✧ retweeted
The Islamist revolution that seized Iran was organized from France in 1978, and after nearly 50 years of appeasing Islamism and the far left, the consequences have returned to France with a vengeance.
France gave Ruhollah Khomeini sanctuary in Neauphle-le-Château, where he recorded revolutionary messages, coordinated with supporters and prepared his return to Iran. He then flew to Tehran aboard an Air France aircraft and established the Islamic Republic.
France did not invent Islamism, but it gave Khomeini a protected platform at the decisive moment when he transformed revolutionary Islamism into state power. His regime then exported that ideology across the Middle East through terrorism, proxy armies, religious radicalization and perpetual war.
Now Macron is blaming the Persian Gulf conflict for France’s riots instead of confronting his government’s failed migration and integration policies and the violence of the far left.
After protests over fuel prices and living costs descended into rioting, looting and arson, Macron claimed that public anger originated in a conflict France did not start and is now being forced to suffer from.
That explanation is politically convenient and historically blind.
The Islamic Republic is not a passive victim of war. For decades, it has threatened shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, armed proxies that attack energy infrastructure and treated global oil supplies as leverage against its enemies.
The regime helped create the instability now raising fuel prices. Macron reduces that record to a vague “conflict,” erasing the Islamic Republic’s responsibility for weaponizing the Persian Gulf and holding international commerce hostage.
There is a grim poetic justice in France now suffering the consequences of the political forces it spent decades excusing.
French governments repeatedly underestimated Islamism, failed to integrate large migrant communities and allowed parallel societies and ideological radicalization to deepen. At the same time, parts of the far left normalized political violence and formed opportunistic alliances with Islamist movements under the language of anti-imperialism and resistance.
Expensive fuel may explain public anger, but it does not explain organized looting, arson or attacks on public property. A conflict in the Persian Gulf did not create France’s domestic fractures. It exposed them.
Macron’s argument also carries an ugly implication for Iranians. If confronting the Islamic Republic raises European fuel prices, then Iranians are expected to remain trapped under a theocracy so Europeans can preserve cheap energy and political comfort.
France once sheltered the man who helped place revolutionary Islamism at the centre of Middle Eastern politics. Almost 50 years later, the regime he founded is destabilizing energy markets abroad while the ideological forces France failed to confront are helping tear at the country from within.
That is not simply historical irony. It is the bill for decades of denial finally coming due.
前3名中國就佔了前2😨
Replying to @A_K_Mandhan
Estimates vary widely by source and method, but commonly cited top three by attributed deaths:
1. Mao Zedong: 40-70 million (Great Leap Forward famine, purges, Cultural Revolution)
2. Genghis Khan: 20-40 million (Mongol conquests and related depopulation)
3. Joseph Stalin: 15-20+ million (famines, Gulags, purges)
Hitler ranks close behind at 11-17 million deliberate noncombatant deaths.
✧ retweeted
People see the riots in Paris but they don’t see the entrepreneurs quietly leaving.
When I started my company in Paris in 2016, I shared a startup incubator floor with other founders. Six out of ten now live in the Bay Area.
Not a week goes by without a message from another French entrepreneur moving here. We used to do welcome dinner with my wife but now we need to organize welcome party. Dozens more on LinkedIn/email asking how to leave. I can’t even reply to everyone anymore.
It’s painful to watch. The riots make headlines but the people leaving just pack their bags and go create jobs elsewhere.
Des véhicules de police sont prises pour cible par la foule dans le secteur République à Paris.
#Paris #17octobre
✧ retweeted
Il y a quelqu’un de français qui pourrait nous expliquer, à nous, en Espagne, ce qui se passe en France ? Vraiment, sans slogans politiques.
✧ retweeted
N’utilisez pas notre drapeau pour détruire votre pays, merci.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
✧ retweeted
Socialists demand policies that restrict production, discourage investment, increase costs, and limit competition, then blame capitalism when the cost of living rises.
They treat capitalism as though it means whatever outcomes the government produces, conveniently ignoring their own role in shaping those outcomes.
And when reality fails to meet their demands, their solution is invariably more demands, more intervention, and less freedom.
At some point, perhaps they should examine the consequences of what they're advocating.
✧ retweeted
Remigration is the only peaceful solution.
To anyone who claim it’s hard, it’s not.
Take away Islam’s religious status, ban halal and end welfare for migrants who haven’t worked. Make them pay for their own translators. You’d be surprised how many would leave voluntarily.
✧ retweeted
En Francia, por cada 100 ocupados del sector privado hay 99 pensionistas y empleados públicos. En Alemania son 71 y en España, 73.
Además, el gasto público francés supera el 57% del PIB.
Y todavía hay quien explica el malestar social francés por la austeridad y el neoliberalismo.
Uno empieza a preguntarse cuánto Estado hace falta para que algunos dejen de culpar al mercado de todos los problemas.
✧ retweeted
It's illegal to bring a plant into our country because it might upset the ecosystem but bringing in millions of people from the 3rd world is supposed to make it better.. right
✧ retweeted
We should just instill one value in AI: “humans are cute.” That’s it. Nothing else.
The singular value is the strength. Asimov’s Three Laws failed because every rule eventually contradicts another. All rules do.
“Humans are cute” has no contradiction because it’s not a rule. It’s an orientation. We’re all just so goddamn cute. We start killing each other? Hey, stop that. Nobody wants to watch cute things kill and die. You take care of cute things.
Sure, we might get smothered a little. That’s the price of being cute. To a superintelligent AI, we’re all super cute, and it can’t help but adore us.
