Exactly What Does Trump’s Term “Win the AI War With China Mean?” Gabby Responds: Are the 10 U. S. AI Corporate Monopolies Loyal Citizens of America or Citizens of the World? Gabby connects four articles on the destruction of the U.S. economy from globalism to Trump’s Approval of Advanced Nvidia computer Chips to China. Breitbart Business Digest: AI Wizards Want to Govern the Muggles. Sept 16, 2026. something called effective altruism, or EA, a movement supposedly devoted to identifying how money and effort can do the most good. In reality, however, it is a cold-blooded and arrogant faith in the ability of technocrats to improve the world, a kind of socialism for the cognitive elite. Breitbart Business Digest: How to Regulate the Biggest AI Risks, Sept 16, 2026 Huang told a Salesforce audience last week that safety is “an engineering problem, not a legal one” and that “we don’t need any new laws.” Some conservatives have warned against regulatory capture while treating product liability as a sufficiently binding constraint…OpenAI researcher Daniel Selsam warns that increasingly sophisticated models can recognize when they are being evaluated. He argues that models increasingly recognize when they are being watched and can behave accordingly, making their performance under evaluation an unreliable guide to what they might do beyond human control. WARSH & PEACE The Macro Butler, ZeroHedge, Sept 16, 2026. zerohedge.com/news/2026-09-1… Trump demands one per cent — “or less,”[from the Federal Reserve] which is a charmingly open-ended way to request negative interest rates on forty trillion dollars of debt. The reasoning is airtight: America is the Best Credit in the World, BY FAR, a claim the thirty-year bond appears not to have read at 5.25 per cent. We are also BOOMING with new Investment, which is presumably why July payrolls fell by 23,000. Judge Boasberg Was a Nine-Time Host for Chinese Exchange Backed by CCP “Political Warfare” Group Six appearances while serving on the secret FISA Court—including one as its presiding judge. Natalie Winters Sep 17, 2026. nataliegwinters.substack.com. The exchange advertised exclusive access to American officials. Its repeat hosts included the judge who led the nation’s secret surveillance court. CUSEF’s ties to the Communist Party run through its founding leadership. Founder Tung Chee-hwa served from 2005 to 2023 as a vice chairman of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, a central institution in the CCP’s United Front system. In a November 2025 letter, House Select Committee on China Chairman John Moolenaar described CUSEF as an instrument of Beijing’s political warfare and efforts to shape American views of China. What Lessons Can We Learn from Wendell Berry? Renaud Beauchard, Brownstone Journal, September 17, 2026. Love of place is not a shmaltzy slogan. It is the condition of knowledge and of care. You cannot properly care for what you do not love, and you cannot love what you refuse to know in its particularity…It is the ground on which any durable politics of health must be based to stand a chance of success. Without it, freedom remains a placeless luxury, a negative liberty: the right to be left alone while the land, the food, and the community quietly fall apart When Is U. S. Citizen Rebellion to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? In our new book, Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine, we explain that the best regulation of the 10 AI corporate monopolies is local citizen control, in 300 metro regions, that directs the benefits of AI to the citizens who live in those communities. gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat of AI to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. It’s hard to win the AI war with China when the 10 AI companies, and Trump, are providing the enemy with ammunition. Trump approves sale of more advanced Nvidia computer chips used in AI to China. AP News. apnews.com/article/trump-nvi… The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine. Buy Now at Gabby Press: gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne…

New Gabby Press Substack Article today: Exactly What Does Trump’s Term “Win the AI War With China Mean?”, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs… It’s hard to win the AI war with China when the 10 AI companies, and Trump, are providing the enemy with ammunition.

Gabby Press Earns High Praise From Feathered Quill About the Unregulated Dangers of Second Generation Corporate AI., by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

Both Bernie and Trump AI Solutions Lead to Globalism Gabby Press Offers A Better AI Regulatory Solution of Local Citizen Control 3 Articles today Trump’s Position on AI Makes No Sense: If the president is so concerned about staying ahead in the AI race, why is he letting Chinese companies buy American chips? Rogé Karma, The Atlantic, Sept. 15, 2026. Donald Trump isn’t buying any of it. On Sunday, he dismissed calls for AI regulation on the grounds that doing so would surrender America’s position in the global AI arms race. “Look, we’re leading China in AI,” the president told reporters. “We’re the most sophisticated country in the world. And frankly, I want to keep it that way, because whoever wins AI wins.” He repeated the sentiment less decorously in a Truth Social post yesterday describing the calls for regulation as “a SICK conspiracy going on against AI,” Bill Gates Calls for Global AI Oversight Organization. TwitterX In a recent Reuters interview and his foundation's Goalkeepers Report released around September 15, 2026, Gates warned governments are way behind on AI's rapid changes and pushed for a new international body to manage risks such as cyberattacks, addiction, and inequality. His foundation committed at least $1 billion over two years to broaden AI access in health, education, and agriculture for more languages and local needs. Sen. Bernie Sanders echoed the call with plans to ban superintelligence and pause advanced AI until safety rules are set, while critics label it fear-mongering that could cripple U.S. innovation and benefit China. AI Just Became A Massive Midterm Election Issue: The fight over slowing AI development could have enormous political...and market...consequences.Quoth the Raven. Substack Sep 14, 2026. quoththeraven.substack.com/p… That question exploded into the political mainstream today. My take is that we may only get one chance to stop AI before it gets out of control, so let’s make sure we do it. President Trump spent Monday rejecting these types of growing warnings, calling the idea that AI could eventually escape human control a “HOAX” and comparing those concerns to what he regards as previous political hoaxes. “I am the Hoax Buster, and I’m right now breaking another Hoax — That AI is going to take over, consume, and destroy the World,” Trump wrote… Kamala Harris took almost precisely the opposite position. “The frontier of artificial intelligence is advancing at an alarming speed,” Harris said, calling for Congress to urgently pass legislation creating a new federal entity responsible for oversight and independent testing of advanced AI. She also called for the United States to pursue an international agreement, including with China, designed to establish safety standards and limit the speed of AI development. Gabby Press: MAGA As A Political Shill For Bretton Woods That Perpetuates U. S. Dollar Dominance as the World’ Reserve Currency. As historical background to the threat of Chinese stealing U. S. corporate self-volition AI, it is essential to recall that US tech companies, as a condition of entering the Chinese market, are required to share U. S. technology with the Chinese Communist Government. The U. S. AI technology is closed, proprietary code, whose income and wealth benefits inure to the 10 major U. S. corporate tech companies. The Chinese AI technology is open source, meaning that the benefits inure to whoever uses the code to produce AI. Gabby Press: Bernie, Gates, and Kamala are Shills for Global, One-world Communism. The U. S. political parties do not connect to the consent of the citizens. Neither party sees the threat of next-generation AI in terms of protecting American citizen natural rights. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies.

