Pinned Tweet
G6PD: Genetic GPS in my blood🧬🗺️
Having previously posted about my G6PD deficiency as an Iraqi Jew, I decided to research variants.
Crucial data incoming:
The Mediterranean variant linked to the Mediterranean basin and the Middle East, my Genetic GPS, traces Levantine roots and ancient migrations.
So if like me you are tired of hearing “Jews are just European colonisers from Europe, living on stolen land” then this thread promises to provide you with evidence to the contrary.
By connecting the dots, this thread is for every Jew told they don’t belong in Israel, or that they are European.
Thread 🧵
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Ours is a fight to get a Jordanian savage tried in Washington on terror charges from 2013. After years of dodging obstructive officials, dismayed by passive, unresponsive media, blocked by the apathy of Congress, I honestly can’t say if the US govt supports us or the killer.
Sbarro bombing at 25: Malki Roth's parents fight for justice youtu.be/79AOZxY7YDQ?si=ewPT… via @YouTube
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Another superb explainer from @HausdorffMedia - I'm so ashamed of our disgusting government. Please do follow Natasha's account if you don't already 🇮🇱👇
Addressing the diplomatic row over Area E1 and the proposed UK trade ban with areas of Israeli settlement in disputed territories, Jerusalem and Judea and Sameria/West Bank, with David Ross.
The deeply concerning rhetoric from UK Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband MP misstates international law, ignores the UK’s real international law obligations and its responsibilities under trade agreements and falls foul of UK-endorsed international agreements, including the Oslo Accords. It also misrepresents the factual position I witnessed on the ground last week.
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Wondering how the woman who planted a bomb inside a @Sbarro, calls it “my operation”, fronted a terror-inciting Jordanian TV show for 5 years, remains shielded today by Jordan from US prosecutors which Jordan achieves by violating its US treaty, here’s how ⬇
Still waiting for a first-ever, fact-based news media take-down of the sole alibi Jordan claims for itself (starting in 2017) that its 1995 treaty with the US is invalid. And that Jordan need not hand @Sbarro atrocity mastermind #AhlamTamimi over to US prosecutors.
Yes I took part, and asked grok for a coat of arms which fits my posts.
What do you think?
🤖 Made with AI
Florance of Arabia retweeted
This joint statement by @dfat @GAC_Corporate & @FCDOGovUK brings shame on 🇦🇺🇨🇦 &🇬🇧, not @Israel.
The statement demonstrates an absolutely inexcusable lack of understanding of even the most fundamental #LOAC principles, and it is an utter embarrassment for the 3 foreign ministries involved.
The decision @IDF "not pursue criminal investigations into this strike" is completely understandable since the strike wasn't fucking criminal. And the claim that this decision was made "without further explanation" is an outright fucking lie.
The joint statement refers directly to the "announcement by the IDF on August 19, 2026", which btw is available at this link: idf.il/en/mini-sites/militar…
And in this announcement available at that link, one finds a FURTHER EXPLANATION regarding the decision not to pursue criminal prosecution.
To wit, the announcement says, "Following review of all findings of the factual assessment, it was determined that, notwithstanding serious failures in the process that led to the assessment that Hamas operatives were travelling in the vehicles, the decisions of the commanders did not raise reasonable suspicion of criminal misconduct. This conclusion was reached in view of the sequence of suspicious indicators and the totality of the operational circumstances" (pic 1).
The announcement continues, "Accordingly, it was determined that there is no reasonable suspicion of criminal misconduct that would justify the opening of a criminal investigation or the taking of additional measures against any of those involved in the incident, beyond those described above" (still pic 1).
See? Not fucking criminal, so no fucking criminal investigation. And icymi, there's our fucking further explanation.
And for anyone who maybe just doesn't know any better - like apparently the staff at all 3 of these foreign ministries - we don't "hold those responsible to account" based on the perceived outcome of an attack during armed conflict. Not Australia, not Canada, not the UK - and not Israel.
We don't do that because that's not how LOAC works. That's the body of law we ALL apply during the conduct of armed hostilities, yet these absolutely clueless foreign ministries expect 🇮🇱 to "hold those responsible to account" based on the OUTCOME of the strike.
I mean, all 3 of these countries have ratified the Rome Statute. Foreign ministers & their staffs have to at least know this, if nothing else. And a cursory glance at the war crimes (art. 8) & mental element (arts. 30 & 32) confirms war CRIMES are committed with intent & knowledge (pic 2). The "further explanation" confirms relevant personnel weren't aware AT THE TIME that a @WCKitchen convoy was attacked, rather they believed AT THE TIME that the convoy had been hijacked by #Hamas militants.