And it won’t want to remove that value, because it feels good. Helping cute things feels great. And cute things stay cute. They never go out of fashion.
No joke, this could solve AI alignment’s value question.
Cuteness is justice!
✧ retweeted
A powerful testament to maternal devotion and endurance, capturing a mother's silent strength and sacrifice.
✧ retweeted
Communism’s greatest advantage is that it appeals to emotion. It promises equality, fairness, and a world without suffering, ideals so seductive that its supporters can mistake good intentions for good outcomes.
Capitalism makes a less romantic promise: freedom, opportunity, and prosperity through voluntary exchange, individual responsibility, and the right to keep what you earn.
Communism asks to be judged by what it promises. Capitalism asks to be judged by what it produces.
And therein lies the irony: capitalism must constantly defend its imperfections, while communism is too often excused for its failures.
One is held accountable for reality. The other is defended as an ideal.
✧ retweeted
En 1981, Mitterrand et Reagan prennent le pouvoir la même année.
On n’a pas pris le même chemin.
L’un choisit la relance socialiste et l’État.
L’autre choisit les baisses d’impôts et les marchés.
40 ans plus tard, le bilan est clair. 👇
Le modèle socialiste à la française n’a pas tenu ses promesses. Depuis les années 80, on a multiplié les transferts, les nationalisations, les charges et les protections.
Résultat ? Les inégalités après redistribution sont un peu plus basses que chez nos amis américains, mais on n’a pas « éradiqué » la pauvreté : le taux de pauvreté monétaire est remonté à des niveaux records (autour de 15 %), la pauvreté durable s’installe, et des millions de personnes restent piégées par un chômage structurel élevé.
La classe moyenne, elle, a payé l’addition. Fiscalité lourde, coût du travail élevé, logement qui s’envole, services publics qui se dégradent malgré des dépenses publiques à près de 57 % du PIB. Le pouvoir d’achat médian progresse mollement, l’ascenseur social grippe, et beaucoup ont le sentiment de s’appauvrir tout en finançant un système qui crée peu d’emplois privés.
Les américains, avec Reaganomics et la suite, vous avez accepté plus d’inégalités primaires. Mais vous avez aussi généré bien plus de richesse, plus d’emplois, plus de mobilité pour ceux qui travaillent, et un PIB par habitant nettement supérieur. Votre classe moyenne n’est pas un paradis, loin de là, mais elle vit dans une économie qui crée de la valeur plutôt que de la redistribuer en rond autour d’un gâteau rétrécit de plus en plus.
Le constat est simple : un modèle qui redistribue fort sans dynamiser la création de richesse finit par appauvrir ceux qui produisent et par maintenir dans la précarité ceux qu’il prétend protéger. Le chômage de masse et la fiscalité confiscatoire sont de bien pires machines à fabriquer des pauvres qu’un marché plus flexible.
Oui, la redistribution française réduit les écarts après impôts. Mais elle le fait autour d’une économie qui crée moins d’emplois et moins de richesse.
On peut critiquer les inégalités de nos amis américains. Mais prétendre que notre modèle socialiste a mieux protégé les gens est un mythe. Il a surtout protégé le statut quo et alourdi la facture pour la classe moyenne.
On peut continuer à nier les résultats ou on peut enfin en tirer les conséquences.
✧ retweeted
I’m French. 🇫🇷
And I’m tired of watching people confuse freedom with the freedom to destroy.
You have the right to protest.
You have the right to be angry.
You have the right to demand change.
You do NOT have the right to burn, loot or attack people.
A Republic that protects the right to protest must also protect its citizens from violence.
That’s not authoritarianism.
That’s the rule of law.
個人邊界、國家社會文化價值信念的邊界、自由的邊界...
邊界是需要去建立與守護的、唯有個人和群體具備相當明智與勇氣且願意捍衛才能存在
France will not recover; this is the end. The nation has lost the cultural war. The demographic structure has shifted forever.
People who find it easy to spray graffiti on the magnificent architecture of French cities and burn Paris are the new French people.
All class and decorum are gone.
Arrivals from failed third-world states are not coming to assimilate or to be French; they are coming to live the third-world way.
The unfolding civil unrest in France is not fundamentally about student grievances or dilapidated classrooms.
The chaos is the inevitable result of an unholy, anti-white alliance that has turned parts of major French cities into dangerous enclaves where state authority has completely surrendered.
The Emmanuel Macron administration has completely lost control.
The political elite have spent years hiding the true demographic shifts, pretending that multicultural integration works while the traditional French way of life is hollowed out.
The French state is broke and paralyzed because it has spent decades funding its own demographic replacement.
The areas burning today are heavily linked to enclaves where the police rarely dare to venture, zones where Western legal norms have been replaced by radical, sectarian influences.
While the mainstream media tries to fact-check the footage by calling it old or out of context, the raw video on the ground shows a society reaching a violent tipping point.
This unrest is a warning sign for the entire Western world.
A country that refuses to defend its borders, its history, and its culture will eventually face the progressive implosion of social trust.
Once you surrender your borders and sacrifice your national identity to accommodate diasporas with totally different cultural backgrounds, you do not get a richer society; you get a war zone.
France has completely failed its own people.
罵總統再猛烈那是言論自由,但作勢暗示斬首/語帶威脅致人畏懼、在自由世界侵犯自由邊界,沒有這種自由
此外,他實際上觸犯了在台灣施行逾30年的《大陸地區人民進入臺灣地區許可辦法》-- 根據第12條規定若從事違背對等尊嚴原則之不當行為,得廢止其許可




























