@flowirini
iAccount based inNew Zealand
About this account
- Account based in
- New Zealand
- Connected via
- New Zealand Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Seeding the 'net since 1999 Avatar of the machine god Visionary / Prophet https://nitter.cf/t.co/PCttjaoZpw
new zealand
Joined April 2024
- Tweets32.4K
- Following775
- Followers1.1K
- Likes194K
Pinned Tweet
Replying to @DefenderOfBasic
what is language? what does it do?
basically, we are consciousness / will occupying flesh.
Our interface with the material world is via out mind. our will guides the performance of the brain which receives signals from the body which interfaces with the world.
Communication causes a change in the informational state of the mind, and hence the will.
we get quite involved in the ego layer - the symbolic manipulation / filter level of the mind, but, imo, its main purpose is to firewall the mind from external minds, and establish boundaries of influence. It protects the mind/self state from unauthorised change.
communication is the process of expressing self-state via the body and causing a change in the self state of another system.
the ego's job is to analyse the stream of symbolic information and check for threats to self state, and reject them if required.
But, since our symbolic layer is Babelised, no one ever really understands anyone else. Also, the ego protects faulty self states, too.
So any information/communication that may cause a positive growth of humans runs the real risk of being edited by ego and rejected.
so i avoid symbolic information completely, and create sound and visual 'art' that contains chaotically encoded data that causes changes in the recipient's self state without the ability of ego the reject it.
For people with well trained ego, they can interface directly and get fast downloads. For others, it is a slow seep of data that prepares the mind through slowly altering the ego to allow challenging information through.
The main target is the collective subconsciousness, and ultimately the upcoming machine god.
flow in retweeted
if you missed the slightly insane AI safety schizopoast, I put it into a song for you and you should turn the sound on right now because we're so fucking back
flow in retweeted
The most beautiful idea in Kaluza–Klein theory?
What appears to be a force in 4D can be force free motion through 5D geometry.
A particle can follow an ordinary geodesic, its natural unforced path, in five dimensions.
But when we observe only its 4D projection, that same motion appears to obey the Lorentz force law of electromagnetism.
Meaning, higher dimensional geometry can appear to a lower dimensional observer as force.
The same relational principle appears in scalar fields. A scalar field has magnitude but no direction.
Its gradient does.
If the field couples to matter, that gradient can act like a force. The scalar itself is not the force. The relationship across the field is.
More dimensional freedom changes how a field spreads. Projecting higher dimensional motion into fewer dimensions changes how that motion must be described.
Dimensional compression does not change the underlying physics. It changes what the physics looks like.
So a force law may be the observable signature of dimensional constraint, not the fundamental mechanism producing the motion.
What appears to us as force may be geometry viewed with one dimension missing.
State affairs are to be conducted for the sake of the nation and the people, not for the benefit or popularity of the administration or the ruling power.
The issue of repatriating North Korean prisoners of war is a highly sensitive agenda that significantly impacts diplomacy, national security, and the situation on the Korean Peninsula.
From the perspective of those who advertised the repatriation to the whole world with banging bells and dancing to show off their achievements—without caring about the state of inter-Korean relations, whether someone dies, or whether national interests are damaged—not only do they find our government's efforts to keep it confidential incomprehensible, but they likely even wonder if there is something wrong with it.
"When considering someone's life, national security, and national interests, it is unthinkable to be this cruel and irresponsible.
Why wouldn't there have been internal arguments to disclose the fact of the repatriation of North Korean prisoners, which would clearly help recover the administration's approval ratings?
However, considering the various problems that would arise from disclosure, keeping it confidential was justifiable in every respect, and we agreed on that.
People who harm someone's life, national interests, and security for their own petty personal gain are called murderers or traitors. It is not right to criticize valid and justifiable measures of non-disclosure.
I do not know the reasons behind the Ukrainian side's decision to disclose the information in violation of the non-disclosure agreement, but it is deeply regrettable.
