Joined December 2012
Francisco retweeted
What most people already understand, even without the economic terminology, is that firms like BlackRock operate less like investors and more like modern feudal landlords. They buy essential infrastructure,water networks, ports, energy grids, data centres, and other public necessities, often using vast amounts of borrowed money and paying prices that ordinary market participants cannot match. Once the acquisition is complete, the debt is pushed onto the acquired company itself. The result is simple: the public pays. Consumers repay that debt through higher water bills, rising energy prices, increased fees, and declining service quality. The infrastructure becomes a cash-extraction machine. Profits flow upward to shareholders and executives, while the financial burden flows downward to ordinary households. When the model inevitably breaks down, the consequences are socialised. Communities are left with crumbling infrastructure, polluted rivers and failing services. Thames Water's £14 billion debt mountain and repeated sewage scandals are a stark example of what happens when financial engineering takes precedence over public stewardship. The executives who loaded the company with debt have already collected their bonuses. The investors have already taken their returns. And when the system finally reaches its breaking point, taxpayers are expected to pick up the bill. Privatise the gains. Socialise the losses. That is the business model......
379
5,034
502
9,085
166,150
“Don’t smash it up, she’s a sister!” This shop manager protecting her business is spared by the thugs out of Muslim solidarity. Still absolutely no connection to immigration.
1,092
15,300
1,306
81,636
2,398,326
It's whether they're wanted.
130
512
38
3,610
66,904
Francisco retweeted
En contraste o profundizando lo que comenta Mosciatti En 2010, Argentina emitió un decreto presidencial unilateral (el 256/2010) que exige a cualquier barco que navegue hacia las Falklands/Malvinas por aguas bajo su reclamo pedir autorización previa. Sin embargo, al ser una norma interna de Argentina, no constituye un acuerdo internacional, no fue firmada por Chile y no modifica el derecho del mar ni los tratados vigentes. Entre ambos países destaca el Tratado de Paz y Amistad de 1984, donde Argentina se comprometió explícitamente a no obstaculizar el libre tránsito hacia y desde el Estrecho de Magallanes. La situación equivale a que un particular exija permisos a quienes transitan por la calle frente a su casa: el anuncio no altera la naturaleza pública del camino. 👉🏻Las multas y amenazas de incautación provienen únicamente de esta orden argentina. Su protocolo establece primero emitir un aviso, luego aplicar multas económicas y, si la nave insiste, contemplar la retención física. 🚫Ninguna de estas medidas tiene amparo en la legislación internacional; de ejecutarse una retención contra el buque chileno "Danstar" de Easter Island Naviera, Argentina violaría directamente el tratado de 1984. Los informes técnicos confirman que Chile descartó la ruta alternativa del Mar de Drake para no ceder soberanía de manera implícita, optando firmemente por ejercer el derecho de paso en el Estrecho. 🤷🏻‍♂️Por esta razón, Chile no solicita autorización. Cuando la embarcación zarpe desde Punta Arenas, las autoridades chilenas dejarán constancia por escrito de la legalidad de la ruta. 👉🏻Si Argentina se limita a notificar o multar a la empresa privada, Chile emitirá una protesta diplomática y el barco continuará su viaje. ⚠️La crisis real —calificada como un "evento crítico" inminente— comenzaría si detienen o se llevan la embarcación. 👉🏻Ante ese escenario, la estrategia chilena contempla una protesta formal inmediata y el despliegue disuasivo de buques de la Armada en aguas propias, respaldados por la cobertura y vigilancia de aviones de la Fuerza Aérea, listos para resguardar la soberanía territorial sin buscar una confrontación.
57
85
4
283
36,732
Francisco retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 ÚLTIMA HORA: Muhammad Saifullah, musulmán de origen somalí residente en Reino Unido: «Ustedes (los europeos) deben convertirse al Islam o habrá guerra». «Osama bin Laden era un musulmán verdadero». «Si yo fuera líder del mundo, Israel no existiría». «No los veo como seres humanos. Los veo como cucarachas». «Los homosexuales serían destruidos». «Con una espada, le cortaría la cabeza así». «Si te descubren cometiendo adulterio, te lapidan hasta la muerte». «A los apóstatas, personalmente, los torturaría». «Si alguien insulta al profeta Mahoma, 100%. Yo mismo lo ejecutaría». Estas declaraciones, que revelan los verdaderos objetivos del Islam en Europa, fueron realizadas durante una entrevista de más de 90 minutos con el podcast británico The Dozen with Liam Tuffs.
