sharing facts and facts only 💯
Joined July 2020
- Tweets21.7K
- Following1.6K
- Followers2.1K
- Likes21.5K
PIERS MORGAN CORNERS a BLACK LIVES MATTER activist over a Black-only theatre night:
“If I put on a whites only show, you would call it racism.”
Her response? “Context.”
His comeback? “Exactly! Exactly my point!”
Piers Morgan: Those who are not black are asked not to buy tickets. The Theatre Royal Stratford East in London says no one's excluded from attending their new show, Tambo & Bones, but promotional material makes clear that white people aren't wanted at the production on the night in question.
It says a Black Out night is a purposeful creation of an environment in which an all-black-identifying audience can experience and discuss an event in the performing arts free from the white gaze. So does this mean I can go if I identify as a black man?
There'd be some on the woke side who would have trouble disagreeing with that given they believe in limitless self-identity. But more importantly, is it ever okay to exclude audiences based on skin color?
What would happen, for example, if it was the other way around, if this was a whites-only audience?
Well, I'm joined by the TalkTV contributor Esther Krakue and the Black Lives Matter organizer and activist, Iman Ayton.
It's alright, Iman, I'm just trying to picture what would happen if I put on a theatrical production in London and said it was for whites only, or people identifying as white, which is obviously a ludicrous phrase, but you would go nuts. You would say that is blatant racism, segregation, dragged us kicking and screaming back to the dark days of appalling bigotry. You would.
Iman Ayton: Well, it depends on the context, right?
Piers Morgan: No, it doesn't. Whites-only audience, no black people allowed. What would you say?
Iman Ayton: Well, I think you're perfectly right, it would be akin to racists finding more ways to be more racist.
Piers Morgan: So why is it okay this way round?
Iman Ayton: Okay, so we have to put it into context. It was one out of the 29 shows...
Piers Morgan: Doesn't matter.
Iman Ayton: Yes, it does. Let's put it into context, Piers. You want to forget about context, context is everything. It is one out of the 29 shows that was targeted towards black people.
And at no point did they say certain people were excluded. In fact, they actually said it verbatim on their website: "no one is excluded." And yet, you have found racism. How does that work?
Piers Morgan: No, no, I just read the rest of what they said. It's pretty clear you are not supposed to go if you're not black.
Iman Ayton: No, please consider booking other dates.
Piers Morgan: Right. Exactly.
Esther Krakue: I think the context is important. I think the issue here is when it's talking about blackouts and it's trying to gather an audience of black people that they believe have the same experience, this doesn't transpose the same way it does in the US in the UK. A black person in the UK could be black African, black British, black from the Caribbean. In the US, their conversation around race is completely different, and that's why it's a problem. Obviously, when you bring this to the UK, people are going to be like, "what are you talking about?" This is especially in London, the most multicultural city in the country.
Piers Morgan: Can you see any merit to it?
Esther Krakue: Of course not, and I don't even think it makes sense in the American context.
Iman Ayton: But why is that? If you're talking about safe spaces, because let's just be clear we're talking about safe spaces.
Piers Morgan: What is a safe space? What does that mean, you wouldn't feel safe if I came along?
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
James Barr EXPLODES at Jordan Peterson’s Auschwitz comparison on Piers Morgan’s show but Esther Krakue agrees with Peterson’s underlying argument. The debate takes an unexpected turn.
Piers Morgan: “Before we come to the rest of the pack, this is Jordan Peterson. He's gotten into a furore over his video about pride. Where he says a sexually narcissistic movement headed for a fall because it's been taken over by the radical trans lobby. Let's take a look.”
Jordan Peterson: “There is a real tinge of narcissism, sexual narcissism, trans-pushing, gender-affirming butchers and liars, primarily target young people whose most likely outcome on the sexual front is homosexuality. “
“I don't like the flag. I think it's a piece of idiocy. I don't understand why it changes every bloody week. And I think the surgery, the gender-affirming care movement, I think it is Nazi Auschwitz-level awful.”
James Barr: “What on earth is that closeted gay man wearing? That is an abomination! That is a crazy load of absolute bullshit. I'm sorry, that is insane. How dare he say that about Auschwitz? Gay people were killed alongside Jewish people and disabled people in the Holocaust. That is disgusting, Piers. “
“That is disgusting. You shouldn't even be giving that airtime.