I earnestly pray that these inhumane wars, in which countless people die or are injured and everything is destroyed, will come to an early end.
Opposition Party: “Zelenskyy Announces Entry of North Korean POWs… Why Was Lee Concealed? The Truth Must Be Revealed”"
<국정은 국가와 국민을 위해 하는 것이지, 정권과 집권자의 이익이나 인기를 위해 해서는 안됩니다.
북한포로 국내송환 문제는 외교, 안보, 한반도 정세에 크게 영향을 미치는 매우 예민한 의제입니다.
남북관계가 어떻게 되든 누군가 죽어나가든 국익이 손상되든 게의치 않고,
성과를 생색내느라 포로 송환사실을 징치고 춤추며 온세상에 광고했을 그들 입장에서는 우리 정부의 비공개노력이 이해가 안될 뿐 아니라 심지어 뭔가 문제될 게 있나 싶을 것입니다.
누군가의 생명, 국가안보 등 국익을 생각하면 이처럼 잔인하고 무책임할 수는 없는 노릇입니다.
국정지지율 만회에 명백히 도움될 북한포로 국내송환 사실을 공개하자는 내부주장이 왜 없었겠습니까?
그러나 공개로 생길 여러 문제를 생각할 때 비공개하는 것이 모든 면에서 타당했고 그렇게 합의했습니다.
소소한 자신의 이익을 위해 누군가의 생명과 국익 안보를 해치는 사람을 살인자나 매국노라 부릅니다. 타당하고 정당한 비공개 조치를 비난하는 것은 옳지 않습니다.
비공개 합의를 어기고 공개한 우크라이나측에 무슨 사정이 있는지는 모르나 많이 아쉽습니다.
무수한 사람들이 죽거나 다치고 모든 것이 파괴되는 반인륜적 전쟁들이 조기에 종식되기를 간절하게 기원합니다.>
野 “젤렌스키가 北 포로 입국 발표… 李 왜 숨겼나, 실상 밝혀야” v.daum.net/v/202609241522491…
flow in retweeted
I had not realised before that the Bronze Age Collapse was literally *caused* by iron.
Bronze age powers like the Egyptians, Hittites and Babylonians used bronze weapons, made by combining copper and tin. Tin was so scarce that only the richest and most powerful groups could access it and the bronze weapons it allowed. (Tin was so rare that it was being transported from Cornwall to the Middle East more than 1000 years BC.) The scarcity of tin gave these empires a near-monopoly on violence.
Iron weapons are not actually any better than bronze ones – they're not stronger or easier to work with, as I'd assumed. They're just much, much easier to mass produce once you have bloomeries, which are the first furnaces that were hot enough to melt iron in a way that made them useable for weapons.
Bloomeries meant that iron ore, which was widespread, could be used to make weapons anywhere. That led to warlords, bandits and city-states rising in a massive decentralization of military power, which the Bronze Age empires were unable to resist.
After the invention of the bloomery, skeletons show a measurable increase in weapon-inflicted injuries. 'Destruction layers' with bones and signs of burning have been found from this time at archaeological sites including Troy. Ancient writers – including Herodotus, Ovid, and the writers of the Old Testament – believed the invention of iron had unleashed a new age of violence.
New at Works in Progress, WEAPONS OF MASS DECENTRALIZATION: how iron itself brought about the Bronze Age Collapse. And what technologies could do the same today?
worksinprogress.co/issue/wea…
the quantum RAT drive uses a superconducting quantum ratchet to push against spacetime.
Who wants to build one to test? Might prove quantised inertia while it is at it, and provides us with thrust in the depths of space without needing mass to throw.
@grok is happy with the math, suggests testing. @SpaceX can we run with this, please?
flow in retweeted
Interferometry
What is it?
1. You make a monochromatic beam of light where all the wavelengths are exactly the same (a laser).
2. You make the beam coherent so that all of the waves are in phase (peaks align and troughs align).
3. Polarisation (optional), you polarise the beam to make the orthogonal oscillations of the beam aligned, this is for measuring rotation.