1,736
14,527
1,135
28,253
1,657,236
🔹Finalmente el Ministro Quiroz acertó con que la guerra iba para largo y se ahorro millones de dolares para el fisco. Y las bencinas hubiesen subido igual. Aquí esta mi comentario del 30 de Marzo al respecto 👇
🔹Ayer publique un tuit con 4 alternativas que el Gobierno podía tomar con respecto al alza internacional del precio de los combustibles. Y mi conclusión fue que el Gobierno hizo lo correcto y apostó que la guerra va para largo. Por favor escuchen al periodista Roberto Saa, quien no es precisamente de derecha. ✅Da a entender que la guerra va para largo ✅Indica que en mas de 95 países el precio de la bencina subió fuertemente. ✅Dice " la gente tiene que entender que este mazazo económico le esta pegando a todo el mundo " ✅Dice " Las otras alternativas eran igual de difíciles y con costos altísimos para Chile. ✅Si Chile se endeudaba y la guerra va para largo, se iban a quemar US$ 2.000 millones de dolares para llegar donde mismo. Todo parece indicar que el Ministro Jorge Quiroz opto por lo correcto ✅
16
118
1
234
8,625
Mx. Andrews, allow me to explain what happened in Gaza, to shed a little clarity on the picture you have posted. What happened in this photograph is that Israel finally acted as the adult in the room and STOPPED LETTING GAZA HAPPEN. You see, Gaza has been happening for a long time, and about three years ago, it decided to make sure everyone in the world understood what it was about. Most people got the story backwards, maybe especially over there in your Eurozone. Gazans, under the leadership of Hamas over the last twenty years or so, and Fatah before that, have been slowly turning their entire city into a war crime. You see, it is a war crime to transform civilian installations into military outposts, including weapons depots, stations for launching rockets (at innocent civilians, no less), command centers, entrances to terror tunnels that could be used to launch military campaigns (against innocent civilians) and hide hostages in horrific conditions, and the like. Under the direction of openly militant terrorist organizations, they have been busy transforming their own infrastructure, including much purchased with direct humanitarian aid provided both by Israel and many Western nations, into munitions and functioning dual-purpose military and civilian structures. Again, they did this more or less to their entire city, including residential areas and buildings, schools, hospitals, and even houses of worship, and not just their own. Of course, they did this with tremendous public support from the Gazans, but given the circumstances on both sides of the equation, it's almost impossible to tell how much of that support was the result of the hideous and murderous ideology (read their charter, or lots of other things!) and how much is the result of terroristic coercion on the part of the terrorist militants running the place, who kill their own people for a variety of reasons including ensuring their support (and also just to make propaganda to falsely condemn Israel and the West). For decades, the world, including your Eurozone, but also Israel and my United States, patiently tried to find a workable solution to this problem. Israel tried a lot of things, including withdrawing from Gaza entirely on their own at great inconvenience and not just (almost endless, almost!) patience and aid but also opening up opportunities for Gazans to work in Israel, offering again and again for there to be a stable two-state solution (ask Bill Clinton about this!), and generally believing that if they were generous enough with the Gazans and gave them enough opportunities, they might come around to making it work. The Gazans, under the direction of Hamas, repaid the world and especially Israel for this kindness, help, and patience by meticulously planning a day of violence beyond human comprehension in its horror, which we know about partly because they gleefully recorded and streamed it themselves while they committed unbelievably heinous acts not against an opposing army under instigated hostilities but against innocent civilians, who they did unspeakable things to while dragging both the living and desecrated bodies of the dead back into their hidden terror tunnels to hold as collateral against Israel, knowing how much the Israelis and Jews in general value life. It was found to be the case that the reason the horrors of 7 October, 2023, were as successful as they were, from Hamas's perspective, is because the Gazans and Hamas were using the opportunities they were granted in the hopes of increasing peace and cohabitation--opportunities for things like jobs as housekeepers, gardeners, taxi drivers, and such, there in the Gaza Envelope in Israel--that these generous opportunities given in good faith were used as opportunities to gather the necessary intelligence for this heinous, terrible operation to have succeeded. That is, what Israelis offered Gazans in good faith was taken not just in bad faith but in the worst possible faith, literally murderous (and that's not even the worst part, as you can go watch for yourself anytime you like as an MEP or even just as a human being with an internet connection). So, what had been happening in Gaza was a steady planning and then execution of something that deserves to be placed among the most grotesque and unconscionable set of coordinated activities in the history of war