you, Johan, about our response in terms of the energy transition. Elliott Cocker from Aalborg University and Robin Fossil Free London. I'm going to interpret the question slightly. In previous global problems that we've tackled, like let's take the ozone crisis, for example, and the Montreal Protocol, we didn't just rely on boosting alternatives.
52:38
Bryony Worthington: actually banned the substances that were causing the problem. Bryony Worthington: And in climate, because it's so complex, we've not taken that approach. But is there a point at which we have to say, it's not just about boosting the clean, we also need to phase out the dirty. We need to start putting more restrictions on fossil as the cause of that greenhouse gas blanket that's still getting thicker even today. You may not want to wish to comment, but this is quite a live discussion in the UK at the moment.
53:07
Bryony Worthington: with North Sea oil and gas being trumpeted as something we should be doing more of just at the time when we're experiencing incredibly horrendous heat waves. So, is there other approaches which perhaps we've not looked at, which we need to look at now because of the urgency?
53:22
Johan Rockström: Hmm. Yeah, no, it's a good point. I mean, among the nine planetary boundaries, only two are today within the safe operating space, and number one is the stratospheric ozone layer, which exactly as was pointed out here, in 1987, the Montreal Protocol was signed.
53:41
Johan Rockström: Global policymakers, believe it or not, they listened to science, they acted accordingly, and they banned a whole family of chlorofluorocarbons that were proven scientifically to destroy
53:54
Johan Rockström: it was an existential threat to the southern hemisphere of the stratospheric… protective stratospheric ozone layer, and industry innovated and brought us away from danger. I think we need similar red lines
54:08
Johan Rockström: also for climate. Now, greenhouse gases is, is slightly different than the chlorofluorocarbons, but not so much, because we have
54:19
Johan Rockström: Quite successful, countries and policies that have put end dates, or attempted to put end dates on.
54:28
Johan Rockström: phasing out coal, like in the UK, but also phasing out internal combustion engine. You have a country like Ethiopia that has forbidden, now, imports of all internal combustion engines. The European Union has a red line on 2035 not to allow more sales of
54:46
Johan Rockström: diesel and petrol-run vehicles. I think these kind of red lines are necessary, and I would say that today we absolutely have evidence to say that we should put a complete ban on all new investments in fossil fuel infrastructure, because we know that that infrastructure
55:05
Johan Rockström: will operate for… for decades into the future, and we simply don't have remaining carbon budget to support it. So… so yes, we need red lines, but at the same time, we need to come back to Ines' point earlier. There is a… there's an equity dimension here as well. There's a global.
55:24
Johan Rockström: claire : access point that needs to be taken very seriously of how do you get a soft landing for those emerging economies in the Global South, and this is, as we know, a struggle in the negotiations.
55:38
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. I'm gonna come to you, Laurie, just for the final question, which is another amalgam of three questions we've had from Gregory Slater, Klaus Radunski, and Mike McCracken.
55:48
Bryony Worthington: We know we need to reduce greenhouse gases, we know that's the fundamental cause of the problem, that's what's destabilized the system in the first instance, and it's what's continuing to thicken the blanket of gases. But, as has been alluded to by Piers and others, there are these other mechanisms that we could look to to try and cool the planet down in the very… in the short term.
56:08
Bryony Worthington: But it needs governance, right? Because it's as much a socio-political problem as it is a scientific problem. Have we got the mechanics and the wherewithal to come together and produce new governance systems that look at how we can protect ourselves from harm?
56:25
Bryony Worthington: where do you look to for examples, and what could we do to try and address that socio-political problem of we don't have a global government that can make decisions on our behalf about the state of the planet? How do we get from where we are now to where we need to be?
56:41
Laurie Laybourn: I think like we've always had to, which is to work around the state of geopolitics at the time. And in the case of the energy transition, there has been some extraordinary work in working with the increasingly competitive geopolitical age we live in when it comes to, you know, one-upmanship, various agreements on winning the renewables race. And in some ways that has kind of been an accelerant to that.
57:03
Laurie Laybourn: For other things, like the technologies you're talking about there, or threats to food security.
57:09
Laurie Laybourn: We've got to make sure that the, the zero-sum logics that currently prevail globally.
57:16
Laurie Laybourn: are not the ones that prevail in those areas. Because ultimately, what we're looking at, when we see the indicators in this report, is that those logics will take us to a situation where all are beggared, ultimately, by an Earth system that is destabilized. So, we are entering, I think, an era in which
57:32
Laurie Laybourn: the geopolitical logic, some of the security logics that have prevailed for hundreds of years, and definitely recently, are going to… well, are not appropriate in the face of the hard dynamics of the Earth system. So, I think that that's the challenge. I think that we have huge opportunities to broker the kind of geopolitics and cooperation that we need now. I'm in Iceland right now, there's a major concern here about the changes in the
57:57
Laurie Laybourn: Atlantic circulation. Laurie Laybourn: And we had the Arctic Circle Assembly last week, where that was on the agenda, and I know Johan was speaking there. There is a huge potential.
58:05
Laurie Laybourn: for countries like Iceland with a quite significant global reach and a reputation to broker some of these conversations for like-minded countries that will all be affected severely if, in this case, the Atlantic circulation were to continue to significantly weaken. So.
58:21
Laurie Laybourn: The geopolitics has got to be how we build this around it, and we've done that many times in the past, and we have to do it again now.
58:29
Bryony Worthington: Okay, listen, thank you so much, everyone, for joining us. We're out of time. Thank you, all of you who posted questions. Sorry we didn't get time to come to all of them. Thank you so much to the speakers for coming, and thank you to Bill Ripple for the paper that has just been published today that's sparked this conversation, a conversation I'm sure will be continued from here on in. I would just like to look at that little earth we've got behind us and remind ourselves that we're living on a fragile
58:54
Bryony Worthington: bauble rushing through space, this is our common home, we've got to come together and protect it, and I think there is enough agency, human agency, now that we could do this, so we should be hopeful, but we should also work with great urgency to make sure that this is at the top of the agenda where it needs to be. Thank you, everyone, and we'll be publishing a version of this, a recording of this, to those who want to go back and listen to any of it again. Thank you again. Bye-bye.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 25:19 to 49:23
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
25:19
Johan Rockström: the threshold lies actually slightly below 1.5 degrees Celsius, and that's what we're seeing occurring right as we speak. I mean, global bleaching due to human-reinforced El Nino events are now impacting over 85% of
25:37
Johan Rockström: you know, causing stress due to bleaching of coral reef systems on 85% of corals across the tropical regions on planet Earth. But on your question on the systems that I at least keep my sharpest eye on right now, the number one is the AMOC.
25:54
Johan Rockström: which is the overturning of heat in the North Atlantic, one of the three thermohaline pumps that regulates the currents and the heat exchange across the ocean.
26:03
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, We can no longer consider this being a low likelihood event of a severe slowdown, or potentially even a shutdown this century. The uncertainty range is wide. I mean, it ranges likelihood-wise from a 10% risk of severe slowdown to over 50%.
26:22
Johan Rockström: likelihood of slowdown within this century. But you know, a 10 to 50% likelihood for a potentially catastrophic impact.
26:31
Johan Rockström: Is… is an unacceptable risk. Johan Rockström: And the second one to keep a special eye on right now is the Amazon Basin, because this is a major carbon sink. It is the richest ecosystem on land on planet Earth.
