Jake Steiner retweeted
If you live in a country that sends poor people to jail for using drugs, but doesn't send rich people to jail for raping kids, you live in a shit hole country.
Jake Steiner retweeted
not to alarm anyone but is anyone else worried about how fucking stupid everyone is?
Jake Steiner retweeted
David Sinclair: "Sudden blindness has doubled because of GLP-1 drugs."
ROGAN: “Holy shit!”
SINCLAIR: “It’s like a stroke in your eye. And then your other eye can go. And there’s nothing you can do about it.”
ROGAN: “Obviously, correlation does not equal causation, but...”
SINCLAIR: “Yeah, there’s a scientist at Harvard, Joseph Rizzo. It looks like it’s repeatable across the planet.”
ROGAN: “Wow, that’s terrible because there are so many people out there telling everyone they should get on GLP-1s.”
@joerogan
@davidasinclair
Jake Steiner retweeted
If Satan had his own chosen people, they would probably be ugly, money-grubbing liars that spent all their time spreading sin and misery and showing pornography to children and stuff like that.
You're 35. Your glasses prescription was −2.00 at 18. It's −5.00 now.
You can't see anything without glasses these days at all.
You spend 9 hours on screens. You wear your glasses. You just got a stronger pair. You've stopped bringing it up.
You don't have a vision problem. You have a signal problem.
In 2010, researchers at Queensland University put 28 adults under one hour of hyperopic defocus — the same type of blur your glasses create when you look at a screen.
Axial length increased by +8 µm. -> Eyesight is measurably worse, in ONE HOUR.
They tried the opposite — myopic defocus. Same 60 minutes. Same subjects.
Axial length decreased by −13 µm. -> Vision measurably improves, with eyeball LENGTH reducing.
One blur grows your eye. The other shrinks it. p < 0.0001. (Read et al., IOVS 2010)
Your optometrist lens subscription seller gives you full correction for distance. You wear that same prescription to look at a phone 30 cm from your face.
Your eyes under-accommodate. Research confirms myopes have ~2× the accommodative lag of emmetropes — about 0.6 D of hyperopic defocus at near. (PMC9544228)
That's the same signal that made the +8 µm happen. Every screen session. Every year.
In 2023, a JAMA Pediatrics RCT (n=263) found that naked-eye 3D vision training — creating myopic defocus — reduced axial elongation by 24%. With high adherence, 40%. (Xie et al., JAMA Pediatr 2024)
A 2025 study (n=208) showed visual training dropped axial elongation from 0.38 mm/year to 0.23 mm/year — 39.5% reduction. And it was additive — it worked on top of orthokeratology, atropine, and defocus lenses with no statistically significant difference between combinations. (Xu et al., Clin Optom 2025)
In 2025, a preprint documented full reversal of −6.00 D myopia in an adult in 5 months — using only myopic defocus and consciously triggered accommodation. n=1, not peer-reviewed. But the trajectory is suggestive. (Martinez-Saito, OSF 2025)
The industry has known since 2002 that passive undercorrection backfires. The Chung study showed giving kids −0.75 D blur with no training made things worse. Critics cite this endlessly. They ignore that it tested passive blur — not differential lenses + active focus. Apples and hand grenades.
The endmyopia approach is different:
Wear differential lenses (1.5–2.0 D weaker aka "computer glasses") for close work — eliminates the hyperopic defocus stimulus entirely
Wear normalized lenses (slightly weaker) for distance — creates mild myopic defocus
Active focus — consciously clear the blur, retraining the ciliary muscle
Two roads. One is a lifetime lens subscription sold by retail optometry, the other is you taking back control.
Keep feeding your eyes the signal that says "grow longer, clearer" — 8 hours a day, every day.
Or fix the signal.
Nobody is coming to tell you this. They make 150 billion dollars a year counting on you not figuring it out.
For those interested, I have a public case registry. A LOT of people reverse their nearsightedness. endmyopia.org/myopia-improve…
370k people saw my last post.
A lot of you asked: "Okay, so what do I actually do?"
Here's what I used:
start.endmyopia.org
It asks your prescription, screen time, and eye habits.
In 5 minutes, it tells you exactly how much hyperopic defocus you're getting every day. How to fix it. A little warning though: It is a rabbit hole.
No supplements, nothing to buy. Tool is 100% free.