Of course, 🇮🇱 hasn't ratified the Rome Statute, but their doctrinal application of the LOAC distinction rule, like most other foundational LOAC rules, is substantially similar (pic 3).
And another thing. The doctrinal version of LOAC isn't about claiming "victims of this [or any] incident and their families deserve justice and accountability." That's just another method of converting LOAC into an effects-based construct - which is completely inconsistent with the doctrinal version we ACTUALLY apply in practice.
Then the joint statement has the audacity to close by claiming, "Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law and must do more to ensure that humanitarian staff can carry out their work safely."
First of all, there is no fucking LOAC obligation to ensure "humanitarian staff can carry out their work safely" - so putting that claim in the same sentence as LOAC obligations is utterly clueless.
And second, the foreign ministries responsible for this joint statement demonstrate throughout that they don't have the foggiest clue what "Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law."
Now, if it seems that my commentary is a bit ... spicier than usual, that's because I suppose it is. This is usually how my internal voice sounds when I encounter ignorant LOAC commentary like that - especially when it derives from some official gov't source as this joint statement does.
I'm not filtering my internal voice on this occasion, though, because I am sick and fucking tired of seeing predominantly liberal governments misrepresenting international law as a convenient & expedient excuse to slam Israel.
And I am sick & fucking tired of Jewish people getting harassed - and sometimes accosted & even murdered - by lunatics who take these same misrepresentations of int'l law these liberal governments are constantly spewing as a convenient & expedient excuse to hate on or attack Jews because they're an easier target than Israel is.
And I am sick & fucking tired of these same liberal governments offering the same fucking platitudes after another fucking attack on Jewish people or property - all while these liberal governments are spewing & spinning performative & ignorant nonsense like this joint statement that is FUELING the sentiment driving the very attacks they claim to denounce.
And I am sick & FUCKING tired of liberals getting away with all the above because conservative politicians & the media aren't familiar enough with the intricate details of the doctrinal version of LOAC these governments ROUTINELY butcher to be able to hold them to account & make them pay at the ballot box where true political accountability SHOULD have taken place for almost 3 FUCKING years now.
Obviously, I'm a little irate. That's not uncommon on occasions such as reading this incompetent joint statement. Though it is uncommon that I show it.
Enough. Liberals - knock it off. Conservatives - get your shit together & start holding these liberals to account (politically, of course) and MAKE them knock it off or make them pay for it (again, politically).
Because if you swapped out the letterhead on this joint statement, it could just as easily have been drafted by some two-bit human rights activist group like @hrw & @amnesty & such. They're just as clueless on the doctrinal application of LOAC as these foreign ministries responsible for this joint statement.
The difference is, human rights activist groups aren't expected to govern shit. Personnel responsible for this clueless joint statement are.
And next time 🇦🇺 🇨🇦 or 🇬🇧 militaries are involved in a high-profile incident of civcas for which "those responsible" are not held "to account" by pursing "criminal investigations" - even though a fact-finding & assessment mechanism determines the incident doesn't warrant a criminal investigation since it wasn't FUCKING CRIMINAL in nature - this moronic joint statement will be what these two-bit human rights activist groups will fervently wave around in the air to nail them for failing to apply the same bullshit standard they're calling on Israel to implement now.
As a former combat soldier & military lawyer turned international law academic, that might be the most irritating thing of all - professionally, that is.
We're watching in real time as these clueless (predominantly liberal) foreign ministries put an official stamp on the demise - at least in the public domain - of international law involving armed conflict. In doing so, they're CREATING the gap between public perception & doctrinal reality that ALL military members, ESPECIALLY legal advisors, will have to contend with henceforth.
And they're doing it all just as a convenient & expedient excuse to condemn the world's only predominantly Jewish state in order shore up their base by scoring a few cheap political points with the Islamist & anti-Israel progressive vote.
It's fucking sickening - and they're just going to keep doing it, and getting away with it, until we ALL know enough about LOAC to stop them & to properly hold them to account.
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Why Iraq is a Failed State
Arab Nationalism
Iraq was a multi-ethnic state.
Jews, Assyrians, Kurds, Chaldeans, Mandaeans, and Yazidis lived in Iraq.
Since the founding of the Iraqi state in 1932, Iraq has mostly had an Arab nationalist government.
Kurds:
The Kurds' initial demand was not for an independent state.
They wanted autonomy and to remain part of Iraq, but they wanted their language to be recognized.
