Dan Nardo retweeted
PROFESSOR COURT DAWG TEACHES CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN THE LINDSAY CLANCY CASE
#LindsayClancy #CourtDawg #TrueCrime
The presumption of innocence is constitutional. Sufficiency review views the evidence in the light most favorable to the government . Jackson v. Virginia; Commonwealth v. Latimore. Courts say the two coexist. Marbury asks whether deference can ever outrun the Constitution.
Today, we filed a motion to unimpound the jury notes and sidebar transcripts These records are essential for the public's understanding and for appellate review of our double jeopardy motion to dismiss.
drive.google.com/file/d/1F9b…
Our supplemental memorandum in support of the renewed motion for a required finding of not guilty under Rule 25 in the Lindsay Clancy matter.
drive.google.com/file/d/1u54…
Today, we filed a motion to preserve juror records, produce questionnaires, and conduct a limited inquiry regarding Juror Doe in the Lindsay Clancy matter.
drive.google.com/file/d/1Z8Y…
Today, we filed a motion to dismiss Counts 1 through 3 in the Lindsay Clancy case, based on double jeopardy grounds.
drive.google.com/file/d/1v8p…
Dan Nardo retweeted
Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, said he hopes his client’s public trial will help bring increased awareness to postpartum psychosis.
He said Clancy’s illness doesn’t disregard the deaths of her three children: “No one is discounting the horrific loss of those kids, let alone Lindsay Clancy, who is well aware and lives with that every day.”
Dan Nardo retweeted
In his first interview with Fox News, Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Kevin Reddington doubles down on his attacks on the lone holdout male juror + his message to Trump and the DA.