Piers Morgan: Well, he's a very famous guy.
James Barr: Yeah, but we shouldn't be listening to what he thinks. I mean, he says loads of nonsense.”
Piers Morgan: Well, you say loads of nonsense. I don't de-platform you.
Esther Krakue: I do agree with you, James. Wow. That drawing likeness to Nazis and Auschwitz is a bit extreme. However, he does make a valid point...
Piers Morgan: “But he was talking specifically about the butchery of gender-affirming care. That's what he was talking about.”
Esther Krakue: “There is nothing positive about basically castrating people and chopping off their breasts and their sexual organs, trying to affirm anything other than some deep psychological distress.”
And I think that's the point he should have made instead of comparing it to Auschwitz. Because it doesn't always have to be compared to Auschwitz. That's a very touching topic.
James Barr: “Everything that's been said here so far, I could write an essay about it. I have so much to say, and it's difficult to just respond to literally all of the insane things that have been coming out of your mouths over the last 10 minutes “
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Senator John Kennedy PRESSES Kelley Robinson on biological advantages in women’s sports but Riley Gaines steps in with a brutal real-world example involving Serena Williams and her own swimming experience!
Senator John Kennedy: Do you think there are more than two sexes?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that there's a definition for intersex as well that I want to acknowledge, but sex is a sign of birth.
Senator John Kennedy: Okay, I'm just trying to understand, I'm thoroughly confused. So you're born, I'm talking about biology, male, female and what else?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that intersex is also acknowledged. But again, I'm not a doctor here, what I can say is that there's a difference between sex and gender, and I think in these conversations we're conflating the two.
Senator John Kennedy: Well, but I want to start with sex.
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Okay, there’s a male. There's female, when a baby's born before the baby has had time to even have a sense of self, there's male, female, and intersex is the third sex.
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that is true, but I would defer to Dr. Lopez as I'm not a physician.
Senator John Kennedy: How many genders are there?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I think the gender is expansive and the definitions are always growing. You know, today I can tell you I talk to young people that talk about non-binary, I think the gender is not a binary is what I'm trying to say.
Senator John Kennedy: But are there more than five genders? I'm just trying to understand. Are there more than five genders?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Well, I mean I think that there was a time where women wearing pants didn't feel like it was appropriate for their gender and yet I'm wearing pants today. I think that there are ways that we express ourselves that are expansive.
Senator John Kennedy: Are there more than five?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I wouldn't subject myself to naming how many genders there are, but what I can say is that genders are a reflection
Senator John Kennedy: Excuse me?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: There's an infinite number of genders. I think depending on your culture, there are a lot of different genders that exist. And I can also say that it's a term that's evolving. If you look at young people today, they really don't lean into the binary of only woman and man. So I think that it's on us not to legislate on this, but create space for them to explore what their identities are, what their gender identities are.
Senator John Kennedy: Let's get back to athletics. I think I understand what you're saying. There are three sexes, male, female, and intersex. I believe that to be true, but again, I'm not a physician. And there are an infinite number of genders because gender is a mental state. Gender is about expression and I think that there are a variety of ways that you can express your gender. Okay, so there's an infinite number.
All right, let's go back to the biology. Male, female, boy, girl, okay? Biologically, do males have an advantage over females biologically in sports?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Again, I'm not a physician and I can't speak to that.
Senator John Kennedy: What's your real-world experience?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: It depends. I mean, there are some people who are born male that I'm faster than if I were to sprint against them, and some that I'm not. Some males that are taller than some women and some that are shorter.
Senator John Kennedy: So you don't believe that a biological male has a physical advantage in sports over a biological female?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Not as a definitive statement. Senator John Kennedy: Give me an example. Ms. Kelley Robinson: Well, no, I don't think... how many female members of the NBA do you see?
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
PIERS MORGAN CHALLENGES a transgender activist:
“Why can’t I identify as a Black lesbian?”
Her response takes an unexpected turn when he asks how many genders there are.
Then he brings up the BBC teaching children there are 100 genders.
Piers Morgan: Okay. Why can't I identify as a Black lesbian?
Angelica Malin: Well, firstly, I mean...