26:45
Johan Rockström: biodiversity-wise. It is a major provider of freshwater across the entire South American continent. It's simply too big to fail in terms of natural system contributing to the entire functioning of the biosphere and the climate system.
27:02
Johan Rockström: So I would say the AMOC Johan Rockström: John Fischer, coral reef systems and the tropical rainforest over the Amazon are 3, but of course, we have a whole set of systems, particularly in the Arctic, that are very, very close to tipping points as well. This just shows how urgent it is to take this science very seriously in trying to move away from danger.
27:24
Bryony Worthington: Mmm. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. I'm sure that simulated a lot of questions. Please do use the Q&A if you want to follow up on any of this. But Piers, perhaps turning to you.
27:34
Bryony Worthington: I mean, Johan mentioned that there are some uncertainties still in this analysis, diagnosis of the problem and how much risk we face. Are there particular areas that you think require more research to sort of narrow down our understanding of what the causes are? I'm always struck when we, when talking to climate scientists that we get to a point where we say, and then there's clouds.
27:58
Bryony Worthington: And we don't really know what's happening to clouds. But I don't want to lead your answer. But Piers, you look at the data that's available to us. Are there areas where you would like to see more attention paid so we can get better observational data?
28:11
Piers Forster: Absolutely. Piers Forster: Well, we absolutely need to have continued observation of.
28:18
Piers Forster: thousand How the atmospheric changes across the sea.
28:26
Piers Forster: scales, and there are certainly opportunities with things like artificial intelligence to try and try and… trying to…
28:36
Piers Forster: Try and develop a more complex understanding.
28:41
Piers Forster: standing, but… but… but I do think the
28:47
Piers Forster: Key thing we have to get away from is just giving the. Piers Forster: We can test… estimate comes from our projections. We have to understand some of the inherent
29:05
Piers Forster: risks that come from the uncertainty, and I think we've got to get better at articulating the different
29:14
Piers Forster: probabilities of potential outcomes, and that is the work I think we have to concentrate on, personally.
29:25
Bryony Worthington: Yeah, and and it it's it's a difficult, it's a really difficult thing for policymakers to to navigate. And in us you you are you're there writing our next big global assessment report, but the the interval between those reports is quite long, right? It's it's a sort of seven to eight year cycle, it ends up being. But but we're in an era where the consequences are with us today.
29:50
Bryony Worthington: And we do spend a lot of time in climate talking about 2100, but policymakers really care about 2030, 2035, if we're lucky. So, what do you think is the value of perhaps focusing more on observable data and these annual assessments to complement the IPCC?
30:10
Inés Camilloni: It's absolutely relevant, in particular in this context. We have the timeline for the presentation for the Climate Change and Cities report. It will be in next year, and also the two methodologies report that are being prepared by the IPCC.
30:26
Inés Camilloni: But these days, the panel, the IPCC is discussing the timeline for the presentation of the three big assessments reports. There's no agreement on that.
30:37
Inés Camilloni: So, every single paper that shows an update until we have this, These big reports, presented.
30:49
Inés Camilloni: Maybe in 2028, hopefully, before the second global stocktake, or at the end in 2029, but it's urgent to have reliable information.
31:02
Inés Camilloni: with… based on… on… on science, and this, the information that was presented today in this paper, and every paper that helps policymakers to… to make decisions about, the… the pathways, the best pathways to
31:19
Inés Camilloni: Not to avoid, but at least to limit the overshoot, not only in the amount of warming exceeding 1.5, but also in the length of the overshoot, that it's also critical in terms of potential impacts and risk, is absolutely relevant.
31:40
Bryony Worthington: Yeah, and if I may, Ines, I mean, you're in South America, you work in Argentina, one of the foremost national institutes for science.
31:49
Bryony Worthington: How are you feeling about this upcoming summer with this supercharged El Nino now looking like it's, as Johan's slide showed, completely unprecedented, off-the-chart heat that it's, that we're experiencing from that? How does it feel in Latin America at the moment?
32:07
Inés Camilloni: The situation is extremely difficult right now, related to El Nino. Substantial South America, in particular in the region of La Plata Basin, is the most populated region in South America.
32:19
Inés Camilloni: And it's also the most important region in terms of the economic activities that are being developing there.
32:28
Inés Camilloni: And in that region, we have a clear signal related to El Nino.
32:33
Inés Camilloni: That, brings much more rainfall. Inés Camilloni: And this is what we are having now, these days. We have severe rainfalls in South Brazil and also in Northern Argentina. The main rivers of La Plata Basin are in really very high levels. We are having… already, we are having flats.
32:56
Inés Camilloni: And the impacts associated to these floods are related, not only related to infrastructure and economic loss.
33:08
Inés Camilloni: but also to health. The risk, for example, for dengue transmission is increasing related to these floods events, so the situation is difficult, and as every developing countries.
33:22
Inés Camilloni: the possibility to adapt to these extreme events is really very limited. So, the forecasts for the next months are not very optimistic.
33:34
Inés Camilloni: But at least we have early warning systems, at least, to help people to save lives, at least.
33:43
Inés Camilloni: But this is what we can do for now. Bryony Worthington: Yeah, thank you, Ines. Returning to you, Laurie, what are the…
33:53
Bryony Worthington: One of the things about the UK, just two of us at least, three of us at least, are based here in the UK, just to focus on what do governments need to do to respond. I mean, the UK has got a reasonable track record on mitigation, you know, it's tried to decouple its economic growth from emissions relatively successfully, but it's now increasingly talking about climate in terms of a security risk.
34:16
Bryony Worthington: And it… but it… what more could, could the UK be doing? And is the UK, I think, still in a sort of leadership position, do you think, when it comes to understanding the totality of the risk?
34:29
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, that's a good question. I think the first thing to say that, when we're talking here about security, we don't mean a narrow focus, say, on defense. We're talking about the kind of concepts of security that we were tragically reminded in the context of COVID, for example. We're talking about the security of the systems that we need to have
34:47
Laurie Laybourn: cohesive and prosperous societies, like food security and water and so on. And that has long been understood. Climate change is threatening the security of those systems. The question has been, well, will that become a major political focus, and will it become institutionalized in government? And it is welcome to hear that the UK government, most recently with Ed Miliband, the UK Foreign Secretary.
35:09
Laurie Laybourn: in New York during the UN General Assembly was making this connection, as you're inferring there. I think what's interesting about what the UK is doing at the moment is a number of, quite.
35:21
Laurie Laybourn: frontier research on issues like the tipping points that Johan was mentioning. There's a fantastic research and development arm of the UK government that is, for example, investing significant resource into developing an early warning system for a part of the overall Atlantic circulation, and
35:39
Laurie Laybourn: I would say that this is… this is showing the potential for Laurie Laybourn: leadership in us understanding how going over 1.5 does materially affect the way we might think and act on climate change. You know, we have now got to comprehend that these tipping points might be triggered, so we need more early warning. We've now got to have better situational awareness of the types of shocks that will hit societies, and another UK example of that is that in January, the government released a national security assessment
36:06
Laurie Laybourn: of the collapse of biodiversity and ecosystems change around the world and the effects on things like food security. That is an example of developing the awareness, the situational awareness of what the conditions we're going to be navigating through are looking like. So I would spotlight the UK as an example of how one among many countries are innovating in the context of policy.
36:27
Laurie Laybourn: On the types of capabilities we will need to navigate through, and ultimately, hopefully, out of the overshoot situation that we're in.
