raghu teja retweeted
Arterial spin labeling can identify perfusion abnormalities that point to seizure rather than stroke, even without DWI or FLAIR changes or spot EEG findings.
See this podcast where I discuss with @mona_gad_ the utility of ASL in code stroke MR protocols youtu.be/xPCJS8DGdr8
Read the paper @TheAJNR @vsyedavalli: doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A9255
raghu teja retweeted
Read the full paper at the AJNR: "Evaluation of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Probabilistic Brain MRI Scoring Systems in Normal Patients" by Crystal Kang et al. @MayoRadiology doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8713
raghu teja retweeted
Replying to @francisdeng
raghu teja retweeted
Before being able to pinpoint pathologies, you must first know normal variants. What is that hole doing in the basilar artery? What benign variant is this?
#FOAMed
raghu teja retweeted
We often talk about the middle cerebral artery (MCA), probably because it's one of the most commonly occluded arteries in ischemic stroke.
Why?
The MCA is essentially the more direct continuation of the internal carotid artery (ICA), making it a common destination for emboli traveling downstream from the heart or carotid arteries.
But what about the anterior cerebral artery (ACA)?
Pic 1 is from Radiopaedia.org. Follow the diagram as you read along.
What are the symptoms of an ACA occlusion?
And should we perform mechanical thrombectomy for these patients?
The role of endovascular thrombectomy for isolated proximal ACA occlusion (A1) remains uncertain. Personally, I favor considering thrombectomy when the occlusion is identified early and the neurological deficits are disabling, provided the anatomy and imaging are favorable.
The ACA, just like the MCA, has several segments.
A1 segment
As the ACA leaves the ICA and travels toward the anterior communicating artery (AComm), it's called the A1 segment.
The ACA supplies structures involved in neurocognitive functions, including personality, behavior, memory, motivation, and even bladder control.
So what happens when these areas are affected by a stroke?
Think:
• Personality changes, including disinhibition (inappropriate behavior during examination)
• Abulia (loss of motivation)
• Akinetic mutism (marked reduction in movement and speech)
• Urinary incontinence
• Contralateral leg weakness, often greater than arm weakness
These symptoms can easily be missed or underestimated, particularly when relying on NIHSS alone.
A2 segment
After the AComm, the ACA becomes the A2 segment, extending toward the genu of the corpus callosum.
A2 occlusions are generally classified as medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs), rather than the conventional large vessel occlusions (LVOs) encountered in thrombectomy trials.
Should we remove these clots?
That depends.
Vessel caliber, vascular anatomy, infarct burden, and, importantly, the severity and disabling nature of the neurological deficits should all influence the decision.
A larger or dominant ACA branch may supply substantially more territory, potentially resulting in greater neurological deficits.
But remember, NIHSS does not adequately capture every disabling manifestation of an ACA stroke.
A3 segment
As the ACA curves around the genu of the corpus callosum, it becomes the A3 segment.
This is also considered a MeVO.
Here, making a compelling argument for thrombectomy becomes more difficult.
Current randomized evidence has not demonstrated an overall benefit of routine thrombectomy for distal and medium vessel occlusions.
However, individual anatomy matters. A relatively large or dominant branch supplying an extensive territory may present a different clinical scenario.
And as vessel caliber decreases, endovascular navigation becomes more challenging, with increasing concern for vessel injury, perforation, and subsequent hemorrhage.
A4 and A5 segments
After the ACA curves around the genu and travels posteriorly along the corpus callosum, we enter the A4 and, more distally, A5 segments.
These are smaller, more distal vessels.
Routine thrombectomy here is difficult to justify based on current evidence, although exceptional circumstances may warrant individualized consideration.
Now that you've had this brief anatomy lesson, let's test your understanding.
Look at pic 2.
This CTA demonstrates an ACA occlusion.
1. Which ACA segment is occluded?
2. If the NIHSS is <6, what would be your preferred approach to treatment?
Bonus question!
Before you go, let's see how well you know your cerebrovascular anatomy.
I've marked three additional structures with red arrows labeled B, S, and V.
Can you identify all three?
Here's a hint: One is an artery, and the other two are part of the cerebral venous drainage system.
#FOAMed
raghu teja retweeted
Is there a connection between this structure, this protuberance, and alcohol?
What's the triad?
Drop your thoughts below 👇
#FOAMed #Neuroanatomy #Wernicke
raghu teja retweeted
This week’s SPIN-POV: In children with back pain, look carefully for posterior apophyseal ring fractures. The ring apophysis is a secondary ossification center. Look for a small osseous fragment displaced posteriorly from the vertebral endplate.
raghu teja retweeted
Our hands, feet, and eyes are strikingly symmetric in size.
Blood vessels? Not always.
It’s common for one vertebral artery to be dominant while the other is congenitally hypoplastic.
But how do you know that tiny vertebral artery on the left (red arrow) is truly hypoplastic and not diminutive because of proximal atherosclerotic disease or dissection?
Here’s a neat anatomical clue: look at the transverse foramen.