Piers Morgan: I'm serious. I'm serious. If I can identify as anything without any need to prove I'm actually what that is, why can't I on International Women's Day say, "I'm Piers Morgan, I'm a Black lesbian"?
Angelica Malin: I think taking it to a kind of absurd status...
Piers Morgan: No, no. I think that's... With respect, I think that you've already opened the absurdity door by saying it is limitless. You can do what you like. Anyone can say, "I'm a woman." So I simply ask you, why can't I?
Angelica Malin: I mean, this point kind of ridicules trans people to an extent.
Piers Morgan: Actually, I think what you said ridicules trans people because actually people who go through the full process of transition, who actually go through what we used to call a sex change which I don't think you can muck around with original biology but those who actually go through surgical procedures over a number of years, I've got great respect for that very difficult journey they go on. I have zero respect for people who just wallop their hand up and go suddenly, "I'm a woman," and I want all the rights that a woman has, and I want to compete, say, in sport. I'm a 6 ft 4 in athlete sprinter, swimmer, whatever who's competed very mediocrely in male sport.
I now want to come in and crush women in swimming pools and in sprinting events and break all their records, perhaps irrevocably, just by saying, "I'm a woman." I think that is the absurdity you were talking about.
My response was to say, "Well, if it's limitless, why can't I then say whatever I want to say?" And you say immediately, as I knew you would, "Well, that's ridiculous." But my point is, you were being ridiculous.
Angelica Malin: Well, that's your opinion. You can think I'm ridiculous, but I don't think you can say...
Piers Morgan: I don't know why I am, but you're not.
Angelica Malin: I don't think you can say it's post-op is the only way that someone's allowed to identify...
Esther Krakue: The original standard for... Hold on. The original standard for being transgender was being diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which is a legitimate condition.
And now it's been, "Oh, however way you feel." So if you feel on Tuesday you're a woman and on Thursday you're a pizza, that's perfectly valid. But to you, that's ridiculous. And I want to know why that is ridiculous. We should be talking about actual women on International Women's Day. That's not crazy.
Angelica Malin: I mean, I agree with that. But what is your idea of an actual woman?
Esther Krakue: The chromosomes. It's pretty clear.
Piers Morgan: It's an adult female. It's not difficult.
Esther Krakue: The chromosomes are a pretty good indication.
Angelica Malin: I don't think you have to be biologically female to identify...
Esther Krakue: Then you are wrong. Because then I can identify as a fox.
Angelica Malin: Yeah, but again, it's a bit of an absurd point.
Piers Morgan: You can't. Well, let me ask you this. Let me ask you this, Angelica. How many genders are there?
Angelica Malin: Two.
Piers Morgan: There are two genders? Wow. So you don't believe in transgenders at all?
Angelica Malin: Well, I think... I think there are...
Piers Morgan: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There are two genders?
Angelica Malin: Well, it's taught in...
Piers Morgan: What, did you say "well"? You've literally just launched this huge defense of transgenderism. Now you've eradicated it. If there are two genders, you mean male and female, right?
Angelica Malin: There's gender fluidity. I will...
Esther Krakue: Fluid between what?
Piers Morgan: Between what?
Senator John Kennedy PRESSES Kelley Robinson on biological advantages in women’s sports but Riley Gaines steps in with a brutal real-world example involving Serena Williams and her own swimming experience!
Senator John Kennedy: Do you think there are more than two sexes?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that there's a definition for intersex as well that I want to acknowledge, but sex is a sign of birth.
Senator John Kennedy: Okay, I'm just trying to understand, I'm thoroughly confused. So you're born, I'm talking about biology, male, female and what else?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that intersex is also acknowledged. But again, I'm not a doctor here, what I can say is that there's a difference between sex and gender, and I think in these conversations we're conflating the two.
Senator John Kennedy: Well, but I want to start with sex.
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Okay, there’s a male. There's female, when a baby's born before the baby has had time to even have a sense of self, there's male, female, and intersex is the third sex.
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I believe that is true, but I would defer to Dr. Lopez as I'm not a physician.
Senator John Kennedy: How many genders are there?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I think the gender is expansive and the definitions are always growing. You know, today I can tell you I talk to young people that talk about non-binary, I think the gender is not a binary is what I'm trying to say.
