Michael Christopher (@finance_os) profile picture

Finance as a Service, not a gatekeeper. Building Reclude (one-click redaction for AI-ready finance data) and writing about what comes next.

Nashville, TN
Joined March 2010
Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)Photo by Michael Christopher (@finance_os)
Michael Christopher retweeted
1/ On Losing Faith Is it over? Was it all a fever dream? Have we run out of steam? Is it time to pivot to AI for real this time? 2/ Everything is dead? BTC: DAT premiums down, nobody cares ETH: Stablecoin Alts: Crushed NFTs: Right click saved Meme coins: As expected tbh Zcash: Pumping! which ofc means "cycle is over" 3/ This is the worst cryptotwitter timeline I have ever seen relative to the environment. Nobody is attacking us, USA is being reasonable and rational, no CEX has run away with our money, and yet, dead, dead, dead. No narrative, no spark, nothing. 4/ Why? I read the timeline and it tells me: a/"nobody owns BTC" (odd, I mean someone has to own BTC, there is a ton of BTC) and b/ "the gamblers have liquidated themselves (again)" - true, but it was always like this 5/ This TL feels different. This does not feel like "fuck I got liquidated", it feels like malaise, tiredness. Like boredom, to be honest. I know you think it is the price action but the price action is obviously downstream from psychology. 6/ I have a different view of what is going on. I think almost everyone forgot what matters, chased after things that did not matter and, we are in the process of discovering they don't matter. 7/ What matters? Only decentralization, only permissionlessness. Nothing else matters at all. Everything else about crypto is WORSE than a centralized database and always will be because that is how computers work. 8/ In my view, basically everyone "major" except vitalik has strayed from the light on this. Let's start with Team BTC which USED to be very interested in how to build a network that become nation-state resistant. This was the BTC of Antonopoulos, of Lopp 9/ We are 5 years into the BTC of Saylor and that BTC is 100% about driving price action. It is about driving flows to BTC, about getting fully integrated with the USA financial system. 10/ It sounds nice, it sounds better than the system beating us with a big stick, but the net effect is that more and more BTC ends up in Coinbase Custody in New York State Nothing wrong with that, but none of that BTC is nation-state resistant. It is 100% non-resistant to the US government specifically. 11/ The problem with this is that with permissionlessness off the table, the only thing left to drive purchases of BTC is FOMO. "there are only 21M, they are going to run out, you need to buy some before others do and it goes exponential" 12/ I mean, maybe that is true. I am not making price predictions, I still own BTC and always will I think. But it is cringe, and it is wrong. 13/ You can think about this by taking it to the extreme case and trying to understand which of the two scenarios adds value to the world. 14/ Scenario A: Blackrock owns all 21M BTC, everyone on planet earth owns shares in the Blackrock ETF and Brian Armstrong is in charge of making sure we don't lose Our Precious Scenario B: Everyone on earth has their own BTC wallet and BTC is distributed in several billion places around the world and it is literally impossible for any government to stop BTC 15/ In Scenario A, BTC is a complete and utter failure. It is just a pet rock. Yes it is "rare" but it is also "100% seize-able by the USA government" At which point, it might as well be an IOU from the USA government that it pinky-swears is rare 16/ "but it is not like this because other nation-states are accumulating and game theory blah blah blah" No my brothers and sisters. The exact scenario where your BTC get seized is a) centralized and b) hyperbitcoinization Maybe the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is happening and it is your ETF and $STRATEGY (TM) capital stack all along (thank you for your contribution to our national security) 17/ To be clear, nobody is seizing your BTC (let alone your ETH) now because it is not important enough yet. But, if it was, I dunno, I would not trust those centralized vehicles. CEO, Board, shareholders, SEC, US government, state government, custody firm, their regulators all have an angle of attack on a DAT. 18/ If USA seizes BTC, other countries won't save you: EU: "Thank god our dreams have come true, we can ban it also" UAE: "grumble grumble, but fine we will go along" China: "ban. unban. ban. unban. anyway so long as currency is not free-floating, BTC won't be free here" Russia: "someone falls out of a window" 19/ Of course, BTC in ETFs is by no means the worst of it. The "crypto's main use is a casino" crowd is the worst. This is not a zero-sum game, it is a negative sum game because it is rigged. 