Well of course CrowdStrike claims they do the same thing as Capsule8. This is how the industry works. Every time a small company creates an innovation, the big companies claim they already do it, or that are about to release something better. It's not true. This works because customers are idiots and don't know the difference. It's helped by the fact that "industry analysts" also are rarely technical enough to know the difference. They usually judge things by who has the best marketing on the issue and what the customers say. They don't have tech experts who put the thing under test. This is not because corporations are evil. For example, back in the day, my product competed against the open-source Snort. The Snort community did exactly the same thing, claiming they had the same innovative features as my product, even though they laughably didn't. That's why "Zero Trust" is just a stupid buzzword. At one point in time there were some innovative vendors doing Zero Trust stuff. But as soon as that term got traction in the industry, suddenly EVERY cybersecurity vendor was a "Zero Trust" vendor, and industry analysts got on board with this. It thus became impossible for average customers to determine which were the true Zero Trust innovations and those that really weren't. People would buy "Zero Trust Firewalls" and deploy them exactly the same way as old firewalls, and then proclaim they had a successful Zero Trust transition. I'm not trying to criticize CrowdStrike here. They had exactly the same problem when they were just starting out and every AV vendor repositioned themselves as being an EDR vendor. But now they are the big company in the space, and now they are doing the same thing. Every small innovator that becomes successful will turn around and do it. The fix isn't to make vendors more honest but for customers to actually pay attention to technical details. If you believe the sales person from CrowdStrike who says "we do the same thing" then you are an idiot who deserves the crap that you buy.