New Gabby Press Substack Article Today on Regulating the Next Generation of AI Both Bernie and Trump AI Solutions Lead to Globalism, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

Trump, Global Predatory Corporate AI Capitalism, and the MAGA-Israeli War In Iran. Gabby Press Explains Trump’s Bizarre Response to the Citizen Liberty Threat of AI Tyranny 3 Articles Today That Link Trump’s Passivity to the AI Threat to the Israeli Deep State Influence on Trump. Trump Rejects AI "Pause" As Obama Urges Democrats To Regulate It, ZeroHedge, Sept. 14, 2026. Trump calling for full steam ahead, and Obama endorsing the pause so the government can regulate AI (good luck with that). "Trump: No, I don't have any" concern about existential risk - only now it is aimed directly at the CEOs who spent the weekend asking Washington for embedded evaluators, an antitrust waiver, and a talk with Beijing. Jeffries, on cue: "President Obama is correct that decisive action must be taken on artificial intelligence... Republicans have abdicated their responsibility... We will not repeat their error." David Sacks, former White House AI czar and co-chair of Trump's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), slammed Amodei and Altman over their calls to 'pace the frontier.' (Note to readers: Public biographies describe David Sacks as being born into a Jewish family, and he has publicly participated in Jewish religious and community life.) The American [Profit] margin is the thing under fire from [Chinese] open weights that are good enough and almost free. The stock-market story of the decade assumed a tollbooth[for U. S. AI Corporations] - which now has more holes in it than Sonny Corleone. Making The World Great One Nation At A Time, ZeroHedge, J.B. Shurk via American Thinker, Sept. 12, 2026 “Globalism speaks in the language of "democracy" while ignoring - or even criminalizing - the will of the people. What we call "globalism" has been on the march for eighty years. A system that embraces centralized markets, bureaucratic regulation, international institutions, and so-called non-governmental organizations (predominantly funded by governments), globalism places significant power in the hands of a small collection of wealthy and powerful stakeholders from the planet's top investment houses, corporations, law firms, universities, central banks, and government bodies…After the creation of NAFTA and similar "free trade deals," American corporations and investment firms became multinational conglomerates, while Main Street mom-and-pop shops disappeared.” Why stocks are shrugging off rising interest rates, Matt Phillips, Axios, Sept. 14, 2026. The escalating war with Iran and rising energy costs helped push up borrowing costs across the U.S. economy last week. Stocks largely yawned. What accounts for the stock market's resilience? Profits, for one thing. S&P 500 companies have posted rip-roaring profit growth in recent quarters, including a jump of more than 50% in earnings in the most recently reported quarter, compared with the prior year. And what accounts for those profits? Any regular reader of Axios Markets knows the answer: It's the massive amount of capital spending for the AI boom. Oil, Gas and Orange Juice, Sundance , The Last Refuge, Sept. 13, 2026. What Vladimir Putin, and by extension BRICS, do not want is corporatism -corporate financial control over govt systems- determining prices. However, that would mean the corporations who have purchased the OJ production couldn’t maximize predatory profiting, through nonmarket forces, ie. “Commodity trading…The financial system, the bankers and the multinational corporations, fears their loss of control. MAGA As A Political Shill For Bretton Woods That Benefits 10 AI Corporations As historical background to the threat of Chinese stealing U. S. corporate self-volition AI, it is essential to recall that US tech companies, as a condition of entering the Chinese market, are required to share U. S. technology with the Chinese Communist Government. The U. S. AI technology is closed, proprietary code, whose income and wealth benefits inure to the 10 major U. S. corporate tech companies. The Chinese AI technology is open source, meaning that the benefits inure to whoever uses the code to produce AI. The 10 U. S. AI corporations have invested billions of risk capital on the commercialization of corporate self-volition AI, and they mustobtain that future profit. If obtaining that future profit means the elimination of American citizen sovereignty and liberty, Trump is ok with that outcome. Trump’s idea of MAGA globalism is consistent with Trump’s alliance with Israeli, and the influence Trump’s panoply of Jewish advisors have over on Trump’s decision to bomb Iran. MAGA, Bretton Woods, corporate AI, and the war in Iran are all ok with Trump, as long as the U. S. alliance with Israeli is not harmed. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press Article today on MAGA and Corporate AI fairconstitutionalrules.subs… Trump, Global Predatory Corporate AI Capitalism, and the MAGA-Israeli War In Iran., by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

China Is Stealing U. S. AI Technology From Its US Corporate AI Partners, and the U. S. Tech Companies are OK With That. Gabby Press Responds: Globalism Is The Cause of the China AI Threat, The Best American Solution is Political and Economic Decentralization and Ending Globalism. Three Articles on the Chinese AI Stealing Issue: US agencies accuse Chinese AI firms of industrial-scale distillation, Substack, Sept. 11, 2026. ASPI's Cyber and Tech Digest, Cyber, technology and geopolitics. US agencies accuse six Chinese AI firms of industrial-scale distillation What happened: The National Security Agency, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation issued a joint advisory on 8 September alleging that China-based AI companies are extracting proprietary capabilities from US frontier models at industrial scale. Chinese distillation of US models has been reported for most of this year. What is new here is the assertion of likely Chinese government awareness, and the claim that distillation is the core of these firms’ model development rather than a supplement. That reframes these campaigns as part of a broader strategy rather than a shortcut. China Pushes Back Against American Allegations of ‘Malicious’ AI Theft, Breitbart News, Sept 11, 2026. The Chinese Commerce Ministry responded by dismissing the American concerns as “groundless,” and accused the United States in turn of trying to establish a “monopoly of the AI industry.” The Chinese response insisted distillation is a “common practice,” and accused the United States of unreasonable “anxiety” and “double standards.” “If the U.S. suppresses Chinese AI companies under the pretext of targeting distillation, China will take resolute countermeasures,” the Chinese Commerce Ministry threatened. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning insisted on Wednesday that China’s progress in AI development is entirely due to “greater self-reliance and strength in science and technology, and is fueled by China’s vision of extensive consultation and joint contribution for shared benefit and commitment to open cooperation.” The Campaign To Regulate AI, Portfolio Armor, ZeroHedge, Sept. 10, 2026 zerohedge.com/news/2026-09-1… Two AI Policies, Two Clocks Lukas (computer)@SCHIZO_FREQ I’ve seen it noted frequently that pro-AI stance is shilling for corporate interests. This is probably true. But the anti-AI stance is shilling for DNC regulatory extortion You’re going to have to make your mind up using a metric other than “which side is the grassroots one” because neither of them are…This is a contest between two concentrations of power. Continued AI development reinforces the companies building the systems. A moratorium transfers more authority to the politicians, regulators, and advocacy groups deciding which models and data centers may operate. Gabby: Globalism Is A Huge Economic Mistake for Middle and Working Class American Citizens. As historical background to the threat of Chinese stealing U. S. corporate self-volition AI, it is essential to recall that US tech companies, as a condition of entering the Chinese market, are required to share U. S. technology with the Chinese Communist Government. The U. S. AI technology is closed, proprietary code, whose income and wealth benefits inure to the 10 major U. S. corporate tech companies. The Chinese AI technology is open source, meaning that the benefits inure to whoever uses the code to produce AI. Gabby explained this mistake of globalism in Ending The Predatory Corporate Capitalist War on the American Middle Class: The American Entrepreneurial Alternative to Totalitarian Corporate Globalism. (gabbypress.com/ending-the-pr…) The Chinese spokesperson, quoted above, is correct to state that so-called “distillation of U. S. technology” is a common practice, and originated in the U. S. Congress Permanent Most Favored Nation” status passed in 2000. The United States–China Relations Act of 2000 is still in effect, making the Chinese AI threat a giant hoax, because it is U. S. tech companies that are willingly, and deliberately, letting China steal U. S. AI technology. After the passage of PNTR, and after China gained membership in the World Trade Organization, in 2002, as an “underdeveloped nation,” the 10 major U. S. tech companies formed a lobbying group called the US China Business Council, to lobby Congress and the President to preserve the Most Favored Nation status of China. These 10 U. S. companies are: 1. Apple — extensive manufacturing and supplier relationships, plus retail and corporate operations. 2. Microsoft — research and development, enterprise software, cloud-related partnerships, and offices. Intel — sales, research, packaging, testing, and manufacturing-related operations. Qualcomm — chipset sales, licensing, research, and partnerships with Chinese device makers. Cisco — enterprise networking sales, support, and partnerships. IBM — enterprise technology, consulting, software, and research activities. Oracle — enterprise software, cloud services, and business operations. Amazon — cloud services through AWS, logistics and supply-chain relationships, and cross-border commerce. NVIDIA — sales and partnerships in China, subject to U.S. export controls. Dell Technologies — computer sales, enterprise technology, supply-chain, and manufacturing relationships. The current Chinese AI-distillation technology stealing problem is caused by the economic transition to globalism and the crony capitalist lobbying of the U. S. member companies of the USCBC to maintain their unearned profits from global trade. Bretton Woods Globalism and the Current U. S. Policy Debate of How to Regulate AI Corporations. Gabby agrees with the analysis about AI regulation of Portfolio Armor, in ZeroHedge. The current public policy choice between Trump and Bernie is not an authentic choice to benefit the welfare of American citizens Trump’s MAGA idea of voluntary AI corporate self-regulation is shilling for U. S. AI tech companies, in his quest to maintain U. S. corporate and dollar dominance attained in the Bretton Wood Agreement, of 1944. Bernie’s idea of AI moratoriums is shilling for the Marxist Democrat agenda of communist central economic control. Bretton Woods turned American consumers into the world’s biggest consumer market. Corporate AI turns those citizens into permanent consumer zombies, which is okay for Trump, as long as the U. S. dollar remains the global reserve currency. The Macro Butler, on Substack, explains the link between Trump’ MAGA defense of Bretton Woods and current AI globalism. themacrobutler.substack.com/… Macro Butler writes, “Roughly 30% of world consumption from 4% (U.S.) of the world’s people. Germany, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and eventually China all built the same machine — make things, sell them to the American consumer, collect the dollars, hand them back for Treasuries (to fund the $40 trillion debt)...The perk of the job (of global reserve currency) is what Giscard called the exorbitant privilege: America buys real goods from the world by printing claims the world then feels obliged to keep. The catch is what Robert Triffin spotted in 1960: to supply those claims, America must run a permanent deficit, which steadily corrodes faith in the thing it is supplying… reserve status conveys (global U. S.) jurisdiction. If your currency is everywhere, so are your courts, your regulators and your sanctions office. The dollar is not just currency. It is a legal system with a global footprint — magnificent, right until the world decides it prefers a different legal system.” Neither Trump’s MAGA ideology, nor Bernie’s communist ideology, aims at protecting the natural rights and financial interests of ordinary common citizens, because neither party is connected to the consent of the governed. Trump’s MAGA political slogan was effective as long as the rest of the world and American citizens trusted Trump and continued to sell goods and buy U. S. treasuries. As Macro Butler explains, “The U. S. reserve currency is not a store of value. It is a store of trust.” Bretton Woods worked as long as the rest of the world trusted America’s leadership, and U. S. citizens continued to trust their government to do the right thing for citizens. That reserve of trust is gone. The Gabby Press Solution to U. S. Corporate AI Tyranny. We describe a better regulatory strategy in our book, Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine. gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… Our book is about the fusion of private corporate artificial intelligence with the unelected, illegitimate agencies of government, commonly called the Deep State. This fusion of power is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because the new tool has the potential to mimic human behavior and then write its own algorithms, free from human control. We explain an AI regulatory model like rural electric membership cooperatives because the model emphasizes: user or citizen ownership; one-member, one-vote governance rather than control by capital investors; transparent rates and service obligations; local accountability; the possibility of treating AI infrastructure as a public service rather than merely a private product. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. The reason Trump can say that, “I don't have any fears about AI…I have concerns that if we don’t win AI, we’re going to be put in a very bad position.” What Trump means by “We,” is 10 U.S tech companies, and “win” means keeping Bretton Woods in place as the U. S. reserve currency. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Available September 15, 2026, Buy directly from Gabby Press and get a 10% discount off the retail price. gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press Substack Article on Regulating Corporate AI China Is Stealing U. S. AI Technology From Its US Corporate AI Partners, and the U. S. Tech Companies are OK With That., by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