Senator John Kennedy: But are there more than five genders? I'm just trying to understand. Are there more than five genders?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Well, I mean I think that there was a time where women wearing pants didn't feel like it was appropriate for their gender and yet I'm wearing pants today. I think that there are ways that we express ourselves that are expansive.
Senator John Kennedy: Are there more than five?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: I wouldn't subject myself to naming how many genders there are, but what I can say is that genders are a reflection
Senator John Kennedy: Excuse me?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: There's an infinite number of genders. I think depending on your culture, there are a lot of different genders that exist. And I can also say that it's a term that's evolving. If you look at young people today, they really don't lean into the binary of only woman and man. So I think that it's on us not to legislate on this, but create space for them to explore what their identities are, what their gender identities are.
Senator John Kennedy: Let's get back to athletics. I think I understand what you're saying. There are three sexes, male, female, and intersex. I believe that to be true, but again, I'm not a physician. And there are an infinite number of genders because gender is a mental state. Gender is about expression and I think that there are a variety of ways that you can express your gender. Okay, so there's an infinite number.
All right, let's go back to the biology. Male, female, boy, girl, okay? Biologically, do males have an advantage over females biologically in sports?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Again, I'm not a physician and I can't speak to that.
Senator John Kennedy: What's your real-world experience?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: It depends. I mean, there are some people who are born male that I'm faster than if I were to sprint against them, and some that I'm not. Some males that are taller than some women and some that are shorter.
Senator John Kennedy: So you don't believe that a biological male has a physical advantage in sports over a biological female?
Ms. Kelley Robinson: Not as a definitive statement. Senator John Kennedy: Give me an example. Ms. Kelley Robinson: Well, no, I don't think... how many female members of the NBA do you see?
James Barr EXPLODES at Jordan Peterson’s Auschwitz comparison on Piers Morgan’s show but Esther Krakue agrees with Peterson’s underlying argument. The debate takes an unexpected turn.
Piers Morgan: “Before we come to the rest of the pack, this is Jordan Peterson. He's gotten into a furore over his video about pride. Where he says a sexually narcissistic movement headed for a fall because it's been taken over by the radical trans lobby. Let's take a look.”
Jordan Peterson: “There is a real tinge of narcissism, sexual narcissism, trans-pushing, gender-affirming butchers and liars, primarily target young people whose most likely outcome on the sexual front is homosexuality. “
“I don't like the flag. I think it's a piece of idiocy. I don't understand why it changes every bloody week. And I think the surgery, the gender-affirming care movement, I think it is Nazi Auschwitz-level awful.”
James Barr: “What on earth is that closeted gay man wearing? That is an abomination! That is a crazy load of absolute bullshit. I'm sorry, that is insane. How dare he say that about Auschwitz? Gay people were killed alongside Jewish people and disabled people in the Holocaust. That is disgusting, Piers. “
“That is disgusting. You shouldn't even be giving that airtime.
Piers Morgan: Well, he's a very famous guy.
James Barr: Yeah, but we shouldn't be listening to what he thinks. I mean, he says loads of nonsense.”
Piers Morgan: Well, you say loads of nonsense. I don't de-platform you.
Esther Krakue: I do agree with you, James. Wow. That drawing likeness to Nazis and Auschwitz is a bit extreme. However, he does make a valid point...
Piers Morgan: “But he was talking specifically about the butchery of gender-affirming care. That's what he was talking about.”
Esther Krakue: “There is nothing positive about basically castrating people and chopping off their breasts and their sexual organs, trying to affirm anything other than some deep psychological distress.”
And I think that's the point he should have made instead of comparing it to Auschwitz. Because it doesn't always have to be compared to Auschwitz. That's a very touching topic.
James Barr: “Everything that's been said here so far, I could write an essay about it. I have so much to say, and it's difficult to just respond to literally all of the insane things that have been coming out of your mouths over the last 10 minutes “
PIERS MORGAN CHALLENGES a transgender activist:
“Why can’t I identify as a Black lesbian?”
Her response takes an unexpected turn when he asks how many genders there are.
Then he brings up the BBC teaching children there are 100 genders.
Piers Morgan: Okay. Why can't I identify as a Black lesbian?
Angelica Malin: Well, firstly, I mean...