36:36
Bryony Worthington: Yeah. Bryony Worthington: I'm going to open a question to all of you. Maybe we'll go in reverse order. This does feel like an unprecedented period. The acceleration, I think, is what's concerning many people. It's clear that the impacts we're experiencing are non-linear, that there's this potential risk that things could speed up very fast.
36:59
Bryony Worthington: In that context, what more could we be doing? Are there more areas of response research, extreme adaptation that we need to be considering? I mean, I think everybody's heard the message that we need to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and move to clean energy.
37:15
Bryony Worthington: But I my concern is that just feels that we're that there that the timing might be out, right? We still haven't bent the curve in emissions, and we are facing the impacts that I was not expecting to see in my lifetime.
37:28
Bryony Worthington: So are there any things that we should be looking at now? Do we need to change gear, I suppose, is the question. I'll come to you first, Laurie.
37:38
Laurie Laybourn: So my quick one to throw in is that we need to, maybe anticipate that the politics of this in many places are going to flip from a focus primarily on emissions reductions to demands from populations for protection. We definitely saw that to an extent in Europe this summer. As that increasingly happens, there is a risk that that could come at the cost of emissions reductions, but there is a vast opportunity
38:02
Laurie Laybourn: Because many of the technologies and ways of organizing society that will help protect us from climate consequences can simultaneously help us reduce emissions. Just to take that hot European summer, heat pumps, which can reduce your bills and your emissions and help you in the winter, do have reverse functionality. I mean, they can cool buildings in the summer as well, and that is an example of where what we need to protect ourselves in the moment
38:27
Laurie Laybourn: can also protect us in the longer term, because it reduces our emissions. So, in what comes next, I think those huge
38:34
Laurie Laybourn: co-benefits and complements between emissions reductions, the focus of a lot of climate action so far, and then keeping people safe, need to be emphasized and offered to people to show them that what they need to do to protect themselves against the consequences can deal with the causes as well.
38:50
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie. I'm coming to you next Ines. Inés Camilloni: Yes, one opportunity is reducing drastically the emissions from shortly climate forces. Methane is an example that it has a large potential of warming, and if we really can reduce it, it will help a lot.
39:14
Inés Camilloni: And also to keep in mind that. Inés Camilloni: multilateral decisions like the Paris Agreement are important. Even when we are out of reach of the 1.5 report, we should continue pushing for this kind of agreement, because
39:32
Inés Camilloni: We are better now than before the Paris Agreement, so it's not enough, but we should keep these agreements alive.
39:40
Inés Camilloni: And also to keep in mind the asymmetries between Global North and Global South. Global South countries has much more less capacity to adapt to these extreme events.
39:53
Inés Camilloni: And in this sense, it's important, capacity building in the Global South, and.
40:00
Inés Camilloni: a contribution in infrastructure, for example, and
40:05
Inés Camilloni: technology transfer also is relevant. So, to work to build a more… a world with more justice and equity, it's also essential in the coming months and years.
40:22
Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Coming to you next, Piers. Piers, I should have said, with your many hats that you wear, you're also on the, one of the advisory boards of the UK's Advanced Research Programme into Climate… Planetary Cooling, Research. But what would, do we need to open the aperture and widen the aperture of the things we look at to try and keep ourselves safe?
40:44
Piers Forster: Yeah, I think that's a very good question. I think, like others have said before, I think this
40:52
Piers Forster: Learning of adaptation and, kind of. Piers Forster: Kind of mitigation is important to understand that society did act.
41:06
Piers Forster: Have to act in. Piers Forster: kind of multiple ways, and it has to protect ourselves in an ecosystem on different time on.
41:15
Piers Forster: different timescales. It of course has to have an emergency response, but it also has to consider our, kind of, our, kind of, long-term
41:25
Piers Forster: term kind of response as well. So this is where I'm very
41:31
Piers Forster: Keen that we don't shut the door on particular He said…
41:36
Piers Forster: Challenges, so things like avoiding contact with aviation, for example, or short-lived pollutants, or even
41:45
Piers Forster: kind of solar radiation kind of modification should be… should be… should be explored, but not necessarily deployed. So I think it's good to keep that thing on the table. But what I've… what would be key, I think, in this kind of
42:03
Piers Forster: geopolitical turmoil, and we have to get countries that are the,
42:09
Piers Forster: coalition of the, kind of, willing, basically, to work with our, kind of, financial institutions to… to… to…
42:19
Piers Forster: to to really give them the urgency and
42:26
Piers Forster: assessments, so we can really accelerate the climate actions, which Johan talked about in his introduction, they are already underway.
42:46
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much. And to you, Johan, same question there. What more could we be doing to respond to this moment of emergency?
42:55
Johan Rockström: Yeah, and let me just start by… I just think it's important for us scientists to tick off the following point. You know, we're using, I would argue.
43:06
Johan Rockström: And I think Piers and Ines and all of you agree that the strongest language that I have at least used in my whole scientific career.
43:16
Johan Rockström: But that is not reactive. We've seen this coming. Already in 2009, when we published the first planetary boundary science, we put the safe climate boundary at roughly 1.3 degrees Celsius, because we knew already then, from the evidence we had already then.
43:32
Johan Rockström: that if we push the biosphere boundaries too far outside of safe levels, we will start seeing exactly the trends that we are experiencing today, with accelerated warming, loss of resilience, energy imbalances moving in the wrong direction, and the biosphere, so to say, misbehaving. So.
43:51
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, In that sense, it's no surprise that we are where we are today.
43:56
Johan Rockström: And we have also explored over the years what needs to happen rapidly to be able to turn away from unmanageable danger. And we know the pathways. I mean, one is indeed to accelerate the phase out of fossil fuels. A global price on carbon would do the job very rapidly.
44:16
Johan Rockström: You know, I congratulate the UK for having phased out coal. The European Union is actually doing headway, thanks to its emission trading scheme with the CBAM in place, which now is actually starting to see
44:28
Johan Rockström: gregory ford: you know, gradual implications, for example, in India, preparing for being able to export to the European Union by introducing a domestic price on carbon. These are the kind of mechanisms that are well researched in the economic area, and that needs to be deployed.
44:44
Johan Rockström: The second is the food system transition. We underestimate and don't really understand that the food system, through its entire value chain, is the single largest emitter of greenhouse gases, if you include methane and nitrous oxide, but it's also the number one
45:00
Johan Rockström: cause for breaching and undermining the biosphere boundaries through deforestation, loss of biodiversity, overuse of fresh water, and so on. So.
45:08
Johan Rockström: And then here again, we have the solutions, because the… Johan Rockström: solution number one is to eat healthy food. You don't even have to care about the planet to contribute towards accelerating the pathway away from danger. Eat more plant-based diets, and we help the pathway in the right direction. So, you know.
45:26
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, The possibilities of moving in the right direction are very significant, actually. It's a question, I would argue, to understand that we have a planetary emergency
45:37
Johan Rockström: at our time step, and we have to act accordingly. I mean, isn't it already Nick Stern that showed in 2007 that if we put 1% of GDP behind climate action, we can deviate away from danger? We're now putting, what is it, 5% of GDP in military spending?
45:54
Johan Rockström: because of just the Ukraine war. So we have to get our priorities right.