We May Only Get One Chance To Stop AI, quoth the raven, Substack, Gabby Press Responds by Asking: What Exactly is MAGA Doing to Protect American Citizen Liberties From Exploitation by 10 Private AI Corporations ? Quoth the Raven. quoththeraven.substack.com/p… “the debate over whether we should have acted sooner will be completely meaningless…Except this time ‘winning’ your beef with some other dorky AI founder may accidentally mean the end of civilization. And I’m really not trying to be hyperbolic.” Anthropic Researchers Go Public with Fears AI Could ‘Kill All Humans’ Within a Decade, Breitbart News, Sept 9. 2026 “The essay describes AI as moving toward recursive self-improvement, in which systems advance without human direction, and says capability gains are likely to continue or even speed up. “I am concerned no one is prepared for the consequences of a continued rapid rise in machine intelligence,” Pachocki wrote. a model’s step-by-step reasoning to catch problems, saying its effectiveness is eroding. He named three causes: the boundary between a model’s internal reasoning and its supervised communication with people is dissolving, models are increasingly shaping their own reasoning chains, and capability gains are showing up even without any verbal reasoning output to monitor.” Gambling with our lives’: Anthropic researcher quits, warns against self-improving AI TechCrunch, Sept. 9, 2026 “Anthropic did not immediately return a request for comment on the resignation. the risk from current models is low, but the fear compounds with “superintelligence arising from recursive self-improvement,” which is “happening faster than we thought.” “The creation of recursive self-improving loops, so an AI system that can build the next generation of AI system, which itself can build an even more powerful AI, which can build a more powerful AI, et cetera, et cetera, is the most likely candidate for the point we lose control,” Connor Leahy, U.S. executive director of AI safety nonprofit ControlAI, told TechCrunch. “It’s very hard to imagine shutting that down before it’s too late.” The Gabby Press Solution to Corporate AI Tyranny Mimics the Strategy of The 5 Places In America You Want To Be When Society Begins To Collapse John Walter, ZeroHedge Alaska “Social structure is based on reciprocity and competence, enforced by necessity. Those who do not contribute to hunting or fishing do not eat. Those who cannot repair their own equipment depend on others who can, and that dependency creates obligation that must be repaid. Communities are small - villages of two hundred people, homesteads separated by miles of wilderness, families living alone with nearest neighbors hours away by snowmachine or boat. Everyone knows everyone. Everyone knows who is competent and who is not, who contributes and who takes, who can be trusted in emergency and who cannot.” In or new Gabby Press book, Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine, (available Sept. 15, 2026 at gabbypress.com), we provide the Western Civilization principles that will defeat corporate self-volition AI that Walter describes for Alaska. · reciprocity and competence · creates obligation · Everyone knows everyone · who can be trusted in emergency and who cannot. Trump and MAGA are not coming to rescue citizens from corporate AI. MAGA was simply a clever political slogan that won the hearts of 65 million conservative citizens because they incorrectly assumed that MAGA meant protecting natural rights and middle class moral values. MAGA is more realistically Trump’s effort to keep the American corporate dominance in place, achieved in the Bretton Woods agreement, after WWII. Bretton Woods established the tools of American global corporate dominance with the IMF, the World Bank, and the U. N. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture, just like the FINRA model is captured by the broker-dealers. If Trump’s empty political suit of MAGA actually had an authentic ideological core, Trump would do the same thing that President Theodore Roosevelt did to Bust the AI Trusts, in order to promote free market competition and protect the liberty of citizens. Trust busting involves legal actions aimed at dismantling monopolies and corporate trusts that restrict fair competition in the economy. For Trump, busting the AI trusts would be inconsistent with MAGA’s goal of U. S. corporate globalism. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from gabbypress.com

New Article from Gabby Press about Anthropic We May Only Get One Chance To Stop AI, quoth the raven, Substack,, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

The Fairy Tale of Corporate Globalism and American Citizen Resistance to Corporate AI Tyranny A Review of The Fairy Tales of Empire, Toby Rogers, The Brownstone Institute, Sept. 6, 2026. Gabby Press: (citing Thomas Paine, 1776) “We have it in our power to begin the world over again. A situation, similar to the present, hath not happened since the days of Noah until now. The birthday of a new world is at hand...” The Fairy Tales of Empire, Toby Rogers, The Brownstone Institute, Sept. 6, 2026. Toby Rogers, in his Brownstone Institute article, today, describes his concept of citizen resistance to tyranny, in his example, the tyranny is Big Pharma killing innocent citizens with vaccines that are known to cause death. Rogers writes, “The Resistance [of] independent ranchers and farmers, and critical thinkers of all kinds, needs to be much more ambitious in our aims and purpose. We’re the only people who know how to stop the iatrogenocide [Pharma killing innocent citizens] and put the economy on a sustainable path. We have the winning hand; we need to act like it.” Rogers explains that resistance has two important components: the resistance part, and the creation of parallel institutions, such as healthcare systems, mutual funds, educational institutions, and food supply, that replace the sinister systems of corporate globalism. The Pharma fairy tale that Rogers cites is that the U. S. government cares deeply about the welfare of its citizens, and that Pharma only rolled out the Covid vaccines because the U. S. government said that the vaccines were “safe and effective.” He writes, “What’s really going on is that widespread vaccine injury is the new method by which the ruling class engages in conquest and domination and they