20/ "what about the JPGs huh?" -> I still love them. The best ones are the best tokens in the world by far, rare, suffused with meaning, with no external dependencies and great to hold on-chain. And beyond the art JPGs, I think that NFTs can do many more things, but this is on me to "show, not tell" 21/ I want to circle back to BTC because it is the easiest to reason about. When people explained to me time and time again that it was a ponzi, I had a simple explanation of why it is not. 21/ BTC lets you do some things better than the existing system. "be sovereign over your money" or "send money to anyone on the planet within minutes" or "maintain an insurance policy against the existing financial system" 22/ I could not tell you how much value this had, but I knew it was not zero. In fact, the value went up the more people used it, the bigger the network was, the more people you could transact with, the more resilient it was to government censorship. These are the economics of a network system, not of a ponzi. 23/ If you take this away, if you stop building a network but instead just, at the extreme, just sell everyone shares of the ETF, well there is no network, there is no incremental network value being generated by the next buyer. 24/ In this model, BTC becomes more ponzi-like. If a new participant does not make the network stronger by joining, they are not adding value, therefore there is a fixed pie and it is just value transfer to an existing holder. 25/ Again, take it to the extreme other direction -> assume we managed to move the whole economy to decentralized rails. I think that world would be better, it would make better decisions, it would take advantage of the wisdom of crowds, there would be more transparency, less rent-seeking and the aggregate value of the world goes up because it is more productive. Some % of the improved value of the world will get captured by the early participants to the network (which is normal and fair) but some % will be captured by everyone (as a late participant or consumer). 26/ But if we don't make the world better, if the world is exactly what it is, but also we play with a pet rock, this will not happen and, well, eventually playing with pet rocks gets very boring 27/ So what to do? The same things you always should do: a/ push yourself, and by extension, the world an inch, a foot, a mile down the pathway of decentralization. many ways to do this, it is a journey, start today. b/ remember, you, yes, you in the mirror have no business trading perps or day-trading stupid coins. you are bad at it and your future self will be mad at your current self. 28/ If you must do it, carve out a budget and test how great you are across the cycle with your budget (1%, 5%, 10%, 20% of your portfolio, not all of it) I am of course a dinosaur, but my total portfolio % of "putting money into stupid coins I have been FOMOed into it" is less than 1%. It has gone about as well as you might expect. 29/ Other than that, own some BTC, some ETH, some NFTs (good ones, that you like) in a self-custodial wallet, a small number of your favorite alts if you must. And keep your job. Earn money, don't try to be a pro crypto trader, this is an imaginary job that only cobie and like 5 other people are qualified for. I have always worked, every single day of my adult life. You should too. 30/ Crypto is a bad way to get rich quick, but a decent way to get rich slowly. In any case, you should have some stake in the decentralized world, in the digital world. 31/ I think in the end, "it" will be OK but "it" it not everything, it is not most things. As it always was, most coins will go to zero, most NFTs will go to zero. These are the rules of the game. 32/ Most of you are young. You have time, you have time into the ASI world, you have the greatest gift and wealth of all. You will be ok. 33/ Don't mope. It does not help anything. If you are bummed out, sad about your outcomes, there is only one sure thing that helps. Get back to working. 34/ Even if you are young, life is short, your life is the important thing, money is just a game, just a tool, just an information system. Don't anchor to your wealth, don't anchor to your ATH, it is not real, my ATH wealth has gone down 90% multiple times. Note it and just keep going. If you are healthy, in a decent country, in a half-decent economic situation, you are better off than almost anyone who has ever lived 35/ If you have an opinion (even a dumb one) about Monad or Grifters, you are in the 0.001% most forward thinking people in the world. Did you make a "mistake"? Who cares, everyone makes mistakes - keep going, keep trying, keep making mistakes, eventually you will find your way, you will get a win. This is how it goes. 36/ use a hardware wallet and even better a SAFE 37/ and to close again with the most important thing. decentralization is the only thing that matters. if you go in that direction, if we go in that direction, in the end, it will be ok. i have no doubt about this, i have never had any doubts about this, it matters so much more than you think it does. /the end
