Replying to @JulietteBryant
Are Trump's people systematicly killing off Epstein survivors?? Virginia in her book said she would never commit suicide as she hid from gunmen in one hideout in the Australian outback after another. When she was then found dead and the media said it was suicide - was suspicious
Replying to @JPavytska
Plus google what is the daily use of diesel in the US - 3.7 billion tons. So at best what Trump is boasting of a one day supply of diesel
Replying to @grablekelly05 @priscialva
…yes - by being clubbed to death by marauding lawless ICE thugs in Trump’s militia, these parents abandoned their responsibility. What terrible parents
Replying to @AndrewGeddes16 @priscialva
The parents were clubbed to death by ICE or kidnapped and sent to the Project2025 concentration camps and the children came home from school to find no parents any more-this why they are alone now
Replying to @NateSilver538
Let’s hope Trump and his toadies in this kakistocracy can not understand graphs or he’ll engineer a false flag ‘attack on The Homeland !’ to get a Bush II type anomalous result after 9/11
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
Post-Trump, the United States will need to learn from Nigeria, Peru, and the Philippines how to track and reclaim corrupt wealth from a fallen autocrat and his crooked family. My story in @TheAtlantic theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0…
Replying to @jurgen_nauditt
I think he’s too stupid to understand orders in order to follow orders - so couldnt be an actual Manchurian candidate -
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
On the House floor tonight, I read the names of several Epstein coconspirators who should be investigated and prosecuted.
I also began collecting 218 signatures for the discharge petition to force a vote on Epstein Files Transparency Act II.
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
16 years ago Google pulled its search engine out of China because they wouldn’t submit to an authoritarian government.
Today, they’re renaming lakes to appease one.
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
If I were president and I wanted to tank the dollar and get rich off it, here is exactly what I would do.
I would hire a Treasury Secretary who already made $3.5 billion crashing another country's currency. I would put my guy in charge of the agency that approves bank charters. I would install a crypto czar with $200M in crypto holdings and give him an ethics waiver so nobody could challenge it.
Then I would sign an executive order banning the government from ever creating a digital dollar so there was no competition.
Then I would have my family launch their own private digital dollar. My family takes 75% of net profits. I would grow it to $4.6 billion in circulation and route a $2 billion Abu Dhabi sovereign fund deal through it to prove it works.
Then I would get Congress to pass a law requiring every stablecoin in the country to hold short-term Treasury bills. Now every dollar of my digital currency is a forced buyer of government debt. Brookings projects $2.3 trillion in captive demand by 2030.
Then I would have my OCC guy grant my family's company a federal bank charter. Now I can issue my digital dollar with federal authority.
Then I would have my Treasury Secretary weaken the actual dollar. Bond buybacks that suppress yields but tank the currency. Build a $950 billion war chest for more. Let the debt hit $40 trillion. Dollar index drops to 99. Gold goes to highest point ever.
Then I would kill the Corporate Transparency Act and delete the FinCEN beneficial ownership database. That was the one law that required every shell company in America to report who actually owns it. Without it, nobody can trace who is buying my stablecoin, who is routing money through it, or where the profits land.
Then I would let the loop run. Weaker dollar drives demand for "stable" digital alternatives. The law I passed forces those alternatives to buy T-bills. That funds the government's debt. My family takes profit on every transaction. Foreign central banks walking away from Treasuries get replaced by legally mandated stablecoin reserves my family controls.
Then I would use sanctions to start cutting countries off from the dollar system entirely. And when those countries need a new way to transact in dollars, the only federally chartered private digital dollar in existence is mine. They can buy it through shell companies nobody can trace because I deleted the ownership database.
I just built a toll booth on the global financial system. I take a cut every time someone uses the dollar. And I made it so nobody can see who is paying.
And every single step I just described has already happened.
So what does that mean for you and I?
The reason the United States can borrow at low rates and keep your mortgage and your car payment and your import prices stable is because foreign central banks hold trillions in dollar reserves. That system has always been public. The benefit went to everyone. Lower borrowing costs, cheaper goods , and the single biggest economic advantage any country has ever had.
What I just described is the privatization of that function. The entity buying the debt is no longer a central bank acting in the public interest. It is a private company taking 75% of net profits for one family. The reserve function used to generate a public benefit. Now it generates a private fee.
Your purchasing power shrinks every time the dollar weakens. Your 401k buys less in real terms. Everything you import costs more. And every time the dollar drops, demand for the private digital alternative goes up. The one the president's family owns. The one that by law must buy government debt.
You absorb the cost of a weakening dollar. His family collects the profit. That is the trade.
The enforcement mechanism to stop a sitting president from doing this? There isn't one. Former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter says it would be a violation for literally any other federal employee, but not the president.
Nobody voted for this. No one was asked. There was no debate. There is no enforcement mechanism. There is no one investigating it. The Senate tried and it was blocked.
This is the largest conflict of interest in American history happening in broad daylight while everyone argues about something else.
So what do you do? Share this. Make it impossible to ignore. Send it to your representative, your senator, every journalist you follow. We make them answer for it.
Because the only thing protecting this scheme right now is the fact that not enough people understand it yet.
Replying to @Mollyploofkins
She's the Big Strong Men with Tears in their Eyes, Who Say, Thank you, Mr President Sir
Replying to @AkshatRathi
on that map, Australia also has an equivalent lack of warming
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
BREAKING: In a shocking new video, a man who was robbed by Ken Paxton is now endorsing James Talarico. This is the best ad we've seen all year.
npr.org/2026/08/02/g-s1-1368…
Is it discrimination against them, or are they just more typically involved in financial crime?
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
BREAKING: Donald Trump reportedly demanded his lawyers sue "Reacher" star Alan Ritchson for calling him a pedohpile, but abruptly exited the room after they explained the discovery process would require him to release all the Epstein Files and give a DNA swab.
Replying to @haribro_hb @igorsushko
Communism was defeated in Russia 46 yrs ago. The Democrats objected to new tariff powers:
“It is extremely dangerous to give Trump massive new tariff powers, particularly after we’ve seen the disastrous impacts of his corrupt, chaotic, and inflationary tariff spree."
SusanKraemer was here retweeted

Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowskiJul 14
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The reason why ICE agents continue to shoot people is because nothing ever happens to them when they do. They essentially have been granted full immunity for whatever they choose to do to people by a lawless regime of thugs.
SusanKraemer was here retweeted
.@elonmusk says that no one can name a person who died from his aid cuts. In fact, I've met the kids who are dying, and I've talked to the families who lost children. In my columns, I've cited many, many names of people who have died because of Musk's aid cuts. A few examples:
*Yamah Freeman was a 23-year-old woman who died in childbirth because Musk cut funding for the diesel for ambulances in her part of Liberia. She couldn't get to a hospital and died as people were carrying her there. I talked to her parents and sister in their village.
*Gbessey Kiadu, age 1, died of malaria because of his cuts to malaria medication in Liberia. I talked to his mom in her village.
*Ibrahim Koroma, an infant, died of AIDS in Sierra Leone after he interrupted HIV supplies. I talked to health workers who cared for him.
*Achol Deng was an 8-year-old girl with HIV in South Sudan who died when Musk cut funding for the health care worker who provided her medicines. I talked to the healthcare workers.
I could go on and on. In almost every village you go to in South Sudan, Uganda, Liberia, Sierra Leone or other countries I reported in, you find people dying because of aid cuts. I challenge Musk: Come with me on a reporting trip, and we'll talk to these moms and dads, and you'll see the dying children themselves. I think if you see the kids whose lives are at stake, maybe you'll change your mind.