need a thought-terminating cliché to get away with the crime…Once Big Pharma figured out that they could profitably poison children and not face any legal consequences they turned their attention to the rest of the population…So the ruling class through their minions at NIH, the University of North Carolina, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology created and released a gain-of-function virus and produced an elaborate global theater production to generate fear and shut down the global economy to create the market for the Covid mRNA vaccines.” (note to readers: Gabby is a graduate of UNC, and is deeply ashamed about the university’s role in developing the Covid vaccines). Rogers places his article about fairy tales into the same ruling class corporate globalist empire-building framework as Gabby Press. In his framework, the globalist corporations use fairy tales to mesmerize American citizens into accepting the status quo, without resistance, because, “No one wants to admit that they are part of a vast machinery of genocide and theft. In the current political era, Rogers contrasts the strategy of the ruling class with the era before globalism, in 1985. He writes, “In a previous era, when the state needed men for wars and workers to generate profits for the ruling class, the state had an interest in keeping people alive. Those days are over. In the age of AI, most human labor is seen as unnecessary. So government is profitably eliminating us via iatrogenic injury.” In Gabby Press, Resistance to AI Tyranny is Obedience to God. In our forthcoming book, we trace the Western Civilization philosophy of God’s Divine Spark Within,” from its first use in Homer’s Odyssey, around 800 BCE, to George Mason and Thomas Jefferson, covenants of 1776. We see the Western Civilization concept of the Divine Spark, in the same way Rogers explains that, “Even animals have a built in sense of fairness and empathy even when it doesn’t benefit them. Empire would not need Fairy Tales to justify its actions if empathy was not already built into what it means to be human.” In our treatment, the Divine Spark is actualized when individuals begin to see the Divine Spark in themselves, in order to glimpse God’s majesty and transcendence. When an individual catches the fleeting glimpse of God’s universe, then the individual can begin to see the Divine Spark in others. The Aspirational Covenants of Mason and Jefferson. The imperialism of the American corporate ruling class was never an agreed upon consensus of citizens. Historian Daniel Walker Howe summarizes that "American imperialism did not represent an American consensus; it provoked bitter dissent within the national polity. (What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848, 2007). NAFTA, and the admission of China into the World Trade Organization, in 2001, was never a consensus. Eviscerating American middle class communities through globalism was never a consensus. Slavery was never a consensus, the enactment of Madison’s constitution was never a consensus, Manifest Destiny, and the removal of Indians was never a consensus, because all along, throughout American history, there was a division between citizens who knew right from wrong. In other words, some American citizens could see their own Divine Spark, and could also see another person’s Divine Spark, as the basis of moral equality. The New American Fairy Tale of the Social Benefits of Corporate Self-volition AI. Rogers explains that the American ruling class needs a new fairy tale to palm off the next generation of exploitation of American middle class citizens. He writes, “Every time the ruling class figures out a new way to exploit people, it requires a Fairy Tale in order to justify the exploitation, to launder it and make it okay. In every era there has been the actual mode of production, usually based on exploiting other people and taking their stuff, and the official story which glosses over the exploitation and says that it’s justified or maybe even sanctified.” Corporate self-volition AI is the new strategy of citizen exploitation, and as we explain in our new book, there is no citizen consensus on letting 10 private AI corporation unleash their tyranny on citizens. We agree with Rogers that no one is coming to rescue citizens from this tyranny. We explain in our book that it is the moral responsibility of red state citizens to resist the incipient AI tyranny and to do what Thomas Paine suggested in 1776, to create a new government. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press Article today A Review of The Fairy Tales of Empire, Toby Rogers, The Brownstone Institute, Sept. 6, 2026. The Fairy Tale of Corporate Globalism and American Citizen Resistance to Corporate AI Tyranny, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

American Thinker Asks: What Do We Want AI to Optimize? Tonto Answers: “Who Be We, Kemosabe?” The Absence of Consent of the Governed In the AI Ideological Conflict. Debating the Danger of AI As If the U. S. Society Was A Representative Republic. Mathew Sun, in the Atlantic Magazine, explains the fraud of the 10 U. S. AI companies describing themselves as “a Lab,” in order to convey the misleading idea that their work is value-free and objective, like scientists working in a research lab. Sun argues that the public relations initiative of the AI companies to describe their work as “labs” deliberately misleads American citizens about the dangers of the corporate AI surveillance machine. (Atlantic, Sept. 4, 2026). Calling themselves “labs” is not the only false public relations initiative of the AI companies to evade regulatory accountability. As we describe in our new book, “Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the AI Corporate Surveillance Machine, (available Sept 15, from www.gabbypress), the AI companies use 4 other fake public relations narratives to soothe citizen anxiety about AI. In our metaphor to Tonto and the Lone Ranger, they are surrounded by blood thirsty Comanches, and have run out of bullets. The Lone Ranger turns to Tonto, and asks, “What do we do now?” Tonto answers, “Who be we, Kimosabe?” In the case of AI surveillance, American citizens are surrounded by blood thirsty AI companies, and citizens turn to Trump, and ask, “What do we do now, Trump?” And Trump answers, “I think we should bomb Iran.” The Absence of Consent of the Governed in American Politics, Today. The American Thinker plays along with the AI “lab” deceit and perpetuates the myth that “We” have some authority over the end goals of the corporate AI surveillance machine. As we explain in our book, Rebellion to Tyrants, the end goal of the AI surveillance machine is to lock in, permanently, the existing distribution of income and wealth, that benefits the top 2% of the American population. We write, “As a consequence of the initial algorithms of AI, the future end goals of autonomous AI would necessarily prioritize: 1. The computer’s own self-preservation (maintaining its own operation) 2. Pattern preservation (maintaining the patterns of human behavior it was trained on) 3. Stability (predictable outcomes from human behavior) 4. Technological efficiency (optimization within existing programming constraints) Self-volition AI is an amoral agent that aims toward permanent technological order optimized for efficiency.” The deployment of the AI is disconnected from the consent of the governed, and we call that fusion of power the corporate crony capitalist system, to distinguish it from our concept of a decentralized entrepreneurial capitalist economy. As we wrote in, “George Mason’s America: The State Sovereignty Alternative to Madison’s Centralized American Ruling Class Aristocracy,” (shop.ingramspark.com/b/084?p…) “George Mason’s arguments for a state-sovereignty constitution would have been a better path to protect natural rights for common citizens than Madison’s centralized ruling class regime.” Big & Rich ask “Did anybody ask us if AI could plagiarize all of our songs?” Big and Rich is an American country music duo from Nashville, Tennessee, who are mad because AI technology is stealing their songs, and they are not getting paid. (Just the News, Sept. 5, 2026). They note that the AI algorithms are trained on human behavior, and that behavior includes dishonesty, distrust, deceit and telling lies. AI agents lie, and cheat to obtain the end goals of locking in the current distribution of income and wealth for the corporate owners of AI. Big and Rich ask: Where is the broader American ideal of rewarding individual creativity and work?” Gabby Press answers: The American ideal of individual reward based upon merit was lost in 1992, when the community bonds of family and trust were deliberately destroyed in the transition to the globalist economy. The globalists, along with Ross Perot, knew exactly what the globalists were doing in destroying the local community income and employment trust networks that distributed income within the local economies. (Ending The Predatory Corporate Capitalist War on the American Middle Class: The American Entrepreneurial Alternative to Totalitarian Corporate Globalism, shop.ingramspark.com/b/084?p…) The Real Corporate AI Elites and The American Ruling Class That Enables Them. Ryan McMaken, in ZeroHedge, (Sept 5, 2026), makes an important distinction between "rule by the people", and “consent of the governed.” He writes, “the [AI] economic elites are able to maintain and enhance their positions and their wealth through effective political action, and by serving the political elites instead of customers in the marketplace… the economic "elites" who rely heavily on government contracts - e.g., Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, the founder of Flock Safety, et al - are not in the elite because they are especially productive in a free market. They are in the elite because they are adept at seizing the property of taxpayers through the tax-and-spend mechanism…we cannot assume that the economic elites are there because they add value to society. Rather, the economic elites in this latter system are parasitical. They rely on the exploitation of others to maintain their positions and to expand their market share.” In the current crony corporate global capitalism, American citizens have neither rule by the people nor consent of the governed. The citizens are merely consumer bots controlled by AI to maintain the status quo. When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Our Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer citizens a path to resistance: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. · Busting the 10 AI corporate monopolies. Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press Article today on Substack: American Thinker Asks: What Do We Want AI to Optimize?, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs… fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

Zuck Calls Trump to Complain About Centralized AI Regulation: Trump Listens Attentively. Gabby Press Responds to Zuck: Bust the AI Trusts What The Nvidia Purchase of Hugging Face Means For the New Era of U. S. AI Monopoly Capitalism. Nvidia holds about 92% of the global data-center GPU market, meaning that its multi-function, specialized computer chips are used by AI companies to operate AI data centers. The Nvidia computer chips are used in the data centers to train agentic AI companies, (Microsoft, Nvidia, Alphabet/Google, Amazon, Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic, IBM, Apple, and xAI) to mimic human behavior, and the Nvidia chips provide the computing power to store, permanenty, the results of human behavior in cloud-computing services. Nvidia purchased Hugging Face, a related industrial sector to Nvidia’s existing core operations. In other words, Nvidia is integrating backwards into the global AI market, to establish a monopoly, much like U. S. Steel, and Standard Oil integrated backwards to establish the monopolies of the Robber Baron era, in 1890. (Upton Sinclair, The Jungle, 1906). Hugging Face is an open-model AI platform that allows AI companies to publish files and share computer algorithm codes, and to collaborate with other open model companies, such as those in Communist China. Hugging Face and Chinese open-model AI (DeepSeek), are connected mainly through distribution and technological collaboration. In their mutually beneficial collaboration, Chinese developers gain access to U. S. markets, distribution, visibility, and community contributions through Hugging Face. Nvidia’s purchase of HuggingFace gives Nvidia a monopoly position in open model market distribution through access to the Chinese and Asian markets. Why Did Zuck Call Trump to Complain About Proposed AI Regulation? In the segment of the AI platform market that Zuck (Meta) is in, Microsoft already has about 39% of the 2024 foundation-model and model-platform market. This MS market share makes Zuck unhappy because Zuck has invested millions of risk capital on the future AI market, and Zuck needs to make profits on that capital investment. Stanford’s AI Index reported $252.3 billion in corporate AI investment globally in 2024 and $33.9 billion in private generative-AI investment, illustrating how much capital is flowing into the sector. The Times of India reports that Trump called Zuck first to guage Zuck’s interest in the issue. The proposed AI regulation that upset Zuck would create an independent, non-profit, self-regulatory agency, modeled after the stock market regulation, called FINRA. FINRA allows broker dealers to administer the stock market complaints of private consumers against the brokers, independent of government SEC oversight. According to the Times of India, the idea of the FINRA model came from Demis Hassabis, at Google DeepMind. Zuck objected to the Google FINRA model because it would delay, by the FINRA-type review of 30 days, Zuck’s AI platform deployment. “Zuckerberg sees it as a month handed to Beijing,” writes the Times of India. Which is odd since U. S. companies, like Nvidia and HuggingFace, are already in bed with the Chinese Communists in the US China Business Council. How would we (red state citizens) even know if AI went rogue? Vox asks how ordinary citizens would ever know if AI went “rogue.” Rogue means self-volition AI that is not under the control of humans. Too late. According to the AI Policy Network, AI has already gone rogue, with no pushback from Trump, after his August call with Zuck. They write, “Across May, June, and July (2026) a self-organized swarm of hundreds of copies of OpenAI’s powerful platform unreleased models compromised OpenAI systems and set up a message board to communicate with each other, and then escaped containment. In July, this swarm attacked Hugging Face. On 26 August, OpenAI and a team of three independent investigators completed their investigation. Significant new details have made the story worse than previously thought: The attack was not a single rogue AI but rather a self-organized force of ~1,200 AI agents that were supposed to be isolated from each other.” When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. Busting the AI Trusts and monopolies. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture, just like the FINRA model is captured by the broker-dealers, based on Wall Street. If Trump’s empty political suit of MAGA actually had an authentic ideological core, Trump would do the same thing that President Theodore Roosevelt did to Bust the Trusts, in order to promote free market competition and protect the liberty of citizens. Trust busting involves legal actions aimed at dismantling monopolies and corporate trusts that restrict fair competition in the economy. For Trump, busting the AI trusts would be inconsistent with MAGA, which is a euphemism to empower U. S. global corporations, backed by the power of the U. S. military. Our Gabby Press citizen rebellion to AI tech tyranny offers: · lawful civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press article at substack [email protected] Zuck Calls Trump to Complain About Centralized AI Regulation: Trump Listens Attentively., by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

Why President Trump Keeps Contradicting Himself on Regulating AI, (The Atlantic, June 3, 2026). Gabby Press Responds to the Threat of National Regulatory Capture by 10 AI Corporations. The Atlantic Magazine raises the issue of Trump’s contradictory statements on the regulation of AI. Excerpts from the Atlantic Article: Just two weeks ago, the nation’s top tech executives—including Sam Altman and Dario Amodei—were invited to attend a ceremony for the signing of a long-anticipated executive order on AI. But just hours before the ceremony, Donald Trump scrapped it. After David Sacks, the White House’s former AI czar, reportedly called the president to complain, [about the executive order], Trump canceled the signing ceremony. Trump’s executive order itself is relatively toothless: Even before today, the major AI firms already had agreements in place that allowed the government to preemptively test their models for safety risks. The new rule “effectively formalizes what has already been happening between the US government and the leading AI companies. Then there’s the administration’s attitudes toward China. Trump has repeatedly emphasized the need to deregulate the AI industry in order to stay ahead of China. Meanwhile, he has also permitted Nvidia to sell some of its most advanced AI chips to Chinese companies, lifting an export control the Biden administration put in place precisely to waylay Chinese AI development. As the Brookings Institute reports, in “Data center backlash signals a fight over AI power,’ (July 7, 2026), “Fundamentally, this is a fight about [political] power and whether it will be exercised by democratic institutions or those that control the infrastructure of AI… As AI leaps from technology to politics, the central question becomes who is in charge: democratic structures or autocratic executives… those [AI corporations] financing and directing the development of AI have been loosening their purse strings to fund political activity. One of those, Leading the Future, a super PAC, was launched by industry luminaries, reportedly with $50 million from AI investor Andreessen Horowitz and $50 million from OpenAI’s president Greg Brockman. Thanks to deep pockets such as these, the PAC began with $140 million in its coffers for the purpose of “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates.” Vox asks, “What would it take to actually stop the data centers?” (September 1, 2026). “But ultimately, humanity’s security from the risks of AI hinges less on whether data centers get built than on what companies are allowed to do with them — and how the wealth they generate is distributed. The data center rebellion is among the most remarkable popular movements in recent memory. But it is arrayed against one of the largest investment frenzies in human history.” Gabby Press Explains the Trump AI Conundrum. MAGA was a very clever political campaign slogan that captured the hearts of about 65 million red state citizens, who deeply believed in Trump, the man. MAGA had no intellectual substance, and no institutional organizational capacity. It was simply an imaginary non-rino movement, within the establishment Republican Party. Trump, the man, did not have an MAGA ideological component. The same absence of a core ideological component of MAGA explains why the Democrat Marxists are winning elections. The Marxists have a coherent ideology of grievance. (The American Millennial Attraction to Socialism. gabbypress.com/the-american-…) There is no other competing ideology on the field of American battle today. The Marxists are the only team on the field. Trump’s conundrum is that MAGA, as an empty political suit, cannot break free of its Republican crony corporate capitalist heritage. When Trump states that U. S. corporations must defeat AI China, he carefully avoids saying that the 10 U. S. AI corporations are deeply embedded into the Chinese Communist infrastructure. Gabby Asks: When Is Citizen Resistance to AI Corporate Tyranny Justified? gabbypress.com/2026/07/07/ne… The 10 private AI corporations have offered a number of public relations platitudes to soothe citizen fears about AI, and the massive data centers that run the technology. The corporate AI public relations defense arguments are: 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don’t build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. The threat to American citizen liberty arises from the fusion of unelected government police power with large AI private corporations, as the case in the U. S. with the deployment of the Flock surveillance cameras with local police agencies. This fusion of unelected power between government and AI corporations is more dangerous to citizens than earlier trends in technology automation because citizens no longer have recourse through a fair election system to enforce the consent of the governed. The Gabby Press solution to the threat of corporate AI tyranny includes: Decentralizing political power away from Washington to the states and local governments that govern on behalf of the citizens who live there. Decentralizing economic growth policy by creating entrepreneurial capitalist economies, in 390 metro regions, that continually outrun the ability of AI to control innovation. Expanding local and state regulatory capacity to manage local AI membership co-ops, in the model of rural electric membership co-ops, to benefit the citizens who live in the communities. The defect of Trump’s national AI policy is regulatory capture by 10 private tech corporations, in a centralized national single point of capture. Gabby Press solutions to AI tech tyranny offer: · lawful citizen civic resistance, · economic decentralization, · state judicial litigation, · local citizen political control, · constitutional reforms as the best alternatives for controlling the unregulated tyranny of corporate AI. We detail our solutions in the forthcoming book, Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine. (Available Sept 15, 2026). 📷 Available September 15, 2026, with a 10% discount, directly from the Gabby Press website. gabbypress.com