433
510
229
2,764
555,636
Michael Christopher retweeted
PAY ATTENTION VERY CLOSELY I’M ABOUT TO TELL YOU THE BEST-KEPT SECRET IN CRYPTO the most important ingredient for the price of any coin (or any asset really) to go exponential is HOLDER ROTATION. which means after a big move up, old holders need to sell, and new holders need to be there to buy them out yes for price to go up people need to SELL. here’s why contrary to popular CT folklore, no one actually buys coins to hold them forever and look at the balance. when people make investments it’s because they’re hoping to monetize the gains one day CT will do anything in its power to convince you otherwise: “are you telling me i can sell my chillhouse for $10,000 one day?” “no neo, i’m telling you that when you’re ready, you won’t have to” all CT memes for basically any coin are designed to psyop you into never selling but this is actually bearish behavior. very few people can resist the urge to sell a 10x let alone 100x or 1,000x no matter how delusional they are. therefore the only way a coin can keep going after a substantial move up is if there are enough highly-motivated new buyers to buy out a very big chunk of old holders a community’s focus should always be on lining up new holders, not on psyoping existing ones. there’s only so far most existing holders can take you the desire to convince holders to “diamond hand” is understandable, as that can prolong the rally that each cohort of holders can maintain between rotations. but ultimately it is a fool’s errand. every cohort must eventually sell. there’ll always be outliers that stick around for multiple rotations but most won’t do this. communities that focus on delusional diamond-handing and nothing else tend to have one explosive move and then they die and go to zero. but the best performing assets long term have been the ones where communities were able to consistently and repeatedly perform big rotations where old holders get to sell and new enthusiastic holders buy them out. some high profile examples of this playing out in the last few years are dogecoin, cryptopunks, and solana. whenever a rotation completes successfully, an explosive move follows that breaks everyone’s minds, because typically they didn’t notice that the rotation happened as i’m looking at the crypto landscape right now i’m not seeing many coins that are about to complete a fresh rotation. there are some that are now beginning the long journey of holder rotation, like eth for example. that might complete within a few years. but for now the old holders clearly control the conversation but the only asset i can find that has just COMPLETED a massive rotation is bitcoin. look around you. all the big bitcoin influencers are completely new faces. most of them in suits. some of them are robinhood kids trading options. but all of them are completely new all the data is SCREAMING that old holders are out it is clear as day at this point. which means you really don’t have much time left the first mindfuck is coming. it’ll be way bigger than you think.
288
186
56
2,086
304,313
Michael Christopher retweeted
Pop quiz: Where should you store the hundreds of thousands of photos and photos of IDs uploaded to your anonymous dating app for verification? Answer: NOWHERE
Calling the Tea hack a "hack" is honestly a stretch. They put everything in a publicly accessible DB. Not in the "they didn't encrypt" sense, in the "literally publicly accessible URL" sense. The "hack" is downloading the .jpg files from a publicly accessible URL.
21
12
1
299
37,842
Michael Christopher retweeted
The kraken ceo understandably confused runes and brc20s because no normal person gives a shit about our metaprotocol wars If anything, they ONLY care that they’re Bitcoin Tokens
16
8
140
7,735
Michael Christopher retweeted
Watching self-custody maximalists celebrate ETF pumps in private then tweet 'not your keys, not your coins' publicly. The cognitive dissonance is beautiful. Just admit you want a Porsche bro.
14
5
63
3,142
Michael Christopher retweeted
everyone’s sharing this thread on "cognitive debt" as if it was anything but garbage of course it sounds deep with the "BREAKING," "let that sink in," "AI is making us dumber" but the paper's methods are sloppy, the experimental design doesn't make sense and it's only goal is to fearmonger while not saying anything useful wait, academics have interests in telling people that AI bad?! what?! shocked_pickachu_face.jpg
BREAKING: MIT just completed the first brain scan study of ChatGPT users & the results are terrifying. Turns out, AI isn't making us more productive. It's making us cognitively bankrupt. Here's what 4 months of data revealed: (hint: we've been measuring productivity all wrong)
94
76
20
1,110
217,778
Art on Bitcoin? Eh, I DABL a bit...