46:00
Bryony Worthington: Hmm. Bryony Worthington: Just turning now to audience questions, and thank you to those of you who've already posted. We're going to use the next 10 or so minutes to run through some of these. And I'm going to start with a question from Ben Nottingham. Thank you, Ben, which is about how we use language, and I think this is super important because, as Johan said at the start, we're all using much more extreme language. We're talking about a crisis, an emergency.
46:25
Bryony Worthington: But, and yet, if you kind of go about day-to-day business, it doesn't feel like the response has been commensurate. So, is there a way in which we are… are we… are we… do we need better narratives, or better stories, or just more clear communications directly to policymakers? It feels like I've been watching this evolve for the last 25 plus years, and I know many of you on here.
46:50
Bryony Worthington: been doing it for longer. Bryony Worthington: we've kind of failed, haven't we, to make this really… for people to really feel that this is a personal and perceptible, immediate risk. What can we do about any of this? Ines, I mean, does the IPCC concern it? Try to focus on, have we done our job right? Have we failed? Like, is that a conversation that's being had?
47:15
Inés Camilloni: Yes, absolutely, and the IPCC is planning an expert meeting on scientific communication that will be held next December.
47:24
Inés Camilloni: Just to improve the ways we use to communicate the scientific results and the assessments of the IPCC. But for sure, we've been trying to use different words. We moved from climate change to climate crisis.
47:39
Inés Camilloni: The, instead of, extreme, global warming, we're talking about unprecedented climate situation, but
47:49
Inés Camilloni: I think that, sometimes, people feel more the danger of climate change.
47:58
Inés Camilloni: when you see the events, for example, we had in Nepal recently, or the floods we have now in Argentina, and yesterday there was an extreme storm in South America, in Santiago de Chile also, so…
48:15
Inés Camilloni: These are not only words, but when you link these words with extreme events that are happening more frequently and more severe of these events, sometimes the communication is easier, but the idea also is to communicate that
48:34
Inés Camilloni: There's… there are many things that we can do. Inés Camilloni: not only to fall in despair about what climate change means, but also that it's a call also for climate action.
48:49
Bryony Worthington: Yeah. Well, and that point about what we can do, and agency, like, how much human agency is there in this… in this system? Like, how much have we perturbed the system, and then how much agency do we have over shifting it? Seems to be the fundamental challenge, right? That have we become godlike species or not? Like, we certainly seem to have unwittingly
49:11
Bryony Worthington: altered our climate. The question is, do we have enough agency to bring us back from the brink? And there's a question here about early warning and monitoring, from Nicholas Harrison.
49:23
Bryony Worthington: are we confident that we're harnessing all of today's technologies that we have available? Like, we're all walking around with supercomputers, thousands of satellites are being thrown up into the atmosphere every year, many of them not to help us monitor Earth systems. Is there more emphasis needed on actually that, kind of.
2026 State of the Climate report with Johan Rockström
Transcript 0:00 to 25:09
Overshoot Podcast
16OCT2026
youtube.com/watch?v=lx4k97Ds…
The Strategic Climate Risks Initiative hosted the launch event for the 2026 State of the Climate Report.
This annual report gives an update on the planet’s vital signs and the critical factors determining our shared security, including greenhouse gas levels, Earth’s energy imbalance, the proximity to tipping points - and progress on tackling these issues SCRI's executive director, Laurie Laybourn, was joined by:
👉 Professor Johan Rockström
👉 Professor Ines Camilloni
👉 Professor Piers Forster
👉 Baroness Bryony Worthington
Transcript
Follow along using the transcript.
Show transcript
Overshoot Podcast
Transcript
0:05
Laurie Laybourn: Good afternoon, good morning, good evening, wherever you might be in the world. Laurie Laybourn: My name's Laurie Laybourn, I'm Executive Director of the Strategic Climate Risks Initiative. We are hosting today's webinar, and we're delighted to have you. Welcome to this briefing on the 2026 State of the Climate Report, which was released today.
0:24
Laurie Laybourn: The Strategic Climate Risk Initiative is a think-and-do tank focused on the huge risks that the world now faces over 1.5 degrees, and how we might navigate them. And that's why we're particularly delighted to be hosting this fantastic panel to talk about this important update on the planet's vital signs. I'm going to give a few housekeeping points, and then I'll be handing over to our panel. The session is being recorded, and it is on the record.
0:47
Laurie Laybourn: Please send questions through the Q&A box that you'll see at the bottom of your screen. Please note your name and affiliation, and we will be taking questions from the press first.
0:58
Laurie Laybourn: If you experience any technical difficulties today, just try rejoining the session, as that may resolve it. For those who wish to use captions, you can do so with the CC button, again, at the bottom of your screen.
1:10
Laurie Laybourn: And my colleagues will be putting a link to the report in the chat, which we're just still waiting to be posted online. So with that, I'm delighted to introduce Bryony, Baroness Worthington, who is chairing us today. Bryony, please, over to you for our session.
1:27
Bryony Worthington: Thank you, Laurie, and thanks everyone for joining us for this important event. I am Bryony Worthington, I've been involved in climate for many years, and I think, like all of us, become increasingly concerned that the observable changes to our climate are accelerating, and therefore the risks we face are also accelerating. And this report is one of many that comes out.
1:50
Bryony Worthington: that gives us an annual snapshot of what's happening with observable data to our climate and to our response to the climate crisis. I'm delighted to be joined by an expert panel today, and we're going to kick off with hearing from one of the report authors, Johan Rockstrom. Johan is the director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact.
2:13
Bryony Worthington: And a professor in Earth Systems Science at the University of Potsdam. Johan, as a report author, we're really keen to hear from you a quick summary of what the report contains. So over to you, please.
2:26
Johan Rockström: Yeah, thanks, Bani, and I'll be sharing my screen here. I hope that you see the first slide. Yeah, so this is the 2026 State of the Climate report, led by an international group of scientists. It is
2:40
Johan Rockström: Spearheaded by Professor Bill Ripple at Oregon State University, and the key findings are summarized here. We follow 16 vital climate signs. 7 of these 2026 show record extreme levels, and the majority of them continue moving in the wrong direction.
2:59
Johan Rockström: We see the first signs of an Earth system showing indications of losing resilience, meaning its buffering capacity to the disturbance caused by our heating of the planet.
3:12
Johan Rockström: We also have statistical, verified evidence that global warming is accelerating. We'll come back to this. Overshoot is now inevitable. Within the next 3 to 5 years, we'll be breaching the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
3:25
Johan Rockström: Tipping points are approaching fast. Johan Rockström: And solutions away from escalating danger.
3:32
Johan Rockström: are available, but needs to be moving very fast. Now, here you have the kind of major slide deck that we follow each year with the 16 vital indicators. I won't go through these all in detail. The number one key take-home is
3:50
Johan Rockström: that the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, and natural oxides continue rising, so we've not been able to bend the curve of emissions yet, which is
3:59
Johan Rockström: very concerning, because there are no IPCC scenarios that can bring us to a safe landing, minimizing the Overshoot pathway if we do not bend the curves very rapidly within just the next few years.
4:14
Johan Rockström: The second key… Johan Rockström: indicator I'd like to point you to is the glacial thickness from mountain glacial thickness, which is following a pathway, as you see, of a rapid accelerating decline.
4:32
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, This is the scientific evidence that was used by the World Weather Attribution, proving that the catastrophic glacier collapse in the Tibetan Nepalese plateau would not have been possible without anthropogenic forcing.