crimes, at least in the last century. What was happening in Gaza was that Hamas and the Gazans who support them, which is close to all of them, were systematically turning their entire city into a war crime while launching war crimes at innocent Israelis for years and then committing one of the most barbaric things to have happened in living memory all against innocent Jews, not military combatants, many of whom were ardent supporters of a peaceful co-existence with the Gazans that was simply impossible, based wholly on hippie-dippy wishful thinking and striking Leftist naivete. The photograph you have shared below is one image of Israel putting a stop to that, God be praised. May we all thank Israel for the effort and sacrifice, and may the honorable memories of those who made the ultimate sacrifice be a blessing to the world, even to you and your ungrateful Irish. While the picture below looks like terrible devastation, there are a couple of things to say about it that demand witness. First, it is devastation exactly in proportion to the war crimes of the Gazans and Hamas, specifically in turning civilian infrastructure into military infrastructure across more or less their entire city. They did this as a defensive tool, deliberately trying to invalidate military targets by hiding them within civilian buildings even while they initiated hostilities that demanded neutralization. They did this on purpose. Deliberately. As a strategy. Part of that strategy is where you come in, Mx. Andrews. It is the strategy of war propaganda, which Palestinians have mastered since they have proven for a century that they're not up to the task of actual warfare. They were good at it to begin with and honed the techniques through much Soviet tutoring, and now they have turned even a Mx. of your high standing into one of their lowly useful idiots. I'm sure you're at least a little embarrassed, right? At least you're not alone, I guess. You have a lot of very bad company here. Second, what you see here is the most minimal response possible that Israel could have made. They took extraordinary pains, all well documented, to minimize civilian casualties and all other forms of collateral damage, often suffering casualties of their own in the effort, so what you see here can be most assuredly understood to be the minimum necessary response to neutralize military installations in a hostile territory that declared war through a surprise attack on civilians at 6:30 am on the sabbath on a holiday. I'm not sure you understand the gravity of this point, Mx. Andrews, so let me elaborate upon it. Israelis shed their blood and paid with their own worthy sons and daughters, may their memories ever be a blessing to this world, in order to minimize collateral damage in Gaza, even after 7 October, even after decades of relentless but niggling (by comparison) hostilities that took their own year after year, even after the Gazans themselves rejected every single bid for true peace while the Israelis did not. Let me reiterate: good Israeli men and women not only went above and beyond to risk their lives but also sustained casualties, including the deaths of many, to minimize the death and damages to Gaza such that only valid military targets would be struck. The result is as you see. Gaza is in bad shape because Hamas and the Gazans arranged that to be a minimum necessity, and Israel left it the way it is now specifically as a result of achieving the lowest collateral damage rate of any in the entire history of urban warfare. That is, Israel paid with its own blood to minimize the deaths of innocents, even among these heinous enemies and under these unbelievable conditions. Meanwhile, Israel did this while receiving not the support or even the blind eye of the world but its scorn. Surely you've seen. Hell, Mx. Andrews, you appear to be participating, and shame on you for that, shame everlasting wouldn't be enough. So on top of these injuries, Israel has borne great insult for its responsibility, morality, and endless honoring of human life, slandered and accused around the world, even by important "statesmxn" like yourself and most of your wretched colleagues, both at home in Ireland and across the EU, never mind the United Nations. Rather than showing the most basic human decency in this situation, though, you have decided to continue to heap scorn and insinuation upon people who not only do not deserve it but who deserve your support, your honor, and your thanks, not that you can conceive of it. They don't even need your support, honor, or thanks, though, and aren't even asking. They don't even want you to think better or shut up. They'd just appreciate it if you did. They are your moral betters in every possible and conceivable way, and you bring shame upon yourself, your family, your country, and all of Europe. I doubt they'll tell you that, but I wanted you to know, from the very bottom of my American heart. To close up, you simply don't understand what you see here. The picture you shared is the result of Israel finally doing what needed to be done for decade: stopping what was happening in Gaza, which was the slow transformation of an entire city into a terrorist-ridden heap of war crimes. The sight is ugly, but it was an ugly necessity, and the world is a far better place now that it has happened. It's a shame about your inverted worldview and broken priorities, though, I must say.
