Immunologist, Molecular Biologist. Trying to do the right thing for the next generation.
USA
Joined October 2021
- Tweets10.2K
- Following1.3K
- Followers665
- Likes51.1K
Pinned Tweet
This is the Tobacco Playbook. Industry incentivizes scientists, journals, and media to sow doubt and confusion. It allowed the tobacco companies to keep selling their toxic products for several decades before the public rejected (mostly) their harmful products.
I think the medical establishment intentionally broadened the definition of autism to muddy the waters, obfuscate, and create confusion—so people conflate socially awkward adults or quirky kids with those who regressed after receiving multiple vaccines in a single appointment and now spend their days in helmets and diapers.
That’s not the same condition—
and they know it.
J. Smith retweeted
NY Times @SherylNYT ran a hit piece on RFK Jr. and NIH for opening a vaccine injury clinic.
Her source? A leak from the NIH hospital board chair.
What the Times left out: that chair is a top PR executive for @WeberShandwick representing Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, Sanofi & more.
🧵
🤖 Made with AI
J. Smith retweeted
This multi-vaccine approach to pregnancy care is unprecedented in human history & the risks of such an approach are unknown.
I disagree with this CDC recommendation for pregnant women to get vaccinated against whooping cough, flu, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) & COVID-19.
There are short-term risks, unknown long-term risks, & no RCTs showing health benefits for moms & babies from this multi-vaccine in pregnancy approach.
Patients can be counseled regarding various vaccines and make their own choices.
CDC should not be recommending this approach to pregnancy care.
cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/r…
J. Smith retweeted
You will not believe how corrupt the FDA’s process for vaccine safety testing is.
“It’s just smoke and mirrors.”
Send this to someone who still believes Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative.
New vaccines are never tested against a placebo.
Bret Weinstein: “That’s jaw-dropping in and of itself.”
But it gets worse.
“They test it against something that they claim is a placebo… the last version of the shot.”
“If the last version of the shot was demonstrated to be safe, and the new version of the shot doesn’t do any more harm than the last version, then it’s safe, right?”
Jeffrey Tucker: “If it’s slightly better, then you report the relative efficacy.”
“It’s a tenth of a percent, and that’s where you get your 95% effectiveness.”
@jeffreytucker @BretWeinstein @thedarkhorsepod
J. Smith retweeted
Please know that flu shots for 50+ are mRNA. Moderna’s study showed 23 died in mRNA group vs 9 in traditional flu shot group. Side effects are significantly higher for mRNA shot. Neither mRNA or traditional flu shot have been shown to decrease risk of hospitalization or death.
Flu season is here, and our community is stronger when we all roll up our sleeves and do our part. Visit @hcphtx to get your free flu and COVID vaccines today: hcp4.info/4ej332a
--
La temporada de gripe ya llegó, y nuestra comunidad está más protegida cuando todos ponemos de nuestra parte. Visita @hcphtx para recibir hoy tus vacunas gratuitas contra la gripe y la COVID-19: hcp4.info/4ej332a
J. Smith retweeted
A Canadian neurologist realized he kept seeing undiagnosed strokes in children after vaccination, and that the most severe ones, like what the triplets experienced, were followed by autistic regressions.
Many readers have sent me similar accounts like this:
J. Smith retweeted
Anna Sims was 11 weeks old. Healthy. Breastfed. Starting to smile and coo.
On 16 December 2013, at around 11 am, she attended a routine visit. Pediarix, Hib, Prevnar 13, RotaTeq. Four vaccines at once. She was dead later that day.
The coroner wrote “undetermined.” Consistent with SIDS. Not the vaccines. Her parents, Abigail and Daniel Sims, filed in the vaccine court in 2015. Case 15-1526V. HHS fought them.
March 2024. Special Master Mindy Michaels Roth ruled the vaccines contributed to her death. Encephalopathy. Swelling. No evidence she died of something unrelated. HHS asked the court to throw it out. Damages were awarded on 8 January 2025. $300,000.
Eleven weeks. Hours. Ten years in a system built so you cannot sue the company. Then a cheque that does not buy the baby back, and a government that still appealed.
They call it rare. They made this family prove it for a decade. The ruling says the shots contributed. The payout says a child’s life has a cap.
govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCO…
J. Smith retweeted
ethics according to paul offit et al:
ethical: mandating vaccines that were never properly tested for safety
unethical: doing studies to determine whether those vaccines are safe
study by Danish researchers, called unethical by @WHO @DrPaulOffit others, had been halted by 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗻𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸.
SDU health sciences dean Jacob Grauslund confirms: he gave researchers go-ahead 4 study today: rollingstone.com/politics/po… /2
J. Smith retweeted
You always see the same pattern with vax safety monitoring systems. They are heralded as a way to prove safety, then once they show the opposite, they get ghosted and swept under the rug. V-Safe was used to justify an EUA & no testing for the vaccines b/c it overcame VAERS's "shortcomings."
