Replying to @robinhanson
@robinhanson Thank you for speaking in Toronto today! I was fascinated by the notion of representing cultures via a multi-dimensional vectors and determining adaptability regions. Question:
1/2
EF employee
- "Am I being laid off?"
EF leadership
- "No, you're being gently cut from the Infinite garden and regrafted into a new plant nourished by the sap of wise whales."
EF employee
- "That sounds nice."
EF leadership
- "Now fill this box and leave the premises."
We’re speed-running modern financial system development, now discovering why you can’t make an arbitrarily large transaction at a bank as a no-name
To be fair, Maker had stepped ceilings way back when and I’ve always found it strange how few protocols have similar logic
0/ DeFi needs circuit breakers and other safety mechanisms which slow down large transactions and provide time for reaction. Borrow lend protocols should not allow a new user to show up with a $300M position and take out a loan against it immediately. Some ideas:
Remember, only sign in with email wallets can stop the bear market
oh wait
I just tried wallet.tempo.xyz/, made a wallet and I will probably build some stuff over the weekend. However, the login experience made me reflect on some things:
1. Account abstraction is actually as easy as the Paradigm bros were telling us.
2. Ethereum needs this ASAP. we can't wait for a bunch of wallets to slowly integrate this. strongly starting to believe that this needs to happen fast and waiting is increasingly a mistake.
holy shit moment
Introducing EVMbench—a new benchmark that measures how well AI agents can detect, exploit, and patch high-severity smart contract vulnerabilities. openai.com/index/introducing…
(cont'd) The man's email contained a factual error. The man let me know at 2.20pm before leaving office at 2.30pm. The entirety of this information could be checked at internet speed, but is gated behind the man for no apparent reason (this is a non-regulated field).
Replying to @freeatnet
OTOH, today I had to go to a place, physically, to show a screenshot of a website to a man who wouldn't reply to my emails, but the man did not have time to respond to my inquiry, so I went back home and he emailed me the answer a couple hours later
I'd send Clawdbot to do that
Hopped on the Clawdbot (sorry, Moltbot) train, asked it to send an email to a relative (and CC me), went exactly how I would have expected it to go
Love the in-depth data analysis here.
tl;dr: a particular type of validator behavior causing these spikes; you will have to read more to discover why and how it was discovered
bhaha, S level trolling always comes with receipts
Good discourse on the bird app
xitter.cf/GwartyGwart/status/199…
xitter.cf/hosseeb/status/1996396…
xitter.cf/yeak__/status/19969699…
Haseeb is literally dead wrong here. Gwart is correct.
Gwart points out 2 flaws in the following statement: traditional incentives work; ergo, crypto incentives work.
1. Web2 is incentivizing real products people want to use, unlike crypto (correct)
2. Web2 incentives have a cost, crypto incentives do not necessarily (also correct)
What Gwart is saying is intuitively true. Haseeb uses lots of words to nitpick, but Gwart's point stands.
Haseeb says #1 is wrong bc he worked at Airbnb and his friends at uber said they had to shut down in china bc fraud. And fraud is pervasive in incentives.
Sure, but this misses the point and also proves the point. Everyone knows how uber came up. The taxi model was outdated. Uber vastly improved payment flow, matchmaking, removed counterparty risk and cut costs by removing downtime. There was a massive edge, nothing proprietary, and a value to blitzing the discovery process by any means.
China market incentives were far different than the global model. less sustainable, more of a subsidy-war. 0 spread or even negative spread on fares. Along with the driver milestone incentives, it’s very easy to see how this could be abused. It was a calculated moonshot to win a massive market, and Gwart obv wasn’t talking about the Chinese market.
Web2's actual crypto analogue is SPELL. There was a proven behavioral phenomenon (CDP lending), a weak incumbent (Maker), an improved successor (yield bearing collateral). As a result, Spell issued token incentives, tapered off incentives and used revenue to buyback the token. Eventually, revenue surpassed incentives, neutralizing cost and suggesting the incentive program succeeded.
Haseeb says #2 is wrong bc “in web2: equity => sell for cash to private investors => give cash to user => user gets cash
web2: tokens => give user tokens => user dumps tokens => user gets cash… it's the same damn thing.”
No it’s not. The user doesn’t “get cash,” they get compressed margins on goods they were already searching for. McDonalds isn’t giving out $6 coupons for $5 menu items. This doesn’t work unless you’re in crypto and your name is [REDACTED].
Re VCs: in web2 there is no guaranteed liquidity event, so there’s more accountability. In crypto you can just raise and trust that people will farm and dump at a higher val. Or just not raise and not pretend to have a product and mint tokens.
TLDR gwart wins. His point is that web2 incentives are sweetening the deal on existing behaviors, which is why it works. There is also an opportunity cost of time that serves as proof of stake in the transaction. Crypto incentives are largely undifferentiated regurgitations of the same products. The product has become the incentive program itself.
freeatnet retweeted
the eth core devs don’t tweet a lot about just how hard the work that they do is so let’s talk about it:
1. every line of code they merge can move more money than most banks process in a quarter. there is no staging server for that.
2. they swap consensus logic for a 400B + dollar economy without scheduling downtime. ever.
3. they coordinate hundreds of researchers, auditors, and client teams across time zones, cultures, and philosophies, yet ship like a single mind.
4. they do it all in public, with every decision dissected by the loudest peanut gallery on the internet, and still keep the vibe collaborative.
5. they design for attackers who have nine figure incentives and infinite patience. then they sleep anyway.
6. they keep six independent clients in perfect sync so the same block lives at the same height for every node in the world.
7. they turn bleeding edge research into production code while preserving backwards compatibility for machines that went online before defi even had a name.
8. they debug issues that only happen once a year on a single archive node because someone somewhere will rely on that edge case.
9. they write cryptography that must stay unbroken for decades while the math itself evolves beneath their feet.
10.when the upgrade lands smooth the outside world shrugs. inside ethereum we know it was a minor miracle. every successful fork proves that decentralized coordination can outperform the world’s best hierarchies and shows that open internet capital markets are now the default.
thank you, truly.
we owe you everything.

