The updated @Google satellite images of #Gaza are quite incredible, for all to see...
90
471
56
1,950
139,757
Trump as a Korean Street Vendor (A.I. Video)
201
854
107
8,178
382,795
Francisco retweeted
Por el fondo, por las formas y por todo, el discurso económico más importante que se ha dado en este siglo XXI. Bastos no ganará el Nobel pero, a diferencia de otros economistas, tiene un mensaje práctico que puedes implementar hoy mismo para mejorar tu vida
61
1,027
51
4,550
287,320
Francisco retweeted
Gran columna de @tucukere sobre el fraude de los trabajos en organizaciones internacionales
244
8
556
29,535
Trump the Mexican Abuelita (A.I. Video)
742
4,887
565
32,192
2,500,940
Hitler SI ERA SOCIALISTA y aca explico por qué. Uno de los argumentos más repetidos para negar cualquier relación entre Hitler y el socialismo consiste en señalar que el régimen nazi persiguió, encarceló y asesinó a comunistas, socialdemócratas y otros socialistas. Pero ese razonamiento contiene un problema lógico, perseguir a una corriente socialista rival no demuestra que quien la persigue sea contrario a toda forma de socialismo. Dos movimientos pueden disputar violentamente el significado de una misma palabra y, precisamente por eso, enfrentarse entre sí. El hecho de que Hitler combatiera al marxismo no demuestra, por sí solo, que rechazara cualquier concepción del socialismo; demuestra que rechazaba el socialismo marxista y pretendía sustituirlo por su propia concepción nacionalista y racial del socialismo. Esto aparece explícitamente en el propio programa de la NSDAP de 1920, presentado por Hitler. El programa exigía, la nacionalización de empresas y trusts, participación de los trabajadores en las ganancias de las grandes empresas, una expansión de las pensiones, la municipalización de los grandes almacenes, una reforma agraria, la expropiación de tierras para fines de utilidad pública y la subordinación de la actividad económica al interés colectivo. El punto 10 establecía que la actividad individual no debía entrar en conflicto con los intereses de la comunidad, sino desarrollarse “en beneficio de todos”; el punto 11 atacaba el ingreso no obtenido mediante trabajo y el punto 25 reclamaba un poder estatal central fuerte. Más importante todavía es que Hitler no ocultaba el uso que hacía del concepto de socialismo. En una entrevista de 1934 explicó que el nacionalsocialismo tomaba de la tradición burguesa la determinación nacional de la idea de un “socialismo vital y creativo”. Definió la Volksgemeinschaft como una comunidad de todo el trabajo productivo y como una superación del individualismo burgués. Es decir, Hitler no decía simplemente “socialismo es una palabra que no significa nada”; afirmaba que el nacionalsocialismo constituía una forma distinta de socialismo y que debía superar tanto al liberalismo burgués como al marxismo. Existe además un testimonio particularmente explícito de su disputa con Otto Strasser sobre el significado del socialismo. Strasser lo acusó de abandonar la revolución social y de colaborar con la derecha burguesa. La respuesta atribuida a Hitler fue: “I am a Socialist, and a very different kind of Socialist”, para inmediatamente distinguir su posición del marxismo. La conversación muestra justamente el problema que suele perderse en el debate actual: Hitler no respondía “yo no soy socialista”; respondía, por el contrario, “soy socialista, pero mi socialismo es diferente”. Al mismo tiempo, su concepción estaba ligada a una jerarquía racial y a la subordinación del individuo al colectivo nacional, por lo que no debe confundirse con el socialismo marxista o igualitario. La misma lógica aparece en Mein Kampf. Allí Hitler rechaza que el Estado deba ser entendido simplemente como una organización destinada a satisfacer necesidades económicas individuales y sostiene que la economía es solamente uno de los instrumentos al servicio de los objetivos superiores de la comunidad. Su concepción política coloca por encima del interés económico individual la preservación y el fortalecimiento de la comunidad nacional. Esto es relevante porque muestra que el eje de su pensamiento económico no era la defensa liberal de la propiedad y del individuo como fines superiores, sino la subordinación de la actividad económica a objetivos políticos, nacionales y colectivos. Por eso, decir simplemente “Hitler no podía ser socialista porque mató socialistas” no resuelve la cuestión histórica. Hitler también persiguió a sectores que compartían con él determinadas palabras, símbolos o preocupaciones sociales, porque rechazaba su interpretación marxista, internacionalista o revolucionaria.