4:48
Johan Rockström: We also have the very concerning decline of albedo. Ice is melting fast. Tree lines are moving north. The planet is getting darker, absorbing more heat. And Piers Forster will come back.
5:02
Johan Rockström: to this point on how that translated into more heat being trapped on the planet. And then we have also the indications that the biosphere is reducing its capacity to take up carbon, and the one data point here is the global tree cover loss because of fires increasing very rapidly across the planet.
5:24
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, Which all of it translates to a rising Earth energy imbalance, and again, Piers will come back to this. So this is an overall diagnostic of the planet, showing an Earth system
5:35
Johan Rockström: That is, been trying to geobiophysically buffer the disturbance we're causing, but showing the first signs of not being able to cope at the level that we have been seeing over the past 150 years.
5:48
Johan Rockström: Now, this is then, in detail, shown very clearly in the observations of temperature rise. Here you see the hockey stick of temperature observations.
5:59
Johan Rockström: The 1950 to year 2000, 0.11 degrees Celsius of rise of temperature, global mean surface temperature per decade, is the rate that essentially leads us to the conclusion that we have a global climate crisis.
6:13
Johan Rockström: It's what has translated into the Paris Agreement, it is what is translated into the UK climate law, the German
6:24
Johan Rockström: The European Union. Johan Rockström: And then suddenly, we reach 2010, Johan Rockström: And bang, you see what happens. We see for the first time an accelerated rate of warming, which is now statistically verified, with a jump that, depending on how you calculate this, is at least 60% increase. And this is a deep concern, because it's not explained only by increase in emissions, because we are actually gradually leveling up emissions.
6:52
Johan Rockström: It is related to complex factors that will be follow up on energy imbalance. But one factor here is what I just summarized for you, changes in feedback dynamics from the Earth system.
7:05
Johan Rockström: Now, this is also the same with the observations in the ocean. Here you have the Pacific Ocean, the blue lines is the 1990 to 2020, gradually warming ocean due to our anthropogenic pressures.
7:19
Johan Rockström: You see in red thin lines the most recent El Nino occurrences, and then you have the 2026 pathway where we are completely off the chart.
7:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, I mean, we are almost 3 degrees Celsius above the average temperature levels. We are in a supercharged El Nino pathway, and the dotted lines is the forecast for the next 3 to 6
7:40
Johan Rockström: John Fischer, months, and what we have already experienced in this year 2026 is unprecedented extreme events of fires, droughts, in particular floods in the tropical region, and we're likely to see even more extreme events in the coming months, given these forecasts.
7:58
Johan Rockström: Now, that, just to close, Should then be juxtaposed to the fact that we're also seeing
8:05
Johan Rockström: a lot of data points showing non-linear positive trends, particularly in the energy transition. And the upper left-hand graph here, I think, is the most significant one, where we, in 2025, now can conclude for the first time that renewable energy is outpacing
8:24
Johan Rockström: coal to produce electricity at a global level. Johan Rockström: But we also have a tremendous positive exponential rise in electrification.
8:34
Johan Rockström: across all sectors, but in particular the transport sector, which you see in the lower right-hand corner. So we are really in a juncture where we have
8:43
Johan Rockström: Negative trends moving faster in a very concerning way. Johan Rockström: putting the entire stability of the planet at risk, but at the same time, we have more and more evidence also of a window of transition for accelerated pathways towards at least a manageable climate future for humanity. And with that, I hand
9:04
Johan Rockström: Back to you, Bryony. Thank you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much Johan for that super concise run through the paper and I believe the paper is now live and a link has been posted in the chat for you to click on and read. I'm going to turn now to Piers Forster who is the director, a professor of physical climate change and the founding director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at Leeds University. He's a former IPCC lead author
9:32
Bryony Worthington: And Piers, we'd just like to come to you for basically a little bit of an explanation of that kind of all-encompassing number of the Earth energy imbalance, and also your reaction to the indicators, the latest use of indicators data in this paper.
9:48
Bryony Worthington: Over to you. Piers Forster: Yeah, yeah, it's excellent to be here today. The first thing I should make clear is that I was not an author of this excellent work, but I do…
10:02
Piers Forster: do really appreciate the work that we put in to put these data sets together. So, I briefly want to pick up on something that Johan introduced, which is this Perth Energy Imbalance.
10:19
Piers Forster: quantity. It's a bit of a technical quantity, but I want to stay and write an important one to understand. So what this does, this integrates all the
10:31
Piers Forster: heating going on in the earth. It indicates the… teaching of the… Ocean, the atmosphere.
10:41
Piers Forster: Here, the ice and the… Piers Forster: kind of soil, and it does put all of this together to work out what's going on in the integrative sort of world.
10:53
Piers Forster: compare. And we can really track this through recording the temperatures, but we can also track it directly from satellites. And what it… what it tells us is what…
11:10
Piers Forster: Can Johan introduce effectively the… the… heating of the… climate system is celebrating.
11:24
Piers Forster: And the other thing to point. Piers Forster: this increasing Heating we observe, it does appear to be right at the… right at the top top
11:42
Piers Forster: top end of the predictions coming from our computer simulations. So, it's good to unpick… I'm trying to pick this to understand what's going…
11:55
Piers Forster: Hold on. So so the big cause of this increase comes, of course, from the very
12:02
Piers Forster: High level of clean house gas. Piers Forster: emissions and concentration currently, and this is continuing to heat up the Earth, of course. But it's not the only thing that's going on. The other thing is that we do have this cleanup of air pollution at the same
12:28
Piers Forster: time, and that contributes about a
12:36
Piers Forster: third of this increase in the Earth's energy imbalance we're experiencing, and we expect this to continue. And the other thing that's going on, and perhaps the thing that is most concerning, is
12:51
Piers Forster: Either we do… do see this alteration in the
12:57
Piers Forster: Okay, the atmospheric and responding, and we see a reduction in the amount of
13:06
Piers Forster: clouds in particular, and this does turn the Earth service darker, and it is taking about heat up more rapidly.
13:19
Piers Forster: The very last bit of information the energy imbalance tells us is what we can expect for the Earth temperature change in the next…
13:32
Piers Forster: 1 to 5 year time. Piers Forster: fucking frame coming up, and Whitehouse, we can… we can expect
13:44
Piers Forster: really significant temperature increases over the next 5 years, and of course.
13:52
Piers Forster: Part of that increase is this big temps effect that's currently coming from the current LNEO.
13:59
Piers Forster: So, so I'm very happy to answer a bit more about this topic, but I'll pass back to our chair, back to you, Bryony.
14:08
Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Piers. Yes, I should say that both Johan Piers Ines and Laurie will be joining me for a panel discussion, and then we'll be opening up to questions within this hour. But I'm going to turn now to Ines Camilloni. Ines is a professor in the Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences at the University of Buenos Aires, and is also Vice Chair of IPCC Working Group One, and is currently at an IPCC
14:33
Bryony Worthington: Ines, thank you for joining us. We'd love to hear your response to this, to this paper this, this morning. Thank you, or afternoon.
14:42
Inés Camilloni: Thank you, Bramney, and thank you for the invitation to be part of this webinar.
14:47
Inés Camilloni: And really, this paper is fundamental for the IPCC work, and in this sense, it's important to have in mind the products the IPCC is preparing in this Simons Assessment Cycle.
15:04
Inés Camilloni: The IPCC is working in the three main reports coming from the three working groups of the IPCC, the fiscal basis of climate change, the Working Group 2 related to impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, and Working Group 3 related to mitigation.