I've spent 10 hours in public reading from the most horrifying nonfiction text I've seen: Cries for Help from V-Safe data. This was the CDC's vaccine safety monitoring system, meant to assure people that the government cares. Defenders of the CDC have said that it was never designed to provide care. But the website said the exact opposite. They lied. Thank you @React19org
brownstone.org/articles/crie…
J. Smith retweeted
This is not even real… the State of New York sent a bill for $118,000 to three little Amish schools, one room schoolhouses out in Clymer, Heuvelton, and the Canajoharie settlement that do not take a single dollar of public money, because 59 of their children are not vaccinated.
And that is just one day. By the state's own position in the Second Circuit case, every day an unvaccinated child walks into that schoolhouse is a fresh violation and a fresh $2,000 fine, per child. Dygert Road got billed $52,000 for 26 kids, Pleasant View $46,000 for 23, and Shady Lane $20,000 for 10. Run that out over a 180 day school year and you are looking at roughly $21 million owed by families who already said they cannot pay the first bill… and their own attorney, Aaron Siri, told the New York Post the only way they pay is if the state takes their land.
Think about how we got here. These families had a religious exemption for decades. In June 2019 Albany repealed it, Andrew Cuomo signed it, and Kathy Hochul has left it sitting right there in force the entire time she has been governor. The fines came down in December 2022, the Second Circuit ruled against the families on June 30 of this year, and now Joseph Miller, Jonas Smucker, and Ezra Wengerd are asking the Supreme Court to let them live by the faith they have lived by their whole lives.
Meanwhile these are the same people who spent years screaming my body, my choice… and yet when a quiet Amish father says he wants to decide what goes into his own child's body, Albany sends the collection notice. Where did that crowd go? Lara is right that money is the weapon here, because they cannot drag the Amish into court in handcuffs for praying, so they fine them until they sell the farm or leave the state, and some of those families are already talking about leaving.
Ask yourself honestly… if they can do this to people who keep to themselves, farm their land, run their own schools, and ask nothing from the government, what exactly do you think they will do to you?
I read those numbers and I had to read them twice. Informed consent is supposed to mean something, and religious liberty is the very first freedom in the Bill of Rights, not a favor the governor hands out when it suits her.
Kathy, your sign says "Keeping New Yorkers Safe"… drop the fines, give these families their exemption back, and leave the Amish alone.
But God.
It is outrageous that the state of NY is punishing the Amish community because their children are unvaccinated. They are using money as a weapon, trying to fine these communities into compliance. This is a blatant violation of the legal principle of “informed consent” which guarantees individuals the right to make informed decisions about medical interventions, particularly vaccines, without coercion or misinformation. Without this protection, you can be forced into anything by those in power, just like the Nazis did in WWII.

Read more about it on:
icandecide.org
J. Smith retweeted
Senator Ron Johnson was just asked point blank:
“Should parents vaccinate their children?”
His answer was blunt:
“I wouldn’t.”
“Certainly not as an infant.”
“I would never get an mRNA-based injection.”
“Ever.”
“We’ve been so lied to about this.”
Then, he revealed the one chart that settles this question once and for all.
“In Aaron Siri’s book, ‘Vaccines, Amen’ page 84, there’s a chart.”
“It shows the number of deaths the year before a vaccine was available for an infectious disease.”
“Most of these childhood infectious diseases, the rate of disease was down 90-99%.”
“Already conquered.”
“We stopped living in squalor.”
“We had sanitation.”
“We had antibiotics.”
“We know how to treat these things.”
“When I was a kid, we would be sent over to a house where the kids had mumps or chickenpox.”
“Get it over with and move on with life.”
“Measles was never considered deadly when I was a kid.”
“Now all of a sudden, it’s scaremongering.”
@SenRonJohnson @bennyjohnson @AaronSiriSG
J. Smith retweeted
If you’re wondering how our elections in America are always so close, like how Democrats pulled ahead in Virginia’s redistricting within a few percentage points, this is how
Former CIA Operations Officer Gary Berntsen explains there are teams of people who rig our elections and keep the vote totals extremely close, by slim margins, so it’s believable and hard to prove fraud
Lara Logan interviews Former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen. He explains, in detail, how elections are being stolen in America
He describes there are teams of statisticians, mathematicians, and hackers who map out every county and identify where margins can be quietly adjusted
Different techniques are used in each location so nothing matches in a recount. When a 70-30 county becomes 68-32, nobody notices. But when you add up these differences across an entire state, those tiny amounts of fraud decide outcomes
Both former CIA operations officer Gary Berntsen and author Ralph Pezzullo explain the strategy. They explain they don't flip the big blue cities. Instead they shave votes in the places no one ever audits
“They know where they can find the dead people... Mm-hmm.”
