B⬡c Elle ⬡

Still salty about not being able to sacrifice core @RichardHeartWin tokens for @ProveXCom? We're here to show you the math behind why this decision was made, using the $PLS and $PLSX sacrifices as examples. We'll use some numbers that could've been applicable to a number of early Hexicans. To make the math easy, here's some assumptions: 🪙 You purchased 20m $HEX at an average price of $0.003 in the early days (which is roughly the current price of $HEX on PulseChain, and a perfectly reasonable average entry for most early adopters) 🪙 You never staked any (obviously unlikely, but we'll discuss later) 🪙 You managed to sac for $PLS and $PLSX when $HEX was it it's highs during both phases - 18c for PLS and 35c for PLSX (chart below). 🪙 You sacced 10m $HEX for each - so $1.8m for PLS and $3.5m for PLSX. The rates won't be exact but let's say both of those sacs got you a 2x multiplier. 🪙 PLS and PLSX 'sac rate' prices are both $0.0001 (ignoring multipliers). ✍️ Once PulseChain launched, now your PLS and PLSX bags were in effect representative of your HEX bags. Let's dive into what prices you were effectively 'selling your HEX at' if you sold PLS and PLSX after launch, and what the comparable HEX price would've been if you instead held and didn't sac.👇