Piers Morgan: I'm serious. I'm serious. If I can identify as anything without any need to prove I'm actually what that is, why can't I on International Women's Day say, "I'm Piers Morgan, I'm a Black lesbian"?
Angelica Malin: I think taking it to a kind of absurd status...
Piers Morgan: No, no. I think that's... With respect, I think that you've already opened the absurdity door by saying it is limitless. You can do what you like. Anyone can say, "I'm a woman." So I simply ask you, why can't I?
Angelica Malin: I mean, this point kind of ridicules trans people to an extent.
Piers Morgan: Actually, I think what you said ridicules trans people because actually people who go through the full process of transition, who actually go through what we used to call a sex change which I don't think you can muck around with original biology but those who actually go through surgical procedures over a number of years, I've got great respect for that very difficult journey they go on. I have zero respect for people who just wallop their hand up and go suddenly, "I'm a woman," and I want all the rights that a woman has, and I want to compete, say, in sport. I'm a 6 ft 4 in athlete sprinter, swimmer, whatever who's competed very mediocrely in male sport.
I now want to come in and crush women in swimming pools and in sprinting events and break all their records, perhaps irrevocably, just by saying, "I'm a woman." I think that is the absurdity you were talking about.
My response was to say, "Well, if it's limitless, why can't I then say whatever I want to say?" And you say immediately, as I knew you would, "Well, that's ridiculous." But my point is, you were being ridiculous.
Angelica Malin: Well, that's your opinion. You can think I'm ridiculous, but I don't think you can say...
Piers Morgan: I don't know why I am, but you're not.
Angelica Malin: I don't think you can say it's post-op is the only way that someone's allowed to identify...
Esther Krakue: The original standard for... Hold on. The original standard for being transgender was being diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which is a legitimate condition.
And now it's been, "Oh, however way you feel." So if you feel on Tuesday you're a woman and on Thursday you're a pizza, that's perfectly valid. But to you, that's ridiculous. And I want to know why that is ridiculous. We should be talking about actual women on International Women's Day. That's not crazy.
Angelica Malin: I mean, I agree with that. But what is your idea of an actual woman?
Esther Krakue: The chromosomes. It's pretty clear.
Piers Morgan: It's an adult female. It's not difficult.
Esther Krakue: The chromosomes are a pretty good indication.
Angelica Malin: I don't think you have to be biologically female to identify...
Esther Krakue: Then you are wrong. Because then I can identify as a fox.
Angelica Malin: Yeah, but again, it's a bit of an absurd point.
Piers Morgan: You can't. Well, let me ask you this. Let me ask you this, Angelica. How many genders are there?
Angelica Malin: Two.
Piers Morgan: There are two genders? Wow. So you don't believe in transgenders at all?
Angelica Malin: Well, I think... I think there are...
Piers Morgan: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! There are two genders?
Angelica Malin: Well, it's taught in...
Piers Morgan: What, did you say "well"? You've literally just launched this huge defense of transgenderism. Now you've eradicated it. If there are two genders, you mean male and female, right?
Angelica Malin: There's gender fluidity. I will...
Esther Krakue: Fluid between what?
Piers Morgan: Between what?
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
PIERS MORGAN CONFRONTS ISRAELI SPOKESMAN OVER 38,000 CIVILIAN DEATHS IN GAZA:
“38,000 civilians in Gaza have been killed in response to the murder of 800 civilians on October 7th.”
Jonathan’s response? Hamas was hiding among civilians and using them as human shields.
But does that justify the scale of destruction?
Jonathan: 190 people that are on the list that the IDF disclosed were first and foremost. It's also true, it is also true that the IDF have killed over 75,000 people in Gaza in response to terrorism.
Jonathan: Listen, Piers, if you take Hamas numbers and you include all the 75,000 people, listen, Piers. Let's be serious. You say that those numbers are accurate. The Israeli government's conceded that they have the Gaza health numbers are broadly accurate. No, that was an off the cuff statement a long time ago by someone who I don't know how connected he was to the fact. But the fact of the matter is.
I have looked into the numbers and others, other serious analysts have looked into the numbers that Hamas have been sharing. And the first obvious very clear. The obvious, very clear statement is that all of those liars, including Mehdi, who have been parroting this nonsense about genocide, it doesn't add up.
