@emaxi
iAccount based inUnited Kingdom
About this account
- Account based in
- United Kingdom
- Connected via
- United Kingdom App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Max Van Kleek–Assoc Prof @CompSciOxford, a16z speedrun sr006, Scientist/Builder/Founder, Human-AI Interaction, Future of Work. 🇺🇸/🇬🇧 🌈
Oxford/London + SF
Joined May 2007
- Tweets25.5K
- Following4.7K
- Followers4K
- Likes16K
electronic Max retweeted
📚 Au Japon, des gens vont désormais en boîte de nuit… pour s’asseoir silencieusement et lire un livre pendant qu’un DJ joue de la musique d'ambience.
Le concept s’appelle JUCY BOOK RAVE et se déroule notamment dans un club souterrain de Shimokitazawa, à Tokyo. Ici, pas besoin de danser ni de hurler pour parler à la personne située à 30 centimètres de vous. Les participants viennent avec un livre, s’installent dans la pénombre et lisent pendant que la musique accompagne leur soirée.
Exponential sustained recursive self improvement X-risk is fearmongering at the highest levels for something that, in all likelihood, will never ever happen, based on emerging research that RSI will hit recursively diminishing returns - my paraphrase of RSI research > open.spotify.com/s/dgKRyib
given how much non technical builders are treating jev as the cheap and instant Oracle of Truth for all things, surprised noone in my TL has so far recommended the UK government just jev for complex policy decisions
electronic Max retweeted
Steve Jobs would fire the entire company and replace them with AI if he was alive to see this
electronic Max retweeted
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it
Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
i think the UK's advice is monumentally bad at this stage of AI adoption where people are just learning how to use AI - imo, i think that environmental optimisation can happen at the infra level, and teaches the wrong skills to the user. automatic token routing, prompt caching, stuff like that can reduce token impact without user burden
in the meantime, humans should be given generous token budgets right now to learn how to best use AI responsibly, not become slop cannons, use it critically to enhance the quality of their work (not reduce it), and to verify outputs and experiment with how it might (or might not) fit into their workflows.
just sort of echoing @nlw here, who routinely talks about the slope of AI adoption
BREAKING: the UK government publishes official rules on how to use AI:
1. Ask first if you really need to use AI
2. Check if a spreadsheet can do the job before using AI
3. Choose the worst model possible so it uses less energy
4. Keep prompts short to reduce the environmental impact
5. In general, use AI only when necessary, as a climate-saving measure
With a mindset like this, we should accept the UK back into the European Union
wasn't "shape of slop" an ed sheeran hit
We trained a model to predict AI-written blog posts from structural features - and discovered the shape of slop.
On posts it had never seen, it told AI and human apart with 98% accuracy, getting only 19 of 1,740 wrong.
Paper and code: arxiv.org/abs/2609.15369
electronic Max retweeted
You already know Jev is fast and cheap. Our new arXiv draft shows, it makes the correlated mistakes as other flash-tier LLMs. The consequence: you don't gain much by cascading Jev's "low confidence" outcomes to an LLM! Explanation in thread. arxiv.org/abs/2609.29769
many people discussing recursive self improvement seem to misunderstand the recursive bit.
it's not sufficient of the system to self improve (that's iterative!) - the EA trope is that it has to build a more efficient version of itself that can bring about further acceleration, which - in turn produces better versions of itself and so on
i hate the term "System 1 model" when referring to Jev. It's a marketing misuse / appropriation of Daniel Kahneman's dual system hypothesis - it's not a complexity class for tasks, it describes how humans process information; it's not about the tasks themselves.
i didn't think i'd be seeing tweets in _support_ of carved stone gargoyles in 2026, but i'm here for it
The University of Bristol just opened a £241m building.
£241,000,000
And the main architectural 'decoration' is the giant lettering on the roof
Meanwhile, Oxford University is still putting British stone and carved gargoyles on major new buildings
How can £241m buy so little visible craftsmanship?
@Gondor_Ind