karmic forces are real
you cannot cheat life or god
there is no shortcut, each route is just different.
If Poly actually means business, charge literally anyone. Make an example
But you guys won’t, Poly is just an on-chain, unregulated betting site
It’s so rampant, insider trading has become a key FEATURE of the platform
Good luck going after ppl’s crypto wallets 🤣
Ahead of the Nov 3 midterms, my team at @Polymarket is watching every election market, and we know what insider trading leaves behind.
If you have information you have a duty to protect, don't trade on it. If you are a candidate, hope that you win, but think twice about trading on it.
We will find you
npr.org/2026/10/27/nx-s1-601…
my dream is to marry a brain surgeon shawty who makes $1m+ yearly so i can stay at home and lose 10k/mo trading hyperliquid perps
What happened to @LunarClient?
I remember in 2020 it used to be clean and scary fast.
Unfortunately, it runs like a mess now.
I used to get 1,000+ frames-- now struggle to hit 150 on 1.8.9
Nothing has changed. 1.8.9 hasn't changed in over 10 years.
AI code bloat? Who knows.
why do you have to pay tax to buy things on income that was already taxed?
i will never understand this.
fredorsomething retweeted
Looks like Polymarket investors got SCAMMED
> In August they bought $1B at $21B valuation
> Now they can't sell even $5k at $11B valuation
that's a solid -50% in 48 days
and even at that price there are NO buyers.
A2DAO, a crypto OTC platform recently listed a sale for Polymarket equity at $11.65B valuation ($112 per share)
For the 2 days that the campaign was online only $5k worth were bought out of the $2M proposed for sale.
They sale was supposed to last for 20 days but they just removed it from the platform entirely.
Ironic.
VCs thought they were going to IPO and dump on the public, yet they are the ones that got dumped on
fredorsomething retweeted
$250k for a full chain is robbery.
For the second time in Google Chrome’s history, Google awarded a $250,000 bounty for a full-chain exploit… to @XBOW. Here’s the full story:
At an all-hands at the start of 2026 in Malta, I set the team a crazy challenge. A full-chain exploit of Chrome by the annual Black Hat cybersecurity conference in August.
I believed there were few better tests of whether @XBOW could move beyond web applications to desktop software, servers and devices.
Chrome is one of the most hardened pieces of software on the planet, used by more than half the world’s population.
A full-chain exploit lets an attacker take total control of a machine, where they can read every email, password and bank login the user types. You don’t need to download anything or click a phishing link. Visiting the wrong site is enough.
So @moyix, Andres Luksenberg, Baul Lee, and Willem Pinckaers took on the challenge along with a fifth teammate: OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol.
They built a chain they thought would win, but Google told us they already knew one of the bugs.
We were already in Las Vegas for Black Hat and DEF CON, and the team didn’t want to go home without the win.
So Brendan and the agents built a new exploit in just 6 days.
We submitted it to Google and waited.
The news came through that we'd done what should’ve been impossible. A full-chain bounty of $250,000, the first awarded under Google’s 2026 rules.
It took just 6 days and $40,000 of compute to construct an exploit that affects a billion users of Chrome on Windows. An intelligence-agency veteran told me his team used to spend 6 months on this kind of vulnerability.
My takeaway: the cost of finding truly critical vulnerabilities is collapsing, for attackers and defenders alike. Restricting powerful models is not the answer; GPT-5.6 Sol is already public.
But defenders have one advantage attackers never will: they can test their own code first.
Assume your software is exploitable. Whoever is hunting your bugs has the same building blocks we did.
This is cause for urgency but not panic.
XBOW is now developing an autonomous product for testing compiled software (desktop applications, servers, embedded devices), and partnering with the world’s top organizations to design that product.
If you’d like to be one of them, get in touch.
P.S. Restart Chrome whenever the Update button appears!
NOBODY wants AI wearables.
If you want to properly measure a founder’s intelligence, ask them whether they think wearables are useful, or just a stupid gimmick.
If you’re a man and I catch you wearing some bracelet-GPT, you’re now a woman.
This is what sucks about @Polymarket
Nothing is EVER right to begin with.
They ONLY listen and make things right once you publicly throw a huge fit & get others to join your cause.
What SHOULD just be a simple fix ends up needing to be a social movement on X 😭🙏
fredorsomething retweeted
Polymarket is not paying multiple markets, for example "Will the Catholic Church publicly excommunicate anyone else in 2026?". It's a market that already qualified for resolving IN AUGUST.
In Polymarket is not the platform who resolve markets but a small set of people who have whitelisted wallets by UMA. If you want a market to resolve you need to find one of those people and pay them $750 for the bond (so they don't risk any money).
It's a perverse system and a lot of people end up selling their positions at market at a huge discount instead of waiting for resolution.
Are there any KOLs that people actually like?
I find 99% of tweets by these accounts to be super spammy/annoying, (or it's just so clear to me that their posts are engagement bait).



















