I replaced Smartlead, Instantly, HeyReach, Gojiberry, Zapmail with one tool I built. ACA. Everything you need to run outbound: 📡 Intent signals (find people who are buying now, not just on a list) 🧲 Lead magnets (capture page, instant delivery, straight into a sequence) ✉️ Cold email sequences 💼 LinkedIn outreach 🌐 Domains and mailboxes 📥 One inbox for every reply 🤖 Autopilot replies 🔥 Warmup and deliverability guardrails And it's not a dinosaur tool: + No seat tax. Add as many people as you want + No AI credits. Bring your own keys and pay the model providers directly + It's agentic. Everything in the UI is available to your AI, through MCP or the CLI You pay for the infrastructure you use, not for the number of logins.

Claude is the interface now. The dashboard is just where the data lives. I put the full setup in a free playbook: 100+ actions, 20+ prompts, 4 workflows and the 5-minute setup. Reply CLAUDE and I'll send it. Reposts get priority ♻️

I've been digging into this for the past few days, and I'm not convinced. Historical data is finite and much of it comes from outdated practices. SOPs evolve, workflows change, and old data becomes less relevant, and now faster than ever. I think we're about to see a new wave of startups collecting first-party, human-generated data and feeding it to AI labs in real time. The business model won't be subscriptions. It'll be monetizing the data humans generate, with AI labs and training companies footing the bill.

I have a "dead" startup. A food safety and workplace compliance app. I closed a round of fundind just the day before COVID lockdown. Wasn't easy to sale stuff to restaurants and food businesses at the time :-( Anyway, the SaaS landscape is changing and I see what could be an opportunity. > Revive the app, make it free (might be a bit of ads), resell data like traceability, workplace efficiency, compliance ect.. to frontier AI labs as learning material This is first hand important data, and could truly have an impact. Good idea or bad idea?

Don't brag about it. We have learned it with @Anthropic's start up program. If this has too much success, they could take it back.

Most agencies sell “website audits” nobody asked for. I built a system that sends the fix before you even ask. Businesses are pouring money into ads right now. Every day. And sending that traffic to funnels that leak. Slow pages. Weak headlines. No offer. No follow-up. No review flow. Missed calls going to voicemail. They’re paying to fill a bucket with holes in it. So I automated the whole thing: > Grok bot finds businesses actively advertising > Audits their site on 10 points that kill conversion rates > Checks if the ads and the landing page actually match If it finds issues, the system: > Finds the decision maker's contact details > Claude builds a new conversion-optimized funnel (strategist, copywriter, offer maker, designer, builder, editor skills) > Plus ads, pre-appointment, post-appointment, SMS and emails, review collector, DBR and missed call text back > Emails the audit AND the new funnel via ACA Read that again. Not “here’s what’s wrong with your site, book a call.” Here’s what’s wrong. Here’s the fix. Already built. That’s the difference between a cold email and a gift. And the targeting is the unfair part. Active ad spend = budget exists + pain is live + they care about results TODAY. This is what outbound looks like now. Signal → audit → deliverable → inbox. Zero humans in the loop until someone replies. I’m thinking about open sourcing the whole thing. If this post hits 200 comments, I’ll release it. Comment “FUNNEL” and I’ll send you a real audit + the funnel it built while you wait.

They offer resets too

SaaS is not dead... Just going to get a lot lot lot harder for those who don't have proprietary data or hold the customers by the balls.

To win the race, AI labs need to: > Make the model extremely good at 3D and motion design > Benchmaax the shit out of it That's how everyone on X judges models, apparently.

Not personal softwares. Internally built in-house softwares. Massive paradigm shift for SaaS products that don't own data or not holding current customers by the balls.

people wonder why their cold emails don't work. 🤨

SaaS is NOT dead. It's changing and the subscription model is about to get massively disrupted. Companies will build "custom SaaS" around whatever controls the data. Distribution or third party software subscription will be not be needed. People are saying that vibe coding is hoax and 99% of those apps will never have a customer. That's true, but the vast majority of these new type of SaaS won't need any costumers at all.

People will still agree to these terms without team plan and API credits benefits? - §2.4 Anthropic "may develop similar or competitive technology" - §2.4 permits reuse, for any purpose, of general ideas, know-how and techniques remembered by personnel looking at your data - §D.4 prohibits accessing their services to build competing products or services - §F.1 allows them to retain and perform safety reviews, superseding ZDR - §6 permits changes to the addendum at any time without notice or liability