The vertebral arteries ascend through the transverse foramina of the cervical vertebrae. During development, the vertebral artery and its surrounding bony canal develop in close relationship. Thus, the caliber of the vessel tends to correlate with the size of the transverse foramen: a smaller vertebral artery tends to have a smaller foramen, while a larger vertebral artery tends to have a larger one.
So, if you see a tiny vertebral artery with a correspondingly tiny transverse foramen, that’s an important clue that the vessel is congenitally small.
A tiny vertebral artery traveling through a much larger transverse foramen, however, should make you consider an acquired diminutive vessel, such as from proximal atherosclerotic disease or dissection.
Now compare the two sides.
🟢 The dominant vertebral artery travels through a larger transverse foramen.
🔴 The hypoplastic vertebral artery travels through a correspondingly smaller transverse foramen.
That smaller transverse foramen is an important clue that the artery has been small developmentally rather than becoming small later from acquired vascular disease.
It’s an anatomical variant. It’s normal.
Know normal anatomy before you confidently call pathology.
#FOAMed
raghu teja retweeted
Replying to @DocNavarrow
Why “anatomical variant”? Isn’t Bochdalek’s flower basket a constant part (protruding into the bulbo/cerebellar cistern) of the horizontal limb of IV ventricle choroid plexus ?
raghu teja retweeted
Think you know brain vascular anatomy?
How many brain vascular circles do you know?
Everyone knows the Circle of Willis, but few know its venous counterpart: Venous Circle of Trolard!
Can you see the polygon on top of a❤️?
Venous Circle of Trolard is the midline connection between the right & left venous networks.
Peduncular veins form the so-called “mesencephalic heart.”
It provides venous collaterals in both the transvesrse & AP directions
It could potentially compensate in contralateral basal occlusion from tumor or surgical injury.
On the flip side--in a dural AVF, it could result in hemorrhage on the contralateral side!
raghu teja retweeted
patterns of spinal cord injury in multiple sclerosis and other CNS autoimmune diseases. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4282…
raghu teja retweeted
❶ | ⑥ Short 🧵
70♂.
2-yr h/o progressive dementia, slow short shuffling gait, poor bladder/bowel control.
Poorly controlled HTN.
SWI MRI ⤵️
raghu teja retweeted
⭐️What is the most likely diagnosis in this 65 y/o female presenting with progressive cognitive decline over 3-4 weeks which acutely worsened over the past few days?
🔷PMH: Non-small cell lung cancer on targeted therapy
#Medicine #Neurology #Neurosurgery #radres #futureradres #MRI #FOAMed @Radiopaedia @TheASNR
raghu teja retweeted
Spin Tweetorial Wednesday
Don’t miss the treatable one.
When confronted with a symmetric paediatric brain abnormality, the temptation is often to ask:
“Which metabolic disorder is this?”
Perhaps the more important question is:
Is there something here I cannot afford to miss?
raghu teja retweeted
特発性正常圧水頭症
(iNPH: Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus)
高齢者の歩行障害を、年齢のせいにしない。特発性正常圧水頭症は65歳以上の約1~4%、80歳以上では約6~8%と、決して稀ではない。
Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Review. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2026.15519. Published online September 14, 2026.
重要ポイント
1.「三徴がそろったら疑う」では遅い
古典的三徴は、歩行障害+認知機能障害+排尿障害だが、初診時に3つすべてがそろうのは50~75%。特に歩行障害は85~95%にみられ、通常もっとも早く出現する。排尿症状は75~90%、認知機能障害は60~80%
