https:https://xitter.cf/t.co/ITFMHB9B6h https:https://xitter.cf/t.co/ys6DEWwOQn https://xitter.cf/t.co/OXN1KkFmsW https://xitter.cf/t.co/auOIP6gMOr
Denver, CO
Joined April 2007
- Tweets23.8K
- Following159
- Followers1K
- Likes395
No exercise for this hit.
🚨 BREAKING: A Jefferson High School football player charged and CLOTHESLINED a Grant player carrying the American flag as his team ran onto the field.
And the Jefferson’s football team CELEBRATED the incident on Instagram!
Absolutely DESPICABLE.
What does it say about the direction of our country when we’re raising kids who celebrate this kind of behavior instead of condemning it?
Where is the accountability?!
Politicial tolerance is not popular these days, but it arguably is indispensible for a democracy that has to reconcile different views, all the time. substack.com/@michaelsvilar/…
Some people find it so hard to understand the simple principle: when you treat people differently from others because of the color of their skin, even if you think it is "benevolent, helpful or non-invidious," it is still racist.
Journalists once were taught not to do this sort of false headline writing. It's of the "when did you stop beating your wife" variety of a non-story with a misleading headline.
J.K. Rowling Denies Inviting Jeffrey Epstein to ‘Harry Potter & The Cursed Child’ Broadway Opening, DOJ Docs Show He Was Turned Away at Door variety.com/2026/theater/glo…
One might argue Anthropic has better things to do with its time and money. Why, in principle, is a sustainable revenue model a bad thing, for a model with a huge consumer user base? Anthropic is leaning into its enterprise customer base, so it has other revenue sources.
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.
But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.
I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it.
More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.)
Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions.
Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.
We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare.
One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path.
As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything.
We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win.
We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users.
This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
Catholic schools, to my knowledge, stayed open during Covid. One doesn't hear about major problems occurring. As close to a controlled policy experiment as one can get.
And so trust in our institutions takes another hit, which is not good.
And people wonder why it might be wise to insist that "following the science" should mean ALWAYS following the science, not selectively doing so.
Gary Kim retweeted
In our competitive society, where it seems that only the strong and winners deserve to live, sport also teaches us how to lose. It forces us, in learning the art of losing, to confront our fragility, our limitations and our imperfections. It is through the experience of these limits that we open our hearts to hope. Athletes who never make mistakes, who never lose, do not exist.
#AI training is the same as human learning, just way more efficient
dlvr.it/TKjlXz