Piers Morgan: Well, hang on. Let's be clear. How many Jonathan, if the if the Gaza Health Ministry numbers are wrong, how many people have been killed?
Jonathan: Yeah, so that's that's a good question. And I know you love asking it and I know you've asked several Israelis about it. And here's the numbers that I know based on the information that I've been able to corroborate from Israeli sources, from Hamas sources, from open source Intel and it is the follows. The IDF assesses...
Piers Morgan: You do trust them after all? Yeah. Fascinating. When they issue obituaries. You lost your friends in Hamas. That's a bit of a. Yeah, when they issue an obituary and when they play when they.
Jonathan: Who are these people? Are you a Hamas sympathizer? Here's when they issue obituaries, and when they pay stipends to a widow, I sure as I will definitely take that into account. And when Hamas holds a military funeral for someone who otherwise...
Piers Morgan: What's the number? What's the number? According to you then Jonathan, how many people have been killed in Gaza since the war started?
Jonathan: Right. So the number of uninvolved people that probably were not combatants, based on those different sources of information, the corroboration of the different sources, according to my understanding, is around 38 or 39,000 people. That is what I understand based on insufficient info, but based on And at least 25,000 terrorists where the IDF knows with a high level of certainty, not 100% because no military ever...
Piers Morgan: So your figure is about 63,000. Is that right in total?
Jonathan: Roughly. And then you have of course natural deaths. was the Health Minister speaking. You're also you're also not factoring in natural deaths and you're not factoring in deaths caused by Hamas.
Piers Morgan: Okay, but let's take your figure. All right, Jonathan, I hear you, let's take your figure. 38,000 civilians then have been killed. Yes. Okay. And how many civilians, how many civilians were killed on October the 7th?
Jonathan: Almost 1,300, but I think that's a very lazy figure. Well, they weren't all civilians, were they? That's a lie. That's a lie. I can give you the numbers of the...
Piers Morgan: No, stop lying, Jonathan. Stop lying.
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed CHALLENGES Donald Trump to take a lie detector test:
“I’ll go through a metal detector every day. If You sit through a lie detector one time.”
“My first question, Epstein.”
“Second question, did you win the 2020 election?”
So, that's the deal. I'll go through a metal detector every day. You sit through a lie detector one time.
That's the deal.
“That's the thing about it is, you know, the only reason that they do this is because they're conmen. “
“And the thing about the con is when they're deceiving
you, they're picking your pocket. That's how this works.”
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Mbappé joked about a MEME featuring his face on Mao Zedong… and China responded by cutting sponsorships and blacking out his games.
He ended up apologizing in THREE languages.
Patrick Bet-David can't believe what happened next.
Patrick Bet-David : Let's go to Mbappé. Mbappé is forced to apologize to China. This is the all-time scorer, I believe, in the World Cup. Is he the all-time scorer? Messi's ahead of him.
I think he's the number one all-time scorer. Just lost the Ballon d'Or to what do you call it? Kane. Messi was fourth, I think he was second or he was third and Yamal was like, uh, uh, second on that list. So here's Mbappé.
Patrick Bet-David : Okay. So is this the meme? This is all him that he is Mbappé... Go a little bit lower. Here's the video. Okay, play that video. And he's speaking in a different language, probably.
Kylian Mbappé : "C'est lui qui est le plus rigolo. C'est quand on avait mis une vidéo d'un mec, un je crois que c'est un dictateur chinois, et ils avaient mis ma... Je l'utilise beaucoup avec mes amis en ligne, ouais. Pour la rigolade."
(Subtitled in English on video: "The funniest one... when people put my face on a Chinese dictator... I use this a lot with my friends online, yeah, for laughs.")
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
STEPHEN A. SMITH FIRES BACK AT HILLARY CLINTON: “WHAT'S WRONG WITH BEING INDEPENDENT?”
After Clinton criticized Matthew McConaughey for encouraging independent thinking ahead of the midterms, Stephen A. wasn't having it. His response? "Don't come to me trying to bully me into siding with you no matter what you do!"
PIERS MORGAN CONFRONTS ISRAELI SPOKESMAN OVER 38,000 CIVILIAN DEATHS IN GAZA:
“38,000 civilians in Gaza have been killed in response to the murder of 800 civilians on October 7th.”
Jonathan’s response? Hamas was hiding among civilians and using them as human shields.