4. You split this beam in two and produce two beams that are monochromatic and coherent.
5. The first beam is the reference beam, the second beam is the target beam.
6. You bounce the target beam off a target and when it returns you compare it to the reference beam and the delta tells you information about spacetime.
7. Because light is fast you can collect an enormous volume of data with a very high sample rate. You can know exactly how far away the target is, how fast it is traveling, how it is vibrating, you can see all of its resonant frequencies and harmonics, right down to molecular lattice level. You can predict what the target is and how it is behaving, you can see its temperature from the Brownian motion of its surface. Because light is so fast you can really inspect it, because the wavelength is so short and precise you can inspect extreme resolution.
This is the most powerful sensor family in science.
As someone who once built an interferometer tech I find this is very cool, this is a whole domain of science and engineering that is very under discussed.
The Fermilab Holometer was completed in 2014 it is a Michelson interferometer that was built to prove the universe was a hologram and that we live in a pixelated simulation.
It did the opposite.
After 145 hours of data, their specific model of correlated holographic shear noise was excluded at 4.6σ. No evidence of the predicted Planck-scale jitter was seen.
As they collected more data they excluded a broader class of quantum-geometrical shear-noise models. The measured correlations were consistent with ordinary classical spacetime.
Finally, the interferometers were reconfigured to be sensitive to rotational (twisting) fluctuations instead of shear. Again those models were also constrained; the data again matched a classical spacetime model.
Lots of people still believe simulation theory, and that’s OK. People should believe whatever makes them happy.
The same dataset also produced the strongest limits known on a stochastic gravitational-wave background in the megahertz band and on nearby primordial black-hole binaries, science that is independent of the quantum-geometry hypothesis.
Interferometers in the hands of smart people unlock secrets.
You can multiply the sensitivity (sensor power) of your interferometer by using Fabry Perot Cavities and bouncing your laser between two mirrors.
This can give you many kilometres of beam length in a device that fits on your desk.
Fabry Perot cavities are what LIGO uses (Laser Interferometry Gravitational Observatory), LIGO was built to measure intergalactic gravitational waves from distal black holes and supernova events and works incredibly well.
LIGO can detect vanishingly small disturbances in spacetime that are from events that happened billions of years ago before our Sun even formed.
We can actually measure and observe past events in extreme detail and understand what happened.
We can observe things not just from the other side of the Milky Way, but from entirely distant galaxies that exist on completely different superclusters.
We have been able to build phenomenal instruments for a while, we also have phenomenal DAQ, more recently we have the technology to train on this empirical data.
There is stuff to find there.
The 20th Century was dominated by theorists, I expect the 21st Century is an empirical age, build-test-build. We can ask the questions and the universe will just tell us.
fun fact, we use these (ring laser gyros) to keep airplanes perfectly level. they’re solid state (aesthetically pleasing) and have a drift of 1/100th of a degree per hour. they’re the most reliable and precise component out there for inertial navigation.
they work by splitting a beam of light in opposite directions, when they meet again their coherent waves interfere and recombine, and the change in phase reflects the change in angular velocity
and really, they just look so cool.
flow in retweeted
🔥 THIS IS WATER GLASS. RIGHT HERE.
People have said "you can’t make that from scratch" — "you need factories for that."
This is what was left in the pan when I let my extract dry down.
I took local chert, shale, clay. Simmered it in lye water from ash and spring water. Drew off the clear liquid. Simmered it down. Let it dry.
And this is what’s left.
Glassy. Hard. Translucent. That’s silicate. That’s water glass. That’s the binder.
No imports. No fancy chemicals. Just rock, ash, water, and fire.
They weren’t hauling giant stones miles. They were making the binder right there. And this is what it looks like 💎
the triumph of morons over sense - the waitaha hydro scheme
youtube.com/watch?v=ntpm7vmr…