> it is very very likely that fable is better than you in every branch of software It is faster than me. It is cheaper than me. It knows way more trick than I do. It also indeed knows every codebase that is out there. But for some reason, it's dogshit at actual engineering. Tries to cheat its way through problems instead of fixing them constantly. Completely fails to produce sensible abstractions. The test suite it produces are both enormous and somehow misses the behavior you care about while being tightly coupled to the implementation. I wish it could do these things for me, but it can't today, and doesn't show much signs of improving. I think people saying this are either doing it for the views, or because they are the ones who produced the mountain of shit software we ase dealing with are are indeed worse than fable in every way. Not something I'd brag about.