It isn't a republican donor list...it was a target list. It was a target list, an enemy list comprised of Americans who supported the opposition party. The distinction is critical important. The CIA is notorious for producing a target list and delivering it to leaders they install. What follows is something most ppl do not understand in America bc it has been hidden from them. It ultimately ends up with torture and murder.

Interesting take Mark. You realize that it’s idiotic to continue to call ppl who have a different opinion than you do a communist correct? Having a standard doesn’t make you a communist. Having an opinion doesn’t make you a communist. Voicing the standard or opinion is called freedom but you recognize it as communism. That says way more about you than anyone you’re aiming to attach the communist label to. Americans distrust their government. They have every right to distrust the government even when they support the president they elected bc 99% of the government ISN’T ELECTED. They are the same ppl that orchestrated at least 4 coups against him and covered up an attempted assassination. Are there more good in there since Trump returned yes, do you have a %? Is it 98% bad? DR is a great researcher and data expert. Data made a name for herself as an independent source of information about government. The ppl that followed her had all just went through their government trying to kill them with a jab and hospital protocol meant to kill a significant amount of ppl. They are very hesitant to let anyone into their trust circle. Especially given we know the CIA seeds ppl into movements to gain trust and F’ck with them for 70 yrs. Again, Americans have a lack of trust, deservedly. When Data was offered the opportunity to work for the government, no one outside the government knows who made the offer or what she’d be asked to do. Data worked along time building a relationship with her audience. She was excellent in responding to ppl and answering questions, following up and answering DMs. Ppl trusted her and her information she shared. Ppl didn’t ask for Data, Data asked them to trust her, follow her and support her work. When those conditions are assessed, reviewed in hindsight it is very easy to see why those same ppl were disillusioned or hurt to find out that she had been working for the government they’ve come to rightfully distrust. Data could have shared the information with her followers but chose not to, that wouldn’t have been an easy decision. She is incredibly intuitive and understood the risk. She could offend ppl by now being completely transparent or she could get in, do whatever the task was and get out and hope no one noticed as she is releasing a book that she hopes all the ppl that has followed her work buys. Now you come along and blame the ppl that feel betrayed by someone they trusted who wasn’t truthful with them and call them communist. You throw that word around like it doesn’t have a history of killing millions of ppl. This has not a fucking thing to do with communism you nitwit and everything to do with trust. Look in the mirror. In your own words, yes she should have told you BUT you’re a communist for saying it out loud and using your freedom of speech to make it known. What he’s actually saying: you are right but saying it out loud makes you a communist. Holding ppl accountable for their decisions is being a communist. We all make mistakes and pay for them. Ppl who choose to work in the public have those mistakes aired in public. It comes with the territory. You aren’t being the white knight you think you are here and you certainly aren’t doing DR any favors by calling ppl hurt by her choices a communist. Really, buy a full length mirror dude you need it. And you’re the honest pollster?

This is disturbing on so many levels. By the way, NATO is a terrorist organization.