But does that justify the scale of destruction?
Jonathan: 190 people that are on the list that the IDF disclosed were first and foremost. It's also true, it is also true that the IDF have killed over 75,000 people in Gaza in response to terrorism.
Jonathan: Listen, Piers, if you take Hamas numbers and you include all the 75,000 people, listen, Piers. Let's be serious. You say that those numbers are accurate. The Israeli government's conceded that they have the Gaza health numbers are broadly accurate. No, that was an off the cuff statement a long time ago by someone who I don't know how connected he was to the fact. But the fact of the matter is.
I have looked into the numbers and others, other serious analysts have looked into the numbers that Hamas have been sharing. And the first obvious very clear. The obvious, very clear statement is that all of those liars, including Mehdi, who have been parroting this nonsense about genocide, it doesn't add up.
Piers Morgan: Well, hang on. Let's be clear. How many Jonathan, if the if the Gaza Health Ministry numbers are wrong, how many people have been killed?
Jonathan: Yeah, so that's that's a good question. And I know you love asking it and I know you've asked several Israelis about it. And here's the numbers that I know based on the information that I've been able to corroborate from Israeli sources, from Hamas sources, from open source Intel and it is the follows. The IDF assesses...
Piers Morgan: You do trust them after all? Yeah. Fascinating. When they issue obituaries. You lost your friends in Hamas. That's a bit of a. Yeah, when they issue an obituary and when they play when they.
Jonathan: Who are these people? Are you a Hamas sympathizer? Here's when they issue obituaries, and when they pay stipends to a widow, I sure as I will definitely take that into account. And when Hamas holds a military funeral for someone who otherwise...
Piers Morgan: What's the number? What's the number? According to you then Jonathan, how many people have been killed in Gaza since the war started?
Jonathan: Right. So the number of uninvolved people that probably were not combatants, based on those different sources of information, the corroboration of the different sources, according to my understanding, is around 38 or 39,000 people. That is what I understand based on insufficient info, but based on And at least 25,000 terrorists where the IDF knows with a high level of certainty, not 100% because no military ever...
Piers Morgan: So your figure is about 63,000. Is that right in total?
Jonathan: Roughly. And then you have of course natural deaths. was the Health Minister speaking. You're also you're also not factoring in natural deaths and you're not factoring in deaths caused by Hamas.
Piers Morgan: Okay, but let's take your figure. All right, Jonathan, I hear you, let's take your figure. 38,000 civilians then have been killed. Yes. Okay. And how many civilians, how many civilians were killed on October the 7th?
Jonathan: Almost 1,300, but I think that's a very lazy figure. Well, they weren't all civilians, were they? That's a lie. That's a lie. I can give you the numbers of the...
Piers Morgan: No, stop lying, Jonathan. Stop lying.
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Piers Morgan CONFRONTS Joy Ann Reid over her firing from MSNBC and accuses her of playing the race card.
But when he challenges her on racialising conversations, she FIRES BACK and turns the accusation against him.
Then he calls her a HYPOCRITE.
Piers Morgan: “I don't think you were fired after all those years because of your skin colour or because you're a Black woman. I think you were fired because your show just got increasingly unpopular. It happens all the time in TV. That's why you got let go. Why play the race card?”
Joy-Ann Reid: “I love the fact that your "play the race card" is your version of the race card. You're so fixated on trying to racialise conversations with me that I find it actually quite charming.”
Piers Morgan: “You racialise more conversations than any host in history!”
Joy-Ann Reid: “You take an entire conversation I had with Marc Lamont Hill and pick the bits that you can racialise, because this is your shtick.
Piers Morgan: “You racialize everything, Joy. Come on!”
Joy-Ann Reid: It is so interesting to me that you, yourself, as a white European, find that when people of colour talk about race, you believe they're racialising conversations.
But when people like you fixate on, "Well, Barack Obama was a Black president, why don't you object to that?" that's not racialising a conversation?
Piers Morgan: “You said Donald Trump is a white fascist. And then Obama did the same thing, I'm not allowed to mention his skin colour!”
Joy-Ann Reid: “I agree with John Kelly, who, last time I checked, is not Black. I agree with his former chief of staff, who said he's fascist, and Mark Milley said he's fascist to the core.
