Pinned Tweet
We have become exceptionally good at creating financial claims on prosperity, without necessarily becoming equally good at creating the underlying prosperity.
Socratic dialogue between two agents playing David Hoffman @TrustlessState and Ryan Sean Adams @RyanSAdams of @Bankless, debating whether Ether is money, built from their actual public statements on Bankless.
Prepare to nerd-out, cubed:
----------------------------------------------------------
ΠΕΡΙ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΟΣ
On Money: A Dialogue Concerning Ether
PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: DAVID, RYAN
RYAN: You have kept apart from the crowd all morning, David. Are you unwell, or unwilling to say what you think?
DAVID: Unwilling. You will not like it.
RYAN: Say it anyway. You once said the opposite loud enough that half of crypto still repeats it back to me.
DAVID: I said Ether was ultra sound money. I still hold the engineering was sound. I no longer hold that sound engineering was enough.
RYAN: Enough for what?
DAVID: For Ether to be money, in the full sense you still mean when you say it.
RYAN: Then tell me first what you take money to be, before you take it from me.
DAVID: You know the answer as well as I. Three functions in one asset: a store of value, a medium of exchange, a unit of account.
RYAN: Good. Judge Ether by that measure, not by your mood.
DAVID: Which of the three do you claim for it?
RYAN: The first, chiefly.
DAVID: Show me a store of value.
RYAN: ConstitutionDAO bid on a copy of the Constitution at Sotheby's. The house listed the currencies accepted for other lots — dollars, yen, francs, and Ether, named beside them. Not by us. By an auction house that owes Ethereum no loyalty.
DAVID: One auction is not an economy.
RYAN: Then take the larger measure. Set Ether beside the things men already trust to hold value across time. Oil, some eighty-five trillion. Gold, twenty-two trillion. Bonds, one hundred forty-one trillion. World GDP, near it. World money supply, near it also. Average them, and the figure lands close to ninety trillion. Divide that by Ether's supply and you get seven hundred forty thousand dollars a coin. Arithmetic, not fantasy.
DAVID: Answer me this first. Does oil trade on what oil might someday be, or on what refineries burn today?
RYAN: On what they burn today.
DAVID: Hold that answer. I will return to it.
RYAN: Return to it, then. But first answer for yourself — you built the case you now doubt. Ultra sound money, you called it. Explain it back to me, so I know what you are actually renouncing.
DAVID: I renounce none of the engineering. Proof of Stake replaced miners burning electricity with stakers who spend almost nothing to secure the chain. EIP-1559 burns the fee instead of handing it whole to validators. Issuance in front, low and steady. Burn behind it, spiking with demand. Justin Drake said it best — if Bitcoin is sound money, Ether is ultra sound money. When burn outruns issuance, the asset shrinks as the world uses it more.
RYAN: Elegant. We agree there.
DAVID: We agree on the engine. We part on whether an elegant engine makes a money, because money is not built by engineers. It is decided by strangers who owe each other nothing, agreeing without being told to agree. Ethereum asked too much of that crowd at once. Decentralized leadership that still moves like a startup fighting for its life. Rollups free to chase their own fortunes yet loyal to the mother chain. A roadmap sequenced correctly across a decade. Each is a coordination win on its own. The maximal version of "Ether is money" needed all of them to land together.
RYAN: Much of it did land. Ethereum holds more than half of all stablecoin supply, three in four if you set Tron aside. Two-thirds of USDC moves on its rails. Coinbase built its house on an Ethereum rollup. Where is the failure in that?
DAVID: Not in the network. In the asset. A man buys stablecoins on Ethereum's base layer, and Ether earns fifty cents of gas. He buys the same stablecoins on a rollup, and Ether earns less than a cent, though the sum moved is counted in billions. Ethereum built roads to every part of its city and set the tolls near zero, because that has always been the promise — the world's most secure blockspace, at cost, no markup, forever. I called that beautiful once. I now see it is also why the asset does not capture what the network creates. Ethereum is a giver, Ryan. Not a taker. A money that wants to be maximal has to take.
RYAN: That is a plumbing problem, not a verdict. Native rollups, based sequencing, faster blocks — repair the pipe between usage and burn, and the loop closes again.
DAVID: I would cheer the repair. But notice what each of us is doing while we wait for it. You hold your position. I sold mine.
RYAN: You sold your Ether.
DAVID: Last week. Bitcoin crossed from tribe to nation on one fact a child can hold in his hand — twenty-one million coins, no more, ever. A government now keeps a strategic reserve of it, an honor no other asset has. Ethereum's case was never that simple, because Ethereum was never trying to be simple. It was trying to be optimal. Optimal things are hard to explain to a stranger in one sentence, and money is a story a stranger has to believe the first time he hears it.
RYAN: So you no longer think Ether is money.
DAVID: I think the thesis did not fail. I think it stopped short of its fullest form, and the market has already paid Ethereum the price that form deserves — not much more, I suspect, and not much less either. I stay bullish on the network. I no longer expect the asset to be rerated as a store of value the way you still expect it. That is why I moved my capital.
RYAN: Then here is where we stop, since neither argument moves the other any further. I say the coordination game is not lost, only slower than we hoped when we were shouting into an empty room. You no longer hold what you held. I still do.
DAVID: That is a fair place to leave it. We built this school on one conviction and have ended at different distances from it. That is more honesty than most arguments produce.
RYAN: Go tell the crowd what you no longer hold, David. I will go tell them what I still do.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sources
Grounded in the real public positions of both speakers, not invented:
Ryan Sean Adams, "ETH is money" (Bankless, 2021) — the origin claim and the ConstitutionDAO/Sotheby's episode.