15:21
Inés Camilloni: But also, the IPCC is working on a special report on climate change and cities, and two methodology reports that are absolutely relevant when talking about the urgency of.
15:35
Inés Camilloni: not avoiding overshoot, because it looks that it's impossible to avoid it, but at least to work towards stabilization of climate, and these methodology reports are… one is on the inventories for short-lived climate forces, and the other one is on carbon dioxide removal technologies, carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
15:58
Inés Camilloni: So, it was mentioned already by Johan, we are in a climate crisis. The climate conditions now are unprecedented.
16:09
Inés Camilloni: And these conditions have emerged as a result of cumulative anthropogenic emissions. And the state of climate and the climate indicators that were presented are fundamental for the IPCC assessment reports.
16:27
Inés Camilloni: And the information that is included in this paper establishes a robust scientific evidence base for evaluating the changes in the climate system, and also for the identification of the drivers of climate change.
16:47
Inés Camilloni: And. Inés Camilloni: This, foundation also allows us to understand that climate change is now stronger than ever, and…
16:59
Inés Camilloni: This, is supported by an expanded observational data sets. We have better models than ever. We have evidence from.
17:09
Inés Camilloni: Paleoclimate indicators, also the science of attribution of climate change has been developing a lot during the last years. And we also have knowledge from new systems considered now in the IPCC reports with much more stronger input related to indigenous peoples and local communities knowledge.
17:33
Inés Camilloni: So. Inés Camilloni: The information that is presented in this paper is absolutely relevant for the Working Group 1 assessment report that includes observations on global surface temperatures, the ocean heat content, sea level rise, and also changes in greenhouse gases concentration, and trends related to all these variables to show how the climate system
17:59
Inés Camilloni: The system is changing. Inés Camilloni: And also for the attribution of these changes. Inés Camilloni: And also, it's relevant for Working Group 2 related to the impacts and risks of climate change, because it allows us to not only evaluate the observed impacts in ecosystem, human health, infrastructure, and also agriculture, but also to evaluate the future risks associated to different scenarios of
18:28
Inés Camilloni: of climate change, and of course provides the basis for, different international climate negotiations, including the UNFCCC, related to mitigation and the different options we have.
18:44
Inés Camilloni: to stabilize the climate. So, the big challenge we have now is how we can translate this robust scientific knowledge that is relevant into something that is actionable, that can guide
19:01
Inés Camilloni: In some way, the risk management, and also adaptation, and early warning, and long-term decision making, because the decisions we make now are crucial for the future, and science really can show us the consequences of the different pathways, the different options.
19:19
Inés Camilloni: We have, and if we can really reduce future climate risk, it will be essential to do that, but this depends on how quickly and how widely and how fairly we act now.
19:36
Inés Camilloni: Back to you. Bryony Worthington: Thank you. Thank you so much, Vanessa, for taking time out of your busy IPCC schedule to join us, and I'm glad you're going to join us in the panel after this. But first, back to Laurie. Laurie, you focus a lot on the risks associated with this accelerating climate change indicators. Talk to us a little bit about your work on derailment risk, and what you worry about in terms of
20:02
Bryony Worthington: the near term of how we're going to be impacted by climate change.
20:07
Laurie Laybourn: Yeah, thanks, Bryony. The first thing I think to establish is that the, the changes that we're seeing presented by Johan are now increasingly graduating into security concerns. They are stressing the fundamental security of many nations around the world. That's not news to anyone, for example, who's staring down
20:23
Laurie Laybourn: this, Super Union that's upcoming, but it's also happening in countries that have Laurie Laybourn: so far felt relatively sheltered, including food security shocks that are happening across Europe.
20:33
Laurie Laybourn: Particularly off the back of this severe summer that we, experienced, in recent months. So, what that means is, we're going into the situation where
20:42
Laurie Laybourn: the systems that we need for shared stability are beginning to be stressed now. So that level of resilience is being challenged, not just at a system level, but at a societal level, and that trend is really starting to emerge.
20:55
Laurie Laybourn: What that means into the future, or what we're concerned about. Laurie Laybourn: is that the two overall trends that Johan was presenting of nonlinear changes in the Earth system, but then also nonlinear progress with, for example, the collapsing price of renewables, those two trends will increasingly meet each other.
21:12
Laurie Laybourn: And it could be that as the consequences of climate change become more severe, it could increasingly frustrate or distract us from dealing with the causes of climate change. And that's what we define as derailment risk. The idea that we could be derailed
21:27
Laurie Laybourn: From a trajectory to ultimately bring us back into some kind of. Laurie Laybourn: Earth system stability. That's not guaranteed that we would be derailed, but the risk is growing as a result of those worsening consequences. What that means is we need to pay far more heed to how we can ensure societies are more resilient so they can stay focused on climate action, even in an era above 1.5 degrees, where climate consequences are getting more severe. So.
21:54
Laurie Laybourn: One of the features, I think, one of the key states of where we are now as we head over 1.5 degrees is we have to pay far more heed.
22:01
Laurie Laybourn: To how societies can not just reduce the harms of a 1.5. Laurie Laybourn: but ensure that they can protect their agency to act so that we can minimize the length and duration of overshoot. So, into the future, we hope that there will be increasing focus on this potential derailment risk, that it could even become something that we see as an indicator, and that will hopefully ensure that people are focused on how we can mitigate that alongside these other risks.
22:28
Laurie Laybourn: Thanks, Bonnie. Bryony Worthington: Thank you so much, Laurie. Right, well, we're now going to have an open discussion about what we've just heard, and then please, if you've got your questions ready, please put them in the Q&A function, and then we'll be coming to you after in the next 10-15 minutes. But I wanted to kick things off, but back to you, Johan. Clearly, risks are escalating, and some of the risks are long-term.
22:54
Bryony Worthington: quite slow moving, but others are… and some could be adapted to, but others are much more unpredictable, or much more threatening and irreversible. So, which are the… which are the risks that really you keep an eye on, that you're concerned about, that policymakers should also be paying attention to?
23:15
Johan Rockström: Yeah, so we have, I would say, come quite a long way to scientifically verify that we have
23:23
Johan Rockström: 16, what we call climate tipping element systems, large biophysical systems.
23:29
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, that are mapped in the IPCC, and that have been, you know, thoroughly scientifically investigated, which are spread across the entire planet, and that fulfill these two criteria that you're hinting at. One is that they contribute to regulate
23:44
Johan Rockström: the stability of the climate system, but secondly, that they have multiple stable states. Push them too far, and they can cross a threshold, and they
23:52
Johan Rockström: Irreversibly shift from a state that generically actually dampened and cooled the planet.
23:59
Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, to becoming a warming and self-amplifying system. And the classic example is when ice sheets melt. In the beginning, they are white surfaces, stable, reflecting, on average, 90% of incoming shortwave radiation back to space.
24:16
Johan Rockström: gary scott: When they melt at the surface, they gradually get darker, and they come to a very, very sharp point where they
24:23
Johan Rockström: Shift from being a net cooling system to becoming a self-amplified net warming system, and that's the tipping point.
24:31
Johan Rockström: And among those 16 systems, we have now
24:36
Johan Rockström: Based on, still, a lot of uncertainty that has to always be recognized, but 6 of them
24:43
Johan Rockström: fall, even in their median assessments, to be likely to cross the thresholds if we permanently exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius. So that just shows how close they are. And among these, you have the Greenan Ice Sheet, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, abrupt thawing of permafrost, but also, now with the latest science, the risk of
25:02
Johan Rockström: pushing a significant part, and particularly the Brazilian side of the Amazon basin, across the threshold.