So if that makes you sad and uncomfortable, I can't help you, Piers.”
Piers Morgan: “I think it makes you a little bit of a hypocrite.”
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Cenk Uygur predicts Abdul El-Sayed could WIN COMFORTABLY and says Mike Rogers has a massive voter turnout problem.
His reason? Even Tucker Carlson’s right-wing audience may refuse to vote for a candidate who’s spent 20 years pushing for war with Iran.
“Who likes the Iran war in Michigan? Almost no one!”
Is Cenk right about the political establishment underestimating this backlash?
CENK UYGUR: No, Abdul's going to win, and he might win by a lot.
Mainstream media says it's going to be the tightest race you've ever seen, and Abdul is in trouble because of voter turnout. But I think the Tucker Carlson contingent that's Massie, Judge Napolitano, MTG, Joe Kent, etc. is a big chunk of right-wing voters, and they're not going to vote for warmongers like Mike Rogers.
Mike Rogers has been pushing for war with Iran for 20 years. We have him on tape all the way back to 2006, saying, "Iran's about to have a nuclear weapon." He says the identical lines Netanyahu does.
The Iran war is his dream come true. And you know who likes the Iran war in Michigan? Almost no one!
CENK UYGUR:
They've lost a quarter of their base, and of course they're going to have a giant voter turnout problem. But literally no one on television is saying that.
Instead, they're trying to plant the thought in your head that you shouldn't vote for Abdul El-Sayed if you're a Democrat, Black, Jewish, or a moderate Democrat.
They're desperately trying to manipulate you into voting against Abdul El-Sayed.
CENK UYGUR:
So here's my official prediction: Abdul El-Sayed wins, potentially comfortably, because Mike Rogers will have a gigantic voter turnout problem.
And look at the Rebellion PAC ad. It's not just popular with the left wing. It's unified both fronts. Everyone in the establishment and every Zionist hates the ad.
But outside that establishment bubble, the left loves it, the right loves it, and independents love it the most!
This isn't even a right-left issue anymore. It's the country united to say: "No, Michigan first, America. You serve America!"
©️Jinchūriki retweeted
Jason Lee ACCUSES Britain of treating Meghan Markle differently because she's Black but Piers Morgan fires back with one uncomfortable question: "When did she report her father?"
Jason Lee: “No, I'm frustrated because every time I come on this show, and every time we talk about Meghan Markle, it's like anything anybody else does is”
"What did she do? What did she not do?" and it's like, "Damn, the Black woman doesn't ever get a break." Like, I'm just trying to understand, what is it that she should have done? You know, what she did to hold her father accountable? “
Piers Morgan: what does her skin color got to do with it?
Jason Lee: “Her skin color has to do with everything when we talk about when we talk about Meghan Markle in this context.”
Piers Morgan: Oh, please.
Jason Lee: In any context that I've ever been on a show with you, it's been about it's been about race. I called it out every time. You know that.
Piers Morgan: Just to be clear, you think that any criticism I have of Meghan Markle is because she's from a biracial, parents, is that it?
Jason Lee: “I think every issue that I think every issue that your country has had with Meghan Markle in general is because she's a Black woman. Your queen literally was the side chick to the king when he was married to his father, uh, to his mother before they killed her out there in Paris. So, I mean, we can go down that trope, I talked about the blood diamonds last time. You know, at the end of the day, she did what she was supposed to do as a daughter. She reported her father, she distanced him from her kid. She doesn't have anything to do with him, he's tried to profit off of her in the past. We know he's trash, right? So maybe to the lawyer's point, yeah, he's presumed innocent till proven guilty, I'll give him that, because that's the way the rule of law is supposed to work. But unfortunately, again, I live in a country where our president in charge, as you know with the Epstein files, is yet to be given his day in court. So, I don't know, yeah, I think race does play a part when it comes to Meghan.“
Piers Morgan: well, okay, let me bring in let me bring in Tom Sykes. Just to be clear, I think the idea that any criticism of Meghan Markle is racially motivated, it's so absurd for somebody like me, right?
Who has done more to cover, you know, issues involving racial, uh, disparity, racial inequality, and everything else for my entire journalistic career.
So, Ja- Jason, with all due respect, it's b*****hit. If you don't don't believe me, go back and read the piece I've written