“They plan this, It's meticulous. It's meticulous. These guys are experts at this. It's not just a few guys in a back room. You're talking about hundreds of statisticians and engineers, and they work it, you know, for a year to plan and mathematicians and hackers.”
“We had a map out of Colorado when we were talking to our engineers, the guys that designed it, that stole the elections.
— We just go to every one place where Trump wins 70-30 and — Shaved it off.
We shave in every other place. We don't go near a Democratic place, because when they wanna do recounts, they're gonna go to the Democratic places. They don't realize we shaved in every other committee. We know every other county.
We know how to do this. And then in each of those things where they shave, they shave with a different technique in each one of those. So if you found something in, in one county, there's no continuity around the state that way.
So this is why the Republicans are so much at fault, because they have the power and the ability to show in their areas they can allow access to the machines, they can allow access to the source code”
People need to go to prison. Democrats are stealing elections nationwide in every county, in every state of America
J. Smith retweeted
To do anything, at anytime, with no strategy makes no sense in any effort. Strategy means thinking about what will actually make one's efforts successful as opposed to just shooting from the hip.
I could not say my personal opinion below on @CHDTVLive, but I can say so on my own personal account here. So here goes:
I know you are impassioned about ending the covid shots Mary, but I am not convinced that your petition is going to help to that end. Your petition is going to help give Democrats control of the House and possibly the Senate. There is zero chance of getting rid of mRNA shots with Democrats holding power.
Z-E-R-O
But that is what your petition is helping to do. The Republicans are not perfect and many of them are NOT our friends, absolutely true. But the only friends we have to stop the covid shots are Republicans, so to have any shot at this we need to keep them in power.
That's just how politics works. It's not "4D chess" as you claimed in our interview. It is simple basic civics.
The only chance we have at getting rid of mRNA shots is with @SecKennedy where he is and empowered to push forward change, because he wants to make that change but is being thwarted.
I hope I am wrong, but I actually see your effort hurting the goal you have.
@ChildrensHD
The actual trial for one of the HepB vaccines consisted of 147 children. Not newborns who were the intended target. There was no saline placebo. In fact no control group at all. Follow up was 5 days. How can you assess whether any adverse events are related to the vaccine without a control group? It’s unscientific.
This vaccine was then administered to every birth cohort of 3-4 million newborn babies over the last 30 year. Even low risk babies. This shameful policy will continue to fuel “vaccine hesitancy” until it is properly addressed. Certainly this vaccine should not be universally given to most newborns without better evidence.
J. Smith retweeted
This ability of the covid synthetic gene jabs to make individuals more vulnerable to infection was considered "dangerous misinformation" capable of producing harm.
It was heavily censored by social media.
At my medical licence suspension hearing in 2021,
3 of the 10 social media posts cited by the medical council as evidence of "dangerous misinformation "
were posts of me warning about negative efficacy
and ADE ( antibody dependent enhancement. )
@Fynnderella1 with the, now classic, Cleveland Clinic study chart and @MaryanneDemasi in her recent piece
has reminded me of why "Digital Duty of Care Bills" are just so dangerous.
My "dangerous misinformation" as selected by the medical council ( judge for yourself ):
pauloosterhuis.substack.com/…
@PaulineHansonOz @MRobertsQLD @Jikkyleaks @JulianGillespie @AugustoZimmerm5 @cafelockedout @TopherField @RWMaloneMD @AaronSiriSG @jeffreytucker @ABridgen @RosieM1276203
J. Smith retweeted
1 in 5 U.S. children now has a developmental disability. The CDC authors credit "earlier detection and awareness," but experts say the paper offers no evidence for that explanation. @ChildrensHD @CHDTVLive
The Deferender story:
childrenshealthdefense.org/d…
J. Smith retweeted
Customer: "Could you remind me what they're all for? I've lost track."
Pharmacist: "Sure. This one's your blood pressure."
Customer: "That I knew."
Pharmacist: "This one's a water pill. For the swollen ankles."
Customer: "Why are my ankles swollen?"
Pharmacist: "That'd be the blood pressure pill."
Customer: "Oh. And this?"
Pharmacist: "For gout."
Customer: "I never used to have gout."
Pharmacist: "The water pill can bring it on."
Customer: "The white one?"
Pharmacist: "Cholesterol."
Customer: "And the one next to it?"
Pharmacist: "For the muscle aches."
Customer: "From?"
Pharmacist: "The cholesterol one, most likely. And this last one protects your stomach from the one for the aches."
Customer: "So how many of the seven are for something that was wrong with me?"
Pharmacist: [counts] "Two."
Customer: "And the other five?"
Pharmacist: "Those are for the two."