25:09
Johan Rockström: The one, victim number one, among all these, is… Johan Rockström: Gil Preuss, with very little uncertainty, the tropical coral reef systems. They have a very narrow uncertainty range.
Replying to @WilliamJRipple
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
Abstract
Earth’s climate system is moving deeper into uncharted territory.
We present the 2026 update of planetary vital signs that track the state of Earth’s climate system, alongside indicators of the human activities driving ongoing change.
Of 16 climate-related indicators, seven are currently at record extremes.
Several indicators also show evidence of accelerating trends or abrupt shifts, raising concerns about increasing climate instability, interacting feedbacks, and the growing risk of crossing critical tipping points.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion, remain the dominant drivers of these changes.
Despite the worsening trends, encouraging signs of societal changes are emerging, including the rapid expansion of renewable electricity and battery storage, although progress remains far below the scale and speed needed to stabilize Earth’s climate system.
Rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, effective adaptation, ecosystem protection, and transformative societal change remain essential to reducing climate risks and securing a more resilient and sustainable future.
We are witnessing the rapid destabilization of the Earth’s climate system.
This is no longer a warning for the future; it is a diagnosis of the present.
Earth’s life-support systems are being pushed beyond stable limits, with changes unfolding faster than our ability to respond.
Human activities are driving profound shifts in the atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are higher now than any time in the last 2 million years (IPCC 2021).
Across the globe, extreme heat, floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are no longer rare events but defining features of a changing planet.
For example, July 2026 was the hottest month on record for the contiguous United States (1895–present) (NOAA 2026), while global ocean temperatures also reached a record high for July (figure S1).
Climate-related changes appear to be accelerating and intensifying, raising concerns about reinforcing feedbacks and crossing of tipping points, with potential irreversible impacts.
Climate change is increasingly interacting with global biodiversity loss, freshwater stress, food insecurity, pathogens, and geopolitical instability, amplifying risks across interconnected human and natural systems.
Yet, the gap between scientific understanding and societal response continues to widen despite mounting evidence of escalating risks.
The evidence for accelerating climate and ecological disruption is now so compelling that attention must shift toward rapid decarbonization as well as adaptation, resilience, scalable responses, and transformative systemic change.
Crucially, the communities least responsible for historical emissions, particularly in the Global South and small island states, are bearing disproportionately severe and early consequences, raising fundamental questions of climate justice that must inform both policy and science.
Amid these intensifying risks, important signs of societal and technological transformation are also emerging.
Solar and wind power are expanding rapidly worldwide, with low-carbon sources providing roughly 43% of global electricity generation in 2025 (Ember 2026a).
This signals the emergence of a new clean-energy era, the Age of Electricity.
At the same time, advances in energy storage, adaptation planning, ecosystem restoration, and climate response tools are providing new opportunities to reduce risks from climate change and strengthen resilience across human and natural systems.
Although current progress remains far below what is needed to stabilize the climate system, these developments suggest that large-scale societal transformation remains possible and still within reach.
In this report, we update the vital signs of the planet and the human activities driving their rapid change. We provide a clear synthesis of the latest evidence for scientists, policymakers, and the public while identifying the risks ahead and the opportunities for meaningful action still available.
Documenting change is no longer enough. We must also communicate what it means and what actions are needed.
As scientists, we have a responsibility to communicate these realities with clarity and urgency.
This report is part of our ongoing effort to deliver timely, accessible updates on rapidly intensifying climate change.
Planetary vital signs
Of 16 planetary vital signs spanning greenhouse gas concentrations, temperatures, the oceans, ice, energy balance, and wildfire, 7 (44%) are currently at record extremes, and several show evidence of acceleration or abrupt shifts (figure 1; and see table S1 for data sources and methods).
Figure 1 Time series of climate-related responses.
For surface temperature anomaly (d), estimates based on a segmented linear regression model are shown in gray (prior to 2010) and black (beginning in 2010).
For area burned (o), the black horizontal lines show changepoint model estimates, which indicate abrupt shifts (figure S3).
For other variables with relatively high variability, local regression trendlines are shown in black.
The variables were measured at various frequencies (e.g., annual, monthly, weekly). The labels on the x-axis correspond to midpoints of years. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S1.
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
Abstract
Earth’s climate system is moving deeper into uncharted territory.
We present the 2026 update of planetary vital signs that track the state of Earth’s climate system, alongside indicators of the human activities driving ongoing change.
Of 16 climate-related indicators, seven are currently at record extremes.
Several indicators also show evidence of accelerating trends or abrupt shifts, raising concerns about increasing climate instability, interacting feedbacks, and the growing risk of crossing critical tipping points.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion, remain the dominant drivers of these changes.
Despite the worsening trends, encouraging signs of societal changes are emerging, including the rapid expansion of renewable electricity and battery storage, although progress remains far below the scale and speed needed to stabilize Earth’s climate system.
Rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, effective adaptation, ecosystem protection, and transformative societal change remain essential to reducing climate risks and securing a more resilient and sustainable future.
We are witnessing the rapid destabilization of the Earth’s climate system.
This is no longer a warning for the future; it is a diagnosis of the present.
Earth’s life-support systems are being pushed beyond stable limits, with changes unfolding faster than our ability to respond.
Human activities are driving profound shifts in the atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are higher now than any time in the last 2 million years (IPCC 2021).
Across the globe, extreme heat, floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are no longer rare events but defining features of a changing planet.
For example, July 2026 was the hottest month on record for the contiguous United States (1895–present) (NOAA 2026), while global ocean temperatures also reached a record high for July (figure S1).
Climate-related changes appear to be accelerating and intensifying, raising concerns about reinforcing feedbacks and crossing of tipping points, with potential irreversible impacts.
Climate change is increasingly interacting with global biodiversity loss, freshwater stress, food insecurity, pathogens, and geopolitical instability, amplifying risks across interconnected human and natural systems.
Yet, the gap between scientific understanding and societal response continues to widen despite mounting evidence of escalating risks.
The evidence for accelerating climate and ecological disruption is now so compelling that attention must shift toward rapid decarbonization as well as adaptation, resilience, scalable responses, and transformative systemic change.
Crucially, the communities least responsible for historical emissions, particularly in the Global South and small island states, are bearing disproportionately severe and early consequences, raising fundamental questions of climate justice that must inform both policy and science.
Amid these intensifying risks, important signs of societal and technological transformation are also emerging.
Solar and wind power are expanding rapidly worldwide, with low-carbon sources providing roughly 43% of global electricity generation in 2025 (Ember 2026a).
This signals the emergence of a new clean-energy era, the Age of Electricity.
At the same time, advances in energy storage, adaptation planning, ecosystem restoration, and climate response tools are providing new opportunities to reduce risks from climate change and strengthen resilience across human and natural systems.
Although current progress remains far below what is needed to stabilize the climate system, these developments suggest that large-scale societal transformation remains possible and still within reach.
In this report, we update the vital signs of the planet and the human activities driving their rapid change. We provide a clear synthesis of the latest evidence for scientists, policymakers, and the public while identifying the risks ahead and the opportunities for meaningful action still available.
Documenting change is no longer enough. We must also communicate what it means and what actions are needed.