Milei afirmó en Francia que Hitler era “socialista” porque su partido decía “nacional socialista”. Su argumento se cae con un dato básico de historia y las redes lo destrozaron. Leé por qué no resiste. diarioregistrado.com/politic…
102
468
39
1,351
41,482
Francisco retweeted
This is Baby Ezekiel, an 11-week-old miscarried baby. He is a human being, not a clump of cells. This is who abortion kills. End abortion now.
25
359
5
1,211
12,553
🚨 WOW! Denmark's Prime Minister is HEAPING PRAISE on President Trump for his permanent security deal over Greenland The "experts" said this could NEVER happen. "Mr. President, you've been very clear, you DON'T WANT ADVERSARIES to come too close. I fully agree! With this deal, THEY ARE NOT. They cannot get ANY control or significant influence in Greenland." HE DID IT!! 👏🏻 She just CONFIRMED it lasts "forever," and said 47's deal is good for ALL parties involved and even NATO "In other words, we are strengthening our common security, boosting deterrence, showing our adversaries who we are, and we are doing it TOGETHER." Trump says US military bases will immediately be increasing, and there is NO COST to the taxpayers
1,049
12,351
678
52,561
2,451,470
They deleted this video almost everywhere for a reason. At an Islamic conference in Oslo 10 years ago, the host speaker said: “These are general views that every Muslim actually has. Every Muslim believes in these things. Just because they’re not telling you about it, or just because they’re not out there in the media, doesn’t mean they don’t believe in them.” Death penalty for homosexuals. Subjugation of women. These are not fringe, radical or extreme views among Muslims in the West. Standard, according to themselves.
153
4,175
233
11,175
883,923
Francisco retweeted
Degrowthers are dangerous
220
428
106
2,530
152,696
Francisco retweeted
El filósofo Michael Huemer sostiene en esta entrada que los extremistas de izquierdas alimentan, sin quererlo, el extremismo de derechas. Os pongo el párrafo final del artículo: “Si eres de izquierdas y quieres que más gente se una a la alt-right, adelante: haz alguna locura. Di cosas extremas y totalmente inverosímiles; intenta perjudicar personalmente a quienes no están de acuerdo contigo; llama “nazis” a la gente por cualquier nimiedad. Así podremos seguir polarizando la cultura. El otro bando hará más locuras, que tú podrás usar para avivar la indignación de los tuyos, y así sucesivamente. Los únicos perdedores son las personas normales que quieren que los problemas sociales se resuelvan de verdad.” api.omarshehata.me/substack-…
50
264
23
652
24,739
Francisco retweeted
Doctors Told Mom 5 Times to Abort Disabled Baby Boy Who Wouldn’t Survive, He’s Now Perfectly Healthy buff.ly/PRh7BBX
25
323
9
1,456
13,299
Francisco retweeted
USAID and The Rap Game (Part 2)
167
2,434
194
7,747
475,293
Platinum Vacheron Constantin Mercator Ref. 43050 This is a 10/10 watch, no doubt. Such a cool complication.
20
60
13
998
83,317