🚨 🚨 NOW LIVE! 🛸✈️ @MikeyMcBryan of Ice Pilots NWT and Buffalo Airways joins @drmounce1 on ALL THINGS UNEXPLAINED! From the mysterious Clan Lake UFO to Bob Lazar, Area 51, Bigfoot, UFO crash retrievals, ghost encounters, and wild aviation stories—we cover it ALL! 🎥 Watch: youtu.be/Q7wmNOvEMTg #UFO #IcePilotsNWT #Bigfoot

🚨 I found Hal Puthoff’s college thesis, and its connection to remote viewing shocked me. @drmounce1 reviews with @AkashiCris17 at 6:30 pm est.

It could be a mix of baiting/luring —with unknown results — and unprompted incursions. The luring could be one component of the investigative process for previous incursions. It could also explain why a USPER official would go to a sensitive site to investigate ‘orb’ incursions…if it was in fact a part of some sort of luring program that could be demonstrated for the USPER, an attempt to replicate prior successful baiting efforts, and that would increase the probability that the USPER would have an encounter on that particular visit. However, I am not sure why at that point they would let such an operation trigger FBI involvement or risk civilian airspace incidents (re:closure of airports). Perhaps these activities were already being coordinated with the FBI and others, and espionage/airport incursion weren’t the triggers for their involvement with USPER incidents. After all, we have been told the UAP Advisory Council is coordinating across multiple agencies. But that raises serious public safety concerns. We know that airports such as Palmdale and El Paso have been closed due to UAP activity (using UAP as a catch all here). Would the military on their own or in coordination with others purposely conduct an operation that would have open-ended results in public US airspace? The Plant 42 incident, for example. Something passed over civilian neighborhoods, intersected Palmdale airport space, and interacted with Plant 42. If that was an incursion that we triggered in an experiment, just what was the risk to the public?! Such an experiment would also be mind boggling if conducted somewhere like Barksdale — a major strategic bomber base in northwest Louisiana that shapes global air defense. Barksdale is also constructing a new Weapons Generation Facility (WGF) to store and maintain nuclear weapons! With that being said, I can see where such a baiting experiment might be carried out somewhere like the Nevada National Security Site. I believe it is likely to be the redacted location of some of the incursions described in the UFO File tranches. It is a 1,350-square-mile desert and mountain reservation operated by the U.S. Department of Energy, located about 65 miles northwest of Las Vegas in Nye County, Nevada. It is larger than the state of Rhode Island, and it is bordered on three sides by the Nellis Air Force Range, which adds an extra restricted buffer zone of 4,120 square miles of protected, federally owned land. This entire area is heavily restricted, guarded, and closed to the public. This vast remote setting would make it a plausible candidate to conduct UAP luring operations while minimizing the risk to the public. If you’d like to see some of my research into how subterranean areas near our sensitive sites might factor into all of this, then check out the link below. ⬇️ I found at least one subterranean area near a sensitive site that was closed to the public and put under active security shortly before some of these airspace incursions began at a nearby sensitive site. Those incursions also involved public reports of UFOs and the closing of an airport airspace. 🔗 Subterranean Areas Near Sensitive U.S. Sites and UAP Investigations youtu.be/80ZySBZZx_4