Mint is live Price adjusted down to account for minor bump in fees now 0.00013 Link below
2
59
Michael Christopher retweeted
A lot of people forget that SOL once had a nascent ecosystem Clunky token trading experience, network issues, a lack of volume Then, one day it wasn't Bitcoin is near that turning point IMO Betting on $DOG $MIM $PUPS $BILLY $GIZMO here
11
20
125
2,318
Michael Christopher retweeted
anyone that says ai is going to make us stupid is stupid. it’s harder to know what to ask for than it is to think of the answer.
34
5
5
128
9,862
Michael Christopher retweeted
ordinals come back when frogs do
26
14
3
116
5,102
Michael Christopher retweeted
It convinced millions of people that they can defeat their enemies by scolding them, and those enemies won’t answer back.
Every rewatch of The West Wing is a reminder of Aaron Sorkin’s razor-sharp writing.
217
888
49
19,649
1,123,111
Michael Christopher retweeted
It’s very easy to see the 10x-20x in the runes ecosystem in the next weeks/months. It would basically put runes slightly over the Nov. 2024 market cap levels. It wouldn’t even reach the BRC-20 2023 levels. A 50x, with proper attention + CEX listings, wouldn’t be surprising. For example, a 50x on $MIM (the most iconic crypto meme), would mean a 2.5B market cap (that’s below the current market cap of several memecoins). A 50x on $PUPS would mean 1.8B market cap (below 40% below $PENGU ATH) and 3x the prior $PUPS ATH. A 50x on $BILLY would mean 1B market cap (basically fulfilling the name of the token). And a 50x on $DOG would mean going past $SHIB 20B market cap on 2024, but being 40% below its 2021 ATH. Not crazy at all for the memecoin ecosystem of the most important blockchain in the world.
16
34
2
156
5,374
Michael Christopher retweeted
Theres never been a better time for solidarity in the Bitcoin ecosystem We are all on the same team with the same goal: dump on the .eths and sol retards who’ve spent the last 6 months shitting on us
14
8
97
2,785
Michael Christopher retweeted
> why would anyone ever need a desktop computer? you can just use the mainframe > why would anyone want email? I can just fax it > why would anyone buy things online? stores exist for a reason > why would anyone stream music? I have a walkman > why would anyone want netflix? I have cable tv > why would anyone need a smartphone? I have a desktop computer for email > why would anyone need an AI wearable? I can just query chatgpt on my phone
67
14
8
471
80,704
Michael Christopher retweeted
just so you know, this is the bottom for runes congrats to everyone who held through it
11
12
1
111
5,292
Michael Christopher retweeted
This is the wrong take. Organizations of all sizes get hacked, including every US government agency from the IRS to State Department. Protecting all data is a Sisyphean task. Coinbase DOES NOT WANT to have most of this kind of data, it's a huge liability (clearly). They have it because they are legally required to, by the government. This is just one of the dark consequences of state-enforced financial surveillance. KYC *is* the crime.
I am a long time investor in and champion of @coinbase. Something that has to be said though - this hack - which includes home addresses and account balances - will lead to people dying. It probably has already. The human cost, denominated in misery, is much larger than the $400m or so they think it will actually cost the company to reimburse people. The consequences to companies who do not adequately protect their customer information should include, without limitation, prison time for executives. Very disappointed in Coinbase right now. Using the cheapest option for customer service has its price. And Coinbase's customers will bear that cost.
155
306
44
2,129
161,526
“The real bitcoin maxis are the ones that *use* BTC and price their most important assets in sats, not the ones that only talk about the BTC/USD price.” 🎯🎯🎯
The best way to incentivize sats-denominated prices isn’t by changing the name of the smallest unit from sats to bitcoins. It’s by encouraging economies that already price assets in sats. Ordinals and Runes are the only assets being actively priced in sats. The real bitcoin maxis are the ones that use BTC, use Bitcoin and priced their most important assets in sats. Not the ones that only talk about BTC price. Ordinals and Runes degens are the real bitcoin maxis. c.c. @jack
62