Joined September 2022
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Ny post på @doubtstack om YIMBY/NIMBY debatten, inklusiv en lille model til at vurdere effekten af byggeri på huspriserne. (Link nedenfor)
1
1
2
234
New Post: Why does housing lower rents? And why might it not? By Jeppe Johansen unreasonabledoubt.substack.c…
21
Unreasonable Doubt retweeted
Det er efterhånden længe siden jeg selv har haft tid til at udgive noget på vores blog @doubtstack Heldigvis har min medskribent, Jeppe Johansen fra KU, skrevet et yderst relevant og skarpt indlæg om boligmarkeds dynamikker. Alle der er interesserede i storbyvalg (især i København), bør helt klart læse med her. Jeppe formår desuden at formulere sig i et sprog, der ikke kræver en lang økonomisk baggrund for at følge med. Så alle, der kan læse engelsk, burde have gode chancer for at få noget ud af indlægget. :) "Why New Housing Lowers or Raises Rents" unreasonabledoubt.substack.c…
1
5
550
Why has Tinder not caused reduced the number of singles? I a new blogpost @JeppeJohansen3 explains how tinder made finding mates easier and mating harder. Read, follow, subscribe! unreasonabledoubt.substack.c…
2
3
563
I have written a post for @doubtstack about how a world in which geopolitics is less dominated by ideology might be a more dangerous one. In a famous paper, @GrahamTAllison argues that when one power is rising and another is falling, there is a larger risk of war. The core 1/8
Are Ideologically arrogant countries less likely to go to war with each other? New Unreasonable Doubt from @larsharhoff explores the Thucydides Trap and how a world in which ideology plays a smaller role in national motivation, might be a more dangerous one. (Article in comment)
2
2
1
8
9,116
Are Ideologically arrogant countries less likely to go to war with each other? New Unreasonable Doubt from @larsharhoff explores the Thucydides Trap and how a world in which ideology plays a smaller role in national motivation, might be a more dangerous one. (Article in comment)
1
1
1
4
8,589
Unreasonable Doubt retweeted
Replying to @doubtstack
@doubtstack er tilbage med et indlæg omkring umuligheden i at kombinere sand religion med sekularisme. Det bliver ofte fremhævet hvordan mange muslimer hvis adspurgt siger at de sætter koranen over grundloven, men er det ikke absurd at forestiller sig en religiøs person 1/n
Unreasonable Doubt is back, with a brillant Contribution from Eirik Gjerstad on the impossibility of combining secularism with true religiosity!
1
1
1
2
910
Unreasonable Doubt is back, with a brillant Contribution from Eirik Gjerstad on the impossibility of combining secularism with true religiosity!
1
1
403
Kan opgøret med nulfejlskulturen være skidt? Jeg havde denne krabat i @weekendavisen i fredags, hvor jeg argumenterer for, at kampen for at gøre fejl socialt acceptable ødelægger vores mulighed for dygtiggørelse. weekendavisen.dk/2024-5/opin…
2
2
7
219
The poverty of embracing failure er nu blevet bragt i @weekendenavisen på dansk! Læs mere om hvordan det ellers velmente opgør med nulfejlskulturen risikerer at underminer vores mulighed for dygtiggørelse med grelle konsekvenser. (English link below) weekendavisen.dk/2024-5/opin…
2
2
1
7
324
Forsvar for Nulfejls-kulturen! @Joachim_S_J har skrevet et glimrende post omkring hvordan forsøget på at afskaffe "Nulfejls-kulturen" er en kulturimport fra management industrien, der fratager folk, med ægte ansvar muligheden for at udføre deres job. 1/4 (link i tråd)
1
2
1
8
372
New Unreasonable Doubt post out! Here, @Joachim_S_J argues that the current zeitgeist of embracing failure leads our attention away from the more fundamental goal; a culture that recognises human beings need for mastery to flourish. Read, follow, subscribe!
1
2
5
145
Unreasonable Doubt retweeted
The Danish government plans to impose limits on the legality of ridiculing religion. Such laws are sold as harmless protection of religious feelings but ridicule plays an important role in rational political discourse. A defence of Ridicule: @doubtstack 1/n (link in comment)
3
6
15
4,854
New Post from Unreasonable Doubt! In this weeks post @AFinnemann writes about how much of science is skewed by publication bias and how to solve it. Read and subscribe! (link in next post)
1
1
1
5
362
Unreasonable Doubt retweeted
Lars is back
Unreasonable Doubt is back from our (long) summer hiatus! In this weeks post @larsharhoff argues that lying is far more damaging than people imagine. If you our posts please share and subscribe to our substack for free (link in the article)! open.substack.com/pub/unreas…
1
1
233
I have written a new post for @doubtstack about the consequences of public dishonesty and the growing tendency to defend it. The post was inspired by Hasan Minhaj who after being caught lying argued that his lies were "Emotional Truth". 1/8 Thread:
Unreasonable Doubt is back from our (long) summer hiatus! In this weeks post @larsharhoff argues that lying is far more damaging than people imagine. If you our posts please share and subscribe to our substack for free (link in the article)! open.substack.com/pub/unreas…
3
2
8
1,289
Among many social scientists, it has become a fashionable view that Soc. Science is - and should be - ideological. This view is not just wrong. It is dangerous to the quality of and belief in academic knowledge. In today's @doubtstack I explain why (link below) 1/n
3
9
2
19
2,341
New article on Unreasonable Doubt from @larsharhoff
Among many social scientists, it has become a fashionable view that Soc. Science is - and should be - ideological. This view is not just wrong. It is dangerous to the quality of and belief in academic knowledge. In today's @doubtstack I explain why (link below) 1/n
2
134
Unreasonable Doubt retweeted
Denne uges @doubtstack har jeg glædet mig til at præsentere. Filosof, forfatter og datalog Eirik Gjerstad skriver om hvordan vi kan gå fra at AI efterligner mennesker, til at vores idé om det ideelle menneske bliver en spejling af AI. En af de bedste hidtil! (link i kommentar)
1
2
4
344