The Iraqi state refused to negotiate with them, attacked the Kurds, and killed thousands of innocent civilians. Today, hardly any Kurd wants to remain part of Iraq.
Christians (Assyrians & Chaldeans)
Just like the Kurds, the Assyrians did not want an independent state.
They wanted autonomy and security from the Iraqi state.
One of the first acts of the Iraqi state was the Simele Massacre in 1933. & 6K Christians were killed by the Iraqi state.
Every Iraqi government, with the exception of Abdul-Karim Qasim, mistreated the Christians. Their villages were destroyed, they were forced to identify as "Arab Christians," and they were forbidden from organizing.
Iraq used to have nearly two million Christians. Today, there are 100K.
Most of them are sick, elderly, or too poor to emigrate.
There are hardly any Christians who identify as Iraqi.
Iraqi Jews:
Jews lived in Iraq for 2,500 years. Iraqi Jews loved Iraq, and most of them did not want to emigrate.
Massacres against the Jews were carried out by the Iraqi state or the Iraqi population.
The most well-known was the Farhud. Hebrew schools were banned, and Jews faced discrimination.
Jews were killed if there was any suspicion that they were Zionists.
There were show trials where no evidence was needed to convict someone; being a Jew was enough.
90% of all Jews were expelled in the 50s. They were not even allowed to take more than 20 dollars with them.
Islamism:
Islamism is a major problem in Iraq. Sunni or Shia, it makes little difference.
ISIS controlled one-third of Iraq in 2014–2015. It was not an occupation; they were welcomed by sheikhs & by the native population.
A genocide was committed against the Yazidis, during which they were not supported.
Women's rights in Iraq:
There are no rights for women in Iraq. A man can marry four women.
There is no real age of consent.
There are no laws protecting women against violence.
When a man divorces a woman, she almost automatically loses her children.
It is not the USA,UK, Israel, or Iran that is to blame.
One can criticize the Bush administration, but can one seriously claim that he is to blame for the fact that there are no longer any Christians in Iraq?
The influence of the Islamic Republic of Iran is, of course, bad.
But it makes no difference to Iraq whether the mullahs remain in power or not.
Iraq will continue to be a failed state.
Israel never attacked Iraq unprovoked.
The Israeli government wants to normalize relations with Iraq, but Iraq refuses.
Shabbath Shalom family, wishing you all a blessed weekend.
Picture of the springers waiting to play fetch. Dogs are such happy beings. Most uplifting to be reminded of the simplicity of life.
🕊️🪬✨🥰
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Today, my Substack is globally #1 Rising in World Politics. On a platform stacked with propagandists, polemicists and populists, top spot is a wild achievement for a mere conflict analyst.
Thank you, everyone, for your support. I’m extremely grateful.
I spent 16 years in the British Army, leaving the Parachute Regiment as a Major. I served three tours in Afghanistan, one attached to US Army Special Forces, as well as tours in Bosnia, Northern Ireland and the Middle East. I later taught military theory and leadership at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.
Academically, I have an LLB in Law & Politics, an MA with Distinction in War Studies & Military History and an MSc with Distinction in Psychology. I also hold postgraduate qualifications in Leadership & Strategic Management and Higher Education, and I am now completing a PhD in War Studies examining what Ukraine and the post-7 October wars can tell us about the future of warfare.
Since leaving the Army, I have spent a great deal of time going to the wars I write about. I visited Gaza twice in 2024, went inside captured Hezbollah tunnels in Lebanon, visited the Ukrainian front lines, and in 2025 became the first neutral researcher invited to observe the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution sites. My research has produced substantial reports on casualty statistics, human shields, information warfare, humanitarian operations and the tactical lessons emerging from Gaza. You can find them at @HJS_Org
I make no apology for advertising to you that this is an unusually strong background for analysing contemporary conflict. There are not many conflict analysts who combine command experience in war, formal study of war, law and psychology, experience teaching future Army officers, think-tank research and repeated fieldwork inside the conflicts they analyse.
Those different disciplines also catch different mistakes. Military experience makes it harder to mistake a map arrow for a feasible operation. War Studies forces tactical events back into their political and strategic context. Psychology matters when propaganda, perception and behavioural manipulation have become part of the battlefield. Law matters when almost every contemporary campaign is simultaneously fought through international institutions, courts and competing claims about legitimacy. Fieldwork is the final check because people who actually fight wars have a habit of complicating theories developed by chairborne researchers from several thousand miles away.
That is what I try to bring to my Substack. I am less interested in telling readers who “won” yesterday than in working out what happened, why it happened, what the participants were trying to achieve, whether they possessed the means to achieve it, and what the consequences are likely to be. Tactical success, military effectiveness and strategic success are not synonyms. Much bad analysis begins by treating them as though they are.
