
Sociologist @UMich. Book: Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. Public Policy @PrincetonUPress https://xitter.cf/t.co/LwS8OFq86M.
Ann Arbor, MI
Joined June 2014
- Tweets25.2K
- Following1.5K
- Followers12K
- Likes31K
After 10 years, 4 drafts, 3 houses, 2 jobs, a pandemic and a life-threatening illness, it’s publication day! A book thread. press.princeton.edu/books/ha…
Still see people I miss here, but Elon's latest antics have reinforced my decision to stay the f@#$ off this platform.
Keeping the account for so I can keep giving invite codes to mutuals. I've got two today, reply or DM if you want one.
Beth Popp Berman (epopppp@bsky) retweeted
IT’S A SWEEP! 🧹 Congratulations to @epopppp, @RoiLivne, and @miradvale! @umich received all three major awards from the @ASAnews #EconomicSociology section last night. 〽️ #GoBlue!
Beth Popp Berman (epopppp@bsky) retweeted
Congrats Beth on your book winning the Political Sociology Section Book Award!
After 10 years, 4 drafts, 3 houses, 2 jobs, a pandemic and a life-threatening illness, it’s publication day! A book thread. press.princeton.edu/books/ha…
One of the great crimes of the decline of this platform is that research threads like this no longer get leverage. Read and share!
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Please follow me so I can get these terrible Brands out of my feed threads.net/@epoppppp
Beth Popp Berman (epopppp@bsky) retweeted
A round-up of all the posts from our @legalhistory series on "Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi." Thanks to @alex_tzhang, José Argueta Funes, @k_redburn, Serena Mayeri, @narosenblum & Alison Gocke for participating! Thanks to @epopppp for helping inspire my posts.👇
Conclusion: Legal Historians' Reflections on "Outside In: The Oral History of Guido Calabresi" dlvr.it/Srdrgk
Beth Popp Berman (epopppp@bsky) retweeted
Useful thread to return to
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
The Supreme Court has lured me back here, which I will probably live to regret. But it's good to see you all.
Really interesting paper. I wish people just understood what they were reading. But if adding variability produces more accurate interpretation of results (and doctors perform worst!), that seems really important.
We are visualizing our data all wrong.
Typically, academic graphs show statistical confidence intervals or standard errors. This paper shows that everyone from doctors to tenured faculty misread these graphs, assuming effects are larger. Show variability! jakehofman.com/pdfs/illusion…