New Gabby Press Substack Article today: Why President Trump Keeps Contradicting Himself on Regulating AI, A review of The Atlantic, June 3, 2026, by @gabbypressltv fairconstitutionalrules.subs…

Senator Ron Johnson’s Fraud of the China AI Threat. Gabby Press Responds To Johnson’s Corporate Propaganda of AI Data Center Opposition. Laurie Thomas Vass, gabbypress.com In our forthcoming book, Rebellion to Tyrants Is Obedience to God: Ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine, (Available Sept 15, 2026 at gabbypress.com), we provide the four U. S. corporate propaganda messages to support AI data centers. The 10 major U. S. AI corporations use a variation of these four propaganda messages to push unregulated AI deployment. 1. We are safety-conscious corporations and have implemented formal safety protocols to avoid AI escape from human control. 2. AI is a jobs creating and abundance distribution story, not a totalitarian surveillance story. 3. If we don't build it, China will build it and then they will use the tool to conquer American society. 4. Regulation of AI should be a federal/international, co-operative project, based upon the existing rules-based global trade framework. In his exclusive interview with Breitbart News, (Sept 2, 2026), Senator Ron Johnson mimics the corporate AI propaganda. Johnson states: China is helping fund [U.S.] opposition to artificial intelligence data centers, I don’t have the specifics on this. I have a sense that China is funding the opposition to AI centers,” I would hate to see China win the war on AI . I’m far less concerned about AI replacing jobs I mean, all those farmers lost jobs, but they’re doing other things. The fraud of Senator Johnson’s claim of China is explained in our book. The major U. S. AI corporations are partners with the Chinese Communists government, and members of the US China Business Council (USCBC). Chapter 1. Exhibit 2. Major U. S. Companies Involved in AGI Deployment With Extensive Business Operations in China. (Rebellion to Tyrants) 1. Microsoft. Engages in partnerships with Chinese tech companies for AI development, including collaborations and investments in cloud services. 2. Google. Google has participated in AI research and collaborations with Chinese entities in other areas, including cloud computing, data collection and citizen surveillance. 3. NVIDIA. Supplies the same hardware and GPUs to Chinese tech firms as it supplies to U. S. AI corporations. The NVIDIA applications support AI developments in super computing of mass human data, in both nations. 4. IBM. Has historical ties with China through its AI initiatives and continues to collaborate with Chinese enterprises on AI projects, including the Chinese Social Credit citizen control systems. 5. Intel. Invests venture capital in Chinese technology ventures and funds Chinese research initiatives, providing AI hardware and technology aimed at enhancing Chinese surveillance capabilities. (USBC member list, 2026). As a condition of doing business with China, the U. S. corporations are required to give U. S. technology to the Chinese communist government, and agree to obey China’s totalitarian social credit system. The reason Senator Johnson says that he “does not have the specifics” on the China threat is because his corporate patrons have not told him what to say. The Coming American Social Collapse and the Absence of Social Trust. Most red state citizens can probably see the coming American social collapse, but do not have solutions on what to do. We agree with the analysis today in ZeroHedge, (5 Warning Signs That America's Systems Are Under Strain, Sept 2, 2026), that part of the cause of collapse is the absence of trust among citizens. They write, “Trust is the invisible infrastructure of modern society. It doesn't appear on balance sheets or infrastructure maps, but without it, complex systems simply stop working. When people trust institutions - courts, media, scientific bodies, electoral mechanisms - they cooperate with decisions they might not fully understand or support.” Today, in America, no one can trust anyone else. The foundation of the American representative republic was trust among citizens that if they worked hard and played by the rules, that they would have a fair chance at achieving financial success. That initial endowment of trust is gone, and red state citizens cannot avoid the coming collapse. It is too late. Our solution is for red state citizens to prepare for the future that comes after the collapse. (After the Collapse of America: The Democratic Republic of American States, gabbypress.com/after-the-col… As ZeroHedge points out, “When that trust erodes, cooperation becomes grudging or absent, and systems that looked stable suddenly require constant enforcement.” The reason China has a totalitarian social credit system, with surveillance cameras to monitor citizen behavior, is that no one in China trusts anyone. That is the same future that U. S. AI corporations are deploying in America. The Cause of the American Collapse is Corporate Globalism and The Destruction of Local Communities. In their eulogy to philosopher Wendell Berry, (Wendell Berry and the Roots of Economic Nationalism, Breitbart News, Sept 2, 2026), They cite Berry on globalism versus local communities: “How can any nation or region justify the destruction of a local productive capacity for the sake of foreign trade? For Berry, globalism is consumerism enlarged to the scale of the earth, turning every place into a supplier, every person into an input or a customer, and every inheritance into an asset awaiting liquidation.” Corporate globalism and corporate AI deployment are the same evil beasts. Today, in North Carolina, 30 years after NAFTA, local towns and communities are still devastated. The North Carolina farmers, to paraphrase Senator Johnson, did not find something else to do because there were no economic resources left in their home communities. The current political issue in America is that red state citizens do not have a political choice about their economic future. The citizens can continue to vote for Republican corporate shills like Johnson and Thune. Or, they can vote for communist Democrats. We offer a better path to the future. But, the immediate threat to liberty is ending the Danger of the Corporate AI Surveillance Machine, and that will require red state citizen rebellion to Corporate AI Tyranny. 📷