したがって、「高齢者の原因不明の歩行障害・転倒を見たら、尿失禁や認知症がなくてもiNPHを考える」ことが重要。
早期診断が重要なのは、症状期間が短く、病期が進行していないほど治療成績が良いから。
2.最も重要な診察は「歩かせること」
iNPHの歩行は典型的には、wide-based(広い歩隔)、slow、short shuffling steps(小刻み歩行)、magnetic gait(磁石様歩行)、足の挙上低下、方向転換困難。
歩行速度低下はcadence(1分間に足をつく回数)低下というより、stride length(一歩で進む距離)の短縮・ばらつきによって生じる。タンデム歩行や方向転換は軽症例から障害される。
実際、筋力・感覚・協調運動・腱反射など通常の神経診察は正常であることも多く、異常が最も明らかになるのは歩行と認知機能を実際に評価したときである。
パーキンソン病との鑑別では、iNPHはよりwide-basedで、足の挙上低下、歩幅の変動性、方向転換障害が目立ち、床の線やメトロノームなどの外的cueへの反応が乏しいことが特徴。
3.認知症のパターンもAlzheimer病とは少し違う
iNPHの認知障害は典型的には前頭葉―皮質下型で、注意力低下、処理速度低下、遂行機能障害、working memory(情報を一時的に頭の中に保持し、それを操作・処理する能力)低下、言語流暢性低下、cognitive flexibility(認知的柔軟性)低下が中心。
記憶障害でも、iNPHではretrieval(取り出し)の障害が中心で、recognitionは比較的保たれる。一方Alzheimer病ではencoding/storage(符号化と記憶保持)自体が障害されるため、手がかりを与えても想起・再認が悪い。この違いは鑑別のヒントになる。
4.MRIで見るべきは「脳室が大きい」だけではない
有名なのがEvans index >0.30。しかし、65歳以上の健常者やAlzheimer病・血管性認知症でも20%以上が0.30を超えるため、Evans index単独の特異度は高くない。
そこで重要なのが、くも膜下腔の不均衡な拡大を伴う水頭症(DESH:disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus)。具体的には、Sylvian fissureの拡大+ high-convexity sulci(高位円蓋部脳溝)の狭小化+ callosal angle(脳梁角)の鋭角化(典型的には≤90°)を見る。
5.画像だけでは「シャントが効くか」は分からない
DESHやcallosal angleなどMRI所見は診断を支持するが、単一の画像マーカーだけではshunt responseを十分な精度で予測できない。
したがって、臨床像+画像に加えて、CSF drainageへの反応を見ることが重要になる。
6.Tap testは「30~50 mL抜いて、歩行を測る」
第一選択のdrainage testはlarge-volume lumbar puncture(tap test)。CSF 30~50 mLを除去し、その前後で症状を客観的に比較する。
特に有用なのは、Timed Up and Go(TUG)、10-m walk test、gait speed、stride length、balance。認知機能にはMoCA(モントリオール認知評価)やMMSE(ミニメンタルステート検査)なども用いる。
重要なのが評価のタイミング。改善は数時間以内に出ることがあるが、最大効果は24~72時間後まで遅れることがある。最も再現性の高い改善項目は歩行速度と歩幅。
7.Tap test陰性=iNPH否定、ではない
Large-volume LPの予測能は、陽性的中率 85~90%、陰性的中率 30~40%
つまり、「陽性ならシャントが効きそう。しかし陰性だからといって効かないとは言えない」という検査。
臨床的疑いが強いのにtap testが陰性・境界の場合は、extended lumbar drainage(持続腰椎ドレナージ)を考える。数日間の入院で200~300 mL程度のCSFを排液して評価すると、shunt responsiveness予測の精度は80~95%、陽性的中率85~95%まで高くなる。
8.治療はシャント――「歩行」が最も改善しやすい
最も一般的なのはventriculoperitoneal(VP)shuntである。VA shuntやLP shuntも選択肢となり、近年は開放圧を非侵襲的に変更できるprogrammable valveが用いられる。
治療効果はかなり大きく、歩行:約70~90%改善、認知:約50~70%改善、排尿:約50~70%改善
PENS trialでは、active shuntとほぼ閉鎖したshuntを比較すると、3か月後に臨床的に意味のある歩行速度改善(≥0.10 m/s)を認めたのは、active shunt 80% vs placebo 24%だった。転倒も24% vs 46%と少なくなった。
9.Alzheimer病やパーキンソニズムがあっても諦めない
iNPH患者の20~30%にはAlzheimer病やParkinson病が併存しうるため、「認知症があるからAD」「パーキンソニズムがあるからPD」と決めつけるとiNPHを見逃す。
さらに、Alzheimer病、parkinsonism、脳血管疾患、フレイルが存在しても、それだけでshunt benefitを否定する理由にはならない。ただし、併存する神経変性疾患がある場合には認知機能の改善は不完全になりやすい一方、歩行・ADL・QOLには意味のある改善が期待できる。
Take-home message
・三徴がそろうのを待たない。最初に出やすいのは歩行障害。
・高齢者の原因不明の歩行速度低下・転倒ではiNPHを鑑別する。
・診察室では必ず歩かせる。特に歩幅・足の挙上・開脚幅・方向転換を見る。
・MRIはEvans indexだけでなくDESHとcallosal angleを見る。
・画像所見だけではshunt responseを予測できない。
・Tap testでは脳脊髄液を30~50 mLぬく。前後をTUGや10 m歩行などで客観的に測定し、24~72時間後まで評価する。
・Tap test陰性でも除外できない。疑いが強ければextended lumbar drainageを考える。
raghu teja retweeted
A RARE encounter👻‼
Not many encounter this!
@jjgarnham posted this ⤵️case on Feb 15, 2025.
Classic.
⚠️ It is not
Dengue or
JE or
WNV or
KFD or
Covid or
EBV or
Deep CVT.
raghu teja retweeted
Imaging Pearl 29: Definition of Anatomical Locations of T2 lesions of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Note: Periventricular lesions should CONTACT the ventricular margin & Juxtacortical lesions should CONTACT the cortical margin
raghu teja retweeted
APSHNR Case of the Week – Answer Revealed (Swipe to Reveal ➡️)
Thank you to everyone who participated in this week’s APSHNR Case of the Week!
✅ Diagnosis: Right Petrous Apex Cephalocele
#APSHNR #CaseOfTheWeek #HeadAndNeckRadiology









