Since so many asked — here's the same tool I used to find out what signal my eyes are getting:
start.endmyopia.org
2 minutes. Free. Tells you your daily hyperopic defocus load. Heads up: It's a rabbit hole.
That number is what my last post was about.
Apparently you can get your eye axial length measured for free, in Italy.
Why does it matter? You can improve your vision. Reduces the length of your eyeball. If you want to go full-nerd, prove that the biology works, this is one way to do it. 🇮🇹
Retail optometry, dentistry, you name it ...
-be me
-go to new dentist, since my old one retired
-new dentist: "you have three cavities"
-feel bad vibe, go get a second opinion
-"woooah - buddy, you have zero cavities. thank god you came to us. let's just do a cleaning"
-send wife to this savior second dentist
-"you have six cavities"
-wife bails on getting them filled, goes to a different dentist a year later
-"woooah gurl, you have zero cavities. thank god you didn't get them filled"
why is dentistry like this 😭
The Eyeball Analyzer (v1.04)
✅ Learn why your eyes are blurry.
✅ Get blur data + analysis with your phone.
✅ Learn how to fix the blur.
Free. (via link below) No app to download. Works on phone, laptop, install it on your microwave (no, not really that).
Home made. Probably still buggy. Try eeeeit and see? start.endmyopia.org/?utm_sou…
Jake Steiner retweeted
Found a tool worth sharing for anyone running their own panels.
LabHackr (labhackr.com) catalogs every direct-to-consumer lab test in the US, then runs a matching algorithm to align identical Quest or LabCorp assays sold under different brand names across 52 retailers. Same lab. Same assay. Same LOINC code. Same printed result. The only thing that differs is what the retailer charges.
The price spread is genuinely absurd.
A Comprehensive Metabolic Panel at Jason Health is $8. The identical panel at LabCorp OnDemand is $60+. Same blood draw at the same patient service center. Same Quest or LabCorp lab running the analysis. Same LOINC code on the result.
A typical Vitamin D test ranges from $35 to $311 across retailers for the same test.
A bundled annual physical panel (CBC, CMP, Lipid, TSH, Vitamin D) ranges from $89 cheapest to $589 most expensive across the 21 retailers that carry it. Same five tests. 56x price range.
How it works:
You search the markers you want or pick from pre-built bundles. Their algorithm finds the single retailer that carries everything cheapest, including the requisition fee. You click through, pay direct, get drawn at any Quest or LabCorp patient service center near you, and have results in 1 to 3 days. No insurance. No referral. No markup.
Why this matters:
The case for running your own panels gets stronger every year. Most insurance won’t cover ApoB or Lp(a) without a specific diagnosis code. Most physicians won’t order fasting insulin, hsCRP, homocysteine, or omega-3 index in routine care. The data you actually need to track metabolic, cardiovascular, and longevity health upstream is largely DTC territory now.
When you can run a basic metabolic and lipid panel for under $30 cash, the economics flip. Quarterly comprehensive testing becomes accessible for the price of a couple coffees a week. You stop arguing with your physician about coverage and start arriving with the data already in hand.
What I’d recommend you build a quarterly basket around:
CBC, CMP, fasting insulin, HbA1c, full lipid panel, ApoB, Lp(a) (one time only, it’s genetic and stable), hsCRP, homocysteine, vitamin D, ferritin with iron studies, full thyroid (TSH, Free T4, Free T3), and basic hormones (testosterone with SHBG for men, estradiol and progesterone for women).
That’s the comprehensive metabolic and cardiovascular foundation that lets you trend your own physiology over time. Built quarterly, that data becomes a longitudinal record nothing else in healthcare can match.
Two honest disclosures from their site that I appreciate: they’re transparent that affiliate revenue covers server costs first, and anything beyond that goes to Partners In Health, who bring the same diagnostics to people in Haiti, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Peru, and Malawi who have never seen a lab panel. They also flag that as of now they haven’t crossed server cost so nothing has been donated yet. When it does they’ll post receipts. That’s the right way to run a transparent affiliate model.
Not sponsored. I make zero income from anything I post. Just sharing tools that actually serve patients trying to take control of their own data.
Quarterly testing was already the brand thesis here. LabHackr just made the math friendlier for the people doing it.
Don’t wait for the diagnosis.
Read the label.















