I've lost the ability to determine what is and isn't satire these days.
Forrest Hanson retweeted
We need to bring back intellectual elitism.
Sorry, but a virologist will always know more about vaccines than a yoga mommy blogger with a chat gpt AI subscription.
Forrest Hanson retweeted
What hits me about the Lesbian Bar is that the outrage weirdos aren't protesting bars without mask mandates. They antagonize and abuse this particular bar owner bc they can access her and bc she cares. They are sending a message that no one should ever even try to appease them.
Forrest Hanson retweeted
the reason this lesbian bar story went so viral is that basically every left wing person in America has personally experienced some version of this story in their life over the course of the last decade and is really goddam sick of it
I love it when people just make up numbers.
I fear that we're not even close to peak AI slop.
I'm not running for office. But if I were, these are some of the lessons I'd take away from what happened in NY yesterday.
1. Authenticity is measurable. Voters can smell a focus group from a mile away.
2. Endorsements from the current Democratic leadership now read like warnings. The establishment wing of the party is no longer a sword. It's a question mark.
3. Conviction beats caution. The candidates who said hard things about rent, about who pays for what, about Gaza, they won. The triangulators lost.
4. Cost of living is everything. Everything else is wallpaper.
5. The middle is not a strategy. It's an empty room. Voters reached past the establishment to grab someone who actually believes something.
6. Don't fear the base. Court it. The Democrats who ran from their own voters lost. The ones who ran toward them won.
7. If you want to lead a party you have to be willing to fight inside it. Mamdani didn't ask permission. He took the field.
The lesson under the lessons: the country is tired of being managed. People want to be led.
Ludwig literally tried to do this and got exactly one viewer...who stayed because they recognized him. youtube.com/watch?v=hzEDxt_I…
Mr Beast says he could start a faceless channel tomorrow and hit 20 million subscribers in six months
“I could start a new channel tomorrow not using my face or my voice without ever promoting it and in six months have 20 million subscribers”
“It’s purely knowledge if you knew what I knew you could get 10 million views a video and 10 million subscribers no matter where you are right now within 6 months”
“It really is just knowledge”
John might get arrested before you even get in the ring.
Can people really read this and not immediately tell it's AI text?
She accidentally described one of the most replicated findings in behavioral psychology.
Harvard and Duke researchers found in 2011 that people value things they build themselves 63% higher than identical pre-assembled versions. They called it the IKEA effect. Labor alone, even assembling a standardized box from instructions, is enough to make people overvalue their own creations.
Gardening runs this effect at full intensity. You chose the seeds. You dug the holes. You watered daily. By harvest, your brain has priced that tomato at roughly 10x grocery store rates, and the math feels completely justified.
Now stack Kahneman and Tversky's loss aversion on top. Losses register at approximately 2x the emotional intensity of equivalent gains. One of the most replicated findings in behavioral economics.
So the aphid eating her garden is triggering both simultaneously. She built something her brain values at 163% of objective worth. She's watching it get destroyed in real time. Her nervous system is processing that destruction at double intensity.
The grocery store tomato being out of stock? Mild annoyance. Zero labor investment means zero IKEA effect, means proportional emotional response.
The garden tomato carries months of accumulated effort justification. The aphid isn't eating a $4 tomato. Her brain priced it at $40 and is processing the loss at $80.
Gardening is the only common hobby that combines the IKEA effect, loss aversion, and a live adversary that reproduces faster than you can respond.
The violence tracks.
the internet seems full of 35 year olds who are like “omg i’m so old i hate going out and my back always hurts, go on without me while you’re young and beautiful…” potentially 50 more years of life left and you’re already packing it in
I'll never understand older dudes at the gym who do a million quarter reps. It's not even an ego lifting too much weight on the bar thing - I just saw a relatively fit dude loudly count 20 "crunches" where his head barely left the mat.
I think I was first told to use odd numbers while listing back in eighth grade English. Same with varying sentence length.
Removing these from your writing because they "sound AI" will literally make you a worse writer.
Ugh just read a Substack article by a lit mag editor that I'm almost certain was edited with AI. The style is so common:
* short, punchy sentences
* "This, not that" construction. ("It's not a rejection; it's a sign the process is working...")
* Things in threes. ("Not a no, not a rejection, not a closed door. A window to something better...")
I cannot say it enough: writers & editors, please stop relying on AI to help you edit your stuff.
AI strips you of your own voice & makes you sound like a machine.
It's utterly depressing to read such pieces from writers and lit mag editors.
$15 for a book someone spent years of their life writing has got to be one of the best values out there.



















