better safe than sorry, and what a time to be alive!
Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash.
Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase).
Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets.
IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster).
Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot.
Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time?
Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.)
Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once.
Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case.
I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026).
Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS.
Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security.
The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.
Frontier / closed models have an edge, for how long though ?
Announcing our $130M Series A to build the Open Superintelligence Stack
Led by Radical Ventures, with NVIDIA, Intel Capital, Dell Capital, and existing investors
Train, deploy, and continuously improve your own models using our stack.
Own your intelligence.
DeSci is maturing. From narratives to hard science, the best is yet to come.
Welcoming Michael Torres, Ph.D. (@Mykalt45) as a Core Advisor to VitaDAO.
From lab bench → clinic → a ~$300M Eli Lilly acquisition (CrossBridge Bio). Co-founder of ReCode. The scientist behind VitaRNA.
Now helping build our crypto × biotech playbook. 💛
vitadao.com/blog/michael-tor…
1/🌐 DAO 2.0: The Distributed Agentic Organization
DAO 1.0 showed that coordination could live on‑chain: shared treasuries, automated rules, votes without a CEO. It was groundbreaking—but it had limits. It often drifted toward hidden hierarchies, brittle rules, and shallow participation.
DAO 2.0 keeps the “O” (organization) but redefines the first two letters. “Decentralized” becomes Distributed; “Autonomous” becomes Agentic.
8/🚀 Declaration
DAO 1.0 proved that organizations could be encoded in code. DAO 2.0 aims higher: encode an evolving, learning, many‑minded intelligence tethered to a shared purpose. It moves from static autonomy to dynamic agency; from token‑voting crowds to coordinated intelligences; from brittle decentralization to robust distribution.
We build DAO 2.0 because the future will be shaped by systems that can sense, think, and act at planetary scale. The only question is whether those systems will serve the many or the few. We choose the many.
9/📣 A personal note
I’m sharing this as a veteran of the space who truly believes in the underlying mission. I speak for myself, not on behalf of any organization. I welcome discussion and debate—so to all attentive readers, fire at will.
#BioProtocol #DAO #Bio #DecentralizedScience
Our Ai team is world class, BIOS is top of its class, again ! Ofc, super proud of the team, but also v excited for the near future, when researchers, together with agents, unlock a better world for humans. We SO need it !!!
Elliott retweeted
PSA: Weekly BioXP rewards for DeSci creators are not affected by the latest X policy banning InfoFi apps.
We stopped using the X API a while ago to reward DeSci creators because of the enormous amount of AI slop and bot farmers.
Instead, we hand-select creators each week based on high-quality, in-depth original content about Decentralized Science.
So, carry on DeSci creators.
If you're real, and you're posting bangers, we will find you. And we will reward you 🫡 🔮
DeSci Yapping: Weekly Winners 🔮
We're giving weekly rewards to creators spreading the word about DeSci, Bio's AI Scientists and direct-to-patient products on Biofy.
Winners announced below ↓
Want to participate this week? Some themes to explore:
• @dermadao Moon + Sol Drops & upcoming $SKIN sale: xitter.cf/BioProtocol/status/200…
• Bio's AI Scientists accelerating RNA research: xitter.cf/vitadao/status/2006098…
• Bio's pipeline from discovery to consumer product: xitter.cf/BioProtocol/status/200…
• @psy_dao funding MDMA prodrugs: xitter.cf/BioProtocolEco/status/…
• Scientific progress from DeSci orgs like @vitadao, @Cerebrum_DAO, @valley_dao, @endrarediseases, @Spine_DAO & more