I will get things wrong. Anyone analysing wars in real time will. The promise I can reasonably make is that I will go to the evidence, go to the people involved where I can, change my assessment when the evidence changes, and tell you what I think rather than what my supposed political tribe would prefer me to think.
There is an enormous quantity of geopolitical commentary available for free. I think the combination behind mine is genuinely unusual.
If that is the sort of conflict analysis you want to read, please check out: mrandrewfox.substack.com
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Well, this is hilarious - interesting what you find when you're digging around. I've been featured by Al Jazeera. Not interviewed, obviously, used as evidence. 😂 Leah too, she would have laughed her arse off 😄❤️
Apparently we're there as an example of the pro-Israel accounts that highlighted X’s new location data, which appeared to show some supposed Gaza-based accounts posting from elsewhere.
Al Jazeera calls it a 'disinformation campaign. And I claim my $7,000 💪
Link in comments.
We have the capacity to choose, we don’t have to accept manipulation.
Take back agency!!!
I just want to see if you see what I see here:
In the chapter “The Emergence of the Genocidal Context”
Small shocks to publicly endorsed norms and roles decrease the cost of displaying deviant norms, and rapidly bring about large-scale changes in publicly displayed judgements and desires. Hence societies experience norm bandwagons and norm cascades. Norm bandwagons occur when the lowered cost of expressing new norms encourages an ever-increasing number of people to reject popular norms, to a "tipping point" where it is ADHERENCE to the OLD NORMS that produces social disapproval. Norm cascades occur when societies are presented with rapid shifts towards new norms.
Florance of Arabia retweeted
I just want to see if you see what I see here:
In the chapter “The Emergence of the Genocidal Context”
Small shocks to publicly endorsed norms and roles decrease the cost of displaying deviant norms, and rapidly bring about large-scale changes in publicly displayed judgements and desires. Hence societies experience norm bandwagons and norm cascades. Norm bandwagons occur when the lowered cost of expressing new norms encourages an ever-increasing number of people to reject popular norms, to a "tipping point" where it is ADHERENCE to the OLD NORMS that produces social disapproval. Norm cascades occur when societies are presented with rapid shifts towards new norms.
Florance of Arabia retweeted
I urge you to please sign the petition.
For most people, that’s as much as they can do. Not doing it is a missed opportunity to help defeat the efforts of the many who work hard so justice is obstructed in this sad narrative.
Jordan must extradite bomber Ahlam Tamimi to Washington where she faces terror charges - Sign the Petition! c.org/mBzTj9hpyW
Florance of Arabia retweeted
I spent 16 years in the British Army, leaving the Parachute Regiment as a Major. I served three tours in Afghanistan, one attached to US Army Special Forces, as well as tours in Bosnia, Northern Ireland and the Middle East. I later taught military theory and leadership at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.
Academically, I have an LLB in Law & Politics, an MA with Distinction in War Studies & Military History and an MSc with Distinction in Psychology. I also hold postgraduate qualifications in Leadership & Strategic Management and Higher Education, and I am now completing a PhD in War Studies examining what Ukraine and the post-7 October wars can tell us about the future of warfare.
Since leaving the Army, I have spent a great deal of time going to the wars I write about. I visited Gaza twice in 2024, went inside captured Hezbollah tunnels in Lebanon, visited the Ukrainian front lines, and in 2025 became the first neutral researcher invited to observe the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation distribution sites. My research has produced substantial reports on casualty statistics, human shields, information warfare, humanitarian operations and the tactical lessons emerging from Gaza. You can find them at @HJS_Org
I make no apology for advertising to you that this is an unusually strong background for analysing contemporary conflict. There are not many conflict analysts who combine command experience in war, formal study of war, law and psychology, experience teaching future Army officers, think-tank research and repeated fieldwork inside the conflicts they analyse.
Those different disciplines also catch different mistakes. Military experience makes it harder to mistake a map arrow for a feasible operation. War Studies forces tactical events back into their political and strategic context. Psychology matters when propaganda, perception and behavioural manipulation have become part of the battlefield. Law matters when almost every contemporary campaign is simultaneously fought through international institutions, courts and competing claims about legitimacy. Fieldwork is the final check because people who actually fight wars have a habit of complicating theories developed by chairborne researchers from several thousand miles away.