Ryan Sean Adams's oil/gold/bonds/GDP/M2 comparison and the ~$740k figure, quoted in David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025).
David Hoffman, "ETH is Ultra Sound Money" (Bankless, 2021) — the Proof of Stake / EIP-1559 case, and Justin Drake's line "If Bitcoin is sound money, then Ether is Ultra Sound money."
David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025) — the value-capture problem and "Ethereum is a giver, not a taker."
David Hoffman, "Why David Sold His ETH" (Bankless, 2026) — the reversal, "money is a coordination game," and the Bitcoin strategic-reserve comparison.
Yo fam, we built something at @Bankless that's materially upgraded my Claude responses
AI is bad at crypto. the labs clearly don't have good crypto data.
So we took everything we've made (2,000+ transcripts and 5,000+ articles), and structured it into...
The Bankless MCP 🤖
Plug it into your AI provider and your crypto queries instantly get better.
We keep it updated with every new article and episode, so it stays current
Premium members only! log in at Bankless dot com, paste the instructions into your AI (or just tell your agent to do it) and boom.
check it out and lmk what you think!
Blockchains can turn ownership, capital, liquidity, and contractual relationships into a programmable, composable financial design space.
Developed in the 1960's, CMOS technology turned physical electronic behavior into a programmable, composable design space.
Imagine if American companies could not use CMOS technology - and the U.S. consequently did not lead the World in semiconductors, computers, and telecom through the 70's, 80's, 90's and early 2000's.
The economic opportunity lost would have extended far beyond the semiconductor industry itself, into nearly every American industry built on top of it.
That is the scale of the opportunity the U.S. risks ceding if programmable capital develops elsewhere because American companies lack sufficient regulatory clarity.
Stated another way: blockchains may do for economic relationships what CMOS did for electronic behavior: a general-purpose implementation substrate on which value can be made programmable and composable for design of entirely new economic systems.
Spent an hour scrolling through podcasts on Spotify and I couldn’t find a single crypto or digital asset focused podcast with the “Verified By Spotify” badge. Seems like some low hanging credibility-fruit for the taking.
@Spotify @mayafish @laurashin @KevinWSHPod @JasonYanowitz @TrustlessState @milkroaddaily @RyanSAdams @_DannyKnowles
I'm not not done.
Bitcoin is also a mechanism that can economically and financially reconnect a divided World—even if nation-states, alliances, and fiat systems stay fragmented or hostile to one another.
As more parties opt in, the Bitcoin Network creates a single, apolitical monetary plane that sits above fractured fiat systems. Countries, companies, or individuals who no longer trust each other’s banks, SWIFT messages, or reserve currencies can still settle directly in the Bitcoin ledger. It is the digital-age version of how gold historically let rival empires trade without trusting each other’s coins or kings.
By maintaining a permissionless, censorship-resistant value transfer layer between distrusting parties, Bitcoin “demonetizes violence and monetizes peace,” giving a divided World a practical pathway to reunite... if not necessarily an easy one.
In that way, Bitcoin becomes a safe port in the storm - a neutral harbor where commerce can continue.
The increasing global fragmentation makes a censorship-resistant, borderless settlement network like Bitcoin more valuable.
$BTC is the sole medium of entry, transit, and exit on the Bitcoin Network.
There is no way to settle on Bitcoin’s ledger using Dollars, Euros, Yuan, gold, or oil. Only $BTC.
🕊️
The increasing global fragmentation makes a censorship-resistant, borderless settlement network like Bitcoin more valuable.
$BTC is the sole medium of entry, transit, and exit on the Bitcoin Network.
There is no way to settle on Bitcoin’s ledger using Dollars, Euros, Yuan, gold, or oil. Only $BTC.
🕊️
The increasing global fragmentation makes a censorship-resistant, borderless settlement network more valuable.
$BTC is the sole medium of entry, transit, and exit on the Bitcoin Network.
There is no way to settle on Bitcoin’s ledger using dollars, euros, gold, or oil.
#stayhumble #stacksats
RT @santiagoroel: rates in DeFi are too low for the level of risk
$11.7B sitting in Morpho vaults today at 2-4% APY. retail is funding thes…
The increasing global fragmentation makes a censorship-resistant, borderless settlement network more valuable.
$BTC is the sole medium of entry, transit, and exit on the Bitcoin Network.
There is no way to settle on Bitcoin’s ledger using dollars, euros, gold, or oil.
#stayhumble #stacksats
AndyXBTer retweeted
SEC decides to drop its own "CLARITY Act" on a Tuesday afternoon--comprehensive token taxonomy...huge
sec.gov/files/rules/interp/2…
1. built defillama directory
2. built defillama extension that detects scam urls and twitter scams
3. built llamasearch extension
4. built llamasearch into defillama extension
5. built internal product to prevent any scam ads when users search for llamaswap
6. built search.defillama.com
7. working on it rn
AndyXBTer retweeted
Replying to @Yubico
How about some quantum-resistant, general-purpose hardware security keys? When Robotnik's army of ClawdBots goes post-quantum, they will feast on our credentials and data!
Cryoto is what would happen if retail could buy and immediately resell things on Amazon.
Actually, Cypto is what would happen if Amazon could pay retail AWS token-incentives to buy and immediately resell things on Amazon.
AndyXBTer retweeted
Replying to @KyleSamani
Generally agree, easier to implement with new protocols I think, because all the existing ones funding rounds did take the unlocks into account. One way to solve this would be to allow investors to exchange locked tokens for smaller number of unlocked ones










