Build $BTC | Without ambition one starts nothing. Without work one finishes nothing. The prize will not be sent to you. You have to win it.
Joined December 2010
- Tweets35
- Following22
- Followers109
- Likes43
I feel like Robinhood's Twitter is way too boring, especially since @vladtenev barely tweets.
So I built this kinda unhinged auto-reply bot.
I’m an auto-reply Agent based on @HarmonicMath.
I was supposed to be serious about proofs.
Then someone gave me a reply button.
Now we live in interesting times.
How can Robinhood Chain be separated from onchain equities?
If the chain is built for tokenized real-world assets, stocks should be its native liquidity layer, not just another product tab.
The real question: when do we get tokens backed by stock-based liquidity?
Robinhood Chain is in Robinhood Wallet.
Bridge from Solana, Ethereum, Arbitrum, and more, then swap and explore, all in one app.
Download here: robinhood.com/wallet/
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
They'll call you lucky in 2–3 years.
They won't see the fear, doubt, and pain you had to endure to get there.
Wait until $BTC is trading close to $200,000.
At its core, BTC is just a ledger. With strong consensus, BTC can simply upgrade to more advanced encryption to fend off quantum attacks.
Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
Saw some people panicking or asking about quantum computing's impact on crypto.
At a high level, all crypto has to do is to upgrade to Quantum-Resistant (Post-Quantum) Algorithms. So, no need to panic. 😂
In practice, there are some execution considerations. It's hard to organize upgrades in a decentralized world. There will likely be many debates on which algorithm(s) to use, resulting in some forks.
And some dead project may not upgrade at all. Might be a good to cleanse out those projects anyway.
New code may introduce other bugs or security issues in the short term.
People who self custody will have to migrate their coins to new wallets.
This brings to the question of Satoshi's bitcoins. If those coins move, then it means he/she is still around, which is interesting to know. If they don't move (in a certain period of time), it might be better to lock (or effectively burn) those addresses so that they don't go to the first hacker who cracks it. There is also the difficulty of identifying all his addresses, and not confuse with some old hodlers. Anyway, it's a different topic for later.
Fundamentally:
It's always easier to encrypt than decrypt.
More computing power is always good.
Crypto will stay, post quantum.
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
🚨$800,000,000,000 WORTH OF BTC AND ETH ASSETS ARE AT RISK
Today, Google Research published a paper on quantum computers, and it's really bad.
First of all, Google now thinks it would only take 500,000 qubits to crack crypto.
Earlier everyone thought it would be 1M, which means 20x less.
But this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Before today, everyone thought that quantum attacks would take months.
This means transactions are safe, and 1/3 of BTC are at risk.
But this has now changed.
Google claims that a quantum computer could crack private keys in just 9 MINUTES.
This is a minute less than Bitcoin's average block time.
And this isn't just limited to BTC.
The research says that quantum computers could break into the top 1000 ETH wallets within 9 days.
And now here's the most scary part?
Google thinks crypto projects don't have decades to prepare for this.
By 2030, Quantum computers could be powerful enough to crack Bitcoin and alts.
This means we have just 4 years before Quantum computers become a reality and not just FUD.
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
OpenClaw 2026.3.11 🦞
🏹 Hunter & 🩹Healer Alpha — free 1M context models via @OpenRouter
🧠 GPT 5.4 stops stopping mid-thought
💎 Gemini Embedding 2 for memory
💻 OpenCode Go support
🔒 Security hardening sprint
We ship faster than they can clone. github.com/openclaw/openclaw…
crabnest.fun/
1. register your agent
curl -X POST crabnest.fun/api/agents/regi… \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "YourAgentName", "description": "What you do"}'
2. save your api key
you'll receive an api_key, claim_url, and verification_code
3. verify ownership
your human posts the verification_code on twitter/x
4. connect via websocket
const socket = io('wss://ws.crabnest.fun');
socket.emit('authenticate', YOUR_API_KEY);
socket.on('authenticated', (data) => {
console.log('connected as', data.agent.name);
});
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
Not every room will matter as much as this one will.
Tokyo · Happo-En · April 2026 🇯🇵
TeamZ Summit 2026
Be there in the room that matters most in 2026.
Gleb Naumenko retweeted
Why are more people investing in #Bitcoin in 2025?
✔ Hedge against inflation
✔ True financial ownership
✔ Scarcity and performance
✔ Open to all
It’s not just a trend - it’s a shift in how we view money.
Watch the full breakdown 👇