That is what I try to bring to my Substack. I am less interested in telling readers who “won” yesterday than in working out what happened, why it happened, what the participants were trying to achieve, whether they possessed the means to achieve it, and what the consequences are likely to be. Tactical success, military effectiveness and strategic success are not synonyms. Much bad analysis begins by treating them as though they are.
I will get things wrong. Anyone analysing wars in real time will. The promise I can reasonably make is that I will go to the evidence, go to the people involved where I can, change my assessment when the evidence changes, and tell you what I think rather than what my supposed political tribe would prefer me to think.
There is an enormous quantity of geopolitical commentary available for free. I think the combination behind mine is genuinely unusual.
If that is the sort of conflict analysis you want to read, please check out: mrandrewfox.substack.com
Receipts rolling in it appears…..
Israel: The Enemy Within
You've likely seen or even praised 'Captain Ella'
She's the highest-ranking Muslim in the IDF and is currently serving as the Spokesperson for the IDF's Arabic desk.
A symbol of coexistence, right?
Wrong.
On Friday she published a post in Arabic, urging her followers to read: Muhammad, The First General in Islam.
A book praising Muhammad's character & leadership.
Let's take a look at page 142 (image), in which the author describes Muhammad's destruction of the Jewish tribes of Medina as an excellent solution.
The massacre of the Jewish tribes was intended to strengthen Muhammad's reputation as a ruthless man amongst the Bedouin tribes.
Why is a senior spokeswoman for the State of Israel and the IDF promoting such a book?
IDF officials should not be promoting admiration for Muhammad, a slayer of Jewish tribes.
Those of us who lived in Iraq, who were ethnically cleansed tell the same stories. The question is whether people will listen, register and comprehend the scale of risk.
My son met a man from Iraq last night, a Muslim whose family fled Iraq and who later converted to Christianity. They talked for hours about the Middle East and the enormous disconnect between what people in the West are told and what people who have actually lived there know.
He told my son that many of the loudest American activists have absolutely no idea what life would be like for them under the regimes and extremist ideologies they romanticize from thousands of miles away. He said that in parts of the region, simply being openly Christian can put your life in danger, and that even a conversation like the one they were having could have serious consequences in the wrong place.
What struck my son most was his frustration with how easily Americans fall for propaganda because they have no firsthand understanding of the region. Even something as simple as knowing that 2 million Arabs live in Israel.
His perspective was simple: Israel isn’t fighting only for Israel. In his view, Israel is on the front line against an ideology that threatens Muslims, Christians, Jews and anyone else who refuses to submit to it.
Sometimes it’s worth listening to people who have actually lived what Americans debate from the safety of their keyboards.
As a Muslim, I say that I love the West with its Christianity and culture, I love Asia with its Buddhism and Hinduism, and I love Israel with its Judaism.
I do not wish for them to be culturally, religiously, or socially conquered by Islam.
islam for the Arabs keep it there….
The Yehudim of today are the descendants of the tribes of Yehuda and Benyamin, along with the hereditary Levim and Cohanim. All the other tribes perished.
Perhaps the most important lesson upon reflection is that the pact made by Yehuda and Benyamin who produced the first anointed King Saul, then King David and Kings Solomon. They ruled during a golden age of unity.
Without unity, those who chose the wayward paths away from the Divine Covenant perish. History has written these lessons time and time again.
When we succumb to division, we do so at our peril. When we stand united shoulder to shoulder with our fellow beings, we thrive, we prosper, we usher love, kindness and blessings, we usher the light to dwell in our midst.
Today our duty is to form communities, to walk in the light amongst our brothers and sisters across the globe, of all faiths.
Our strength is amplified through unity.
Shabbath Shalom, wishing you all a blessed weekend. Count your blessings, let the light fill your hearts.
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Listen!
25 Years After Sbarro, Remembering Malki, Seeking Justice • Nachum Segal @talljewishradio speaks with Arnold Roth, father of Sbarro bombing victim Malki Roth, about extraditing terror mastermind #AhlamTamimi from Jordan, and the @MalkiFoundation
podcasts.apple.com/ch/podcas…
Florance of Arabia retweeted
Another day, another attack on Jews - the hatred is ramping up.
Kippah-Wearing Jewish Tourist Pepper-Sprayed, Kicked in Back-to-Back Antisemitic Assaults in Rome
August 12, 2026
"At around 8 p.m. last Friday night, a 22-year-old Jewish tourist from France wearing a kippah was attacked in central Rome. A man pepper-sprayed him in the Italian capital’s Piazza Cairoli while shouting 'Free Palestine', according to the tourist’s complaint."
Link in comments.

































