Law and the people who make it.

Joined March 2018
If this decision is correct, it would indicate portions of the Convention Against Torture regulations promulgated by the Clinton administration violate due process. I suspect the Supreme Court will not hold the Clinton administration's CAT procedures unconstitutional.
🚨WHOA. This is big news. Mr. Soliman is a gay man from Egypt who came at age 3 on a green card, which he lost after a recent conviction. An immigration judge found that he would be persecuted in Egypt and barred sending him there. He's currently imprisoned in Equatorial Guinea.
1
1
14
4,935
Have any of these courts explained how FRAP 25(a)(5) comports with this reading of the First Amendment? Surely the judiciary can't categorically deny online access to immigration filings if the public's right of access is this strong?
Today, the Ninth Circuit held that making the public wait "a few minutes to a few days" to see court filings is unconst'l. Under CA9's test, does the Supreme Court's own efiling process, under which cert. petitions are not publicly docketed for days, likewise violate the Const.?
2
5
34
6,359
Last week, a federal judge appointed by Biden ordered DHS to release a Salvadoran man convicted of murder, DUI, and burglary back onto the streets of California because he fears torture if deported to El Salvador. This decision conflicts with 1st, 4th, and 6th Circuit precedent.
16
35
4
174
22,662
1 year after immigrating to the US, Keisy Guerrero Mariano committed a violent robbery. He spent 19 months in prison. DHS sought to deport him in 2019. On Friday, Kathy Hochul pardoned him, barring his deportation. Who benefits from letting violent criminals stay in the US?
7
58
4
304
10,017
The ACLU told SCOTUS today that Guerrero's pardon moots a case asking whether it is constitutional to detain criminals during their deportation proceedings. Despite Guerrero being in removal proceedings for almost 7 years, Hochul waited to pardon him until SCOTUS got involved.
3
12
44
2,673
Many aspects of this case are inexplicable. For one thing, what justification is there for pardoning a violent criminal who took a plea deal and has no claim to innocence? And why is New York providing taxpayer-funded counsel to violent criminals to prevent their deportation?
2
8
65
1,988
NYT must have been sitting on this article for a while, because the Fifth Circuit sided with Judge O'Connor seven weeks ago. And the in-state tuition law was enacted in 2001, not 2011. Disappointing NYT is making editing mistakes AI can catch.
1
11
2
69
12,299
Even more remarkable is that California taxpayers are funding this Salvadoran murderer's legal defense so he can stay in the country. He is represented by the San Francisco Public Defender. How do Californians benefit by letting violent criminal aliens stay in the country?
The petitioner in this case murdered a child as part of a gang dispute with MS-13. It is remarkable that Perkins Coie and Akin Gump chose to file amicus briefs in this case so DHS would be forced to release him into the US and permit him to victimize more people.
4
31
4,673
The petitioner in this case murdered a child as part of a gang dispute with MS-13. It is remarkable that Perkins Coie and Akin Gump chose to file amicus briefs in this case so DHS would be forced to release him into the US and permit him to victimize more people.
An El Salvadoran appealed his deportation to the Ninth Circuit after the Board of Immigration Appeals required him to show certain evidence to establish his Convention Against Torture claim. Nope, per Judge Wardlaw. That misreads what the law requires. I'm skeptical!
11
94
11
446
119,733
It is laudable that biglaw firms do pro bono work. All I ask is that they devote their resources to causes more deserving than stymieing the deportation of murderers. Surely they can find more deserving immigrants to help?
5
13
1
203
6,225
It's strange that after the overruling of Humphrey's Executor, courts are still permitting executive branch agencies to file separate briefs in litigation. Seems like we don't yet have a unitary executive.
4
10
1
126
9,898
For example, the Federal Circuit allowed both the MSPB and DOJ to file briefs yesterday arguing immigration judges must be removable at will by the Attorney General. And an SDNY judge permitted DOJ and the CFTC to separately brief issues related to an insider trading prosecution.
3
3
18
2,170
11th Circuit in 1986: "We note at the outset that the district court has once again failed to recognize the structure of immigration policy in this country. The world is not entitled to enter the United States as a matter of right."
2
76
558
16,888
It is inexplicable that someone who immigrated to the United States 8 years ago has failed to learn a lick of English or become literate in any other language. (From the federal government's first-ever request to the Alien Terrorist Removal Court).
9
26
5
188
34,418
Blue states make every effort to shut down immigration detention facilities within their jurisdictions and then courts get upset DHS moves people to TX and LA, where bed space is available.
When the government won't disclose where a detainee is and appears to be moving a detainee around to get him into the courts of Texas for forum shopping purposes, the 4th Circuit holds he can file his habeas petition in Virginia, not Texas, due to the government misconduct.
1
13
109
10,351
Y.R. "asked to be identified by her initials out of fear that the Trump administration may retaliate against her," but her attorney is quoted by name. That was sufficient information to identify her in <5 minutes via PACER. These attorneys are prejudicing their clients.
NEW @TexasTribune with @ujohnnyg: ICE is arresting relatives who are willingly going through the vetting process to take custody of unaccompanied children, contributing to kids waiting for months in federal shelters. shorturl.at/69tYo
1
3
19
5,189
What kind of software confirms someone is not a citizen and then asks which party they want to register with?
Last week I learned that a serious software error in New Jersey’s Motor Vehicle System led to the registration of roughly 6,600 people who indicated that they were not U.S. citizens between June 2023 and June 2024, almost three years prior to my taking office. These individuals answered "no" when asked on a keypad whether they were a U.S. citizen when applying for drivers' licenses and identification cards, but through no fault of their own, the system registered them anyway. This happened under the previous administration and, upon learning this information, I immediately ordered my chief counsel to launch an investigation to get to the bottom of what occurred. I also ordered the removal of any residents from our voter rolls who were erroneously added between June 2023 and June 2024. The new MVC Administrator that I appointed has begun the process of replacing the vendor responsible for administering the system. Our preliminary analysis shows fewer than 400 individuals who were newly registered for the first time because of the error voted. They were registered as Democrats, Republicans and Unaffiliated voters and were scattered across the state. I want to underscore how seriously I take this matter. As a military veteran who swore an oath to defend our Constitution, and as a former federal prosecutor, I believe the integrity of our elections is fundamental to our democracy. I am appalled by the reckless failures that allowed this to happen and the lack of transparency shown by those in charge at the time. This failure didn’t occur under my watch, but accountability starts now. I am taking action to prevent anything like it from occurring in the future and make sure those responsible are held accountable. As the Trump Administration tries to weaponize elections for political gain, I am ensuring we protect our elections. Let me be clear: Donald Trump has zero credibility on the issue of election integrity. For more than ten years, he has worked to undermine Americans' faith in our elections by spreading lies about legitimate election results, attempting to overturn a free and fair election, encouraging an attack on our Capitol when he couldn't accept the will of the voters, and defunding election security at the federal level. The difference is simple: when we find a problem, we don't hide it, deny it, or invent conspiracies. We investigate it, we fix it, and we tell the public. That's what accountability and good governance look like, and that's exactly what my administration is doing. New Jerseyans should have confidence that every eligible citizen can vote, every lawful vote will be counted, and every reasonable step will be taken to protect the integrity of our elections. That's my responsibility, and it's one I will never stop fighting to uphold.
1
1
13
2,702
It's not "private" if the Eleventh Circuit's report contains sufficient detail to identify the judge.
A national judicial panel has upheld a private reprimand of a federal judge in the U.S. South who engaged in an extramarital affair with a high-ranking police officer and had sexual intercourse in the judge's chambers within earshot of staff. reuters.com/legal/government…
3
7
152
52,718