As scientists, we have a responsibility to communicate these realities with clarity and urgency.
This report is part of our ongoing effort to deliver timely, accessible updates on rapidly intensifying climate change.
Planetary vital signs
Of 16 planetary vital signs spanning greenhouse gas concentrations, temperatures, the oceans, ice, energy balance, and wildfire, 7 (44%) are currently at record extremes, and several show evidence of acceleration or abrupt shifts (figure 1; and see table S1 for data sources and methods).
Figure 1 Time series of climate-related responses.
For surface temperature anomaly (d), estimates based on a segmented linear regression model are shown in gray (prior to 2010) and black (beginning in 2010).
For area burned (o), the black horizontal lines show changepoint model estimates, which indicate abrupt shifts (figure S3).
For other variables with relatively high variability, local regression trendlines are shown in black.
The variables were measured at various frequencies (e.g., annual, monthly, weekly). The labels on the x-axis correspond to midpoints of years. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S1.
fj retweeted
7 in 10 people on the Pacific's low-lying coasts live on ground that has never been precisely measured.
Yet without knowing the land's height and the depth of the water beside it, governments cannot say where floodwater will go.
@yusuketaishi and @KribBKK on the urgent need to close the data gap - and the model that Tuvalu 🇹🇻 offers: go.undp.org/NgA #PreCOP31 #ClimateAction
fj retweeted
🚴♀️🌳🚶#CityWithNature #LocalAction
The 2026 state of the climate report: challenges and opportunities
Free
14OCT2026
William J Ripple , Christopher Wolf , Michael E Mann , Johan Rockström , … et al.
academic.oup.com/bioscience/…
Abstract
Earth’s climate system is moving deeper into uncharted territory.
We present the 2026 update of planetary vital signs that track the state of Earth’s climate system, alongside indicators of the human activities driving ongoing change.
Of 16 climate-related indicators, seven are currently at record extremes.
Several indicators also show evidence of accelerating trends or abrupt shifts, raising concerns about increasing climate instability, interacting feedbacks, and the growing risk of crossing critical tipping points.
Human activities, particularly fossil fuel combustion, remain the dominant drivers of these changes.
Despite the worsening trends, encouraging signs of societal changes are emerging, including the rapid expansion of renewable electricity and battery storage, although progress remains far below the scale and speed needed to stabilize Earth’s climate system.
Rapid reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, effective adaptation, ecosystem protection, and transformative societal change remain essential to reducing climate risks and securing a more resilient and sustainable future.
We are witnessing the rapid destabilization of the Earth’s climate system.
This is no longer a warning for the future; it is a diagnosis of the present.
Earth’s life-support systems are being pushed beyond stable limits, with changes unfolding faster than our ability to respond.
Human activities are driving profound shifts in the atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are higher now than any time in the last 2 million years (IPCC 2021).
Across the globe, extreme heat, floods, droughts, storms, and wildfires are no longer rare events but defining features of a changing planet.
For example, July 2026 was the hottest month on record for the contiguous United States (1895–present) (NOAA 2026), while global ocean temperatures also reached a record high for July (figure S1).
Climate-related changes appear to be accelerating and intensifying, raising concerns about reinforcing feedbacks and crossing of tipping points, with potential irreversible impacts.
Climate change is increasingly interacting with global biodiversity loss, freshwater stress, food insecurity, pathogens, and geopolitical instability, amplifying risks across interconnected human and natural systems.
Yet, the gap between scientific understanding and societal response continues to widen despite mounting evidence of escalating risks.
The evidence for accelerating climate and ecological disruption is now so compelling that attention must shift toward rapid decarbonization as well as adaptation, resilience, scalable responses, and transformative systemic change.
Crucially, the communities least responsible for historical emissions, particularly in the Global South and small island states, are bearing disproportionately severe and early consequences, raising fundamental questions of climate justice that must inform both policy and science.
Amid these intensifying risks, important signs of societal and technological transformation are also emerging.
Solar and wind power are expanding rapidly worldwide, with low-carbon sources providing roughly 43% of global electricity generation in 2025 (Ember 2026a).
This signals the emergence of a new clean-energy era, the Age of Electricity.
At the same time, advances in energy storage, adaptation planning, ecosystem restoration, and climate response tools are providing new opportunities to reduce risks from climate change and strengthen resilience across human and natural systems.
Although current progress remains far below what is needed to stabilize the climate system, these developments suggest that large-scale societal transformation remains possible and still within reach.
In this report, we update the vital signs of the planet and the human activities driving their rapid change. We provide a clear synthesis of the latest evidence for scientists, policymakers, and the public while identifying the risks ahead and the opportunities for meaningful action still available.
Documenting change is no longer enough. We must also communicate what it means and what actions are needed.
As scientists, we have a responsibility to communicate these realities with clarity and urgency.
This report is part of our ongoing effort to deliver timely, accessible updates on rapidly intensifying climate change.
Planetary vital signs
Of 16 planetary vital signs spanning greenhouse gas concentrations, temperatures, the oceans, ice, energy balance, and wildfire, 7 (44%) are currently at record extremes, and several show evidence of acceleration or abrupt shifts (figure 1; and see table S1 for data sources and methods).
Figure 1 Time series of climate-related responses.
For surface temperature anomaly (d), estimates based on a segmented linear regression model are shown in gray (prior to 2010) and black (beginning in 2010).
For area burned (o), the black horizontal lines show changepoint model estimates, which indicate abrupt shifts (figure S3).
For other variables with relatively high variability, local regression trendlines are shown in black.
The variables were measured at various frequencies (e.g., annual, monthly, weekly). The labels on the x-axis correspond to midpoints of years. Sources and additional details about each variable are provided in supplemental file S1.
fj retweeted
Biodiversity is the web of life that keeps our planet healthy, from the air we breathe to the food we eat.
But it is under threat from pollution, habitat loss, and climate change.
Explore more on what biodiversity is all about and the ongoing work to protect it for people and planet: unep.org/en/what-we-do/natur…
fj retweeted
27,000 New Yorkers lost their SNAP benefits due to cruel cuts from the federal government. If you’re one of them, New York City is here to help.
As of October 1st, you can re-enroll for SNAP benefits. But there are new rules.
Call 718-SNAP-NOW or visit nyc.gov/ACCESSHRA for help re-enrolling and to understand what’s changed.
While Washington turns its back on working Americans, New York is here for you. Because everyone deserves to put food on their table.
fj retweeted
US, 1892
WTF
Bison slaughter shows what happens when nature treated as an obstacle to profit, power, dominion
Meanwhile Trump’s admin weakens wildlife and habitat protections to favour development
Different century
Familiar priorities
Conservation safeguards exist for a reason
By 1907, fewer than 1,000 bison remained in North America.
That year, the Bronx Zoo shipped 15 bison to Oklahoma's Wichita Mountains in one of the first bison reintroduction efforts — and it worked.
Their descendants still roam those grasslands today.
It's National Wildlife Refuge Week — visit one near you. 🦬
Video of a close up of bison bull bellowing by Nancy Corona: USFWS
fj retweeted
Forest clearance at smallest total since records began in 1988 in success for Lula ahead of presidential run-off
theguardian.com/environment/…
fj retweeted
Nuevo Plan Ciclista de París 2027-2032: otros 140 km de red protegida y mejora de más de 400 intersecciones. paris.fr/pages/amenagements-…
















